Skip to main content

Posts by issue number/Posteos por número de la edición

 

Articles in this issue (scroll down or click to read article below):

  • From RefuseFascism.org:

    The time has come for…THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIMEBeginning November 5, 2025Washington DC
  • A MAJOR STATEMENT BY BOB AVAKIANREVOLUTION #141:The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!
  • TRUMP MUST GO NOW!Surround the White House 1.0In nonviolent protest
  • Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

    A Timeline and Bibliography

  • Surrounding the White House, 1.0—Saturday, November 15

    Voices From the Protest

  • Trump Fascist Regime's Gangster Moves vs Venezuela... and ALL of Latin America
  • On the Controversy Over Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
  • The Trump Regime’s War on Universities, and the Resistance That’s Urgently Needed
  • Remaking the U.S. Military as a Fascist War Machine, Streamlined for War Crimes and on a War Footing
  • New Horrors from the U.S.-Israeli Genocide: 

    Torrential Rains Flooding Gaza, Children Left Soaking Wet, Fear of Disease Spreading and the Killing Has Not Stopped
  • Israelis Threaten West Bank Olive Harvest“Jewish Terrorism in the West Bank Has a Clear Plan”
  • “Fascists Are Not Welcome Here” 

    The Berkeley Protest Against Turning Point Was Righteous!Trump Must Go Now!
  • From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    As Political Prisoners’ Dogged Struggle PersistsEscalated Repression of Leftist Intellectuals Sparks Broad Outrage
  • In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the MovementThe Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today
  • “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 
  • What If People Had Listened?THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!In the Name of HumanityWe REFUSE to Accept a Fascist AmericaA Better World IS Possible
  • From Aurora Roja, voice of the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution
  • U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)
  • Readers’ Corner
  • ARTICLE:

    From RefuseFascism.org:

    The time has come for…THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIME
    Beginning November 5, 2025
    Washington DC

    This is reposted from RefuseFascism.org.

    11-05 11 AM - NATIONAL MALL - WASHINGTON MONUMENT - TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

     

    Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now

    Humanity's only hope is for the decent people of this country to rise in our millions. We cannot wait for future and rigged elections. We must drive the Trump Fascist Regime from power.

    Beginning November 5, the one-year anniversary of Trump's election, flood DC in nonviolent protest. Surround the White House. Surround the Capitol. Surround the illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court. Come back again and again. Across the country, refuse to comply. Every person of conscience, millions of us together, grind the machinery of the fascist regime to a halt.

    Don't stop until Trump is removed.

    The Trump Fascist Regime is illegitimate. What it is demanding we become is unconscionable. At every level of society, in every institution, tens of millions of us know this in our bones. If we dare, we can defeat a horror that threatens humanity's very survival. If we fail to even try, future generations — if they exist — will never forgive us.

    The Trump Fascist Regime is shredding the rule of law. Making a mockery of due process. Disappearing immigrants and other brown-skinned people into brutal concentration camps. Aggressively resurrecting genocidal white supremacy. Reversing the gains not only of the 1960s, but even of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Enslaving women through the brutality and suffocation of forced motherhood. Erasing LGBT people. Trampling democratic rights. Violating international law. Illegitimately deploying the military on U.S. soil. Assaulting and threatening politicians and judges. Paving the way for boundless terror against the people. Accelerating climate collapse. Cutting science and medicine, costing millions of lives. Depleting humanity's store of knowledge. Destroying truth. Drowning out reason. Subjugating the arts to fascist cruelty and conformity. Targeting everything that is decent, moral and good. All at the whim of a debased lunatic tyrant.

    Hopes of waiting this out are illusion. Every accommodation – even in the name of preserving some ability to do some good – only fuels the regime's demand for ever more slavish submission. Every capitulation – by universities, law firms, agencies – only feeds its ravenous hunger to remake all of society in its grotesque image.

    This is FASCISM. A different form of brutal rule. It cannot be lived with. It must be defeated.

    The elections are way too late. Besides, no honest person can expect the tyrant who instigated and then pardoned the January 6th insurrectionists to respect an election he loses.

    But there is a way.

    We have protested. Marched. Defended neighbors from ICE. Decried genocide. Some of us have resigned or blown the whistle. This shows we are millions. Many more of us than of them. Now we must take all this higher. We must direct all this and more towards the only thing that truly measures up to the existential threat humanity faces:

    The Trump Regime Must Go Now!

     

    The Whole Trump Fascist Regime Must Be Driven From Power!

    This Can Be Done. By refusing to surrender the future and our humanity to a vengeful fascist maniac. By millions rising in massive, unrelenting, nonviolent protest and resistance. By defying and refusing to comply with fascist dictates. By walking out. By shutting down. By fearlessly using our platforms and influence to inspire and challenge others to join us.

    By doing all this day after day. Coming back stronger in the face of attack and repression. Uniting, not dividing, across many viewpoints and backgrounds. Fostering a collective spirit of courage and righteous fury. Willing to sacrifice for the greater good of defeating this fascism.

    We begin now. On Wednesday November 5, from across this nation, we pour into DC. From that day forward, we don't stop until the regime is removed.

    History is full of examples where people who had right on their side fought against tremendous odds and were victorious. It is also full of examples of people passively hoping to wait it out, only to get swallowed up by a horror beyond what they ever imagined.

    The future is unwritten. WHICH ONE WE GET IS UP TO US.

    In the Name of Humanity,
    We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America!
    The FASCIST TRUMP REGIME MUST GO NOW!

    Initiated by RefuseFascism.org
    welcoming everyone to join the biggest nonviolent mobilization in US history

     

    Go to RefuseFascism.org to commit to join nonviolent relentless protest in DC now.

    Sign up with RefuseFascism.org.

    To learn more, go to RefuseFascism.org and @RefuseFascism or @refusefascismdmv.

  • ARTICLE:

    A MAJOR STATEMENT BY BOB AVAKIAN

    REVOLUTION #141:
    The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!

    This major statement from Bob Avakian was released prior to the recent demonstrations for No Kings Day on October 18 and  on November 5 initiating the sustained mass nonviolent protest needed in DC to drive out the Trump fascist regime. But the analysis, strategic vision and orientation laid out here continues to provide critical and extremely relevant guidance to everyone working for the removal of the Trump regime and the defeat of fascism.

    This is Bob Avakian—REVOLUTION—number 141.

    Over the past 30 years, I have analyzed how the Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist. And now, with the “second coming” of the Trump regime, this fascism is on an unrestrained rampage.

    It would have been far better—we would very possibly not be faced with the terrible situation we are now forced to confront—if this analysis, sounding the alarm about very real fascism, had not been so often ignored, or met with stubborn resistance and cheap accusations of being dishonestly “alarmist.” In a number of critical situations over the past decades, those of us who have recognized this developing fascism for what it is, have called for massive mobilization to defeat it—but, although some responded to this call, the millions who should have taken it up did not do so. So, now, here we are. And, while we should not “live” in the past, we definitely should learn from it.

    Every day this is driven home more and more forcefully and cruelly: There is no living with this Trump/MAGA fascism—it must be removed from power before it commits even more horrific atrocities and forcibly shuts down any real possibility of resistance. 

    The profound question with which all decent people are now confronted is: Will we rise together, in the millions, to do what urgently needs to be done, to drive out this Trump fascist regime that is a truly terrible scourge on humanity and a very serious threat to humanity’s future?

    This means actively resisting—massively defying and demanding that all institutions refuse to comply with—the dictates of this fascist regime. It means rallying in even greater numbers than before on October 18 in the “No Kings 2.0" demonstrations around the country. And, most crucially, it means actively taking up the Call initiated by RefuseFascism.org, and open to all:

    “The Time has come for...THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIME – Beginning November 5, 2025 – Washington DC.” The Call continues:

    “Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now

    “Humanity’s only hope is for the decent people of this country to rise in our millions. We cannot wait for future and rigged elections. We must drive the Trump Fascist Regime from power.

    “Beginning November 5, the one-year anniversary of Trump’s election, flood DC in nonviolent protest. Surround the White House. Surround the Capitol. Surround the illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court. Come back again and again. Across the country, refuse to comply. Every person of conscience, millions of us together, grind the machinery of the fascist regime to a halt.

    “Don’t stop until Trump is removed.”

    Why DC? Because that is the seat of government—it is where the power of this fascist regime is concentrated, and where it can be impacted by masses of people in the most concentrated and powerful way.

    In a number of messages—including the previous one (number 140)—I have spoken to the basic means through which this regime could actually be driven from power: the decent people, in the millions and tens of millions, who deep in their hearts abhor this fascism, must seize the initiative themselves, rising with nonviolent but powerful determination to reset the terms, creating a massive “political earthquake from below,” bringing about a profound political crisis such that the completely illegitimate nature of the Trump fascist regime stands out all the more sharply, provoking and motivating major shifts and realignments throughout society, including within the dominant and ruling institutions, such that this regime can no longer function and cannot remain in power.

    There are many people and forces within the ruling institutions—or with strong ties and potentially important influence within those institutions—who are very deeply troubled by, or even strongly opposed to, how they see the actions of the Trump fascist regime “violating the Constitution and the law, destroying our great American experiment in democracy” and “seriously undermining and damaging our country’s standing in the world.” As a revolutionary communist who has developed the new communism as a whole new framework for human emancipation, I have a fundamentally different understanding of the nature of the system that rules in this country and its role in the world; but, at the same time, I have a clear sense of the very real difference it makes, in a profoundly terrible way, when there is not even a pretense of democracy and basic rights are openly trampled on. In light of the urgent need to defeat and remove the Trump regime that is enforcing an undisguised fascist dictatorship, and the crucial importance of uniting all who can be united to drive out this regime, I recognize the particularly important role that such people and forces, with ties and influence in key institutions, could play in regard to this urgent need. I also recognize that they will only feel both compelled and enabled to play this role if there is, in fact, the kind of “massive political earthquake from below,” that can be brought about by millions taking up the Call from Refuse Fascism, and in this way moving to create the kind of political crisis where this “political earthquake from below,” in combination with heightening divisions within the dominant and ruling institutions, could lead to the removal of the Trump fascist regime.

    Finally, I want to speak directly to this: While there is a real possibility that this powerful combination could actually succeed in creating the conditions where the Trump fascist regime is removed from power, there is no “guarantee” that this will succeed. But there are times and circumstances when—even as the challenge is daunting and the chances of success are uncertain and may seem unlikely—going up against powerful forces of oppression is necessary and a far better course of action than failing to do so. This is one of those times and circumstances. 

    If the Call from Refuse Fascism—to flood DC with the nonviolent protest of millions, beginning November 5—had not been made, if work to make this a reality were not being carried out, then any possibility of actually defeating and removing this fascist regime would be effectively shut down, and very soon. The profound reality is this: The massive mobilization called for by Refuse Fascism, and open to all, represents the real possibility—the ONLY real possibility—of actually driving out this fascist regime, and putting an end to the endless horrors it is determined to perpetrate.

    Yes, the Trump regime might seize on the mobilization for November 5 as an excuse to bring down further repression. But this regime has already brutally demonstrated that it intends to viciously persecute those it chooses to identify as “enemies,” and to relentlessly repress any actual or potential forces of opposition, within the ruling class itself as well as in the larger society, whether or not they actively resist the regime.

    In the circumstances we are now facing, failing to even try to drive out this fascist regime, while there is still a possibility of succeeding, would be far worse than failing in the attempt to drive out the regime. As the Call from Refuse Fascism plainly and sharply puts it: “If we fail to even try, future generations—if they exist—will never forgive us.”

    But we may not fail! As dramatically demonstrated by the accelerating juggernaut of the Trump fascist regime—and, on the other side, by the continuing protests and repeated massive rallies and marches against this fascist horror—these are not “normal times.” In these extraordinary times, things can change very rapidly, on a huge scale and with major impact. That can apply not only in very negative but also very positive ways: the repeated outpourings against this regime can be built on and then given the most powerful expression in the mobilization and convergence on DC, November 5, being called for by Refuse Fascism, with an open invitation to all who are outraged by Trump/MAGA fascism.

    If this succeeds, it will be a truly historic achievement for humanity now, and something that will contribute in a profound way to the possibility for a far better world for future generations.

    And again, if millions are rallied to this Call for a massive, nonviolent but determined mobilization and convergence on Washington DC, November 5—there is a real possibility that this could succeed.

  • ARTICLE:

    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!
    Surround the White House 1.0
    In nonviolent protest

    Updated

    Received from RefuseFascism.org:

    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

    SURROUND THE WHITE HOUSE 1.0

    In nonviolent protest

    Saturday November 15; 1 PM
    Monday November 17; 3 PM
    Monday November 24; 3 PM

    Building the Power of the People 
    for the Fall of the Trump Fascist Regime
     

    * GET TO DC NOW, Come back again & again because:
    THERE IS NO LIVING WITH TRUMP FASCISM!

    Children left screaming as masked ICE agents drag away parents… Food for the hungry and health care denied… Barbaric cruelty abounds.  Fundamental rights denied.  EVERYTHING DECENT, TRUTHFUL AND MORAL DENIED.

    If the Trump Fascist Regime is not driven from power now, it will continue to escalate its atrocities and violently crush all space to meaningfully oppose it.

    * * GET TO DC NOW, Come back again & again because:
    MIDTERM ELECTIONS ARE WAY TOO LATE!

    They are being rigged. No honest person can expect the tyrant who instigated, and then pardoned, the January 6th insurrectionists to respect any election he loses.

    * * GET TO DC NOW, Come back again & again because:
    THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE CAN DRIVE OUT TRUMP!

    We see this potential in the millions who have protested, defended neighbors and resisted. But it will take masses of us flooding the streets of the capital in nonviolent protest to compel and enable those in power to move heaven and earth to remove Trump now while there is still a chance.

    In the Name of Humanity, 
    We Refuse to Accept a Fascist America

    From now until Trump is out of power—Everyday in the DC area going out to the people to grow the nonviolent movement to Drive out the Trump regime! 

    Saturday, Nov. 15, 1 PM; Surround the White House 1.0 {Part 1}

    16th St. NW and H Street NW

    Monday Nov. 17, 3-6 PM; Surround the White House 1.0 {Part 2} 

    Thursday – Saturday Nov. 20-22; 

    Join with the Trump Must Go Now Coalition at Removal Coalition actions

    Monday Nov. 24, 3-6 PM; Surround the White House 1.0 {Part 3} 

    Refuse Fascism banner "Trump Must Go Now" in front of the White House gates.

     

    In front of the White House, April 19, 2025.   

  • ARTICLE:

    Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

    A Timeline and Bibliography

    Recently, in Bob Avakian’s (BA’s) social media message, REVOLUTION #141—“The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!,” BA made the following sobering assessment:

    Over the past 30 years, I have analyzed how the Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist. And now, with the “second coming” of the Trump regime, this fascism is on an unrestrained rampage.

    It would have been far better—we would very possibly not be faced with the terrible situation we are now forced to confront—if this analysis, sounding the alarm about very real fascism, had not been so often ignored, or met with stubborn resistance and cheap accusations of being dishonestly “alarmist.”  In a number of critical situations over the past decades, those of us who have recognized this developing fascism for what it is, have called for massive mobilization to defeat it—but, although some responded to this call, the millions who should have taken it up did not do so.  So, now, here we are.  And, while we should not “live” in the past, we definitely should learn from it.

    Below is a timeline of selected talks and writings by Bob Avakian over the past 30 years that warned of the rise of fascism in the U.S.; exposed its roots in the soil of this country; addressed its accelerating development and expanding atrocities; and most recently, emphasized the urgency and the stakes of driving out the Trump fascist regime. 

    Most of the works listed below can be found at BA’s Collected Works at revcom.us, or through the website’s search function, as well as @BobAvakianOfficial Substack page

    For a “comprehensive overview” of BA’s analysis and discussion of Trump fascism in particular, see The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go! In The Name of Humanity, We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America. A Better World IS Possible. This is a film of a talk given by Bob Avakian in 2017; it is also available as a PDF of text. These can be found in the Collected Works of BA at revcom.us. 

    1996

    1. Preaching From a Pulpit of Bones: The Reality Beneath William Bennett's “Virtues”
    2. Putting an End to “Sin”
    Return to top

    1997

    Return to top

    1998

    Return to top

    2004

    Return to top

    2005

    Return to top

    2006

    Return to top

    2007

    Return to top

    2009

    Return to top

    2010

    • Birds Cannot Give Birth to Crocodiles, But Humanity Can Soar Beyond the Horizon (Part 1: Revolution and the State; Part 2: Building the Movement for Revolution)
    Return to top

    2017

    • THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO! In The Name of Humanity, We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America. A Better World IS Possible A Film of a Talk by Bob Avakian (Available as film and text.)
    Return to top

    2019

    Return to top

    2020

    Part 1: The Democrats Can’t Fight Trump the Way He Needs to Be Fought
    Part 2: Trump Is Already Stealing the Election and Threatening Even More Violence to Stay in Power
    Part 3: Trump’s Fascism—More Blatant and Dangerous Every Day: How a Determined Fight and Massive Mobilization Could Defeat This (Long Version—The Larger Canvas and Fuller Picture; Short Version—The Basic Picture and Essential Vision)

    Return to top

    2021

    Return to top

    2022

    Return to top

    2023

    Return to top

    2024

    Return to top

    2025

    • 2025: A New Year—Profound New Challenges—And a Profoundly Positive Way Forward in the Face of Very Real Horror.
    • TRUMP/MAGA FASCISM What We’re Really Facing, Why and What Must Be Done to Defeat It Before It’s Too Late, Volume 1
    • TRUMP/MAGA FASCISM What We’re Really Facing, Why and What Must Be Done to Defeat It Before It’s Too Late, Volume 2
    • REVOLUTION #112—Trump’s fascist rule, like Hitler’s before him, is a regime of horrors—and is completely illegitimate.
    • REVOLUTION #113—The Trump MAGA fascists would have been on the side of the Confederacy in the Civil War, fighting to maintain, and expand, slavery.
    • REVOLUTION #114—Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!
    • REVOLUTION #115The Trump Fascist Regime Must GoNOW—before it is too late!
    • REVOLUTION #116—Black People Should Be Among the Front Ranks in the Fight to Defeat Trump/MAGA Fascism
    • REVOLUTION #117—Trump/MAGA fascists—cruel, demented, dark ages oppressors—who twist reality inside-out to “justify” their lawless tyranny
    • REVOLUTION #118—This system has brought forth Trump/MAGA fascism: People, in their millions, must put an end to this fascist regime—NOW—before it is too late!
    • REVOLUTION #119—Democratic Party politicians may contribute to the crucial struggle against Trump/MAGA fascism—but the Democratic Party will not, and cannot, lead the struggle where it needs to go.
    • REVOLUTION #120—Opposing the enemy within in the fight to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism
    • REVOLUTION #124—Donald Trump’s whole fascist regime is caught in a contradiction of its own making: his continual Big Lies
    • REVOLUTION #125—Not the courts, and not the Democratic Party: Decent people, mobilizing massively and relentlessly, are the force that must be relied on to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism.
    • REVOLUTION #130—Blatant racism, overall fascism—not “fighting crime”—is the basic reason why Trump is illegally using the military to occupy cities and terrorize people.
    • REVOLUTION #131—Crime is a real problem. But fascism is not the answer to crime—fascism is itself a monstrous crime.
    • REVOLUTION #133—Yes, this Trump/MAGA fascism really is that bad. And, if it is not driven from power soon, it will get far worse.
    • REVOLUTION #134—“Play by the rules” and lose—succumbing to a fascist horror, far beyond even the worst of today—or, do what needs to be done to drive out this fascist Trump regime.
    • REVOLUTION #135—Now the MAGA maniacs are openly proclaiming that they are fascists!
    • REVOLUTION #136—Truth is Truth, Fascism is Fascism—and why there is “no version of Charlie Kirk” on the “left”—part one.
    • REVOLUTION #137—Deeper reasons why there is no “left” version of Charlie Kirk—and why the Democratic Party will not, and cannot, do what needs to be done to drive out the Trump fascist regime. Part 2
    • REVOLUTION #139—Yet more genocidal racism from Donald Trump!
    • REVOLUTION #140—Blatant racism and undisguised fascism are openly and officially celebrated—and people opposing this are threatened, attacked, hounded and sacked!
    • REVOLUTION #141—The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!
    Return to top
  • ARTICLE:

    Surrounding the White House, 1.0—Saturday, November 15

    Voices From the Protest

    Surround the White House 1.0 banner leads, November 15, 2025.

     

    Surround the White House 1.0, November 15, 2025.    Photo: revcom.us

    This past Saturday, Refuse Fascism, working with others, marshaled over 250 people to surround the White House with yellow crime tape. They stood for over an hour, stretching more than a mile, and shouted their demand that Trump Must Go… NOW!

    The first thing to say about this demonstration is this: if determination, energy, creativity, fierceness and love were all that was necessary to do that huge task of driving the orange Hitler from power, the four to five hours in the street this past Saturday might well have done the job. 

    But as the organizers themselves made clear to everyone, more—much, much more—is needed. The point and purpose of Saturday’s action was to take the next step in building the movement needed to achieve that critical goal, Trump Must Go NOW! 

    Imagining What Is Needed… and Working to Make It Real

    Andy Zee took the microphone and made a request:

    Andy Zee speaks to Surround the White House 1.0 rally, November 15, 2025.

    I'm going to ask you to shut your eyes for a moment. That's good. Imagine a sea of people. From here, to the White House, to the Capitol, to the Supreme Court, to every institution, creeping beneath the ground, shaking the ground, getting underneath the Potomac River to those people still in the Pentagon who have some degree of upset about the removal of Black and Latino and women and trans from the forces and are disgusted by the idea of waging war on the soil of America and fighting against the very people who make up this country. We can shake these institutions. Every day, we need thousands of people in the streets of DC. Now, not next year, not waiting to see what's going to happen, but now, the hundreds of you need to become thousands to become millions… 

    [E]very one of you is now a leader. And you're not just leading your friends and your neighbors. You're leading the remaining people of conscience in these institutions here. And you are telling them not to comply with the norms of society, but to do what needs to be done to remove the regime. You are telling people who resist ICE, keep it up, but get in the streets of DC at the same time. You are telling people who are feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, keep it up, but get to DC because you are not going to Trump-proof one city. You are not going to Trump-proof one state. The political power of a fascist regime is living across the street that needs to be evicted. 

    Handmaids march in Surround the White House 1.0, November 15, 2025.

     

    Surround the White House 1.0, November 15, 2025.    Photo: revcom.us

    In fact, there are not just millions, there are SCORES of millions who abhor this regime from the top of their heads to the soles of their feet. More than a few, from all walks of life, have risked their necks going right up against the criminal sadists of ICE. Thousands and millions more have been “showing up” in other ways.

    Why We Absolutely Cannot Wait

    But the vast majority of those people who detest Trump have not—yet—been won to see that all these outrages are part of a comprehensive approach to transforming society, in a rapidly accelerating way, on an actually fascist basis. Not just “authoritarian”—but fascist. Sunsara Taylor provided the kind of powerful agitation needed to bring that home to people:

    Sunsara Taylor speaks at Surround the White House 1.0 rally

    We are not in normal times. We are in a time when the fascist tyrant in the White House already incited one insurrection, pardoned the insurrectionists as his number one act on day one of his regime, this week pardoned 77 more of the people who tried to steal the election. His movement has packed election deniers into key state offices to oversee the next elections in 18 states....

    Not only do we not have time to wait a year and a half for new people in office, immigrants whose families are being shattered now do not have time. Trans people whose rights are being erased now do not have time. The planet that is being destroyed right now does not have time. Science and medicine that is being dismantled now does not have time. The academy and the universities that are being purged of any discussion of gender and race and the actual fucking history of this country do not have time. The legal sphere that is under attack with law firms being extorted by this regime does not have time. 

    So not only do we not have time, you have to be smoking something to think that you can have him respect an election he loses. So we cannot wait for the midterms and we cannot count on the midterms. We have to act now. 

    The Challenge to the Sidelines: Get on the Field

    Human Rights Activist Jim Keady speaks to "Surround the White House 1.0" on what we all must do

    Jim Keady put the challenge to everyone who recognizes the fascism in the White House but still does not act to step out of their comfort zones: 

    For the people who are not here and are at home today, we hear you… We hear you if we have personal conversations. We see what you post on your Facebook pages, your Instagram posts, threads, smoke signals, whatever you use. We know that you're saying that you believe that Trump is a fascist... We know that you're saying that you believe he's consolidating power, that he wants to crush dissent, weaponize the courts, weaponize our military against our own people in the United States. 

    You know this, and you have your reason or your multiple reasons on why you, too, believe that Trump must go now. And if you believe that, if you believe that in your core, you need to ask yourself, if you believe that fascism is currently sitting in the seat of power in our White House, what is more important for you on a Saturday afternoon than saving our republic from that fascist regime?... 

    I'm not saying these words to admonish you for the folks who are not here with us today. But it is a challenging invitation from a coach. Coach Keady is telling you it is time to get off the sidelines. 

    At the end of hours of marching, those in the crowd who clustered around to not just get organized themselves, but to become organizers of others, began to form the living answer to that urgent call. Plans were made to organize people to come out Monday, November 17 and then the Monday after, as well as to the Remove the Regime demonstration this coming Saturday. These demonstrations, taken together, must build the power of the people to drive OUT this regime.

    What will you do?

    From the call initiated by Refuse Fascism and open to all: “The Time Has Come for… the Fall of the Fascist Trump Regime—Washington DC”

    The Trump Fascist Regime is shredding the rule of law. Making a mockery of due process. Illegitimately deploying the military on U.S. soil. Disappearing immigrants and other brown-skinned people into brutal concentration camps. Aggressively resurrecting genocidal white supremacy. Reversing the gains not only of the 1960s, but even of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Enslaving women through the brutality and suffocation of forced motherhood. Erasing LGBT people. Trampling democratic rights. Violating international law. Assaulting and threatening politicians and judges. Paving the way for boundless terror against the people. Accelerating climate collapse. Cutting science and medicine, costing millions of lives. Depleting humanity’s store of knowledge. Destroying truth. Drowning out reason. Subjugating the arts to fascist cruelty and conformity. Targeting everything that is decent, moral and good. All at the whim of a debased lunatic tyrant.

    Hopes of waiting this out are illusion. Every accommodation – even in the name of preserving some ability to do some good – only fuels Trump’s demand for ever more slavish submission. Every capitulation – by universities, law firms, agencies – only feeds the regime’s ravenous hunger to remake all of society in its grotesque image.

    This is FASCISM. A different form of brutal rule. It cannot be lived with. It must be defeated.

    A Surprise Performance by The Neighborhood Kids

    At the end of the rally at Surround the White House 1.0 on Saturday, November 15, Sunsara Taylor told the hundreds gathered that they were in for an “unexpected treat”—a surprise performance by the hip-hop group The Neighborhood Kids. The group, out of San Diego, are on a tour and were performing that night in DC with Tom Morello. They had come to the White House to shoot a clip for their video—and happened to come across the Refuse Fascism protest.

    Amon the MC stepped up to the mike and said, “We didn't even know this was going on. This beautiful woman came up to us and said, ‘Are you guys The Neighborhood Kids? Are you willing to share a song with us?’ And we would love to share a song with y'all.” Then he and Verde ripped into their song “Kids in the Cages,” which went viral on Instagram this summer as Trump’s ICE gestapo rampaged through southern California. “This one song, we feel like it's one of our most important songs that we've written. And this one is for all the immigrants. This one's for all the people.”

    The impromptu performance by The Neighborhood Kids infused even more fire, creativity, and energy into the protest demanding Trump Must Go NOW!

  • ARTICLE:

    Trump Fascist Regime's Gangster Moves vs Venezuela... and ALL of Latin America

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arena, without even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.

    —Bob Avakian, REVOLUTION #114: "Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!

    This policy of open fascist thuggery and threats of war is rapidly escalating in the Trump regime's military offensive against Venezuela, while they declare their intention to much more fully and openly control the whole of Latin America. 

    On Friday, Trump said to the press, "I can’t tell you what it would be, but I’ve sort of made up my mind," on whether to take military action in Venezuela. This came after two days of White House meetings where they were said to be deliberating this.

    In just the last few days:

    • On November 15, the U.S. carried out the 21st illegal military strike on small speedboats in the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific, with over 83 people now murdered.
    • On November 12, Trump was briefed on military options for military operations in Venezuela, including possible land strikes.
    • The U.S.'s most massive and most lethal warship is now within striking distance of Venezuela.
    • It was disclosed last week that a U.S. military combat aircraft and two spy planes have been operating from an El Salvador military base. Meanwhile, the U.S. is making plans for an air base in Ecuador, beginning troop rotations in Panama, and reopening a naval base in Puerto Rico.

    The Trump Regime Asserts Violent Control Over "Their Neighborhood"

    Pete Hegseth changes the building plaque to the "Department of War."

     

    Pete Hegseth installs "Department of War" plaque on the Pentagon, November 13, 2025.     Photo: USAF

    The justification for this military offensive is a thin lie. Trump claims Venezuela is aiding drug cartels and the boats the U.S. is shooting out of the water are boats bringing drugs into the U.S.—but there is no evidence to back this up, and all evidence that does exist points to the contrary.

    We know for a fact that many of those killed off the coasts of Venezuela and Colombia are fishermen, not drug smugglers.1 But as we wrote previously, "Even if the charge of drug smuggling were proven in court, this would not be legally punishable by death! And if there were evidence for this crime, those suspected should be arrested and given a trial. Second, if the people in these boats were trying to bring drugs to the U.S., it's extremely unlikely they would be bringing fentanyl, which mainly comes through Mexico. Colombian and Venezuelan cartels both export cocaine to the vast U.S. market, where for a whole host of reasons (largely societal) people use drugs to both numb and stimulate themselves. And cocaine does not account for 'thousands and thousands of deaths' a year, fentanyl does."

    While Hegseth continued with this lie in a recent statement, his subtext made the U.S.'s intentions more clear. He tweeted out the official name for this military operation: "Operation Southern Spear." Hegseth wrote, "this mission defends our Homeland, removes narco-terrorists from our Hemisphere, and secures our Homeland from the drugs that are killing our people. The Western Hemisphere is America’s neighborhood—and we will protect it." (Emphasis added.)

    Map of Central and South America

     

    Click to expand    OnTheWorldMap.com

    This view that the whole of the Western Hemisphere is "America's neighborhood" openly channels the U.S.'s military doctrine articulated by President James Monroe in the early 1800s: Latin America is the U.S.'s "sphere of influence," so the U.S. was justified in violently asserting American control. The expansion of U.S. imperialism with this justification led to two centuries of American invasions, coups, the funding of death squads, and the extension of its parasitic tentacles deep into the economies of all the countries throughout Latin American. (To get more into this history, see articles in the American Crime series at revcom.us.)

    As we wrote previously:

    The Trump regime's goal is to consolidate Latin America into a political and economic fascist bloc with the U.S. at the head. They see this as a strategic necessity for the U.S. imperialists in their contention with their top global imperialist rival, China—which has become a dominant economic force in Latin America. China is now South America’s top trading partner and a major source of both foreign direct investment, and energy and infrastructure lending. 

    Venezuela, for example, is becoming increasingly dependent on China, which has given the country about $60 billion in military assistance. And China buys 90 percent of Venezuela's vast oil production. The core of Trump's regime sees forcing Venezuela's President out of power as the first step toward toppling the two other regimes they see as “leftist strongmen” (i.e., those not totally obedient to U.S. demands)—Cuba and Nicaragua. At the same time, they are moving to embrace and reward those governments that agree to come under the control of the U.S., and punish others who resist. 

    An anonymous Trump official was quoted in the Washington Post saying, "The overall strategy is America First. Countries who choose to align with U.S. interests and are open to mutually beneficial deals reap the benefits and have the option of partnering with our incredible military and intelligence services... [But] those who enable and support cartels who poison U.S. citizens or allow adversarial nations access to control critical infrastructure or base hostile capabilities in our backyard will feel pressure to change course.” (Emphasis added.)

    These are sovereign nations, and the U.S.—like an open gangster—is saying, "Work with us or else."

    Massive Military Might Deployed to the Region

    It's not clear at this point whether Trump is sending all this military equipment to pressure Venezuela's president, Nicolas Maduro, to resign—or if he intends a land attack, or even a ground invasion.

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford en route to the Caribbean, October 1, 2025.

     

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford arrived in the Caribbean this week to join the huge naval force in place.    Photo: U.S. Navy

    The warship, centerpiece of the "Ford Strike Group," now off the coast of Venezuela is the most advanced and largest aircraft carrier the U.S. has. At 100,000 tons, it holds a crew of 4,500 sailors and marines. This is in addition to the 10,000 soldiers already stationed in the area. The ship holds 75-90 aircraft (from drones to helicopters to spy planes). According to ABC News, "The strike group includes three destroyers that will augment the eight Navy surface ships already in the SOUTHCOM region. The sizable U.S. military presence in the region also includes a submarine, reconnaissance aircraft, 10 F-35 fighters and Reaper drones."

    This is massive military might.

    The military news website Stars and Stripes quoted a retired Navy officer, Bryan Clark, that "That level of firepower seems like overkill for the current mission in the Caribbean... But the addition [of the aircraft carrier] would be an efficient way to sustain strikes against targets ashore, Clark said, noting that the U.S. doesn’t have any land bases in Central or South America." 

    In other words, if the U.S. were to start a war, this ship—acting as a military base—would be essential.

    There Is No Living with This Fascism

    Over 80 people have been killed in the U.S. strikes off the coasts of Venezuela and Colombia. The fishing industry in those countries have been affected with extreme fear among the fisherman of going out to the high seas where they make their living. 

    Not only is this a violation of international law, but the Trump regime is declaring their ability to wage war anywhere they see fit, without Congressional approval or oversight. On October 23, Trump said: “I don’t think we’re going to necessarily ask for a declaration of war [from Congress]. I think we are going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, OK? We are going to kill them, you know? They are going to be, like, dead.” 

    Trump's bloody serial murders on the seas, his declaration that he can murder anyone he wants to at any time, and the threats of even bigger war crimes against Venezuela and other countries in the region, are completely lawless and illegitimate. These moves pose extreme danger to the people of Venezuela, Colombia, to all of Latin America, and the whole world. And they represent an even further leap in the consolidation of a fascist America, and underscore why millions must rise up to demand: 

    IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY, we refuse to accept a fascist America!

    Trump Must Go Now!

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. For more on this, see Trump Threatens War in Venezuela, While Carrying Out Unprovoked Murder: at revcom.us, and Family of Fisherman Killed in U.S. Military Strike Says It Wants Justice, New York Times, Nov. 13, 2025. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    On the Controversy Over Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

    Updated

    Amidst ongoing revelations about Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, convicted sex trafficker who died in prison in 2019, we are reposting our article from last July.

    In addition to providing important background and orientation, we make the essential point:

    MAGA Will Not Self-Destruct—but Conflicts Within MAGA Can Play a Role IF THERE IS A POWERFUL MOVEMENT DETERMINED TO END TRUMP’S FASCIST RULE NOW

    This week, after the seven-week long government shutdown ended on November 12 and amidst outrage at the Democratic Party leadership’s capitulation, Democrats in the House of Representatives made public three email exchanges involving Epstein. The emails contained references to Trump, including one in which Epstein wrote that one of the women victimized by Epstein’s sex trafficking “spent hours at my house with him [Trump].” Within hours of the Democrats’ release of emails, House Republi-fascists released a massive pile of 20,000 documents from the Epstein estate. They said this was to counter what they claimed was Democratic attempts to “cherry-pick” documents. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the Democrats were working with the “liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump.” Democrats and some Republicans are pressing for the release of even more Epstein documents, including from FBI and other government files. Meanwhile, Trump ordered his attorney general, Pam Bondi, to investigate Epstein’s ties—not to him, but to prominent Democrats like Bill Clinton and to major banks.

    This is a major controversy, and we don’t know where it will lead. It has also fed widespread illusions among people broadly who hate and oppose Trump and MAGA fascism that this is the way to get Trump out—through a huge scandal that weakens him and leads to Democratic Party victories in the midterm elections. Elections that are a year away, and that Trump is already moving to steal.

    Again, while we do not know where this Epstein scandal will end up, relying on this as the way to defeat fascism—as Trump MAGA fascism is rapidly consolidating power before our eyes—is extremely dangerous and is likely to lead to disaster.

    Over the past several weeks, a major controversy has erupted over Donald Trump’s ties to the convicted sex trafficker and millionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein. Before Epstein’s conviction on two counts of procuring a child for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution in 2008 and the 13-month sentence he served for that, Epstein had risen to a certain prominence in the same Florida and New York circles that Trump travelled in. The two had, in Trump’s own words, been friends for 15 years and reportedly ended the friendship over a real estate disagreement in 2004. Several years later, Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell were arrested for multiple counts of sex trafficking. Maxwell was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Epstein was found hung to death in his cell in 2019 and was presumed to have committed suicide rather than go to trial. 

    The Epstein Case and MAGA

    The Epstein case has played an important role in the MAGA mindset. Many in MAGA fervently believe that there is a cult which includes top members of the Democratic Party and famous celebrities who sexually molest and traffic young women and children. Some go so far as to believe that these supposed cultists murder and drink the blood of young women and children in satanic rituals. Further, many believe that all this is interwoven with the so-called “deep state”—sections of the intelligence agencies and repressive apparatus—that are “really” in control.

    There is no evidence for any such cult. But there is plenty of evidence throughout history of how belief in such cults serves the ruling class overall. This belief of many in MAGA echoes themes of classic “conspiracy theories” dating back a thousand years to the Crusades, in which European Christians waged “holy wars” against Muslims. The same slanderous myth of drinking the blood of young children was also used to justify the dispossession, forced exile and murder of Jews in Europe over the centuries, including in the Nazi extermination of six million. 

    The “Industrialization” of Sexual Exploitation, Imperialist Globalization, and the Descent Into Hell

     

    To be clear, the whole ruling class—Democratic and Republican alike—do control a system which exploits and oppresses 150 million children. These children toil as child laborers in places like the coltan mines of Congo, or the garment factories of Bangladesh, and other places in the “global south.” There is also a huge international capitalist industry in the forced prostitution (or “trafficking”) of women.2 Further, misogyny and sexual abuse permeate every pore of society. But these monstrously criminal acts grow out of and are reinforced by the everyday functioning of the economic and political system of capitalism-imperialism, which is interwoven with brutal patriarchal domination of women and children that has marked every oppressive society for millennia. In other words, this is systemic and not some conspiracy cooked up by a few people.

    The supposed existence of this “deep-state sex ring” today has been cynically encouraged and spread by prominent MAGA people like Steve Bannon and J.D. Vance, to name just two. Rumors have existed (and been stoked) within MAGA-world of an “Epstein client list” which would supposedly reveal the identities of those who were part of this alleged cult. 

    Trump partying with Epstein in 1992 at Mar-a-Lago

     

    Trump partying with Epstein in 1992 at Mar-a-Lago   

    Again, one complicating factor in this is that Trump himself was a very high-profile friend of Epstein’s for 15 years. While Trump has encouraged suspicion of the so-called “deep state” (that is, the FBI and other government bodies that launched investigations against him), Epstein per se has not been one of his core themes. 

    Nonetheless, some prominent Trumpers—especially including Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI head Kash Patel and Patel’s number two, Dan Bongino—did make a big deal out of the Epstein case and especially what they called Epstein’s “client list.” This list supposedly contains the names of prominent people to whom Epstein supposedly pimped out young women and girls. Bondi and the others promised to release it… until recently, when they all switched gears and stated that such a list did not actually exist. To be clear, nobody actually knows whether such a list exists or not, and relying on the statements of the known liars Bondi, Patel and Bongino—or anyone else in or around the Trump regime—is not a way to determine that. 

    But the sudden reversal about the very existence of this list has infuriated a section of the MAGA forces. Trump told them to essentially get over it and focus on other parts of his agenda. A week-long controversy ensued in which some prominent MAGA leaders called on Trump to make Bondi release the list and in which Trump, in turn, then accused those opponents of being “weaklings,” among other things.

    The controversy went to a whole higher level last Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal accused Trump of having sent a misogynist card for Epstein’s 50th birthday, complete with a semi-pornographic cartoon. Trump denied that he wrote and drew such a card. This in turn attracted even more attention from those generally opposed to Trump.

    How, then, should people opposed to Trump and fascism understand and evaluate all this? 

    Cover-pamphlet BA on Trump/MAGA Fascism

     

    Vol 1 and Vol 2.   

    First, MAGA is a fascist force moving at warp speed to impose a fascist transformation of U.S. society. In the view of those running MAGA, this is the only resolution to the extreme crisis that U.S. capitalism-imperialism now faces and is a life-and-death mission. Whatever Trump did or did not do 25 years ago cannot change this central and essential fact: Trump is a fascist, and he and his whole MAGA movement is illegitimate because it is fascist.

    That has real meaning! Bob Avakian put it this way in a recent social media message:

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arenawithout even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.

    It is a regime that is bent on unleashing unregulated and unfettered capitalist plunder, and in the pursuit of that takes a sledgehammer (or chainsaw) to crucial programs and services that people depend on—ruining livelihoods, wrecking science and health care, undermining and perverting education, and creating chaos that will cause huge numbers of people to suffer, here and all over the world.

    A fascist regime like this requires someone like Donald Trump as its head: a pathological maniac, with his finger on the nuclear button, who appoints dangerous madmen and power-mad parasites to key positions of power. (From Revolution #114: Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!)

    There has been a long and unfortunate history of people looking for some easy way to get rid of Trump that tries to get around this essential fact about Trump, his political machine, and his supporters. Too often people have been fooled, or fooled themselves, into thinking that this time Trump’s gone too far and won’t get away with it—whether it’s the Hollywood Access “grab ’em by the pussy” tape, the Russia investigation, the first impeachment, the attempt to violently overturn the 2020 election, his mishandling of top secret government documents, his criminal indictments and even convictions—and time and again, people’s hopes have been dashed. Why? Because these fascists overall are on a mission to which Trump is essential, and any quarrel they might have with this or that element of what Trump represents will almost certainly not, in and of itself, derail them.

    This losing approach has often been stoked and even initiated by the Democratic Party. The main leaders of the Democratic Party would rather point to Trump’s personal failings than confront and marshal opposition to the full fascist program of MAGA.

    Why? To again cite Bob Avakian, from a different message:

    Eliminating the underlying causes of this fascism is impossible within the confines of this system, and the Democratic Party’s highest priority is maintaining and enforcing this system. The heads of the Democratic Party will always seek to keep the struggle against this fascist regime within terms and limits that do not threaten the stability of this system. But, even short of a revolution to abolish this system overall, the necessary struggle to defeat and remove this fascist regime requires non-violent but determined and sustained struggle, of millions of people, to bring the functioning of this system, under the rule of the fascists, to a halt—to make the country “ungovernable” by this fascist regime—so that different factors and forces come together, as a big powerful broom sweeping this fascist regime from power. (from Revolution #119: Democratic Party politicians may contribute to the crucial struggle against Trump/MAGA fascism—but the Democratic Party will not, and cannot, lead this struggle where it needs to go.)

    MAGA Will Not Self-Destruct—but Conflicts Within MAGA Can Play a Role IF THERE IS A POWERFUL MOVEMENT DETERMINED TO END TRUMP’S FASCIST RULE NOW

    That does NOT mean that conflicts within MAGA could not play any role, or even an important role, in actually driving out this regime. On the contrary, if there were a situation of massive, day-after-day, nonviolent but militant resistance, contradictions within the Trump camp could become magnified, and a back-and-forth dynamic could set in where the deepening divisions and cracks within the regime encouraged more masses to come in the streets, and the greater mass upheaval could amplify the divisions. But, again, such a dynamic requires that massive and relentlessly ongoing nonviolent struggle aimed at driving out the regime be on a far higher and more sustained basis than it is now. There is no shortcut, no magic way out of this—but there IS a way out, as concretized in the program, stance and strategy of Refuse Fascism. People who burn to see this fascism defeated need to focus on that, joining, supporting and actively building Refuse Fascism.

     June 14 Refuse Fascism protest in DC

     

     June 14 Refuse Fascism protest in DC   

    Ask yourself: what if in the next weeks the movement against this fascism were able to achieve something along the lines of the outpouring of 2020 over the police murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor? Let’s remember that thousands and eventually millions poured into the streets, night after night, from big cities to the smallest of small towns, demanding that police murder STOP. If a movement approaching that size, scope and determination were to be united around the single unifying demand that TRUMP MUST GO NOW!, internal conflicts that MAGA has in the past been able to withstand could, under the pressure of a major challenge, intensify, and contribute to significantly weakening the cohesion of the fascist forces. 

    To draw once more from Bob Avakian, Revolution #125: Not the courts, and not the Democratic Party: Decent people, mobilizing massively and relentlessly, are the force that must be relied on to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism.: 

    It is up to the decent people, in the millions and millions, to stop this Trump fascist juggernaut and the horrors it is moving to impose on people in this country and in the world as a whole.

    Ongoing protests, and powerful mobilizations all over the country, have been very important, and they show the potential for what must be done. But all this must make a leap, soon, to become a massive popular uprising, determined to actually defeat this fascist regime, uniting around the urgent demand: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go—NOW!

    This means “no business as usual.” It means protest and resistance building day after day: non-violent but sustained and relentless—responding to repression by the fascist regime with even greater outpourings of resistance—uniting all who can be united, in continually growing numbers, motivated by the necessary sense of urgency, aiming to create a profound political crisis and major shifts and “realignments” throughout society, including in the dominant institutions of power, so that this illegitimate fascist regime cannot function, and is actually removed.

  • ARTICLE:

    The Trump Regime’s War on Universities, and the Resistance That’s Urgently Needed

    Crowd of students at Day of Action rally on the Berkeley campus.

     

    Rally on Berkeley campus, April 17, 2025.    Photo: AP

    College campuses are supposed to be sites of questioning, debate, investigation, and learning—places where students and faculty can follow the evidence to the truth about the world and strive to improve it. But none of this can be allowed under the Trump fascist regime. Professors are being denounced for speaking out against fascism, instructors removed from class, tenured faculty smeared and threatened, students criminalized or put under investigation for protest—while the federal government dangles funding and other “carrots” in exchange for institutions’ submission. It is a strategic campaign to break academic dissent, frighten immigrant students, and transform higher education into a transmission belt for the regime’s poisonous, Christian fundamentalist, white supremacist, male supremacist, hateful fascist program.

    Look at what is happening on the ground.

    Indiana University: Speaking Truth About White Supremacy Punished

    Graph: Overt White Supremacy & Covert White Supremacy

     

    Click to expand    Graph: Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence

    At Indiana University, lecturer Jessica Adams was removed from teaching her class while the university investigates a complaint about her use of a “pyramid of white supremacy” graphic that included “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) as “covert” white supremacy.

    A student submitted the complaint to Senator Jim Banks, whose office forwarded it to IU. The pyramid tool is widely used for teaching about structural racism, but Adams says she was denied basic procedural protections: she was not allowed counsel during the investigation, and her dean became the primary complainant. The case points to a terrifying inversion: a state “intellectual diversity” law (Senate Enrolled Act 202) is being used to punish a teacher for teaching about structural racism.

    UNC-Chapel Hill: Tenured Professor Threatened for Anti-Fascist Ideas

    At UNC-Chapel Hill, Professor Dwayne Dixon—a tenured teaching associate professor in Asian and Middle Eastern Studies—was placed on administrative leave after fascist media outlets and groups like Turning Point USA circulated accusations that he had engaged in “politically motivated violence,” pointing to his past involvement with Redneck Revolt, an anti-racist, anti-fascist community defense network that formally disbanded years ago. They also attempted to link him to inflammatory flyers that had appeared at Georgetown University, despite no evidence connecting the professor to them. UNC responded by initiating a “robust threat assessment,” pulling Dixon from the classroom and—according to the ACLU of North Carolina—even barring him from communicating with students or colleagues without dean-level approval. Yet after consulting campus security, system officials, and law enforcement, the university found no basis for the allegations, no threat, and no violation of policy. Dixon denounced the suspension as an attempt to “suppress my free speech,” and his students and fellow faculty organized petitions, rallies, and public statements demanding his reinstatement.

    What makes this incident even more alarming is that Dixon is tenured—one of the few remaining structures in academia meant to safeguard academic freedom from political interference. Tenure is not a perk; it is a core principle that protects scholars from being fired or disciplined for teaching controversial material, holding dissenting views, or engaging in political activism. To fire or even suspend a tenured professor for their political associations is supposed to require extraordinary justification and due process, precisely because tenure is designed to guarantee that intellectual inquiry is not subordinated to political pressure.

    Dixon’s reinstatement, forced in part by student mobilization, faculty pressure, and intervention from civil liberties organizations, does not erase the significance of the suspension itself. The fact that UNC removed a tenured faculty member from the classroom over unsubstantiated accusations means even the protections of tenure can be eroded when the target is someone whose politics collide with those of the regime.

    Political Purges After the Kirk Assassination

    Across the country the fallout from the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been used as a pretext to purge educators and staff. Dozens of faculty and K-12 educators were suspended or fired after social-media posts about that event; many of those terminations have produced lawsuits alleging retaliatory discipline and First Amendment violations. These were clear politically charged firings and suspensions over social-media posts that violated no law, chilling dissent far beyond the individuals targeted: speak, and you may be next.

    Legal Threats Replace Debate as Universities Are Pushed to Silence Dissent & Protest

    Meanwhile, the regime’s reach has not been limited to personnel actions. It is extending to institutional blackmail and legal pressure. High profile suits and federal investigations have been used to punish and extract concessions from universities that had pro-Palestine encampments or whose students and faculty criticized the genocide in Gaza. UCLA—among other institutions—has faced suits and Department of Justice findings tied to not cracking down hard enough on pro-Palestinian protests last year. Administrations are pressured to hand over names of student and faculty activists—a tactic straight out of the McCarthy era. This is not about “campus safety”—it is political policing. The financial penalties and legal threats mean the choice is to capitulate, hand over lists, police your students and faculty, or face ruinous litigation and federal scrutiny.

    “The Compact”: The Regime’s Push of Funding-for-Ideology Bargain on Higher Education

    And now comes the Compact: a White House letter and accompanying “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education.” Disguised as demands for “protection of conservative ideas,” it explicitly invites universities into an agreement promising preferential access to federal grants and other “benefits” in exchange for institutional commitments that, in practice, would embed the Trump administration’s political priorities into hiring, admissions, and curriculum oversight. This Compact amounts to coercion—conditioning public funding and access on political compliance—and is designed to re-shape curriculum, change approach to hiring of critical voices, and institutionalize a politically enforced “balance” that privileges fascist and regime-friendly perspectives.

    Some institutions are refusing to go along. MIT rejected the proposal, warning that tying funding to institutional conformity undermines academic freedom. The University of Virginia also declined, arguing that merit-based research, not political litmus tests, should drive federal support. This is a fascist-style bargain: money for silence, grants for ideological control.

    Turning Zones of Inquiry into Zones of Control

    Put these pieces together, and the picture is stark. Administrations are being harassed and sued; they respond by handing over names, suspending faculty, canceling events, or opening investigations that destroy careers and chill debate. The Department of Education, DOJ, and other federal instruments have been marshaled or used as a threat as part of this broader campaign. All this is happening as immigrant students live under the threat of ICE raids on or near campuses, afraid for their own safety at school—and that attending class could mean coming home to deported parents.

    It is a conscious political project of a fascist regime that zeroes in on colleges because campuses are supposed to be where entire generations learn how to think—or at the very least provide some space to independent, critical, scientific inquiry that can push at the boundaries of what world young people believe is possible.

    From Campuses to the Capital: An Urgent Call to Join the Movement for the Fall of the Trump Fascist Regime

    And yet, this assault also exposes a choice—a dire, urgent choice. We can watch academia—one of the last refuges of critical thinking—be turned into a pipeline for fascist indoctrination. Or we can refuse to comply. History shows that the tentacles of fascist regimes have to be cut back at their base, and campuses are one of the critical bases. That means protecting students from ICE raids and deportation fear; it means defending faculty tenure, whistleblowers, and classroom speech; it means institutional opposition to any Compact or so-called “agreement” that trades federal resources for political submission; it means refusing to let administrations turn over lists of activists to the feds.

    But most of all, what history demands now is millions rising up to stop this. The mobilization that began November 5 in Washington, DC, called by RefuseFascism.org is not a symbolic gesture. It must grow—to millions in DC, spreading nationwide—nonviolent, sustained, determined—until the Trump Fascist Regime is driven from power. 

    BobAvakianOfficial - REVOLUTION #115

     

    Listen to and watch message Revolution #115 from Bob Avakian   

    This is not a gentle appeal. The stakes are the soul of our future: whether campuses continue to be places where truth is pursued, or whether they are converted into tools of propaganda and repression. We must choose—to submit, or to resist. History will not be kind to those who choose submission.

    In his social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #115: “The Trump Fascist Regime Must GoNOW—before it is too late!”, the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian described clearly what is urgently needed now:

    This truly life-and-death fight against fascism requires, and needs to involve, rapidly increasing ranks of people, drawn from all parts of society and all walks of life—including Black people, immigrants, college students and other youth, professionals and government workers, women, LGBT people, and others—all who actually have a profound interest in defeating this fascism: people with a broad diversity of political views and perspectives, uniting all who can be united and overcoming all “divide and conquer” schemes, in order to bring forward the millions who can be the decisive force in driving out this fascist regime.

    Playlist: Truth is Truth, Fascism is Fascism—and why there is “no version of Charlie Kirk” on the “left”

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Remaking the U.S. Military as a Fascist War Machine, Streamlined for War Crimes and on a War Footing

    "Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arena, without even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries." 

    - Bob Avakian, from Revolution #114, Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!

    Pete Hegseth—Trump's "Secretary of War"—is on a mission to forge a fully fascist military geared to serve these fascist aims. Hegseth is a dark ages Christian fascist, working aggressively to turn the biggest military in the world into an even leaner, meaner and fully fascist war machine—preparing to contend even more intensely to maintain the U.S.'s top-dog global position and to target people within America's borders.

    For background on Hegseth, see extensive coverage at revcom.us here, here, and here.

    "A Wartime Footing"

    On November 7, Hegseth gave a major speech to military and industry leaders responsible for producing the machinery of death that enables the U.S. to terrorize the world with high-tech missiles, bombs, surveillance equipment and more. Hegseth announced a major change in the process through which weapons get acquired and produced for the U.S. military.

    800 generals assemble at Quantico September 30, 2025.

     

    Generals and admirals listening to Hegseth speech, September 30, 2025.    Photo: AP

    This is dealing with a strategic problem that the U.S. military has faced for decades—of an outdated, bureaucratic and relatively slow "military industrial base." In a major article in The Atlantic last year, Mark Bowden wrote, "The vaunted American war machine is in disarray and disrepair." He quoted the former assistant secretary of the Army for acquisitions, logistics, and technology: "The system for equipping the war machine is 'peacetime designed,' the basis of it is not built for war.”

    Hegseth announced he is changing this to get on a "wartime footing." In line with Trump's change from calling it the "Defense Department" to "the Department of War," Hegseth announced "the defense acquisition system as you know it is dead. It's now the warfighting acquisitions system.... We're not building for peace time. We are pivoting the Pentagon and our industrial base to a wartime footing." Using a frat boy taunt short for "fuck around and find out," Hegseth continued, "Building for victory should our adversaries FAFO." 

    In actual fact, it is the U.S. military that—at Trump's fascist direction—is openly violating international law, bombing inside Iran without provocation, assassinating fishermen in international waters, and threatening invasions into places as far flung as Greenland, Venezuela, and Nigeria!

    In this speech, Hegseth did not specify who these American "adversaries" are, but he has repeatedly talked about the need to specifically get into position to face off with, and defeat, China in its imperialist aspirations. 

    In the midst of an intensifying trade war last spring, China's embassy posted on X: “If war is what the U.S. wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we’re ready to fight till the end." Hegseth responded, “We’re prepared." He threatened, "That’s why we’re rebuilding our military. That’s why we’re re-establishing deterrence in the warrior ethos. We live in a dangerous world with powerful, ascendant countries with very different ideology. They’re rapidly increasing their defense spending, modern technology, they want to supplant the United States.” 

    Keep in mind: these are two nuclear-armed powers jockeying for position and imperiling the world with the danger of nuclear war. And when Hegseth means that China wants to "supplant the U.S.," he means the U.S.'s position on top of a global imperialist order based on ruthless exploitation of the precious resources on our planet and billions of people around the world, including millions of children. 

    A Military Streamlined for War Crimes

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford en route to the Caribbean, October 1, 2025.

     

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford arrived in the Caribbean this week to join the huge naval force in place.    Photo: U.S. Navy

    On November 4, the New York Times published an opinion piece starkly titled “Whom Will Our Military Be Ordered to Execute Next?”, written by Frank Kendall, the former secretary of the U.S. Air Force. Kendall starts by exposing the criminal nature of the Trump regime’s ongoing attacks on boats off the coasts of Venezuela and Colombia, which have killed at least 76 civilians. Kendall describes this as “intentionally killing people who, as far as can be determined, are not engaged in any violent, hostile act against the United States, have no perceived intent to engage in hostile acts against the United States, do not appear to be armed to carry out any attack and could be apprehended easily instead of killed summarily.” 

    Kendall points out that U.S. military training teaches officers that “they have a duty to challenge any order they believe may be illegal—and disobey any order they know to be illegal.” But then he brings out that Hegseth has systematically gutted the legal apparatus that could provide backing and backbone to officers or soldiers considering such refusal—for which they could be court-martialed if the order is ultimately judged to have been legal. 

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

     

    Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (left), fired earlier this year by "Secretary of War" Hegseth    Photo: AP

    Hegseth fired many top judge advocate generals (JAGs) and other legal officers up and down the line. These are the people who are supposed to guide military personnel to recognize illegal orders. Now these positions are filled by people who agree with Hegseth’s mantra prioritizing “maximum lethality, not tepid legality.” Kendall writes that “the legal chain of command for the military, at least at its senior echelons, has been populated with lawyers who will not say no to virtually anything Mr. Trump or Mr. Hegseth directs them to do.” And Kendall says that without the backing of these lawyers, “a few officers may, as a matter of conscience, still say no,” but most “would almost certainly obey the [illegal] order.” 

    Pervasive Purges to Create an Atmosphere of Fear and Blind Obedience

    On November 7, the New York Times published a report (“Hegseth Is Purging Military Leaders With Little Explanation”) bringing out that Hegseth has “fired or sidelined at least two dozen generals and admirals over the past nine months,” which is “without precedent in recent decades.” Top military leaders with decades of experience are removed for a whole host of reasons or no apparent reason at all. This includes for being too "woke" or for "DEI" (in other words, being Black or female), for having worked closely with former Chief of Staff Mark Milley (who stood against Trump's attempts to use the military as a tool of political suppression), for questioning the Caribbean boat attacks, for pushing to have woman instructors in SEAL training, for failing to doctor reports to make the Pentagon look good, and many other signs of real or even just possible disagreement with the MAGA fascist crusade. Hammering into place this kind of obedience is essential if the regime is going to consolidate its hold on the military apparatus. But for now, it has created an atmosphere of fear and mistrust, and likely resentment. Even very high-level people feel that they their positions depend entirely on the wishes and whims of Hegseth and Trump. 

    It Could Quickly Become Too Late... but It Is Not Yet Too Late 

    As we wrote previously, "We here at revcom.us have documented many crimes that have been committed by the U.S. armed forces in their 'normal functioning' as the enforcer and protector of this imperialist system. The horrors have been many, with millions of lives taken by this killing machine after World War 2. But to wield this military to crush and lock down the tens of millions opposed to, or just in the way of, the Trump fascist program would be a leap on to a whole other level of horror, and would make any chance of fundamental change or even basic protest against this system or any of its outrages qualitatively more difficult."

    This is what the Trump MAGA fascists are rapidly working to consolidate: a fascist program of rule through open terror and violence, open white supremacy and the patriarchal hatred of women and LGBT people, terror and deportation inflicted on immigrants and the gutting of the rule of law, basic right to due process, and crushing of all dissent and protest. To do this requires a military that is loyal to the fascist tyrant Trump, and not the Constitution they pledged an oath to. This is what Hegseth is working to hammer in and compel.

    The longer the regime remains in power, the more this machinery of oppression and terror will consolidate, and it could quickly become “too late.” But it is not yet too late.

    All these moves represent big strategic changes and hold big potential risks.

    Carl Dix Speaks on Refusing Orders to Vietnam & Uniting Everyone to Remove Trump’s Fascist Regime

    Sir! No Sir! Official Trailer

    A Matter of Conscience: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War–Interview with the Podcast Creators

    As we wrote above, Hegseth is purging Black and female generals. Hegseth and Trump are bringing back the names of Confederate generals on military bases, and Confederate military statues while purging military libraries of books about the truth of America's history—rooted in slavery and genocide. 

    All this, and more, in a military where nearly half the soldiers are Black, Latino and other oppressed nationalities.

    In violation of the law and separation of powers, Trump has sent the U.S. military to Washington, DC and Los Angeles (and now Memphis, New Orleans and more)—to counter a supposed "invasion" that is not, and has not been, happening. And he has been fighting the courts to be allowed to use the military in Chicago, Portland and more. In a speech last month, Trump said: “I told Pete [Hegseth], we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military...” 

    There are a number of vets speaking out against this, and a few brave active-duty soldiers. Captain Blaha, an active-duty member of the Illinois National Guard and Democratic candidate for Congress, has said he would refuse orders to be deployed to Chicago: “I never, never expected that I would be deployed against my neighbors, against my community.” Staff Sgt. Demi Palecek, also in the Illinois National Guard and a state legislative candidate, said, "It's disheartening to be forced to go against your community members and your neighbors... It feels illegal. This is not what we signed up to do."

    When this kind of stand began to be taken during the criminal Vietnam War, it spread throughout the ranks—in the U.S. and among the soldiers in Vietnam itself.

    Finally, the supposed legitimacy of the armed forces is that it is "apolitical" in its nature (i.e., not standing with any political party). In addition to Kendall, there are others with ties into the dominant ruling institutions who have expressed profound concern about what Trump and Hegseth are doing, from the perspective of the U.S.'s standing in the world. The New York Times quoted retired General McChrystal about shredding the "norm in which the military avoided politics." He continued that “recent months have challenged this paradigm, at significant risk. Once lost, the legitimacy of a military that reflects and represents all Americans will be difficult to recover.”

    This whole fascist regime—and the moves to remake the U.S. military to serve that fascist regime—is completely ILLEGITIMATE! What is needed—urgently—are millions amassing in Washington, DC, determined to drive this regime from power through sustained nonviolent protest coming back again and again until the demand is met: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW!

  • ARTICLE:

    New Horrors from the U.S.-Israeli Genocide: 

    Torrential Rains Flooding Gaza, Children Left Soaking Wet, Fear of Disease Spreading and the Killing Has Not Stopped

     Mother and child examine damage from flooding at a tent camp in the central Gaza Strip, November 14, 2025.

     

     Rainstorms caused flooding at a tent camp in the central Gaza Strip, November 14, 2025.    Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana

    The U.S.-Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza has not ended, but taken on new horrific form. Winter arrives with torrential rains. Israel continues to block food and medical supplies. Injuries remain untreated. Millions are living amongst the dead still buried under the rubble. Israeli attacks on civilians continue. And genocidal monsters are maneuvering and still on the loose.

    This is a "ceasefire" that brings the "peace" of the graveyard, a “peace” based on the continuing domination and oppression of the Palestinian people.

    Torrential Rains Bring Massive Flooding 

    The horror of torrential rainstorms of the last week has been magnified by the lasting impacts of the U.S.-Israeli genocide in Gaza.

    On Friday night, November 14, heavy rains poured down on Gaza into the morning hours, causing widespread flooding and swamping hundreds of tents. The hardest hit were the tent cities and camps of displaced persons in Gaza City, Khan Yunis and central Gaza. 

    “Rescue and civil defense organizations have reported that hundreds of tents were flooded, while rainwater has penetrated and ruined residents' possessions," Haaretz reports. “Some of the displaced persons have been forced to move to higher ground to flee the rising water."

    Pictures and video from Gaza show torn tents, soaking wet and barefoot children and families desperate for shelter. 

    “The rain was heavy, and the holes were too many. Our mattresses and blankets were flooded,” said a young man in Gaza who lives in the tent with his parents and three younger siblings. Even hospitals have been flooded.

    Imagine the nightmare of your traumatized children cold and soaking wet, with nowhere warm and dry to go to. Imagine losing the few precious possessions that you may have left from homes lost to bombings. Now imagine even more hell: because many sewage systems aren't functioning, rainwater is mixing with sewage water. This can cause respiratory, skin and intestinal diseases. 

    According to officials in Gaza, more than 900,000 people face the risk of flooding and entire neighborhoods could be flooded by overflow from Gaza’s sewage system, which has been hit by Israeli attacks and often lacks enough fuel to operate due to Israel’s blockade.

    Why does heavy rainfall lead to such devastating consequences? 

    Because Israel has razed homes and buildings all across Gaza, leaving hundreds of thousands homeless. 

    Because Israeli bombs and shells—most supplied by the U.S.—have destroyed or damaged 85 percent of Gaza’s roads, water, electricity, and sewage systems. 

    Shelters for displaced Palestinians in Gaza flooded by heavy rain | Al Jazeera English

    And because Israel has deliberately blocked basic, life-saving aid—including tents. Israel has blocked 95 percent of the 300,000 tents promised under the Trump ceasefire. As a result, 93 percent of the tents in Gaza are uninhabitable, many damaged by extreme weather or Israeli shelling, forcing tens of thousands to try to survive in makeshift shelters, torn tents, or bombed out homes.

    The video above is just one that capture the nightmare.

    Trump, Oppressive Powers Scheme Over Palestine’s Future… Israel’s Gaza Genocide Continues Under Ceasefire 

    The fascist Trump regime, Israel, and other oppressive global and regional powers are actively scheming and contending over Trump’s “Peace Plan” and the future of the Palestinian people. 

    Meanwhile, Trump’s ceasefire hasn’t made the genocidal impacts of Israel’s U.S.-enabled war crimes disappear, they still haunt Gaza. Hundreds of thousands are still sick, homeless, and/or hungry. The dead—estimated at 10,000 buried under rubble—have overwhelmingly not been recovered and buried. The wounded, including 6,000 amputees, have not all been treated. Gaza’s hospitals, food and water systems remain crippled if not devastated, and reconstruction hasn’t started in any meaningful way. 

    The ceasefire has lowered the volume of Israeli attacks, but it has not changed Israel’s bloodthirsty, genocidal intent, and it has not stopped its ongoing attacks, destruction, and blockades. They are ongoing, all with the aim of keeping Israel’s boot on the necks of the Palestinian people and pushing its genocidal aim as far as possible, while not so flagrantly violating Trump’s plan as to provoke a U.S. or international response.

    Making matters worse, Israel continues to bar international journalists from Gaza. They have killed more than 200 journalists that were reporting from inside Gaza. And the major U.S. and global media have greatly scaled back their ongoing coverage of the situation in Gaza.

    Here are just some of the ways that Israel’s criminal attacks are continuing, often in direct violation of the terms of Trump’s plan they signed onto:

    Attacks and killings continue. Israel isn’t killing dozens or scores a day, but it is still regularly killing Palestinian people. On November 10, Israel killed two children in southern Gaza and carried out air attacks in north, central and southern Gaza. On November 12, three more Palestinians were killed. On November 13 and 14, more Israeli air strikes were reported and another Palestinian was killed.

    Bodies of unidentified Palestinians are buried in the Gaza Strip, November 14, 2025.

     

    Bodies of unidentified Palestinians are buried in the Gaza Strip, November 14, 2025.    Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana

    This brought the number killed by Israel since the ceasefire went into effect on October 11 to at least 260 dead, including 107 children, and 632 wounded. The official death toll in Gaza since October 7, 2023 now stands at 69,187 killed and 170,703 wounded.

    In 18 months of genocidal massacres—October 2023 to March 2025—Israel charged only three of its soldiers with crimes, and only one of the cases resulted in a conviction for its massacres in Gaza. 

    The reality is that Israel’s entire campaign in Gaza was a monstrous, towering crime for which its entire political and military leadership, and the soldiers who carried it out, should be on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity! 

    Israel Is Still Blockading Food and Needed Supplies. Israel has allowed somewhat more food and aid into Gaza and opened at least one new entry point, but overall its Nazi-like blockade is continuing. Here are just a few of the ways reported in the past week: 

    * The UN has charged Israel with blocking 1.6 million syringes for vaccinating children and nearly one million bottles of baby formula, preventing the immunization of more than 40,000 children under three against polio, measles and pneumonia.

    * The New York Times reports, “Hundreds of trucks are now entering Gaza daily, although many are carrying commercial goods for sale rather than aid handouts.” This means that more junk food is getting in—like chocolate, chips or soda but not the nutrition people need after a famine. U.N. officials say they still face Israeli restrictions on what goods they can bring into Gaza. 

    * The World Health Organization reports that only half of Gaza’s 36 hospitals are even partially functioning. Yet Israel is even more aggressively barring foreign doctors from entering Gaza as volunteers. One is Dr. Feroze Sidhwa, a California trauma surgeon.

    * Israel systematically destroyed Gaza’s healthcare system—some 94 percent of its hospitals are damaged or destroyed—and now it’s threatening to deport some 90 Palestinian patients now in East Jerusalem back to Gaza. This includes infants, the elderly and others being treated. Medical groups have denounced this as illegal under international law. A patient suffering from kidney failure told CNN, “I will die there in two days,” if he’s returned to Gaza.

    Desecrating Palestinian Remains. Under the terms of the ceasefire, Israel has returned the remains of 330 Palestinians. None have been identified, and many showed signs of torture and abuse. This past week in an interview with Al Jazeera, a surgeon who examined the bodies found that hearts, lungs, kidneys, and corneas had been surgically removed, and noted surgical cuts and evidence of stitching to this effect, as well as skin with burn marks consistent with the use of preservation chemicals. This amounts to systematic organ theft by Israel.

    Shijaiya neighborhood of Gaza City totally destroyed, November 5, 2025.

     

    Shijaiya neighborhood of Gaza City totally destroyed, November 5, 2025.    Photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg

    Razing 1,500 Palestinian Buildings. This past week an analysis by BBC found that the Israeli military was continuing to bulldoze, detonate, and destroy Palestinian homes and other buildings in the areas it controls. The analysis showed that at minimum 1,500 buildings, including whole neighborhoods, were destroyed after the ceasefire went into effect. This is a complete violation of the terms of the ceasefire and clearly shows that Israel is continuing its campaign to make Gaza unlivable for the Palestinian people, ceasefire or no ceasefire.

    The System That Is Driving This Nightmare

    The U.S.-Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people is not a product of human nature but the nature of a system—the Jewish supremacist, apartheid state of Israel, and fully backed and supported by U.S. capitalism-imperialism. 

    As we wrote on revcom.us in June 2024:

    What is going on in Gaza did not “start” on October 7, and it is not essentially a “war” between Israel and Hamas. It is a one-sided slaughter of overwhelmingly defenseless Palestinians. 

    Israel seized on Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel—which included the war crimes of taking hostages and the murder of civilians—to attempt to deal with what Israel’s rulers see as an existential threat. That is: in the area now ruled by Israel (the state of Israel and territory it occupies), Jews are a minority. Israel’s objective in the current genocidal assault on Gaza is to reduce the Palestinians to such a state that they can no longer pose any threat to Israel’s existence as an apartheid, Jewish-supremacist state. (Note, for example that Netan-Nazi defines Israel’s objectives as “ensuring that Gaza”—not Hamas—“no longer poses a threat to Israel.”) 

    That genocidal death, destruction, imposed famine and disease, and attempt to crush the very existence of the Palestinian people has been hellishly escalating...

    And, as the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian has brought alive, why is "the entire government and ruling class of the U.S., supporting Israel in carrying out genocide against the Palestinian people, before the whole world?" 

    This is not because of “the power of the Jewish lobby”—or because of some ignorant, ridiculous and outrageous notion that “Jews are controlling everything.” It is because Israel plays a “special role” as a heavily armed bastion of support for U.S. imperialism in a strategically important part of the world (the “Middle East”). And Israel has been a key force in the commission of atrocities which have helped to maintain the oppressive rule of U.S. imperialism in many other parts of the world. 

    The murder, oppression, and genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza, the West Bank and within Israel must end. The millions around the world who’ve stood up must continue to demand that this imperialist domination and oppression end, and that we fight for a whole different, and much better world!

    Stop the U.S.-Israeli Genocide of the Palestinian People!

    End the Siege on Gaza!

    This whole system is rotten and illegitimate! We need and we demand: a whole new way to live, a fundamentally different system!

     

    Additional Sources: Drop Site News, November 11-14

    Teaser REVOLUTION 48

     

    Listen to and watch message Revolution #48 from Bob Avakian   

  • ARTICLE:

    Israelis Threaten West Bank Olive Harvest

    “Jewish Terrorism in the West Bank Has a Clear Plan”

    Israeli settlers and soldiers attack Palestinians during the annual olive harvest, October 26, 2025 | Al Jazeera English

    For generations, the olive harvest has been a cultural and economic mainstay for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, with a good crop ensuring a family’s finances throughout the year. 

    Now, across the Palestinian West Bank, that crucial harvest is being threatened by unprecedented violence and terror by Israeli settlers, with backing and support from the Israeli military. What was once an occasion for celebration, picnics and coming together with neighbors, has been turned into a time of terror for Palestinian farmers and their families. 

    Settlers are people who "settle" on stolen Palestinian land. They are often rabid Jewish fundamentalists who engage in mob violence against Palestinian people. In recent decades, settler attacks have escalated during the olive harvest from September to November. This year things have gone to a whole other level. “Across 77 towns and villages, according to U.N. figures, gangs of Jewish extremists have burned cars, looted farming equipment and vandalized more than 4,000 trees and saplings,” the Washington Post reports. “The number of attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinians—an average of eight incidents a day—is the highest since the United Nations began documenting them in 2006.”

    B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, said settlers were attacking Palestinians “daily,” including “shooting, beating and threatening residents, throwing stones, torching fields, destroying trees and crops, stealing produce, blocking roads, invading homes, and burning cars.” 

    The Israeli army uses tear gas to disperse Palestinians from harvesting their olives, October 28, 2025.

     

    The Israeli army uses tear gas to disperse Palestinians from harvesting their olives, October 28, 2025.    Photo: AP/Nasser Nasser

    A few examples from this past week: settlers set fire to dozens of olive trees in the village of Majdal Bani Fadil. Settlers attacked Palestinians harvesting their olives with rocks and clubs near the village of Beita, injuring more than a dozen people including reporters from Reuters and Al Jazeera. As hundreds of anti-occupation Israeli activists were coming to the village of Burin in solidarity with an olive harvest, the Israeli army declared the village a closed military zone. Some of the activists tried to block traffic, then stood along the road with signs saying “Stop Jewish Terror.”3 

    Israeli settlers and the IDF aren’t only targeting the olive harvest. This past week settlers rampaged through the West Bank’s Beit Lid industrial zone setting cars, fields and buildings on fire, and then moved on to attack the Kedumim Industrial Zone, including a dairy factory which is a major West Bank employer.

    Israeli settlers also attacked a mosque in Deir Istiya, setting fire to its entrance, and defacing the mosque by spraying threatening graffiti on its outer walls, including “we are not afraid,” “we will revenge again.”

    “Israel has done something truly incredible—
    Israel has managed to turn Jews into Nazis!”

    Bob Avakian, November 10, 2023

    The West Bank is the area of historic Palestine west of the Jordan River (on the east side of what is now Israel). It is home to nearly three million Palestinians and has been mandated by the United Nations to be part of a future Palestinian state. It has been under illegal military occupation since it was seized by Israel through war in 1967. Since then, some 600,000 to 750,000 Israelis have set up more than 250 settlements and outposts across the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem. These are flagrantly illegal under international law, but Israel has relentlessly expanded them, while terrorizing the Palestinian population and destroying Palestinian homes, farms, crops, and animals.

    What’s happening today is a sharp escalation of even those atrocities, and their backing from the highest levels of the Israeli state. 

    Jewish Terrorism in the West Bank Has a Clear Plan

    Settler attacks in the occupied West Bank: Palestinians face arson and assault near Beit Lid | Al Jazeera

    Even as violence is rising, investigations of settler violence by Israeli authorities and police have fallen 73 percent over the past three years. “The situation is out of control, the [Israeli army] is doing nothing,” one Israeli newspaper said. Israeli authorities and prominent settlers make light of the violent attacks as the work of a few extremists or "a few lost boys." 

    In reality, “Hundreds are taking part, not a small group of wayward youths,” Haaretz reports (“A Few Lost Boys? Jewish Terrorism in the West Bank Has a Clear Plan”). And this is given full backing from the fascists in power.

    Palestinians survey damage from Israeli settlers attack on an industrial zone in West Bank village near Tulkarm, November 12, 2025.

     

    Palestinians survey damage from Israeli settlers attack on an industrial zone in West Bank village near Tulkarm, November 12, 2025.    Photo: AP/Majdi Mohammed

    Haaretz went on, “The incidents are occurring almost every day, and they're part of a larger plan. While the settler mainstream deplores the events, some settlers see them as highly useful. The violence, in some cases to the point of killing, is designed to instill fear among the Palestinians, shrink their living space and forcibly evict them from their land, on which new settler farms and outposts would be established.”

    Trump’s “Peace” Plan, Israeli Maneuvers, and the Future of the Palestinian People

    This past week, the Trump regime submitted a revised U.N. Security Council resolution, aimed at legitimizing and enshrining Trump’s 20 point “Peace” Plan for Gaza, which for the first time included language indicating a possible pathway to Palestinian statehood, something Israel has vehemently opposed. This comes after Trump told Israel not to formally annex the West Bank (steal it from the Palestinians and make it formally part of Israel).  

    In another first, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (aka Netan-Nazi) condemned settler violence in the West Bank, claiming Israel “will take very forceful action against the [settler] riots … against Palestinians, and against IDF soldiers — because we are a nation of laws, and a nation of laws acts in accordance with the law.” Up to now, the fascists in Netan-Nazi's cabinet have given full backing to the anti-Palestinian settler movement.

    It is beyond the scope of this article to delve into all the maneuvering between the U.S., Israel, and various global and Middle East powers over Trump’s “Peace” Plan, and the repercussions of the U.S.-Israeli genocide in Gaza. (We have analyzed the basics of Trump’s plan HERE and HERE.) It is also the case that the future of Trump’s plan is impossible to predict with any certainty.

    But a few things can be said with certainty:

    First, Trump’s plan has nothing to do with ensuring the rights of or a just future for the Palestinian people. It is an effort by the Trump fascist regime to extend U.S. dominance in the Middle East, as well as open up big financial opportunities for U.S. capitalism-imperialism. An ongoing open, and undeniable, genocide in Gaza or openly annexing the West Bank would prevent many Arab governments from openly getting on board with Trump’s agenda.

    Second, the language about a future Palestinian state is subject to U.S. dictates and therefore largely meaningless. It is political window-dressing to provide cover for the reactionary Middle Eastern regimes which are allied with the U.S.

    Even a "two-state solution," which Trump has not mentioned but which a number of European powers have argued for, would, as the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian has said, "really amount to nothing more than a powerful state of Israel continuing to occupy land stolen from the Palestinian people, while the so-called 'Palestinian state' created with this 'solution' would be a bitter joke—a puppet state—merely a patchwork of separated small territories, surrounded and dominated by Israel, with the Palestinian people still subjected to terrible oppression and deprivation." (That is from his social media message REVOLUTION #48, "Liberalism, 'progressivism'—opposition to injustice—and Zionism: you can’t 'have it all'—you can’t hold on to Zionism...and be consistent in opposing injustice and atrocity.")

    Third, as an Israeli analyst from the International Crisis Group wrote in the New York Times, “A U.S., European or Arab policy that says no to formal annexation but does nothing to stop de facto annexation [of the West Bank] will be interpreted by Israel as an invitation to continue apace” with its “explicit agenda of expanding and deepening its control over the West Bank.”

    Fourth, Israel and the U.S. may have their differences over Gaza and the West Bank, but Israel remains America’s key military outpost and enforcer in the Middle East. In fact, this past week it was reported by Axios that Israel is now pushing for a new, 20-year military aid agreement with the U.S., which would double the current $38 billion deal which provides Israel with massive military equipment and support.

    And finally, Israel’s atrocities in the West Bank are not fundamentally a matter of policy or who is Prime Minister. As Bob Avakian analyzed in his social media message REVOLUTION #76, The Democratic Party Convention: Delegates chant “We Love Genocide!”, Israel’s towering crimes against the Palestinian people: 

    ...flows out of—and is the “logical extension” of—the nature of Israel as a Zionist (racist, Jewish-supremacist) state, which justifies its massive atrocities by denying the humanity of the Palestinian people.

    For more, see: Israel’s West Bank Violence Escalates to Highest Level in 20 Years 44 Children Killed This Year Alone, revcom.us, November 10, 2025.

    Bob Avakian on the Middle East
    Bob Avakian on the Middle East

     

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Drop Site News, November 10, 2025; The state of Israel, Haaretz, November 14, 2025. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    “Fascists Are Not Welcome Here” 

    The Berkeley Protest Against Turning Point Was Righteous!

    Trump Must Go Now!

    Editors’ note: This updates and expands “A Message to the UC Berkeley Community” from Revolution Books, Berkeley.

    Protest outside a Turning Point USA event at the University of California, Berkeley, November 10, 2025.

     

    Protest outside a Turning Point USA event at the University of California, Berkeley, November 10, 2025.    Photo: AP

    The fascist group Turning Point USA (TPUSA) held a speaking event at UC Berkeley campus on Monday, November 10. TPUSA was founded by the fascist ideologue and organizer Charlie Kirk. Kirk was assassinated last September, and this event was aimed at promoting him as a fascist saint and martyr. Kirk’s assassination was wrong and harmful, but that doesn't change the fact that he was a fascist.

    This event was met by an angry, but overwhelmingly nonviolent, legal, and politically essential protest at UC Berkeley. This was organized by both on-campus student groups and political groups from the community, and it was a strong repudiation of TPUSA and fascism.

    This righteous protest has now become a focal point of attack—from fascists, and many mainstream voices who are prettifying fascism. In keeping with their pattern of capitulating to this fascist regime in repressing student protest and speech, the University itself is joining in on the repression.

    The hundreds of students and community members who chanted “Fuck you fascists,” "Fascists out of Berkeley" and "Trump Must Go Now" outside the TPUSA event were doing exactly the right thing. This overwhelmingly nonviolent protest stung the fascists politically, and powerfully demonstrated that they are very unpopular and don’t have control of the campuses. 

    Berkeley student protestors face off against police at the demonstration against Turning Point being on campus.

     

    Protest outside a Turning Point USA event at the University of California, Berkeley, November 10, 2025.    Photo: AP

    The attack on this protest by the Trump regime was spearheaded by Attorney General Pam Bondi who claimed that the protest was the work of “antifa,” characterized it as “violent riots,” and stated, “Look at antifa at Berkeley. That could be material support for terrorism.” “Violent riots” is a complete lie. “Antifa” is not an organization but an orientation toward opposing fascists, racists and other forms of injustice—but “antifa” has dangerously been officially designated by Trump as a “domestic terrorist organization.” When Attorney General Bondi uses the word, that means the power and repressive machinery of the government is being wielded to suppress and intimidate a broad swath of opposition. 

    Bondi immediately launched an “investigation” of the protest by the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force. Harmeet Dhillon, assistant U.S. Attorney General, was in Berkeley a few days after the protest, “investigating” in her words “mob assault and thuggish intimidation of attendees…”

    Local “mainstream” TV news and news outlets have also played a harmful role, presenting Kirk and TPUSA as if they were decent people, and joining in grossly exaggerating the “violence” of the protest. All this gave backing to the lies and threats being spread by people like Bondi. The local media painted TPUSA as if they're just "conservatives," instead of the backbone of a fascist movement. And few of the articles actually quoted one of Kirk’s many outrageous fascist statements. All this served to cover up and hide what was actually going on. Coverage like this objectively backs the government attack on the university and the protest.

    Again, as we said up top, the assassination of Kirk was wrong and harmful. But that doesn’t change what Kirk actually was: a high-level leader and organizer of a fascist movement. The Trump regime is on a mad rush to strangle and suppress speech on campuses across the country, law and the constitution be damned. They want to use the murder of Charlie Kirk to lock down control of campuses where there is now some space for critical thinking and progressive political life. They see this as a key to controlling all of society. 

    The fascists make a big deal out of how at times Charlie Kirk posed as a defender of open debate on the campuses—but the truth is that Kirk and TPUSA initiated a “Professor Watchlist” and online database to "expose and document college professors who discriminate against conservative students and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom." The list has over 300 professors who have reported being doxxed, harassed, the targets of repeated death threats, and being fired. The only “free speech” these people are about is for their own fascist views, and they want to use the state to crush opposition views.

    teaser REVOLUTION 27

     

    Read/listen to this social media message from @BobAvakianOfficial.   

    Part of why TPUSA and the fascists in general focus on Berkeley is because of the legacy of the Free Speech Movement (which happened in the fall of 1964 and played a big role in breaking open the student movement of the 1960s). The fascists want to rewrite and overturn the actual history of the Free Speech Movement. The Free Speech Movement was not just about free speech in general (although it was that) but also specifically involved and centered around the right of students to organize politically for/in support of civil rights—exactly the kind of civil rights which Kirk and his fellow fascists (above all, the Trump regime itself) have attacked and moved to gut. As the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian has said, "The Trump MAGA fascists would have been on the side of the Confederacy in the Civil War, fighting to maintain, and expand, slavery." And these fascists are out to crush all those with ideas in opposition to this nightmare.

    Front Cover of pamphlet "FSM Reflections On Becoming a Revolutionary" by Bob Avakian

     

    Courtesy of The Bob Avakian Institute.

    UC Berkeley claims as an institution to proudly uphold the Free Speech Movement. But instead of a spirited defense of free speech, and the activists under attack by a fascist government, what we have seen from the administration in the last days is shameful bowing down to the fascist assault:

    • Outrageous arrests, felony charges and $10-20K bail have been leveled against four students who allegedly attempted to decorate Sather Gate with posters and an art installation (a cardboard bug) that opposed TPUSA.
    • UC Berkeley spokesperson Dan Mogulof announced that the university will assist the Joint Terrorism Task Force "to identify the outside agitators responsible for attempting to disrupt last night's TPUSA event." Borrowing from the brutal history of the southern sheriffs attacking the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, Mogulof brands the Cal student groups and community groups like Jewish Voice for Peace involved in organizing the protest as “outside agitators”—when in the real world, Turning Point was packing Zellerbach Hall with MAGA fascists from all over California and beyond, who were brimming over with hatred of immigrants, LGBTQ people, and basic rights for women. 

    This is a continuation and furthering of the UC administration’s blatant capitulation to Trump. Only a few months ago, the university caved in to Trump's demands to purge campuses of people opposing the genocide in Palestine. UC Berkeley admitted it turned in the names of 160 students, staff and faculty to the government’s office of Civil Rights for a witch hunt investigation of “antisemitism.” This is a violation of basic rights and the kind of critical thinking that universities are supposed to be about. “Antisemitism” in Trump-speak means anything critical of Israeli crimes. Right now purging campuses of this “antisemitism” is a cutting edge of suppressing critical thinking and disruptive protest in general. And campuses across the country have been leaned on hard to hand over names, and to allow the fascist Trump regime to dictate what can be taught on campuses. 

    There have been protests against the shameful turning over of names at Berkeley and other places. These need to grow—and protests like the one against Turning Point need to be supported and the people and organizations now under fire must be defended. We need to demand that the university as an institution refuse to bow down to Trump/MAGA fascism.

    The fascist moves to take over the campuses, and university administrators capitulation to this, must be fiercely opposed. This opposition must become part of the struggle to defeat the Trump regime. We support and urge others to support and join in the mass nonviolent protest in Washington, DC, initiated by RefuseFascism.org and now involving a growing coalition of organizations committed to not stopping until the Trump regime is forced from power.

    We invite people to come to Revolution Books, where we have an extensive collection of books on fascism, historically and in the US today, along with literature on many crucial questions, including the works of new communism, developed by Bob Avakian, on why we need a whole new way to live, a fundamentally different system.

    Posters with quotes from Charlie Kirk, and responses.

     

    Posters with quotes from Charlie Kirk, Sproul Plaza, UC Berkeley, November 14, 2025.    Photo: Revolution Books, Berkeley

    Charlie Kirk—in His Own Words

    Four people were arrested on felony charges for posting signs on Sather Gate which prominently featured quotes from Charlie Kirk along with a call to protest the TPUSA event. Here are just a few of the quotes where Kirk tells you what he was in his own words:

    Black women: Referring to Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson as “affirmative action picks,” Kirk said, “You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

    Death penalty and public executions: “By the way, this is the my other problem with the death penalty—it takes too long. … It should be public. It should be quick. And it should be televised. … Well, I think at a certain age, it's an initiation. … You think children should have—you should see it? What is the age—at what age should you start to see public execution?”

    Women and feminism: “[M]ore younger women need to get married at a younger age and start having kids. The single woman issue is one of the biggest issues facing a civilization.” 

    It is so materially insane to think that one in five American women will be raped in their life… meaning that they’re lying about being raped, that they’re lying about being sexually assaulted.” 

    Stoning gay people: “You might want to crack open that Bible of yours. In a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture, is in Leviticus 18 is that, ‘thou shalt lay with another man shall be stoned to death.’ Just sayin’! So Miss Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19… the chapter before affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.

    For much more, see here

  • ARTICLE:

    From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    As Political Prisoners’ Dogged Struggle Persists

    Escalated Repression of Leftist Intellectuals Sparks Broad Outrage

    Revcom.us editors’ note: We received the following from the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now (IEC). Translations are by IEC volunteers.

    “They should be respected and cherished, instead of being threatened and incarcerate.”

    PEN America says their mission is to “protect free expression in the United States and worldwide… and to unite writers and their allies to celebrate creative expression and defend the liberties that make it possible.” This is all the more important at a time when progressive and revolutionary thought as well as the thinkers are being demonized and criminalized by fascist theocratic regimes—be it Christian fascists in the U.S. or Islamic fascists in Iran. PEN noted such attacks by Iran’s regime on a range of progressive “writers, poets, creative artists, social media commentators, and activists” had escalated coming off the so-called “12-day war,” which was in reality an unprovoked bombing of Iran by Israel and the U.S. Most egregious was the Israeli bombing of Evin Prison, a dungeon filled with political prisoners since it was built by the U.S.-CIA backed Mohammad Pahlavi Shah of Iran (1953-1979), and maintained by the Islamic theocrats.

    On November 5, PEN raised the alarm in an article about “Shocking Arrests of Writers and Scholars in Iran Latest in Escalating Free Speech Crackdown,” which included home raids, interrogations, and arrests of “several notable leftist intellectuals in Tehran,” “part of a wider spate of detentions and targeting of academics and others who have voiced criticism of Iran’s economic policies and social conditions or other dissident views.” At least two of those targeted “are known for their translations of leftist texts or topics including economics and gender.” 

    A week later on November 12, PEN announced a petition where they “joined almost 300 scholars and writers worldwide—including Fatemeh Shams, Ervand Abrahamain, and Judith Butler—calling for the release of a group of prominent progressive scholars, writers, and translators arrested in early November, as well as other unjustly detained writers in Iran.” We applaud this effort. 

    There is real significance in the fight for a better world to defend progressive and revolutionary dreamers and fighters of a society as to what future we get. There is no movement for social or fundamental change without thinkers who use their intellectual capacity and training—of working with ideas—in the service of liberating the people from historically outmoded socio-economic systems. Imagine if there is a Darwin among them in Iran? What would be lost to humanity if such thinkers and their revolutionary ideas were suppressed—as is being done currently by theocrats everywhere?

    Twelve political prisoners in Evin who protested writers' arrests.

     

    Twelve political prisoners in Evin who protested writers’ arrests. By row, from top left –Hossein Shanbehzadeh, Siamak Amini, Mehran Raoof, Nasrollah Amirloo; Reza Khandan, Morteza Parvin, Saeed Ahmadi Deljoo, Morteza Saeedi; Siamak Ebrahimi, Shariar Baratinya, Mohsen Gashghaei-Zadeh, Abolfazi Ghadyani.     Farsi graphic posted by @burnthecage, English added by IEC

    Twelve political prisoners in Evin Prison quickly issued a statement against these arrests and raids. In part, it reads:

    In a situation where economic misery has put the livelihoods and lives of the people in a deplorable state, the regime’s security system has taken action to arrest and interrogate economists who defend the lower classes of society… The arrest of these individuals reflects the fact that the regime is still in conflict with thought and thinkers who think differently. We, a group of political prisoners imprisoned in Evin Prison, while condemning this rotten policy, demand their immediate and unconditional release.

    On November 12, Radio Zamaneh, a left-leaning Farsi language station based in Amsterdam, reported that three “leftist researchers” who had been arrested on November 3 had now been released on bail. They were Parviz Sedaghat, a political economy researcher and translator; Mahsa Asadollahnejad, a sociologist researcher; and Shirin Karimi, a social science writer and translator. 

    Importantly, Radio Zamaneh noted that the repression of these progressive intellectuals “sparked widespread condemnation. A group of 12 political prisoners held in Evin Prison, as well as around 900 cultural, civil and political activists, denounced these politics and called for immediate and unconditional release of the researchers, and to hold accountable those responsible for the poverty and misery which prevails in Iran.

    Referring to the petition announced by PEN, they went on to say “More than 260 Iranian and non-Iranian academics from various countries also signed a statement recognizing the prominent and respected position of these researchers in the scientific community – emphasizing that ‘in every lawful society that values academic freedom, they would be respected and cherished, instead of being threatened and incarcerated!’”

    Evin Prisoners’ Bold Resistance Prevents Transfer of Death Row Inmate

    When Ehsan Afrashteh was dragged out of Ward 7 of Evin Prison in Tehran, calling for help and covered in blood from being beaten by guards, his fellow prisoners feared that they would not see him again. They chanted “Down with [Supreme Leader] Khamenei!” and fought with guards. It was the second time guards had tried to transfer the 32-year-old engineer, sentenced to death on unfounded charges of espionage and sent to Ghezel Hesar Prison, which executes the largest number of prisoners in the country. Last month, fellow prisoners had physically prevented his transfer. On November 10, guards locked the other prisoners in the yard and separated Ehsan, along with two other political prisoners, Mehdi Farid and Behzad Panahi, and moved them to an unknown location.4

    In response, 200 prisoners in Evin, which holds the largest number of Iran’s political prisoners, immediately announced a hunger strike, and the next day joined with the “Tuesday No to Execution” weekly hunger strike. Iranian diaspora activists flooded social media about Ehsan Afrashteh and Mehdi Farid,5 who is also accused of espionage and sentenced to death.

    Ehsan Afrashteh

     

    Ehsan Afrashteh     Photo: Social media via IEC

    It is a testament to the determined and courageous struggle of Evin prisoners and their supporters that three days later, the authorities returned two of the prisoners, Ehsan Afrashteh and Behzad Panahi, to wards in Evin. 

    Families and Supporters of Hunger-Striking Prisoners Attacked Outside Evin

    The day after of the violent transfer of political prisoners, a sit-in of families and supporters of two Azerbaijani ethnic minority political prisoners was attacked by a large gang of police in front of Evin Prison gates. They tore up signs and physically dispersed the family protesters. Four long-time activists who had joined them were beaten and arrested. Even in the face of this, the families have continued to sit in and hold signs. On November 13, Islamic state police forces again attacked and dispersed them.

    That same day, two political prisoners who were on their 17th day of a hunger strike, lost consciousness and were taken to the prison infirmary.6

    Graphic of hunger strikers Vadud Asadi, Lawyer Taher Naghavi. Back: Families and supporters hold signs outside Evin Prison demanding their release.

     

    Front: L-R hunger strikers Vadud Asadi, Lawyer Taher Naghavi. Back: Families and supporters hold signs outside Evin Prison demanding their release.     Original graphic: @Dadban2021, subtitled by IEC

    Prolonged hunger strikes continue to be a tactic of last resort among many prisoners, and, tragically, many have lost their precious lives or suffer permanent damages to their health. The “No to Execution Tuesday” campaign of a one-day hunger strike every week has proven to be a creative and sustainable practice which has garnered worldwide support. Nearing its two-year anniversary in January 2026, it has spread to 54 prisons across Iran to date.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Ehsan Afrashteh, 32, had left Iran for Turkey but returned in 2024 at the request of his father, who died in 2024. He holds a master’s in engineering and worked as an IT and network specialist. His time out of the country made him suspicious to the regime, which arrested him in July 2024 and attempted to force him under torture to confess to spying for Israel, which he has denied and for which no evidence exists. His first appeal was rejected, and a second appeal continues. “Tension in Ward 7 of Evin Prison; Death Row Prisoner Ehsan Afrashteh Transferred to an Undisclosed Location,” en-hrana.org, November 11, 2025 [back]

    2. Mehdi Farid was an employee of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization who on his own reported that Israel’s secret service had approached him and he had rejected their efforts. For this, he was charged with “collaboration with Israel” and sentenced to death. His case is under appeal. https://x.com/Amoody408/status/1989009418852446483 [back]

    3. Vadud Asadi, a civil activist, and Taher Naghavi, a lawyer, went on hunger strike as a last resort to demand their release due to medical conditions which are not being treated. Part of a group of 20 Azerbaijani activists arrested in 2024, they were convicted of the blatantly political charges of “assembly and collusion to disrupt national security” and “propaganda against the Islamic Republic.” The Azerbaijani minority is the second largest ethnic group in Iran and is concentrated in its North West. Two Iranian Political Prisoners Collapse After 17 Days on Hunger Strike, iranwire.com, November 13, 2025 [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the Movement

    The Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today

    Updated

    Did you know that from 1956 to 1971 the FBI conducted a program designed to foment conflict within revolutionary movements, as well as broader movements for reform—conflicts which not only crippled these movements, but served as a cover to carry out frame-ups and even outright murder of revolutionary fighters and activists?

    Did you know that they sent undercover people into these movements specifically to create or magnify conflicts? Did you know that they relied on unsubstantiated gossip and often inventions, as well as forged documents as part of their arsenal?

    Did you know that they took statements out of context to distort the real views of activists and revolutionary fighters and use these as pretexts for smear campaigns and attempted prosecutions?

    All this came to light in 1971, when some brave and heroic people appropriated the files revealing this program in a nighttime operation to go into an FBI office and bring these criminal activities by the government to light. As a result, many people in the movements of the time and even beyond, in broader society, adopted different standards for settling inevitable conflicts over politics and ideology in a principled way, and preventing the police, FBI and other government agencies from spreading slanders, fomenting conflicts and endangering the lives of people active in the struggle for justice.

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.

     

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.    Photo: AP

    Now, decades later, a new generation is way too unaware either of the FBI activities or the protocols widely adopted. We saw the results of this in 2022, with the vicious and very dangerous slander campaign that was launched against Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, the revcoms, Bob Avakian and Sunsara Taylor. And now, in light of the heightened repression from Trump fascism and the low standards that exist among people broadly, we are reissuing this article.

    We urge people to read and spread the article below, and to insist on principled discussion and debate over disagreements and to oppose any dangerous campaigns of lies, disinformation and distortion.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    COINTELPRO was launched by the FBI in secret in 1956 in the context of the rising civil rights movement, and operations were later “signed on” to by the Kennedy administration. Its reach was broad and vicious. The FBI, working in sync with local police “Red Squads” (political police) wrote leaflets fomenting conflicts between different groups. They sent anonymous letters warning parents and school administrators of what their children and students were supposedly doing. They conducted police surveillance and repression against antiwar coffee houses opening near military bases. And those the FBI identified as leaders, in particular, were marked for “neutralization” by the FBI, a euphemism for being framed up on serious criminal charges or killed.

    One of the earliest, ugliest and most grievous FBI operations was against Malcolm X. We recently covered this, and we are including it here as a companion to this article.

    Going After Martin Luther King Through Personal Slander and Harassment

    One element in COINTELPRO attacks on the civil rights movement was the dissemination by the FBI of allegations about Martin Luther King’s sex life that had nothing to do with the struggle for civil rights, or debates within that movement or in society as a whole. The FBI bugged King’s bedroom(!) and then, directly or posing as “concerned individuals” sent supposed taped “evidence” to media outlets and others, including colleges where King was invited to speak, demanding he be disinvited. They even sent such a tape to his wife, Coretta Scott King, in the hope of causing anguish and breaking up the marriage.

    The FBI also circulated allegations that King’s movement had organizational and financial connections to communists, playing on anti-communist prejudices, to push (and provide an excuse for) white liberals and what the FBI identified as “the responsible Negro community” to stay away from the civil rights movement at a time when civil rights activists were being brutally attacked and murdered by police and the KKK, and as a cover for massive surveillance of the civil rights movement. Whether or not the authorities were directly involved in King’s murder in Memphis in 1968 as his family and close associates have insisted, the COINTELPRO operation created conditions that facilitated his assassination and was continued for a year after his death.

    WIKI-Mlk-suicide-letter-400.jpg

     

    Going After the Panthers: Fomenting Conflicts to Murder Leadership

    A major objective and focus of COINTELPRO was isolating and setting up the most revolutionary forces at the time, especially the Black Panther Party (BPP), for attack. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, in a secret memo, wrote to offices calling for “imaginative and hard-hitting counterintelligence measures aimed at crippling the BPP.” (Emphasis added.)

    As they did with Malcolm X (see the accompanying article), the FBI often focused on setting up others to do the actual dirty work. To take one notorious example, the FBI forged a letter, supposedly from someone in the community, to Jeff Fort, the leader of the Blackstone Rangers, a Chicago gang at the time, claiming that the Black Panther Party was getting ready to move on him. In this case, in the climate of the times when there was both a broad culture of being alert to moves by the authorities to forge accusations to set people up, and when there was broad respect for the Panthers and the revolution, Fort decided the threatening letter was not credible. This letter was part of a larger COINTELPRO operation that set into motion events that led to the assassination of Panther leader Fred Hampton by Chicago police and the FBI in 1969.

    FredHamptonKilledHirez_AP691204082-400.jpg

     

    Chicago police with Fred Hampton's body.    Photo: AP

    In another COINTELPRO operation, the LA office of the FBI came up with a plan to forge a letter claiming the US Organization (United Slaves), which had been attacking the Panthers, believed that the BPP had a contract out to kill their leader. The LA FBI office wrote that the objective was for “this counterintelligence measure [to] result in an ‘US’ and BPP vendetta.” The operation was part of what led to the terrible murder of Black Panther leaders John Huggins and Alprentice “Bunchy” Carter by US members in Los Angeles.

    Black Panthers, Bunchy Carter and John Huggins

     

    Bunchy Carter and John Huggins, Black Panther leaders, murdered in 1969.   

    Again, there were real issues to resolve, questions to investigate, and debates to struggle out among those struggling for a different and better world in different ways, coming from different outlooks at the time, as now. The pattern and practice of COINTELPRO was to exploit these contradictions to twist them into vicious, destructive personal attacks, with an aim of disintegrating the movements for social change and an edge of isolating and setting up the most radical and revolutionary forces and leaders for what COINTELPRO documents euphemistically referred to as “neutralization.”

    Conclusion: don’t fall for—and don’t tolerate—the kinds of behavior that mimic what the FBI has used to destroy social movements. Call it out.

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.

     

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.   

    Identifying and Going After Bob Avakian Early On

    In his memoir, From Ike to Mao and Beyond, Bob Avakian (BA), who emerged as a revolutionary in the 1960s and today is leading the movement for revolution, talks about how he was a target for surveillance. At a demonstration, he was approached by the head of the Berkeley police “red squad” and told that he and the Revolutionary Union (the RU, which BA played a central role in founding) were under surveillance.

    BA has written about being in Chicago for the New Politics Convention and going back to his car and finding a guy who was “obviously from the Chicago red squad or the FBI” in a car behind his car “writing things down.” A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) discovery revealed that the House of Representatives did a “whole report and investigation on the RU.” Another FOIA inquiry also showed that BA was under surveillance in Maywood, a suburb of Chicago, and that the FBI had made a diagram of the inside of his house, “indicating through which windows someone could see different things going on inside the house.” This was a similar type of diagram to that used by the FBI and the Chicago cops that enabled them to assassinate Fred Hampton, leader of the Chicago Black Panther Party.

    memoir-front.jpg

     

    Resources:

    The book The COINTELPRO Papers, by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall contains a vast collection of original FBI memos and reports including documentation for the incidents described in this article. It is available as an online PDF.

    This article draws on installments of the American Crime series at revcoms.us: American Crime Case #41: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the New Left, 1964-1971 and American Crime Case #42: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the Black Freedom Struggle, 1956-1971.

    An important letter drawing lessons for today from the COINTELPRO operation against Malcolm X: A Reflection on Piggery—Then and Now.

  • ARTICLE:

    “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 

    Trump/MAGA fascism is being aggressively imposed on this society in many horrifying ways, instilling fear and a pull towards cooperation with government authorities. One of the ways people are being confronted with this is in situations where people are stopped as they go about their daily business at school, work, or shopping for food and necessities. Right now, that is a living reality for people who are being targeted as “illegal” immigrants, based on how they look or talk. But there are other situations that can be equally frightening: like when someone is arrested at or in connection with a political protest, or when someone is being questioned by police when they don’t have any idea what it is about. In all cases, people need to know what is the best way to respond to prevent these government agencies from doing great harm

    In the popular culture in movies and TV shows, to the ever-present law-and-order shows of one kind or another, and even the news, all trumpet the same theme: if the police want to talk to you, you are already assumed to be guilty—of something. To exercise one's legal rights is viewed as further evidence of guilt; even the most basic right—getting a lawyer to defend oneself from the legal and illegal onslaught of cops, prosecutors and judges—is depicted with a sneer as "lawyering up," as though this shows you must be guilty or have something to hide. 

    Miranda Rights, four points.

     

    Sometimes you hear the police reading what’s called the Miranda warning (see box) to a person they are intending to interrogate, stating that you have the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. But then everything proceeds as though the person being questioned is showing their guilt by refusing to answer questions and getting a lawyer to represent them.

    But in real-life situations, the best advice lawyers give anyone who is being arrested, questioned or contacted in any way by the police is: DON’T TALK. 

    It is important for people to know what rights they DO have when agents of repression come sniffing around. And it is especially important to insist on those rights even as they are increasingly coming under attack. 

    Bob Avakian has spoken to this point in his social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #106:

    As we revcoms (revolutionary communists) have made clear in the Declaration WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM: “So long as we are still living under the rule of this system of capitalism-imperialism, we will defend people against attacks on their lives and on the rights that are supposed to be guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.”

    So, what rights based on the U.S. Constitution are supposed to apply whether during an arrest or in any contact with police or government agencies? How should people defend their rights individually and collectively, and what kind of culture is needed to resist the government forces of repression?

    The Right to Remain Silent—Don't Talk

    When facing agents of government repression (here we are talking about the local police and prosecutors, state or federal law enforcement or various government agencies), the principle of "Don't Talk" is an important legal principle overall, and it is crucial in fighting to protect the various movements of resistance and of revolution from government repression. This principle is stressed very strongly by criminal defense lawyers and civil rights organizations—you have a RIGHT to remain silent.

    Many legal rights organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and National Lawyers Guild (NLG), have published materials to inform people of their rights. The most important thing they all advise is to assert your right to NOT answer questions. 

    For example, the following is from a brochure published by the ACLU of Southern California

    WHAT TO DO IF YOU’RE STOPPED BY POLICE, IMMIGRATION AGENTS OR THE FBI:
    YOUR RIGHTS 

    • You have the right to remain silent. If you wish to exercise that right, say so out loud.
    • You have the right to refuse to consent to a search of yourself, your car or your home.
    • If you are not under arrest, you have the right to calmly leave.
    • You have the right to a lawyer if you are arrested. Ask for one immediately.
    • Regardless of your immigration or citizenship status, you have constitutional rights.

    And the National Lawyers Guild advises what to do if an FBI agent or police officer knocks at the door:

    Do not open the door. State that you are going to remain silent. Do not answer any questions, or even give your name. Anything you say, no matter how seemingly harmless or insignificant, can be used against you or others. Ask the agents to slide their business cards under the door and tell them that your lawyer will contact them. If the agent or officer gives a reason for contacting you, take notes and give the information to your lawyer.4 

    What Harm Can Talking Do?

    There are many myths and lies promoted in the dominant culture and by the police themselves which leave people confused and feeling they have no choice but to cooperate. This is absolutely wrong and dangerous to any movements of resistance from among the people. 

    Myth #1—Cooperating will make the authorities go away.

    In fact, it often does just the opposite. After all, if they size someone up as a "talker" or weak link, they'll milk this person for all the information they can get. They may return with more questions or continue this line of questioning with others.

    Myth #2—Talking will prevent being arrested.

    The authorities promote the illusion that a person should try to "save their own hide" by cooperating and talking. In reality, as the ACLU and NLG underscore, in many circumstances talking may increase the chances of a person being busted, and may be sealing the case against himself/herself as well as others.

    Myth #3—As long as the information provided is harmless, there's nothing wrong with talking.

    When people don't know their rights and talk freely to the authorities, this can do great harm—no matter what information they provide.

    First of all, because the person doesn't know the full agenda of the authorities, he/she has no basis to evaluate whether or not information is "harmless." Even if the authorities claim to be investigating something that has nothing to do with your politics or political activities (or those of others), appearances can be deceiving. The authorities can and will twist any information to their advantage.

    Secondly, the act of talking encourages the authorities to pursue this tactic and go after others.

    Finally, and most importantly, talking fuels the government's efforts to eliminate any movements of opposition and dissent, while standing firm and not talking as a matter of principle contributes to building a culture of resistance and defiance.

    Myth #4—If I don't cooperate, won't it look like I have something to hide?

    According to the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR),

    This is one of the most frequently asked questions. The answer involves the nature of political "intelligence" investigations and the job of the FBI. Agents will try to make you feel that it will "look bad" if you don't cooperate with them. Many people not familiar with how the FBI operates worry about being uncooperative…. (T)hey [the FBI] are intent on learning about the habits, opinions, and affiliations of people not suspected of wrongdoing....

    They will do anything to get a person to talk: from good cop/bad cop approaches (aimed at getting the person to "open up" to the more sympathetic cop) to threats and outright brutality. They also use "mind games" such as saying that others have already informed on a person; or even going so far as falsely telling someone a family member has died in order to get the person to let down his/her guard and reveal information about themselves or others.

    Any information that a person provides—no matter how seemingly insignificant—can be twisted and used against that person themselves, or against people and organizations who expose and oppose the crimes of this system. The government has a long history of lying about the facts and fabricating "evidence" in order to frame movement activists and revolutionaries. They take intelligence gathered from a variety of sources and use it in the most sinister ways, even including murder. Consequently, there is no reason to be in the least defensive about not talking to or cooperating with authorities.

    If a person thinks that he/she can just "bullshit" an agent, this too is a trap. The investigators are trained to be "friendly" and listen to people's stories. To quote a textbook on interrogation techniques, "Letting the subject tell a few lies, and letting him apparently get away with them, is an excellent technique, and works well with many types of subjects. We have seen that lying on the part of the subject works to the advantage of the interrogator...." The NLG has pointed out:

    Keep in mind that although they are allowed to lie to you, lying to a government agent is a crime. Remaining silent is not. The safest things to say are "I am going to remain silent," "I want to speak to my lawyer," and " do not consent to a search." [emphasis added]5

    Conclusion

    As spoken to throughout this article, as part of trying to beat down movements of resistance and of revolution, agents of the government (police, FBI, prosecutors, etc.) have developed methods to trick, intimidate and brutalize people into giving up legal rights and protections established by the legal system in this country. This basic dynamic and truth needs to be clearly understood, and if various organizations and movements are serious about the challenges they face, they need to grapple with how—mainly by relying on mass movements of the people—to resist such repression.

    History has shown that when the decent people refuse to concede the moral authority on what is right and what is wrong, they are better able to withstand repression and continue to develop resistance. If they do not take this approach, they find themselves in a situation where: That which you do not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn—or be forced—to accept. Part of building a culture of defiance and resistance among people standing up against fascism and the crimes of this system is refusing to allow the government to either intimidate or bamboozle people into giving up resistance, and refusing in any way to enter into complicity with such intimidation and repression.

    In this context, the legal principles underlying "Don't Talk" take on heightened importance. Those confronted by police agents should not be bamboozled into giving up the legal rights they do have, as this will only lead to strengthening the repressive apparatus of the state, and help to undercut the ability to struggle against the crimes of this system and to build a movement for revolution to overthrow this system and bring about a fundamentally different and much better system. 

    Immigrant Legal Resource Center red cards

     

    Red Cards

    Red cards are being distributed by the thousands in immigrant communities throughout the country, advising people of their rights. This is the text of the “red cards.” 

    I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on my 5th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. I do not give you permission to enter my home based on my 4th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter, signed by a judge or magistrate with my name on it that you slide under the door. I do not give you permission to search any of my belongings based on my 4th Amendment rights. I choose to exercise my constitutional rights. These cards are available to citizens and noncitizens alike.

    • DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR if an immigration agent is knocking on the door.
    • DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS from an immigration agent if they try to talk to you. You have the right to remain silent.
    • DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING without first speaking to a lawyer. You have the right to speak with a lawyer.
    • If you are outside of your home, ask the agent if you are free to leave and if they say yes, leave calmly.
    • GIVE THIS CARD TO THE AGENT. If you are inside of your home, show the card through the window or slide it under the door.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Operation Backfire: A Survival Guide for Environmental and Animal Rights Activists, National Lawyers Guild, 2009 [back]

    2. “Know Your Rights! What to Do if Questioned by Police, FBI, Customs Agents or Immigration Officers,” by National Lawyers Guild, S.F. Bay Area Chapter, ACLU of Northern California and the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC-SF), 2004  [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    What If People Had Listened?

    THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!

    In the Name of Humanity
    We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America
    A Better World IS Possible

    BAfilmTrumpencemustgo3.jpg

     

    What If People Had Listened?
    This talk was given in 2017, during the first Trump fascist regime, and it is all the more crucial now, with what Bob Avakian has referred to as the “second coming” of the Trump regime and this fascism now “on an unrestrained rampage.”
    See Q&A from the film, clips, and trailer.

    Listen to and read Avakian's most recent social media message: Revolution #141: The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime! and join the mobilization for the Call from RefuseFascism.org, and open to all, for “The Fall of Trump Fascist Regime, November 5, Washington DC.

    We are confronted by—we are now being ruled by—a fascist regime: relentlessly assaulting civil rights and liberties and openly promoting bigotry and inequality; acting with callous disregard or cold-blooded malice toward those they consider inferior and a drain or stain on the country; on a mission to deny health care to millions who will suffer and many who will die without it; crudely degrading women, as objects of plunder, breeders of children without the right to abortion or birth control, subordinate to husbands and men in general; defying the science of climate change, attacking the science of evolution, and repudiating the scientific method overall; a regime brandishing an arsenal of mass destruction and threatening nuclear war; intensifying state terror against Muslims, immigrants and people in the inner cities; unleashing and giving encouragement and support to brutal thugs spewing vile “America First,” white supremacist, male supremacist and anti-LGBT venom—a regime that boasts of all this and declares its intention to do even worse.

    This has caused disgust, anger, and agonizing among huge numbers of people, and there have been many important acts of resistance, big and small, to the continuing outrages committed by this regime and its supporters. But the regime remains in power and is determined to ride roughshod over all obstacles to carry out its monstrous agenda; and the need for a massive outpouring of people, acting together nonviolently but with sustained determination, to create a political situation where this regime cannot remain in power—cries out.

    The organization Refuse Fascism (RefuseFascism.org) has put forward a call and a plan, and is actively building, for that mass mobilization, to begin on November 4.

    So this is the challenge we are facing. To meet this challenge there are big questions that need to be seriously engaged, even as people are moving to build momentum toward November 4.

    Donald Trump claims to have won the popular vote in the 2016 election. That is another of his Big Lies. But the fact is: It would have been a disgrace if just 10 people voted for this, or 10 thousand—but tens of millions did. Why? The fundamental answer lies in the whole history of this country and its role in the world.

    Did you know that the Constitution adopted by the founders of this country institutionalized the right of men to rape, at will? I had thought of beginning this talk with that statement—and then, in response to the gasps of shock and disbelief that such a statement should call forth, I could have said: No, the Constitution didn’t actually do that, but it did something no less horrific: institutionalizing the enslavement of millions of people. In fact, however, the Constitution adopted by the “founders” did legalize mass rape: Besides enshrining property relations in which men could legally rape their wives, the Constitution, by explicitly codifying the status of slaves as property, in effect established the “right” of the slaveowners to do anything they wished to their slaves, including raping the women. And slave women were raped, regularly and repeatedly, by their owners and overseers.

    Often, people who do not want to face the reality and the implications of this will argue: “We have to judge things by the standards of the time—people back then did not know better.” As they say in England: rubbish! For one thing, the slaves knew better! And there is the example of Edward Coles, who before becoming governor of Illinois was private secretary to James Madison (the main author of the U.S. Constitution): Coles freed his own slaves and tried to convince Madison and Thomas Jefferson (author of the Declaration of Independence) to do the same. They refused, but you can’t say nobody knew better back then! It is true—Madison and Jefferson (and, yes, Hamilton!) belong to a past time—and it is long past time that we move beyond what they represent.

    The terrible truth is that, with some notable exceptions (including the very significant exception of the generation that came of age in the 1960s), white people overall have either been directly involved in, or have supported or at least passively accepted all this throughout the history of this country. During the whole time of slavery. During the decades of Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror, when repeatedly Black people, in particular Black men, who did not “know their place”—or sometimes without even knowing why, angered some white person—would be lynched, while crowds of white people would gather in a “picnic” atmosphere, vying to get parts of the mutilated body of the Black person hanging from a tree, and photographs of this were turned into postcards that were sold throughout the country. Yes, this is true—the ugly, shameful truth. Today, with the repeated murders of Black people by police, in the rare instances when the murdering cop is indicted, there are white people who sit on juries and refuse to convict. And still too many white people who claim to care about justice, and will take to social media to denounce far less outrageous and sometimes even trivial acts, cannot find it in themselves to be outraged and moved to act about this! If the police wantonly shot down dogs, over and over again, there would be a huge outcry throughout society, including from people who are silent, or make excuses, when this is done to human beings of darker skin.

    Now, it would be wrong, and harmful, to ignore the fact that there are white people, in particular younger white people (but others as well), who have taken to the streets to protest these murders by police, and who have put forward the stand: White silence is violence, it is complicity in murder. This is, of course, a good thing—and it needs to happen much more, on a much greater scale. But, given the actual history of this country, down to today, does it really make sense to insist, as some people still stubbornly do, that “fascism couldn’t happen here, not in this country, with our democracy and our great traditions”?!

    It is, however, very important to dig into the question: How did things come to this point, where we are confronting the real horror of a fascist America? Here, told briefly, is the “longer story,” the broader history that has led to this.

    Thousands of years ago, human beings, who had lived for tens of thousands of years before in small hunting and gathering societies, settled on land and carried out farming and domestication of animals, particularly in the “fertile crescent” of the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East areas. With this came the emergence of class division, the polarization between rich and poor, powerful and powerless, including the patriarchal oppression of women by men. As this way of life spread and took hold in large parts of the world, ancient civilizations and empires arose—for example, in India, Egypt, China, Persia, Greece and Rome, and then, centuries later, the Islamic empire, covering a large territory in the Middle East and parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe. While built on plunder and oppression, they nevertheless brought forth many great achievements in architecture, art, music, the development of language and literature, science and other spheres. But the history of the rise of empires has also been the history of their decline and fall—because of contradictions and conflicts within them and because of invasions from outside forces, themselves driven by their own contradictions, conflicts and challenges.

    This went on for thousands of years. But then, several hundred years ago, something dramatically new emerged: the development of the capitalist system. This is a far more dynamic system than previously existed in human history—a system driven by its own internal contradictions to constantly expand, to continually transform the technological basis on which it operates, to repeatedly intensify the exploitation of people on which its profits rest. And, again as a result of the contradictions and conflicts within and between different countries, and the rise and fall of different powers, it just so happened that it was mainly in Europe that capitalism first took hold and emerged as a dominant force on the world stage. This was accomplished, in its very foundation, through the most horrendous means. Karl Marx, the founder of communism, described, with bitter irony, the “rosy dawn” of capitalism: the massive hunting of slaves in Africa, shipping them in chains, in the millions, to be worked mercilessly in the Americas; the conquest of the original peoples in South America and their enslavement unto death in the gold and silver mines there; and atrocities of a similar kind that fed countless human beings, in far-flung parts of the world, into the relentless machinery of an ever-expanding capitalism. This, as well as brutal exploitation, including child labor, within these capitalist countries themselves, was the basis on which “western civilization” made leaps in its development and became the dominating force in the world, economically, militarily, politically, and culturally.

    Capitalism, through all the horrors it has brought about, including two world wars and countless other armed conflicts, has in fact laid the basis for a whole new leap, beyond relations of exploitation and oppression, and the madness of war and environmental destruction; but, at the same time—and this is now posed in very stark and acute terms—this system of capitalism stands as the greatest obstacle to this advance, and human society everywhere is straining against the confines in which capitalism continues to enchain human existence.

    This puts in proper perspective and sharply refutes the racist notion of “the superiority of western (that is, white European) civilization” and the idea that somehow capitalism is the highest form of existence that human beings can attain and should aspire to.

    And here is the “shorter story,” the more particular reasons why things have come to this crossroads in this country, with potentially disastrous consequences for human beings everywhere.

    The USA is a country which established its territory and built the foundation of its wealth through the armed conquest of land, genocide, slavery, and ruthless exploitation of successive waves of immigrants to America. And it has continued as a country marked by white supremacy, patriarchy and male supremacy, and other oppressive divisions, while expanding its domination into an empire stretching across the globe, sitting atop a lopsided world of profound inequalities and plunder of the environment (it would take the resources of nearly 5 earths for the rest of world to have the kind of “consumer society” that exists in the U.S.)—all this backed up and enforced by a massive machinery of death and devastation, the U.S. military, and reinforced with a constant barrage of ideas and culture rationalizing and justifying all this oppression and destruction, propagated through an equally massive machinery of molding public opinion. Today, while the U.S. is, and loudly proclaims itself to be, the world’s number one superpower, it is riddled with sharpening contradictions, and facing growing challenges, within the country and internationally, and this has brought forth a fascist regime that now holds the reins of power, with the finger of a demented bully on the nuclear button—a regime that, without exaggeration, threatens not just greatly heightened suffering for the masses of humanity but the very existence of humanity itself.

    So this poses sharply the immediate, urgent challenge we face.

    Calling this regime fascist is not an “insult” but speaks to the terrible reality. On the website revcom.us this explanation regularly appears:

    “Fascism is the exercise of blatant dictatorship by the bourgeois (capitalist-imperialist) class, ruling through reliance on open terror and violence, trampling on what are supposed to be civil and legal rights, wielding the power of the state, and mobilizing organized groups of fanatical thugs, to commit atrocities against masses of people, particularly groups of people identified as ‘enemies,’ ‘undesirables,’ or ‘dangers to society.’

    “At the same time—and this can be seen through studying the examples of Nazi Germany and Italy under Mussolini—while it will likely move quickly to enforce certain repressive measures in consolidating its rule, a fascist regime is also likely to implement its program overall through a series of stages and even attempt at different points to reassure the people, or certain groups among the people, that they will escape the horrors—if they quietly go along and do not protest or resist while others are being terrorized and targeted for repression, deportation, ‘conversion,’ prison, or execution.”

    Refuse Fascism has published as a pamphlet, and posted on RefuseFascism.org, material that can be made into portable panels outlining the outrages already committed by the Trump/Pence regime, as well as what they are preparing to do (and what they have called forth from the thugs they have encouraged and unleashed), in their attacks on Muslims, immigrants, civil liberties, women and LGBTQ people, on the environment and on the people of the world, and what they have done to reinforce and fortify white supremacy, police brutality, and mass incarceration. It is very striking how far things have already gone, and how much worse they are bound to get, if this regime is allowed to remain in power and fully implement its agenda.

    One of the most distinguishing and significant features of this particularly American version of fascism is the “unholy alliance” between Trump and fundamentalist Christian Fascists. As I pointed out in another recent talk:

    “Trump, I think it’s fair to say, could not have won the election if the Christian Fascists ... not only if they had opposed him, but if they’d been unenthusiastic about him ....And ... even when the ... pussy-grabbing thing came out, they didn’t turn against him (...Jerry Falwell, Jr. and all these others)—because they recognized: “Here is somebody who is going outside of the whole rules and the way this is done in the ‘swamp of Washington,’ who will actually carry through on this stuff [like outlawing abortion and suppressing gay people].”... And Trump, for his part, recognized that if he didn’t get this force behind him, he was not going to be able to do it....

    “Pence is obviously a critical linchpin in this ... uniting of what’s represented by Trump ... and the Christian Fascists.... [T]he regular bourgeois institutions, ... like CNN, the Democratic Party and so on, ... they keep saying: ‘He can’t do that, that’s not the way things are done.’ But then [Trump] does it, because he’s not playing by those rules. He’s not working within the norms as they’ve been. He is going directly up against them, precisely as an important part of what he’s doing.”

    And, while Pence plays a very important role in all this, he is far from the only Christian Fascist in this regime. Besides the appointment of Neil Gorsuch, who is himself a Christian Fascist, to the Supreme Court—re-establishing, after the death of Antonin Scalia, the right-wing majority on the Court—Trump’s cabinet is full of these Christian Fascists.

    Perhaps it seems harsh, or even extreme, to refer to these fundamentalist Christians as fascists. Well, in Katherine Stewart’s book The Good News Club, The Christian Right’s Stealth Assault on America’s Children, she cites these comments by Rich Lang, himself a former Christian fundamentalist, who broke with that and became a liberal Christian pastor:

    “When I was born again [Lang recalls], faith was something inside of you, something you were supposed to reflect through your life. But in the 1980s, something happened. Fundamentalist Christianity jumped back into the public square with the intention to reshape the country as a Christian nation as defined by them....

    “It’s no different than the Nazis wanting to start with the Hitler Youth. That is where you’d want to start if you were trying to build a fascist movement....

    “That’s the word, ‘fascism.’ Nobody likes to use it in this country. But I believe that in this country, underneath the appearances, that is exactly the great temptation of our time. ...[A]nd you have to call it what it is—‘Christian Fascism.’”

    Stewart further summarizes Lang’s views this way: “Modern fundamentalism, like fascism in earlier times, he says, involves a strong feeling of persecution, typically at the hands of godless liberals or a religious ‘other’; the belief that one belongs to a pure race or national group that is responsible for past greatness, suffers unjust oppression in the present, and is the rightful ruler of the world; the impulse to submit unquestioningly to absolute authority; and the relentless drive for power and control. It is, he says, a kind of supremacist movement, with religion rather than race at its core.”

    And there is this chilling statement by Lang:

    “People have no idea it’s going on....

    “What does it mean that the conservative church that’s growing in America is an end-times church? What does it mean that we are raising a generation of children to believe that they are the last generation? What is going to happen if we keep on telling them, ‘Don’t care about the environment, and bring on the war, because we’re going to be lifted out of here, and you can forget about loving your neighbors, because they’re just going to get blown away?’”

    So, that is the insight of someone very familiar with these Christian Fascists. And the fact is that, in this country, with its whole history of genocide, slavery and racism, any form of fascism, including one basing itself on “Christian supremacy”—any urge to “restore past greatness”—cannot help but be bound together with white supremacy.

    The Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the late 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist.

    In running for President in 1968, Richard Nixon adopted what has been called the “southern strategy,” which the Republican Party has followed ever since. This is a direct appeal to white supremacy—to the racism of white people, particularly (though not only) in the southern states, who are enraged that Black people are not “staying in their place.”

    The Republican Party is not “the Party of Lincoln”—as it sometimes demagogically claims to be—it has become much more the Party of the Confederacy.

    With Ronald Reagan, the Republican Party took another leap on the road of fascism. Reagan very deliberately began his campaign for president in 1980 in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where in 1964, three civil rights workers were kidnapped and brutally murdered by white supremacists. There, in Philadelphia, Mississippi, Reagan proclaimed his support for “states rights,” which, particularly in the South, have long been code words for white supremacist lynch-mobism.

    And after George W. Bush took things still further in a fascist direction—including the open use of torture and the active promotion of Christian fundamentalism—the Trump/Pence regime has made the leap into all-out fascism.

    There is a direct line from the Confederacy to the fascists of today, and a direct connection between their white supremacy, their open disgust and hatred for LGBT people as well as women, their willful rejection of science and the scientific method, their raw “American First” jingoism and trumpeting of “the superiority of western civilization” and their bellicose wielding of military power, including their expressed willingness and blatant threats to use nuclear weapons, to destroy countries.

    The truth—another terrible truth that must be faced—is that, in the context of profound and acute contradictions that are asserting, or re-asserting, themselves in ways that are tearing at the very fabric and deepening cracks in the foundation of this country, at the same time as the American empire is facing serious challenges internationally, fascism is one possible resolution of this, on the terms of this system and its ruling class, even as this is a horror for humanity.

    While the Constitution does establish the separation of church and state—and the Christian Fascists are wrong, or simply lying, when they insist that the founding documents of this country established it as a “Christian nation”—the reality is that Christianity has all along been the unofficial state religion of this country, and the country’s identity, throughout its history, has been as a “white Christian nation,” grounded in male supremacy as well as white supremacy and driven by a “manifest destiny” to dominate not only the continent of North America but ultimately the world as a whole. All this has been brought into question, and has become the focus of intense struggle, going back to the 1960s and, in some important ways, back to the Civil War. And while developments internationally, including the demise of the Soviet Union, have given further impetus to the globalization of the capitalist world economy, this very heightened globalization has propelled changes that have sharpened contradictions within the U.S. as well as on the world level, particularly with an emerging capitalist China mounting a challenge to U.S. global economic dominance, at the same time as this heightened globalization, under conditions of western imperialist domination, has wreaked havoc in countries throughout the Third World, including the Middle East (and other places where Islam is the prevailing religion), adding fuel to a virulent Islamic fundamentalism that has declared war on the “decadent West” and on “infidels” and others oriented toward the West and facilitating its imperial domination.

    In order to bring about any positive resolution to all this, even short of abolishing and moving beyond this whole system, it is necessary and crucial to break with the “normal routine” and the “normal workings” of the political process.

    Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winning economist, recently wrote that, faced as we are with the gravity of the growing climate crisis, those now ruling us may end up destroying civilization because of their willful ignorance and opposition to the scientific method. This was said very seriously, and it is deadly serious. Speaking to this, in “A Question, A Challenge for Paul Krugman, And All Those Concerned About the Future of Humanity,” I emphasized the importance of refusing “to simply hope that the ‘normal workings’ of a process that has brought these people to their ruling position will somehow prevent them from acting in accordance with their ‘willful ignorance,’ and worse.” But why do many people still stubbornly cling to such false hopes?

    Thomas Frank is the liberal author of a book with the catchy title What’s the Matter With Kansas?—How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. But the more important question is: What’s the matter with liberals?

    Well, it is important, first of all, to draw the distinction between ruling class “liberals” and “regular” liberals. As for “liberals” of the ruling class, what is “the matter” with them is something I will get to shortly. But for those who are not part of the ruling class, the “matter” is that, although they are willing to admit that there are real problems in this country and they would like to have a more just society, and world, many resist recognizing the systematic and systemic nature of the injustices, and they fear the conflict, turmoil and chaos that could be set loose by a determined struggle against this. Even as they do have a sense of the horrors that the Trump/Pence regime represents, too many are caught up in thinking that amounts to this: “I am hoping, and by staying within the established ‘norms’ I am gambling on the hope, that the horrors don’t hit me and those I most care about.” This, it has to be said, is politically as well as morally bankrupt, and will only contribute to the impending disaster. It used to be a common saying: To the person of the Right, order is more important than justice, while for the person of the Left, it is the opposite. Now, the question is put squarely to liberals, and really to everyone: Which, after all, is more important: Order, even if that is the order of fascism, with everything that means? Or justice, even if that means stepping outside of our “comfort zone,” and putting ourselves on the line to prevent this fascism from consolidating its rule and fully implementing its program?

    Another dangerous illusion is the notion that, particularly for Black people, what is happening now is just more of the same. Yes, the history of this country is the history of unspeakable atrocities committed against Black people, as well as others—but what we are facing now, with this fascist regime, is the heightened possibility not just that this oppression will be carried to genocidal extremes, and that the masses of people everywhere will be subjected to previously unseen horrors, but that the human species itself will be wiped out.

    In confronting and moving to prevent this, one of the biggest obstacles standing in the way, and weighing people down, is American chauvinism—the disgusting notion that America and Americans are better and more important than everybody else. This is a poison infecting people broadly in this country, even among the bitterly oppressed, and there is a great need for people to break with this American chauvinism. Free yourself from the GTF!—the Great Tautological Fallacy. A fallacy: an idea, or a way of thinking, that is false, wrong. A tautology: a round-in-a-circle way of reasoning that asserts something and then claims to prove it by merely asserting the same thing again. So, the Great Tautological Fallacy to which I am referring is the notion that America is a force for good in the world, and therefore whatever it does is good (or at least done with “good intentions”), even if the same thing when done by other forces, especially forces opposed to “us,” is bad, is evil—because... because America is a force for good in the world. Thus, in the grip of the Great Tautological Fallacy, when one is told by the authorities in government and the media, etc., that North Korea developing a small number of nuclear weapons and a few long-range ballistic missiles poses a “grave threat,” one does not question, one does not ask why that is a “grave threat,” while the only country ever to use nuclear weapons, the United States, having thousands of nuclear weapons and the capability to use them, anywhere in the world, is somehow not a grave threat. Under the influence of the Great Tautological Fallacy, one does not stop to think about the fact that, in this situation, North Korea could only be developing this weaponry as an attempt to deter an attack from the United States—for North Korea’s leaders know that if they initiated an attack, they would face massive, overwhelming retaliation—and from the point of view of the imperial rulers of the United States, such a possibility of deterrence is precisely the problem, because it could in some measure limit the ability of the U.S. to dominate and dictate.

    Here is another example: Recently, Chelsea Manning, a former solider, who took great risk and spent years in prison for exposing, among other things, war crimes by the U.S. military in Iraq, was extended an invitation to be a lecturer in an academic program at Harvard University. But then, when some government officials and others, including Mike Pompeo, objected and threatened to pull out of the program, Harvard disinvited Manning. Well, who is Mike Pompeo? He is the head of the CIA—an “intelligence” arm of the U.S. government which, without exaggeration, is an instrument of murder on a mass scale. Going back to the 1950s, and through succeeding decades, the CIA has worked through right-wing butchers, in countries such as Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Indonesia, and many others, to pull off coups that have removed popular governments from power and replaced them with murderous reactionary dictatorships. More than a million people have been slaughtered as a result of these actions by the CIA. But, through the lens of the Great Tautological Fallacy, the head of the CIA is a respected figure, and his denunciations of Chelsea Manning can cause Manning to be ousted from the program to which she was invited at Harvard.

    Of great help in casting off the Great Tautological Fallacy is the “American Crime” series that appears regularly on revcom.us—where you can get a beginning sense of the scope and the depth of the atrocities that have been carried out, here and all over the world, by the rulers of this country, from the beginning and down to today.

    But from childhood we are indoctrinated with the notion that America is a shining light of freedom, and the President of the United States is “the leader of the free world.” Well, when has this been true? Was it true during all the years of slavery? Or during the long years of Jim Crow segregation after the Civil War, when thousands of Black people were lynched while leering mobs of white racists celebrated, and Black people as a whole were subjected to constant terror? Is this a shining light of freedom now, when Black people have to take to the streets demanding “Stop Killing Us!” because the police kill a thousand people every year, many of them unarmed, especially Black people, Latinos, and Native Americans? When millions of women are battered and huge numbers are raped every year in this country, is this a shining light to the world? And what is this “free world?” Does it include the countries where the U.S. has backed and armed military juntas and other oppressive dictatorships, with their bloodthirsty death squads terrorizing the people, over the last 100 years and more, throughout Latin America and many other parts of the world? Does it include today countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey—all “allies” of the U.S. and all ruled by brutally repressive governments? Or what about the Philippines, where the government has carried out the cold-blooded murder of more than 10,000 people within the last year, and the head of state, Duterte, openly boasts of this? Does the “free world” include Israel, a nuclear-armed state that has occupied Palestinian land, in flagrant violation of UN resolutions, for 50 years, and forcibly maintains over a million Palestinian people in Gaza in what amounts to an open-air prison, living barely above survival level, and subject to repeated bombardment by Israeli armed forces, which in 2014, with full support from the U.S. government (headed then by Obama), killed over 2,000 people in Gaza, the overwhelming majority civilians, hundreds of them children. Is all this the “free world” of which the U.S. is the leader? Once you remove the blinders of the Great Tautological Fallacy, it can be seen that the “free world” simply means those parts of the world that are under the domination of, or are “friendly” to, the United States, no matter how monstrous their ruling classes may be, while the “non-free world” is made up of those who remain outside of, and especially those who pose opposition or obstacles to, the domination of the U.S. empire.

    The U.S. government wages war in Africa and Asia, as well as the Middle East, claiming it is fighting to defend civilization against the brutal and murderous Islamic fundamentalist jihadists. But the imperialists of the U.S. are certainly no less brutal and murderous, and the “civilization” they boast of is literally built on the blood and bones of people all over the world. And why is this Islamic fundamentalism such a force now? Fundamentally because of the workings of capitalist imperialism itself. Besides the overall role of imperialism in creating more favorable soil for these Islamic fundamentalists, actions of the U.S. imperialists have further fed their growth.

    In the 1980s, the U.S. actually armed and built up Osama bin Laden and other Islamic fundamentalists to strike at the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

    In 2003, in violation of international law, the U.S. invaded Iraq to overthrow the head of government there, Saddam Hussein. This invasion was carried out under the cover of lies that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. This invasion, and the occupation of Iraq by American forces that followed, caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, set off bloody conflicts among the Iraqi people and created more fertile ground for Islamic fundamentalist forces.

    And the same thing happened in Libya. Under the presidency of Barack Obama, and with the insistent urging of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the U.S. intervened in a conflict within Libya on the side of forces opposed to the long-time ruler Muammar Qaddafi. With the fall of Qaddafi—which was brought about mainly as a result of massive bombing of his forces by the U.S. and its allies—the rivalries and conflicts within Libya were intensified, and Islamic fundamentalist forces gained strength.

    Or take the case of Iran. In 1953, the CIA engineered a coup that overthrew a popular government that was moving to nationalize the oil of the country, so that it could be used for the development of its economy, instead of being controlled and plundered by the U.S. and Britain. This coup brought the Shah of Iran to power, and the people of Iran suffered decades of torment and torture at the hands of the Shah and his secret police. And, here again, these actions of the U.S. created more favorable ground for the forces of Islamic fundamentalism, which ultimately seized power through the revolution that overthrew the Shah in 1979.

    These are only a few examples of the American crimes that have been committed, and the kinds of consequences that have followed from these crimes, in countries all over the world. And all this underlines the crucial importance of casting off the blinders of the Great Tautological Fallacy and breaking with American chauvinism. We need to think about humanity, first and above all.

    During the 1960s, a whole generation (or a large and defining part of that generation) broke with American chauvinism, cast off the Great Tautological Fallacy and, at the cost of real sacrifice, dared to stand up against the atrocities committed, here and throughout the world, by the rulers of this country, and fight for a better world. Unfortunately, all too many (though not all!) of that generation have become disoriented and have allowed themselves to become, as the French say, “récupérer”—that is, they have come back under the wing of the ruling class, in particular its “liberal” representatives in the Democratic Party, and have far too much accepted things on the terms of a system they once, very rightly, recognized as viciously criminal. But now, when the workings of this system have brought this fascist regime to power, there is, more than ever, a profound and urgent need for people, of all generations, to finally and thoroughly break with American chauvinism, and act in the interests of humanity.

    Here is another important statement that can be found on revcom.us:

    “The Democrats, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, etc., are seeking to resolve the crisis with the Trump presidency on the terms of this system, and in the interests of the ruling class of this system, which they represent. We, the masses of people, must go all out, and mobilize ourselves in the millions, to resolve this in our interests, in the interests of humanity, which are fundamentally different from and opposed to those of the ruling class.”

    Why is it that the Democrats can only try to resolve this on the terms of the system—and for that reason cannot offer any alternative that is in our interests, in the interests of humanity?

    Why are they determined to keep things within the “established norms” and “acceptable limits.”

    We can turn to the words of Barack Obama, shortly after Trump won the electoral college vote. We, Democrats and Republicans, are on the same team, Obama insisted. And he made a point of saying that we should wish Trump well and help him succeed because his success is success for all of us. Well, we can say that here Obama was telling an important truth—ultimately and fundamentally they are all on the same team—which explains why the Democratic Party will only oppose what the Trump/Pence regime is doing within narrow limits, and always in the interests of the “team” of which they are all a part. And, really, we should all help Trump succeed with his fascist agenda, because a “successful” fascism will be good for all of us? Only with the perverted logic of the system all these politicians serve, and with the poisonous outlook of American chauvinism, could anyone put forward such a position!

    Like the Republicans, the Democrats believe in the superiority of the capitalist system of exploitation and the “exceptional greatness” of America and its empire.

    They champion a brave new world of “21st century globalization,” which rests on a vast network of sweatshops where people, including children, slave long hours for near-starvation wages.

    They firmly believe in the right of America to dominate the world—and to overturn governments, bomb countries and slaughter people to do so—but they say it should be done with the cooperation of allies and in the name of “making the world more free, orderly and peaceful.”

    They will talk about “diversity” and “inclusiveness” while actually acting to maintain the fundamental relations of inequality and oppression that are hallmarks of this country, because those relations are built into this system and it could not exist or function without them.

    In short, even with their real differences with the Republicans, they represent and serve the same system—the system whose “normal workings” have now brought fascists to power.

    It will only make things worse, and work against what needs to be done to put an end to this nightmare, if people are taken in when Trump appears, for a moment, to be “more reasonable” and is praised by his ruling class opponents for being “more presidential,” or when they treat him as a miserably failing clown, or an egomaniac with no ideology or program, while he forges ahead with his fascist agenda. Hitler, too, while perpetrating monstrous atrocities, and preparing to do even worse, became skilled at “normalizing” this at each step and at times “toned down” his rhetoric. This fed illusions that too many wanted desperately to cling to.

    Upon coming to power, Hitler moved to crush the communists, because of his deep hatred for communism and because the communists were the most powerful organized opposition to the Nazis. Early in the Nazi regime’s rule, the Reichstag (German parliament building) was burned down and, although there are indications that the Nazis themselves were responsible for this, they blamed the communists, and seized on this situation to round up communists and declare emergency measures eliminating or severely restricting rights and liberties, measures which they moved to make permanent. A group of communists was charged with burning down the Reichstag—but the trial actually resulted in the acquittal of most of them, including the prominent communist Georgi Dimitrov. Many people wanted to believe: If communists are acquitted in court proceedings in these circumstances, surely that shows that the “separation of powers” and the remaining institutions of democracy can still “work” to contain and restrain Hitler. These kinds of illusions fed political paralysis and undermined the kind of massive resistance that might have ousted the Nazis from power, before they were able to force the reorganization of society in line with their barbaric outlook and aims, and go on to commit atrocities on a scale few would have thought possible when the Nazis first came to power.

    So, it is crucial to correctly understand, and respond to, the maneuvers of the fascist regime in power now in this country and the conflicts among the powers-that-be. As the statement on revcom.us, about why the “liberal” section of the ruling class cannot resolve this crisis in our interests, goes on to say:

    “This, of course, does not mean that the struggle among the powers-that-be is irrelevant or unimportant; rather, the way to understand and approach this ... is in terms of how it relates to, and what openings it can provide for, ‘the struggle from below’—for the mobilization of masses of people around the demand that the whole regime must go, because of its fascist nature and what the stakes are for humanity.”

    This brings us again to Refuse Fascism and November 4. As the publication from Refuse Fascism, “NOV. 4—IT BEGINS” explains:

    “RefuseFascism.org is a movement of people coming from diverse perspectives, united in our recognition that the Trump/Pence regime poses a catastrophic danger to humanity and the planet and that it is our responsibility to drive them from power. This means working and organizing with all our creativity and determination toward Nov. 4 when many thousands of people will fill the streets of cities and towns, beginning a struggle that must continue day after day and night after night, eventually involving millions of people, demanding: This Nightmare Must End: The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go!

    As I also emphasized in the “Paul Krugman” article:

    “People who hold many divergent points of view must come together and act politically, in what is really a meaningful and powerful way, to deal with the looming—in fact the ongoing—disaster embodied in this Trump/Pence regime, because of its willful opposition to the scientific method and its utter disregard for and repeated trampling on the truth, because of its overt white supremacy and misogyny, its xenophobic and bigoted attacks on immigrants, Muslims and LGBT people, its raw ‘America First’ jingoism and the grave danger it poses to human existence through its predatory approach to the environment and bellicose wielding of military power, including its expressed willingness and brazen threats to use nuclear weapons.”

    Many people who deeply hate everything Trump is about, have nonetheless raised: If we drive out Trump, then we’ll just get Pence, and if anything he is even worse. But that reflects still too much being confined within, and weighed down by, the “normal way” of doing things, which is precisely the trap that people have to break out of in their millions and millions. It is a matter of driving out the whole Trump/Pence regime through massive and sustained political mobilization and resistance from below, changing the whole political landscape, the whole political situation, culture and atmosphere in society. If, and as, this begins to happen on the scale and with the determination that is needed, this, in turn, will have significant repercussions among the ruling political forces, creating or deepening cracks and divisions among them and forcing at least sections of the “liberal” ruling class forces to pretend to recognize the legitimacy of what this mass mobilization is demanding, while at the same time seeking to co-opt it and bring it back within the normal and “acceptable” channels and positions. This, in turn, must be responded to by seizing on the further openings that are created by all this, to draw even greater numbers of people into massive and sustained mobilization. And this overall dynamic must be continued, amplified and accelerated toward the goal of actually driving out this regime before it can fully consolidate its rule and implement its program.

    Thousands must be organized to take to the streets in cities all over the country, beginning on November 4, overcoming fear and feeling the strength of their common cause and action, and their common aspiration and determination, making clear their resolve to not just make a statement but to continue—and, more than that, to spread and multiply their numbers and impact—until millions have been mobilized and refuse to stop until the demand has been met: This Nightmare Must End: The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go! Preparations must be made, logistically as well as politically, so that this mobilization can be sustained and can continue to expand and gain strength, so that the spirit, the determination and courage of those involved can be lifted and reinforced, while growing numbers of people, from broad and diverse sections of society, can be involved and can provide support and assistance. This is the great cause and the great movement to which all those who REFUSE to accept a fascist America must apply their energy and creativity to make a reality, now and moving forward to November 4, and beyond.

    A Better World IS Possible!

    In the most fundamental sense, only a thorough transformation of society, through a revolution to break the hold of this system and bring into being a completely different economic and political system, geared to meeting the needs of the people, for basic necessities and for a stimulating and inspiring intellectual and cultural life, seeking the truth through scientific means and giving flight to creativity and imagination, with new relations among people that do away with all oppressive divisions—only this can bring an end to the unnecessary suffering that is continually inflicted on the masses of humanity and make possible a world where human beings can truly flourish.

    Going back to the foundation of this country and the decisive role that slavery played in its rise as a capitalist power, and reflecting on the historical development of not just this country but human society more broadly, I have pointed to this profound reality:

    There is the potential for something of unprecedented beauty to arise out of unspeakable ugliness: Black people playing a crucial role in putting an end, at long last, to this system which has, for so long, not just exploited but dehumanized, terrorized and tormented them in a thousand ways—putting an end to this in the only way it can be done—by fighting to emancipate humanity, to put an end to the long night in which human society has been divided into masters and slaves, and the masses of humanity have been lashed, beaten, raped, slaughtered, shackled and shrouded in ignorance and misery.”

    Within the framework and limits of this talk, it is not my purpose, nor is it possible, to go deeply into the analysis of why this system cannot be reformed but must be abolished through revolution. I have done this in the book The New Communism, which not only speaks to why a revolution is necessary but also what the character of that revolution must be, and how that revolution could actually be brought about, even up against the tremendous power of the existing oppressive system.

    And in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America a sweeping, and at the same time concrete, vision and plan for a radically different society and world is laid out, embodying a whole new dimension of freedom and whole new relations, among people and between people and the environment, beyond the narrow confines and the terrible consequences of the present system of exploitation and plunder.

    But, whether we consider ourselves revolutionaries, convinced of the need for a radical overturning of the system and thorough transformation of society, or we believe that it is possible to bring about changes that will lead to a more just society within this system; whether our understanding is that America is not, and cannot be, a force for good in the world, or we hope it still can become that—all of us need to come together, and act together, with the urgency that corresponds to the terrible present and the gravely imperiled future that this fascist regime represents for humanity, and with the conviction that something far better is necessary and possible.

    We may have differences about what that “something far better” is, and how it can be brought about—and we should continue to discuss and debate this, with the orientation of seeking the truth, whether convenient or inconvenient, comfortable or uncomfortable, and following the truth wherever it leads—but it is not only possible but crucial and urgent that we unite—and actively go forward to win truly massive numbers of people—to act, in a really meaningful way, to bring about the removal of this fascist regime before it can fully consolidate its rule and bring down the full effect of its horrific agenda. In the “Paul Krugman” article, I put it this way:

    “Krugman is a proponent of capitalism, whereas I am an advocate of communism, a new communism, who is convinced that what is ultimately and fundamentally required to deal with the current horrors facing the masses of humanity, and the looming threat to the very existence of humanity, is a truly radical and emancipating revolution. But that is not the immediate question and challenge before all of us at this present moment. Rather, it is to deal with the grave danger posed by those now in power, through nonviolent but massive and sustained political action—the mobilization of first thousands, growing into millions, determined to get and remain in the streets until this regime is removed from power. Does not the common recognition that this regime ‘may end up destroying civilization,’ demand of us—of all those, of many divergent viewpoints, who can recognize that these are the stakes for humanity—that we act together, and do everything in our power, to bring about the massive political manifestation that is urgently needed to drive out this regime?”

    And, in concluding, let me go back to what I wrote at the end of that article:

    “to act, from their own perspective, to give meaningful support to, and indeed to become actively involved in, the critical work building toward November 4: publicly endorsing and promoting the Call from Refuse Fascism, helping to break through what is effectively a white-out of this by the mainstream media, donating and raising funds, directing people to the RefuseFascism.org website, and in countless other ways helping to develop the necessary political and organizational basis for what Refuse Fascism very rightly calls ‘this great cause.’ For it is the massive and sustained political mobilization called for by Refuse Fascism that truly represents the prospect of forging a positive path through and beyond this extremely dangerous and potentially disastrous situation.”

  • ARTICLE:

    From Aurora Roja, voice of the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution

    Revcom.us editors’ note: The following translation from Spanish to English is by revcom.us volunteers. Download the PDF of the 44-page pamphlet in Spanish at: RevolucionSocialista-OCRM.pdf

    1. We Need a Real Revolution, Nothing Less

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution Cover

     

    Why? Because we live under a system, a capitalist system dominated by imperialism. This system of exploitation and oppression is the root cause of so much unnecessary suffering of the people, so many crimes, so many atrocities. Globally, this system, capitalism-imperialism, is leading humanity and many other species toward the precipice of potential extinction, whether through rampant environmental destruction or a disastrous nuclear war between major imperialist powers like the United States, China, and Russia, while perpetuating crimes against humanity everywhere, such as the genocide of the Palestinians. In Mexico, it has left a growing bloody toll of murders, disappearances, femicides, rapes, trafficking in women, poisoning of nature and human populations, macrocrime, and other completely unnecessary and intolerable horrors.

    This revolution is not only urgently necessary, it is also possible. We are fighting seriously now for this revolution. If you’re not yet participating in this struggle, you need to understand —many more people need to understand—what a real revolution is, why this revolution is possible, and the radical liberating transformations possible with this revolution. This is what we’ll address here.

    We must face the reality of the world we live in, and not remain on the sidelines, locked in the narrow struggle to “get ahead,” hoping the crimes and horrors that surround us will not touch us. By understanding that a much better world is possible, you can and must open your mind, open your heart to the people, and join the struggle for a new socialist society of hope, liberation, and community.

    2. A Real Revolution Overthrows This System and Creates Another, Radically Different and Much Better System

    Since the fundamental problem is the system itself, a real revolution is needed to put an end to this system. How do we put an end to the system? We must overthrow and destroy the current state, which represses and murders people to defend this system of exploitation and oppression. In its place, the very revolutionary struggle of millions of people will forge a radically different new revolutionary state that will promote, support, and defend the struggle to end all forms of exploitation and oppression.

    The imperialist-dominated capitalist economy must also be eliminated, which superexploits and impoverishes people, destroys the environment, and wages a bloody war against the people in its relentless pursuit of maximum profits. A victorious revolution will confiscate the economic assets of big national and foreign capitalists and pave the way for the voluntary collectivization of economic activity by peasants, small business owners, and merchants. This will create a new socialist economy dedicated to meeting the needs of all people, overcoming all forms of inequality, exploitation, and oppression, and driving forward the world revolution.

    By breaking these chains, the creativity of millions, now suppressed or distorted in most cases, will be unleashed, criticizing the putrid culture and selfish, racist, and macho ideas that currently prevail, and giving rise to the blossoming of a new culture and diverse, vibrant, revolutionary, and inspiring ideas.

    In short, this socialism born of a real revolution will create a radically different and far better new economic system, a new political system, and a new culture. It will be a great liberating advance for the people of Mexico and, at the same time, will support, give impetus to, and inspiration for the revolutionary struggle of people around the world. This revolution is part of the worldwide struggle for communism, a society without classes, exploitation, or oppression, and the emancipation of all humanity.

    A real revolution is needed, nothing less, unlike the various false illusions promoted as supposed “alternatives,” which we will address below.

    3. A Real Revolution Is Needed, Not a So-Called “Ideological Revolution”

    The so-called “ideological revolution” influences a significant number of people in various forms and to varying degrees. The basic idea is that, to achieve fundamental change, all that’s needed is to change people’s ideas, whether in the family, at school, or in society as a whole. This is a false illusion that traps people in continuing to suffer under the current perverse system. This is what it leads to, regardless of the often progressive intentions of people influenced by this idea.

    It’s true that changing people’s ideas is enormously important. In fact, transforming people’s thinking is a fundamental part of the revolutionary process, both before and after overthrowing this system and forging another radically different system. But first, changing people’s ideas to what other ideas and to achieve what? It must be nothing less than upholding the emancipation of all humanity, and not simply the interests of one group or country against others. It must be to serve the people and be caretakers of the environment, rather than merely seeking “something for me and my people.”

    On the other hand, if the capitalist economy continues to operate with its ruthless competition of everyone against everyone, if the mainstream media, education, government, and other institutions are left in the hands of the ruling classes, which are the ideas that will prevail? No matter how hard you try to change people’s ideas, capitalist institutions and the very functioning of the capitalist economy and the relationships between people it engenders will continue to impose the selfish, racist, misogynistic, and other ideas that are inherent to the economic, political, and social relations of the current reactionary system. Just think of the daily competition to get into a good school, get a job, or outsell the competition. The very operation of the system instills selfishness and a “me first” attitude. Not to mention the dominant culture that the most important thing is to “get ahead,” without concern for others, to “stand out” above all others, that men must “conquer” women, and other values that are inherent to the economic and social relations of the current system.

    Finally, if you have the audacity to act according to ideas that clash even with aspects of how the current system works, what happens? The capitalist state, its Army, National Guard, and police, come to punish, repress, or kill you. This can be direct, like the cowardly murder of student teacher Yanqui Kothan by police from the Morena [political party] government of the state of Guerrero, to serve as a warning to all those who dare to fight for something as basic as truth and justice for the 43 Ayotzinapa student teachers who disappeared in a joint operation by the Army, police, and organized crime. Or it can be indirect, like the hitmen hired to kill Samir Flores after he was threatened by the federal government delegate for opposing the ecocidal thermoelectric plant in the state of Morelos (a project that former Mexican president López Obrador [AMLO] promised to stop during his campaign, and later imposed by force). The large number of social activists, journalists, and defenders murdered year after year bear witness to the consequences of acting according to more progressive ideas under this system.

    Special mention of, and genuine contempt for, must be made regarding the so-called “revolution of consciences,” a phrase commonly used by members of Morena (the National Regeneration Movement). In practice, it boils down to parroting what the president says during his or her morning press conferences and turning a blind eye to the accumulation of crimes against the people and the destruction of the environment. All of this continues under the governments of the so-called “Fourth Transformation” [the current nationally ruling party coalition platform], as well as under the despicable electoral parties of the bourgeois “opposition.”

    Transforming the way people think is essential to achieving a fundamental, radical change, but it must be an integral part of the process of making a real revolution. The so-called “ideological revolution” is like thinking that a person drowning in the sea only needs to change their ideas, shouting “Cheer up, you can do it.” It’s not wrong to try to encourage them, but you have to change the real material situation, by throwing them a life preserver and helping them out of the water. That’s how it is. We fight to transform people’s thinking as an integral part of the struggle to change everything, so that humanity doesn’t continue to drown in the sea of this outdated system, but rather has new life and hope in a world we all want to live in.

    4. Nothing Fundamental Is Going to Change Through Elections Under the Current System

    Mexico’s recent experience also illustrates that it is not possible to change anything fundamental through elections. There was genuine jubilation among many, and hope for real change when the bloodthirsty criminals of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and National Action Party (PAN) were finally removed from power with the triumph of López Obrador and Morena in 2018. But what happened? He promised to return the military to their barracks, but instead imposed the greatest militarization of Mexican society in history. He preached “hugs, not bullets,” while the number of murders and disappearances reached the highest level of any recent six-year presidential term, and to top it all off, he tried to “disappear the disappeared,” attempting to erase them from the official record. They say “we don’t repress,” while, under AMLO and [current Mexican president] Sheinbaum, the Army, National Guard, and police continue to murder citizens and migrants, as we have extensively documented on our website. (See, among other articles, “Nuevas masacres militares: con ejecuciones y militarización, SÍ son lo mismo” [New Military Massacres: With Executions and Militarization, They ARE One and the Same Thing]).

    They claim “we are not the same as the neoliberals,” while carrying out the ethnocidal and ecocidal megaprojects that previous neoliberal governments only promised, such as the so-called “Maya” Train and the Isthmus Interoceanic Corridor, among many others. They rightly label the bourgeois opposition as “traitors,” while Morena also follows Washington’s orders, even calling for “collaboration” with the fascist Trump administration to “contain,” repress, deport, and murder migrants. In fact, current Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s six-year term began with the military murder of six migrants in Chiapas and another two in Chihuahua. They maintain many of the neoliberal policies of the past and even boast of achieving high levels of imperialist foreign investment and high profits for big business. Sheinbaum has even refused to repeal the 2007 ISSSTE [social security] Law, which she herself called “neoliberal” and promised to repeal during her campaign, thus condemning teachers and others to a miserable retirement. She is trying to cover this up with another cynical promise: Welfare funds, which will not be forthcoming.

    Yes, they’re throwing more money at their “social programs” to get people to support them, but fundamentally, nothing has changed. In fact, for many people, especially where there is “co-governance” with organized crime, the situation has gone from bad to worse.

    And why? Simply because AMLO, Sheinbaum, and Morena are a bunch of lying frauds like all the politicians in this system? No, not only because of this. The problem is deeper. Because, no matter how honest and well-intentioned a person is, upon coming to power, they have to face the reality of how the capitalist system dominated by imperialism works and must function. They have to seek more foreign investments and loans from the imperialists, they have to foster the scandalous profits of big national and foreign businessmen, or the economy will collapse. They have to respond to the demands, especially of U.S. imperialism. And they have to defend the system in which a few people exploit and oppress the vast majority, or everything would become chaos.

    As in the example mentioned by Bob Avakian, author of The New Communism, what would happen in this system if it were declared that everyone had the right to eat, so anyone could go to the supermarket and take whatever they needed without paying? Obviously, there would be chaos, and soon there would be no products in the supermarket, because who is going to produce them for free? The productive capacity exists to feed everyone healthily, not just in Mexico, but throughout the world, and yet, under this system, many go hungry, many suffer from malnutrition. Only under a different system, under true socialism, will it be possible to guarantee something as fundamental as the right to eat.

    Thus, it is not possible to change anything fundamental through elections, because even if you have the best intentions, once you come to power, you find that you must act in accordance with the necessary functioning of the current economic and political system. Therefore, as Marx said, bourgeois elections are, at best, nothing more than the right to choose which representatives of the ruling class will oppress and repress the people in the coming period. The change that people so urgently need will not come from elections under this system but from a real revolution that gets rid of the current system and gives birth to a radically different and much better system: Socialism guided by the scientific understanding of the new communism.

    5. It Is Not Possible to “Change the World Without Taking Power”; It Is Necessary to Destroy the Current State Power and Forge a New, Radically Different, Revolutionary State Power

    Nor is it possible to “change the world without seizing state power” by generalizing alternative projects of autonomy, self-management, self-defense, or other such projects under the current system. Ultimately, “seizing state power” within the current system, whether through elections or other means, will not change anything for the reasons we have already pointed out. Nothing fundamental can change without destroying, shattering, the current state power, that is, the capitalist state, getting rid of the entire current system, and creating a radically different system through a real revolution.

    Supporters of the position of “changing the world without taking state power” through alternative projects often cite the experience of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) as an example, although Zapatista leaders do not use that phrase. What does that experience show us? The peasant and indigenous uprising of 1994 inspired millions, although the EZLN’s program would not actually take us beyond the current capitalist system, for reasons we have explained elsewhere. (See, for example, Hace falta tumbar el sistema capitalista, no tratar de “democratizarlo” [See an English translation here: We need to overthrow this system, not try to “democratize” it], available on our website.) However, within a few days, the EZLN halted the uprising and entered into negotiations with the government. The government then betrayed even the limited demands it had accepted and signed in the San Andrés Accords.

    With monetary and other support from various forces in Europe and elsewhere, the EZLN has achieved certain partial changes in its limited territory of greatest influence in Chiapas, and we can and should learn from that experience. However, the greatest lesson is the narrow limits to change within the current system, without overthrowing the capitalist system. Although the Zapatistas have done much to avoid antagonizing the government, what has happened? All governments of all electoral parties have mounted, including with the advice of U.S. imperialism, a systematic campaign of harassment, repression, and murder of the Zapatista rank and file, using the Army, the National Guard, police, paramilitaries, and, especially more recently, drug traffickers’ hitmen. This reactionary repressive campaign continues today. We must denounce and fight against this repression against the EZLN. It must also be recognized that this illustrates the need to overthrow the state and the entire current system, and not just try to create “alternatives” within the confines of the current repressive system.

    Attempts at “self-defense groups,” “community police,” “autonomous municipalities,” and other alternative projects often represent positive efforts by the people to fight and resist the onslaught of the current system of exploitation and death. However, they have faced similar counterinsurgency campaigns, again from all electoral parties, because they all represent and defend the same capitalist system dominated by imperialism.

    While these attempts to achieve certain partial changes in one or another circumscribed place remain under siege by the dominant system, or are, in fact, suppressed or co-opted, the deadly capitalist system continues to ruin lives, crush hopes, impose misery, disappearances and murders, as well as destroy the environment in Mexico as a whole.

    Regardless of the intentions of those who promote the possibility of “changing the world without taking state power” or, in general, who deny the need to overthrow the state and the entire capitalist system through a real revolution, this position also condemns the people to continue suffering unnecessarily under this system.

    It’s time to discard the false illusions of some “ideological revolution” or “revolution of consciences,” of electoral “change,” or of “changing the world without taking state power,” limiting ourselves to “alternatives” that, at best, are nothing more than Band-Aids applied to the cancerous wounds of a rotten system. For the people, for humanity, the radical surgery of a real revolution is necessary. We must support every just struggle and mobilize the masses in key struggles against state power. But on their own, these struggles, although just and necessary, are at best able to wrest a bit of land or other concessions. Sooner or later, they are attacked and ultimately defeated or subverted by the system if they are not linked to the struggle for a real revolution. Instead of confining people to the necessary but limited immediate struggles to survive under this criminal system, we must fight against state power and transform the people for revolution.

    6. This Revolution Is Possible Because More and More People Can No Longer Live as Before, and the Ruling Classes Face Increasing Difficulties in Continuing to Govern as Before

    It’s common to hear the opinion that revolution isn’t possible because “look at where the people are at.” But look at where the people are really at! Entire communities are displaced, uprooted, and destroyed, whether by the government’s deadly megaprojects, by the devastating mining operations of big national and foreign capitalists, or by organized crime, which increasingly takes over the national territory in collusion with authorities at all levels and all electoral parties. Young people in many places face the cruel choice of either being forced into the mafia, fleeing with their families elsewhere, or daring to try to confront, using community police or other means, the infernal triple alliance of the government, organized crime, and big business. Fighters, defenders, and honest journalists are being murdered or disappeared left and right. With each new six-year presidential term, the bloody toll of murders, disappearances, trafficking of women and children, “co-governance” with drug traffickers, extortion, and other abominations increases.

    What’s more, in the face of this situation, thousands of people are struggling, even with great courage. Many family members persist in the fight to find their missing loved ones and to expose the criminal complicity of the authorities, despite the threats and the murder of several mothers and other searchers for missing people. The courage and determined, and sometimes even armed, resistance of many indigenous communities and other peasants in defense of their territories, water, forests, and crops against the death-dealing megaprojects of the government and big business, as well as the terror, forced recruitment, and extortion that organized crime attempts to impose in collusion with the government and big business, is inspiring. A sea of green and purple periodically fills the streets with the fury and joy of women fighting to end femicides, for the full right to abortion, and to end patriarchy. Family members, students, teachers, activists, and others continue to fight for Truth and Justice for the 1968 Tlaltelolco Plaza massacre, the Dirty War, Acteal, El Charco, Ayotzinapa, and other crimes against the people, which not only remain unpunished, but the government has even rewarded several of the responsible criminal military officers. Many people across Mexico have taken to the streets to protest the genocide in Palestine, while the current so-called “leftist” government refuses to break relations with Israel or even clearly call out the genocide. Thousands of people are fighting even bravely and selflessly, and it is not right to turn our backs on them and justify our own apathy with the apparent “apathy” of the majority of the people. In reality, the problem for many people is not simply “apathy,” but that they do not see or are not convinced of how they could really change the situation.

    The truth is that millions of people in Mexico desperately need a revolution, and more and more people cannot continue living as before. This is an aspect of the potential unfolding of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation that requires further research and analysis. This is very acutely expressed in large areas of the countryside, in many small and medium-sized cities, and in the “slums” surrounding large cities. A striking example of both this potential revolutionary situation and the revolutionary potential of the masses is the repeated emergence in various parts of Mexico, primarily in the countryside, of various forms of “self-defense groups,” “community police,” and other forms of armed popular resistance. These are not in themselves revolutionary struggles aimed at overthrowing the system, and in the face of vicious aggressions by the government, drug traffickers, and business leaders, many end up crushed or co-opted by the system. However, they very concretely express that conditions in significant parts of Mexico are forcing the masses to arm themselves as the only viable means of resistance to the atrocities they are experiencing.

    Though the revolutionary potential of the masses has not yet manifested itself in the emergence of a revolutionary people of millions, this is not because the majority of people are content with the situation. Even a significant portion of the population—millions—thinks a revolution is needed, although their understanding of what this means varies greatly, and they do not yet see how this would be possible.

    So that this feeling, this desire, this need can be transformed into a conscious material force, into an ever stronger movement for revolution, a growing core of revolutionary communists must go out to the people, to debate and convince them of the truth that we don’t have to continue living, suffering, and dying like this, and to organize them now for a real revolution. It requires going against the suffocating dogma of the reformist “left,” which insists that revolution is a “last resort” in a far-off future when the people “are up to their necks in water.” They refuse to see that, for millions, the water has already risen far beyond their necks. Many are on the verge of drowning or have already drowned in the deadly waters of this system. They don’t need the reformist leadership so prevalent on the so-called “left,” which refuses to face the reality we are living in. They need revolutionary leadership capable of scientifically analyzing the real facts that make revolution possible and convincing more and more people of that reality. And one of those facts, as we’ve already pointed out, is that more and more people can no longer live as they did before or, quite simply, are no longer with us.

    The other aspect of the potential unfolding of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation, not in some distant future, but in the midst of what we are experiencing now, is that the ruling classes are facing increasing difficulties governing Mexico. This is partly expressed in the petty contention between the highly discredited bourgeois parties—PAN, PRI, and PRD—and the bourgeois parties of the so-called “Fourth Transformation.” However, it is even more acutely expressed in the violent conflicts between one or another group of big capitalists, including their political representatives, allied with one or another organized crime cartel. The multimillionaire leaders of the main cartels already constitute part of the ruling classes, that is, the big national and foreign capitalists and rural landowners. They exercise local power or “co-government” in more and more areas of Mexico. They are intertwined and colluding with several so-called “legal” capitalists and with authorities at all levels, not only in Mexico but also in the United States. The clashes between different groups—both “legal” and “illegal”— of the ruling classes are most openly expressed in the fact that they can no longer hold elections without a pile of massacred candidates and their supporters, as well as in the bloody wars waged between the various cartels, often allied with one or another part of the state, and “legal” businessmen. The supposed actions of the state against organized crime have nothing to do with actually eliminating this scum, but rather with favoring one or another opposing group or showing the public that “something is being done.”

    Both the investigations into the Ayotzinapa state crime by the Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts (GIEI) and the “Guacamaya Leaks” documents show that the Mexican Army has clearly identified the criminal gangs and their members, but curiously, it can only find one or another, according to their interests. In reality, organized crime is so integrated with all three levels of government and the ruling classes in general that the authorities are neither able nor willing to truly combat it. Now the Trump fascist administration has pressured the Mexican government—always willing to “collaborate” (as Sheinbaum herself says) with that fascist regime—to mount more operations against certain sectors of organized crime. The goal of the U.S. fascists is also not to wipe out organized crime, but rather to subject it—and Mexico in general—to more direct control by U.S. imperialism. There is a whole history of collusion between the U.S. government and organized crime, of which the “Iran-Contragate” scandal is only the most publicized case, in which the United States used drug trafficking to supply arms to counterrevolutionaries in Nicaragua.

    All of this is fueling conflicts and violent clashes between different capitalist forces (both “legal” and “illegal,” although it is increasingly difficult to distinguish one from the other). They are causing increasing risks and instances of ungovernability, such as the recent armed attacks in Sinaloa, Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Guanajuato, and even the recent murder of two close associates of the mayor of Mexico City. Although the rampant growth of organized crime presents significant problems for the revolution, it is drowning Mexico in a growing sea of blood, disrupting the daily lives of millions and creating increasing conditions of ungovernability. These internal struggles within the ruling classes are opening cracks in the power structure through which the suppressed revolutionary potential of the masses could erupt with enormous force.

    The unfolding of a potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation in Mexico is deeply intertwined with the current crisis in the United States. The clash is growing between the Trump administration’s attempts to consolidate fascism—the open dictatorship of the ruling class—and the struggle of a growing number of people against this, notably in the widespread protests across the U.S. in defense of immigrants and against the consolidation of a fascist regime. As Bob Avakian, author of The New Communism, has profoundly and scientifically analyzed, this situation entails both the enormous danger of the consolidation of fascism in the U.S. and the possibility of revolution —yes, revolution!—in the most powerful imperialist country in the world. And the Revolutionary Communist Party, and the Revcomare fighting against all odds both to remove the fascist Trump from power and to make such a liberating revolution. Since U.S. imperialism is the strongest bulwark of support for the system of exploitation and oppression in Mexico, this deep conflict across the Rio Bravo/Grande also opens up both enormous dangers and enormous revolutionary possibilities here.

    U.S. imperialism has always mercilessly superexploited, oppressed, and plundered the Mexican people, as it does against other peoples around the world. The consolidation of fascism in the U.S. would take all this to another level of brutality and horror, as reflected in Trump’s constant characterization of Mexicans and oppressed immigrants in general as “murderers and rapists,” as well as the increasing aggression and espionage against Mexico by his government, despite the collaborationist Sheinbaum’s assurances that this is “cooperation.”

    On the other hand, the advance of the “Trump Must Go Now!” movement by the Refuse Fascism organization, as well as the struggle for a real revolution in the United States, encourages and propels revolutionary possibilities in Mexico, as well as the advance of the movement for revolution in Mexico encourages and propels the struggle for revolution in the U.S. This is why it is so important to forge revolutionary unity among the oppressed people on both sides of the border against the big capitalists and their governments in both countries.

    In short, revolution is possible in Mexico, not at some distant time, but in the times we live in, because more and more people can no longer live as before, the ruling classes are finding increasing difficulties in continuing to govern as before, and the political crisis in the United States is also exacerbating all of this. However, it is not possible for all this to lead to a real revolution without forging a growing revolutionary communist leadership core guided by scientific understanding, and not by the common “wisdom” of the majority of the so-called “left.”

    7. The Possibility of Revolution Arises from a Revolutionary Situation Caused by the Contradictions and Crises of the System, Not from the Slow Accumulation of Struggles for Reforms

    Contrary to what we’ve been arguing, the overwhelming majority of this so-called “left” sees revolution as something vague and distant, at best a buzzword to add to their speeches for a select audience. Why? Because they don’t approach the question scientifically, but rather with a reformist approach incapable of seeing beyond the existing oppressive system. They imagine (or they have been wrongly taught to think) that revolutions are the product of a growing mass movement for immediate demands, and since there is currently no high tide in mass struggle, they conclude that the prospects for a revolution are very remote. This is the dogma of all the phony “communists” of the various groups that identify themselves with the acronym “PCM” [Mexican Communist Party], the multiple permutations of Trotskyists, and even many anarchists, among others.

    Revolutions do not happen this way, through the gradual accumulation of forces in the daily struggle for demands. Revolutions are the product of the intensification of the central contradictions of the system, which give rise to the emergence of a revolutionary situation. This was the case with the Russian Revolution, which occurred amidst the deep contradictions of the system that burst out in the First World War. At first, the Bolsheviks’ revolutionary opposition to the imperialist war was more isolated and even faced stone-throwing from the patriotic masses, but with the intense sharpening of all the contradictions during the course of the war, the conditions for the triumph of the socialist revolution were created. In the case of the Chinese revolution, the existence of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation made it possible to wage a protracted people’s war from the countryside until a shift in the international situation in the wake of the Second World War made it possible to seize power throughout the country. (For a deeper analysis of these experiences and their relevance today, we highly recommend Bob Avakian’s excellent pamphlet, Revolution: Major Turning Points and Rare Opportunities, available at revcom.us.) As we discuss in more detail in Revolutionary Hope, the Mexican Revolution of 1910, while not a socialist revolution, also did not happen as the phony revolutionaries imagine. It erupted with the intensification of the exploitation and oppression of the peasants by the haciendas [large rural land holdings] and imperialist domination amidst a situation of apparent relative apathy among the masses.

    No one is as blind as those who refuse to see. No one willing to open their eyes can deny the reality that this system is creating an increasingly desperate situation for millions of people. Nor can it be denied that the enormous bloodbath of murders and disappearances created by criminal gangs of hitmen, the Army, the National Guard, the police, and imperialist agents expresses growing conditions of ungovernability. But the phony reformist and counterrevolutionary “revolutionaries” and “communists” want to blame the masses for their own lack of revolutionary will. Their position, in essence, is that “when the masses rise up in revolutionary struggle, we too will recognize that revolution is possible.” No, no, no, no. A hundred times no! The masses make revolutions, but, as Marx pointed out, revolutions are not a product of what people think or do at a given moment, but of what the upheavals of the system force them to confrontas long as a leading revolutionary force exists capable of leading the struggle of millions to victory. And in the case of socialist revolution, such a leading force must be guided by a correct scientific understanding of the problem and the solution, among other things.

    There is no doubt that, in the current situation, this is not easy. A lot of debate and struggle among the people is needed to convince even the most revolutionary-minded people that a real revolution is necessary, possible, and liberating. Why? Among other reasons, because the owners of the capitalist system obviously have a strong interest in convincing people that such a revolution would be very bad and even impossible, while viciously repressing even struggles for the most basic needs. Also because the prevailing phony “left” suppresses the revolutionary potential of the people, lulling them with empty phrases about a supposed “revolution” in the distant future. They preach that we must limit ourselves now to fighting for crumbs under this system. If this deeply flawed position is followed, that future will actually be an uninhabitable planet at best.

    Furthermore, the potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation is not readily apparent; this requires science. This requires the science of the new communism to penetrate beneath the enormous power and very real repressive force of the system and realize that the very crises of the system and the internal struggles among the powers that be open cracks of ungovernability through which the revolutionary potential of the exploited and oppressed masses could burst forth. This requires science to penetrate beneath the surface and see that the situation experienced by increasing millions is not simply tragedy and tears—which it is, by far—but also contains an intensification of the revolutionary potential of the masses, capable of exploding with tremendous force, even though the people themselves do not yet realize their enormous potential revolutionary force.

    It takes science to penetrate beneath the surface, the appearances, and analyze the features and intensification of the potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation we have highlighted here. This requires a revolutionary communist nucleus armed with and applying that science. And this requires taking out to the people this scientific understanding that revolution is possible, not in the distant future, but in the times in which we live. This must be taken to the people, and it must be debated, fought for, and more and more people must be convinced and organized now for revolution.

    8. The People Must Be Organized for Revolution, and Not Be Trapped in Struggles for Immediate Economic Demands That They Are Already Waging

    We’ve just written that the people must be organized for revolution, and we can already hear the chorus of complaints from the so-called opportunist “revolutionaries”: “It’s not possible to talk to people about revolution. They can’t understand it.” Nonsense! Have they ever tried? We have. We’ve talked about revolution and the new communism, we’ve debated this with peasants and intellectuals, with day laborers and students, with merchants, and mothers and fathers searching for disappeared loved ones. In short, with all kinds of people. Because a real revolution can only be the product of the conscious struggle of the people. And we’ve found that it’s possible to talk to all kinds of people about a real revolution. Some are against it, others think it’s not possible, and they raise all kinds of doubts and questions. But there’s no one who can’t “understand.” Even the most oppressed people, whom the system has denied every opportunity, have their opinions about revolution and ask us fundamental questions: “How will it be possible to defeat the Mexican Army, let alone a Yankee intervention?” “I’ve been told that communism is bad, because if you have two cows, they’ll take one away from you.” “After the revolution, won’t it be more of the same thing, like in Nicaragua?” “I don’t see that this is possible now, given where the people are at.” And many more questions.

    The phony “revolutionaries” despise the people, claiming they “can’t understand.” They blame the masses for their own backwardness. They themselves don’t want to grapple with the real problems of making revolution, because in reality, they don’t seek a real revolution but rather a movement for reform within the suffocating confines of this system, sometimes exalted with “revolutionary” rhetoric. So they repeat over and over again the old, worn-out dogma of the opportunist “left” for decades past and all over the world: “The masses must be organized to fight for their most heartfelt demands,” by which they mean the economic struggles that, in many cases, the masses themselves are already waging.

    They are not concerned that this has never led to a real revolution. The so-called “Leninists” are not concerned that this economistic position is precisely the erroneous position Lenin polemized against in his famous work What Is To Be Done? And without a thoroughgoing repudiation of this reformist dogma, the Bolshevik revolution would never have triumphed.

    Economic and other demands for justice are just and should be supported and encouraged. Sometimes they can even have a significant political impact, as in the case of the recent teachers’ struggle for a fair retirement, which made it abundantly clear that the Morena government is on the side of the Afores (annually funded pension fund managers), the banks, and the capitalist system, and against even the most basic rights of the people, despite the current ruling party’s constant use of the words “people, people, people.” Struggles for reform are necessary and can sometimes play an important role, but they must be subordinated, as Lenin said, as the part is subordinated to the whole in the struggle for revolution and socialism.

    However, what the masses most need from true revolutionaries, from revolutionary communists, is not simply to help organize the struggles that people already know how to wage and are currently waging. What they most need is the scientific political understanding that this system has denied them and that they are not going to find out simply in the daily struggle for immediate demands. They urgently need to understand the profound truth that we do not have to continue suffering under this outdated system that is leading all of humanity toward the precipice of extinction, or at least the end of civilization as we know it. They need a basic scientific understanding of why the problem is the capitalist system and why the solution is a real socialist revolution. They need to understand why such a revolution is not only urgently necessary but also possible, and what we must do to ultimately win.

    It’s not that people can’t understand these questions. It’s that we revolutionary communists need to assume our responsibility to the people and to humanity to bring them this understanding, to wrangle and debate with them in a good way, and to organize them for revolution. In doing so, we have found that this struggle is not easy. It requires a lot of struggle and debate about the colossal garbage pit of wrong ideas promoted by the capitalist system in general; by the supposedly “left” capitalist party that is now in power and which has dedicated itself to trying to co-opt, subjugate, or destroy people’s movements; and by the motley opportunist supposedly “revolutionary” and “communist” groups that predominate among what passes for “the left” in Mexico. It is not an easy struggle; it is a struggle going against the current, but it is possible to win over and organize a significant minority for revolution now.

    Organizing these people now for revolution is urgent, because a real revolution doesn’t happen simply because a revolutionary situation arises. The vast majority of revolutionary situations don’t lead to revolution. They either fizzle out due to a lack of revolutionary leadership, as in the case of the Arab Spring in 2010, or they never get out of the capitalist-imperialist system due to the leadership’s wrong orientation, as in the case of the Nicaraguan revolution of 1979. If you wait for a revolutionary situation to mature before organizing people for revolution, you would miss the opportunity to make it and condemn people to continue needlessly suffering the horrors of the current system.

    For people to rise up in revolutionary struggle, for a real and liberating revolution to triumph, not only is a revolutionary situation necessary. A revolutionary communist nucleus based on the revolutionary science of the new communism is also necessary, strong enough and linked to the masses of people to fully awaken their revolutionary potential and lead the difficult struggle, ultimately encompassing millions, to triumph in a real revolution.

    We are organizing people for revolution now by applying a dialectic, an interrelationship, between two aspects: * boldly spreading the new communism through revolutionary exposures of the system and the promotion of revolutionary communist theory and analysis; and * mobilizing the masses in struggle against key crimes of the system that demonstrate its reactionary and outdated nature, such as the struggle for truth and justice for Ayotzinapa and all the disappeared persons, the struggle against femicide and for the right to abortion, the struggle against genocide in Palestine, and many other struggles in which we have participated alongside many others. In these struggles, it is essential to fight to raise people’s consciousness, as well as their combativeness and opposition to this criminal system, thus also serving to strengthen the struggle for a real revolution.

    Also, and very importantly, we are organizing people into the Revolution Movement, which is a mass revolutionary organization united around its six Points of Orientation, where people can contribute in various ways to furthering the movement for revolution while critically debating and learning about the new communism. And we promote and build the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico, as the revolutionary communist nucleus needed now in the struggle to forge a new type of revolutionary communist party led by and concretely applying the new communism developed by Bob Avakian.

    9. We Are Forging a Revolutionary Communist Core Guided by Bob Avakian’s New Communism, Combating the Snarky Attacks by the Haters

    We are seriously fighting to organize people for a real revolution and to forge the growing revolutionary communist nucleus that is needed. We are not going to lie to you, we are but a few people. Many more people need to join in and contribute their ideas, their creativity, their hearts, and their efforts to this struggle because there is no other real way out for the exploited and oppressed masses, nor for humanity.

    By organizing people for a real revolution, the most important thing is that the guiding understanding be truly correct and scientific, that it correspond to the reality of the current world and how it can truly be changed to liberate people. If the guiding understanding isn’t correct, if it doesn’t correspond to the real world and how it can truly be transformed, it would lead the movement to a dead end and never break out of this system.

    That’s why it’s so important to base it on science, on an understanding developed from real evidence, not from whims or wishful thinking. And today this science is the revolutionary science founded by Marx and raised to a new level in Bob Avakian’s new communism. By learning, among many other sources, from the great breakthroughs but also the significant mistakes of the early socialist revolutions led by Lenin and Mao, and by analyzing the new features of today’s capitalism-imperialism, Avakian has forged a new leap in revolutionary science, a new framework for the emancipation of humanity—one that’s more scientific, more revolutionary, more liberating, and more in tune with our times.

    Faced with the restoration of capitalism in the Soviet Union in 1956 and the subsequent restoration of capitalism in China in 1976 (although it continues to call itself “communist”), the vast majority of female and male revolutionaries around the world abandoned revolution and communism, while others turned it into an empty phrase. Avakian, on the other hand, has dedicated his life to fighting for the exploited and oppressed and for communist revolution worldwide. Moreover, he has dedicated more than 40 years to analyzing and developing a deeper understanding of why capitalism was restored in these early socialist experiences and how to better fight to prevent such restoration, and advance more and better in a new wave of socialist revolutions around the world. He has developed an inspiring and realistic vision of another possible society, one in which dissent, debate, and critical thinking are not only permitted but encouraged, while people’s struggle to end all forms of exploitation, oppression, social inequality, and discrimination is thoroughly promoted and supported.

    In fact, the qualitative leap in the revolutionary science with the new communism is the greatest advantage we now have in the struggle for a very different and much better world. With scientific navigation, a ship can reach its destination and not get lost at sea. With the scientific guide of the new communism, it is possible to chart a correct path toward the emancipation of humanity. Without a scientific guide, the revolutionary struggle would go astray and sink in the murky waters of global capitalism-imperialism.

    The Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico (OCR,M) has applied this scientific guide of the new communism to the concrete conditions of Mexico in the world context. It has forged a basic orientation and program for revolution in Mexico, which need to be further developed and deepened. They are embodied in documents such as La revolución liberadora [The Liberating Revolution] and Revolutionary Hope, among others. Many more people need to get into the process of debating and grappling with the new communism, its application to the concrete conditions of Mexico, and the struggle to forge a growing movement for a real revolution in the urgent situation in which we live. If you truly want to fight for deep and real change, you must join the Revolution Movement, critically learn about the new communism and the OCR,M, and participate in fighting the powers that be and transforming the people for revolution. We are very open to debate and criticism, and Bob Avakian himself has been a model of responding to criticism and disagreement with reasoned arguments. He has been the first to criticize and help others learn from the mistakes he himself has made.

    Avakian is appreciated and loved by many for the same reason he is hated by others: Because he is the most revolutionary and scientific international leader of our times. This is because of his uncompromising fight for the deepest interests of the people suffering needlessly under this system, his insistence that a revolution is necessary and nothing less, and his groundbreaking contributions to the science of revolution. Faced with this, the petty projects of the haters who seek only to organize a supposedly “revolutionary” movement in the interests of a few, a movement within and without leaving the suffocating confines of the current system, pale in comparison. Recognizing Avakian’s contributions does not represent a “cult,” as the haters claim. It is appreciating and critically learning from his important contributions to science, just as we also appreciate, or should appreciate, the contributions of a Darwin, Einstein, or Marie Curie, a Lenin or Mao.

    Criticisms of the content of new communism, supported by reasoned arguments, are most welcome: Debating them contributes to deepening everyone’s understanding and to rectifying errors where they exist. But the phony communists and revolutionaries loyal to the system, the haters who slander and defame the new communism, spewing lies instead of presenting serious arguments, do everything possible to avoid the content of Bob Avakian’s work, like the vampires in fables who avoid the light. They limit themselves to snarky, personal, and lying attacks because they are incapable of refuting the scientific content of new communism.

    The struggle against imperialism is a farce and a deception without the struggle against opportunism, said Lenin. And this remains profoundly true today. They will say that we are “isolated.” We are not afraid of being “isolated” from the opportunists. We are not afraid of being “alone” with the honest masses in their millions, while we fight to make clear to honest people the true content of the new communism, against the pernicious deceptions of the opportunists. In this, we are not fighting for the interests of “our group.” We are fighting for debate to take place on the basis of principles and honest criticism of the content of both positions, which is a fundamental and vital process for any truly revolutionary movement.

    10. We Are Fighting for a New and True Socialism of Hope, Liberation, and Community, Not the Phony “Socialism” of Maintaining Capitalism with More State Ownership and “Social Programs”

    The triumph of the real socialist revolution in Mexico will open up a new dawn, a completely new horizon for the liberation of the people and, ultimately, for the emancipation of all humanity.

    We’re not talking about something like the phony “socialism” and real state capitalism of countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and present-day China. For phony “socialists” and “communists,” “socialism” simply boils down to a degree of state ownership, some economic planning, and some social programs to somewhat alleviate the misery of the exploited and oppressed. However, if state ownership and planning are led by the capitalist principle of maximizing profits, the result is a capitalist society not unlike those openly claiming to be such. This is the stark reality of present-day China, with its billionaires, its stock market, and its imperialist superpower behavior competing with U.S. imperialism for world domination. Cuba is another example of capitalism under a “socialist” banner. While the criminal blockade imposed by U.S. imperialism must be condemned and opposed, that blockade has been even more effective due to the fact that from the beginning, the Cuban revolution remained within the imperialist capitalist system, dependent at the time on the Soviet Union, which was restoring capitalism (under a “socialist” banner). The island’s focus was on maximum profits, prioritizing sugar cultivation for export, rather than a diversified agriculture to feed the people. Later, the island became increasingly open to foreign imperialist investment and became dependent on “industries” like tourism, accompanied by prostitution, openly justified by Fidel Castro himself when he said, “Cuban women like this,” a repugnant misogynistic self-exposure.

    True socialism requires, but is not reduced to, confiscating capitalist property, converting it into the property of all the people, and planning the economy. This requires that the planning is governed not by the capitalist principle of maximizing profits, but by the socialist principles of meeting the needs of the people, continuing to transform the inequalities, oppressive relationships, and ideas inherited from the old society, and contributing to the advancement of the world revolution.

    Above all, revolutionary China, but also the Soviet Union, were early experiences of advancing along the path of true socialism, before the restoration of capitalism in both cases. Contrary to bourgeois propaganda, they actually achieved great, inspiring breakthroughs which demonstrate what the exploited and oppressed are capable of when they hold state power. They also suffered from significant errors, which is not surprising given that these were the first and unprecedented experiences of a radically different and better society, under the fire of capitalism-imperialism, which still predominated in the world.

    However, we’re not even talking about repeating the best achievements of these truly socialist revolutions, by avoiding past mistakes. We’re talking about a new socialism inspired by the new framework for human emancipation of the new communism developed by Bob Avakian, applied to the specific conditions of Mexico.

    With another system, everyone could have what they need to live a full life. No one would have to endure the worries and real anguish of the daily struggle to survive under the current system. The resources and scientific and technological knowledge already exist to provide healthy food, decent housing, and quality medical care for everyone. Although this will be a hard struggle to break the shackles of imperialist domination of the economy and society in Mexico, this will also be possible in Mexico by developing a socialist, independent, and internationalist economy after a real revolution. It is only because of capitalism, which seeks maximum profits for few people, that so many people suffer from hunger and malnutrition, live in the street, and die from lack of medicine, medical care, or from substandard medical care.

    The victorious revolution will break the shackles of capitalism and imperialist domination by confiscating the companies and capital of the big national and foreign capitalists, as well as renouncing foreign debt and unequal treaties. This will lay the bases for a new socialist economy guided by the principles of serving the needs of the people, caring for the environment, and promoting a world revolution for the emancipation of all humanity. It will no longer be an economy subordinated to the dictates of imperialism and big capitalists, based on the super-exploitation of cheap labor, the plundering of natural resources, and the devastation of nature.

    An urgent transition to clean energy sources will begin, drastically reducing and ultimately eliminating dependence on fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), which cause global warming and are leading the Earth toward existential disaster for our species and many others. At the same time, the people and scientists of the world will be called upon to join the determined fight against this destruction of our only planet. Mexico has a decisive role to play in this regard, not only because of the example such a transformation will set for the world, but also because of the impact the revolution here will have on the possibilities for a revolution in the United States, the world’s largest source of pollution, if there hasn’t already been a revolution on the other side of the border.

    Agriculture, now largely dominated by mega-corporations, often transnationals, which poison the land, water, air, and their very products with pesticides, monocultures, genetically modified crops, and nasty concentrations of pigs and other livestock, largely for export, will be transformed. These big corporations will be confiscated, and peasants and day laborers will be relied on in carrying out a radical land redistribution and the transformation of large agricultural units, respecting the rights of the indigenous peoples. On this basis and based on a process of voluntary collectivization, a new decentralized and diversified agriculture will be created, based on organic and healthy methods to feed the people.

    The oppression of the indigenous peoples will be attacked at its roots, who, as part of the backbone of the revolutionary army and the revolutionary vanguard, will not only retake the territories that rightfully belong to them but will also establish regional indigenous autonomy. Instead of the current artificial states that often divide one indigenous nationality among several states in Mexico, autonomous indigenous regions will be established in the areas of concentration, with their own government and economic planning, where all people, both indigenous and non-indigenous, will enjoy equal rights. As part of the national socialist planning of the economy, priority attention will be given to raising the standard of living of the indigenous peoples and the countryside in general. The development of indigenous languages, now suppressed in many ways in fact, will be encouraged, and the new revolutionary state will promote a nationwide struggle against the racism that remains so prevalent in Mexican society.

    This new state, radically different and emerging from the conscious revolutionary struggle of millions of people, will mobilize the people themselves in new ways of administering expeditious justice subject to due process and genuine respect for the rights of the accused, to arrest, prosecute, and punish all the femicidal murderers, rapists, and harassers who enjoy almost complete impunity in today’s macho and misogynistic society. The right of women to have or not have children will be finally established, with the right to abortion at any point during pregnancy and the broad and accessible distribution of contraception. Throughout the revolutionary process, the fury of women will have been unleashed as a powerful force for the revolution to transform all of society and, in particular, to overcome all forms of oppression and inequality for women, as well as the macho ideology that justifies those forms. Likewise, equality and respect for LGBTQ people will be thoroughly protected, and backward prejudices in this regard will be fought against throughout society.

    With new methods of administering justice, once again expeditious but also subject to due process and genuine respect for the rights of the accused, those responsible for so many state crimes will be prosecuted and punished, from the 1968 massacre, the Dirty War, Acteal, Ayotzinapa, and the massacres of migrants under the current government. Since the new state, born of the conscious revolutionary struggle of the people, will no longer be in collusion with both “legal” and illegal big business, the organized crime cartels will be swiftly and finally dismantled, giving the rank and file of these organizations, often recruited by force, avenues for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

    All of this will be regulated by a new socialist Constitution that, unlike the laws in current Mexican society, will be respected and applied consistently, guaranteeing the rights of the people. The Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North Americawritten by Bob Avakian, serves as an excellent example of a new vision and conception of a truly liberating socialist society. While this Constitution applies specifically to the territory of what is now the United States (and not to the particularities of Mexican society), it is guided by several universal principles and methods of the new communism for leading the socialist society and pursuing revolution, which need to be applied in all countries. An example of this is the principle of a solid core with a lot of elasticity based on the solid core, which we will explain a little later.

    The future Revolutionary Communist Party, Mexico, having led the revolutionary struggle of millions, will provide leadership for the new socialist state within the framework of the principles of the new Constitution. However, unlike even the best socialist experiences from the past, it will not attempt to play this leading role by monopolizing leadership positions in the new political and economic apparatus, but rather by presenting proposals to the new institutions and through its influence and mobilization of the masses to continue transforming society and contributing to the world revolution toward the luminous goal of communism. That goal is a society without classes, exploitation, oppression, or social inequalities, with a fundamental transformation of all the backward ideas that correspond to the relationships in the old capitalist society. This future communist society will be a truly free and diverse community of human beings throughout the planet.

    Even with all the big and radical transformations that will be possible with the triumph of the socialist revolution, many relationships and inequalities inherited from the old society will still remain—between women and men, between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples, between rural and urban areas, between manual workers and intellectual workers, between those who earn more and those who earn less, among others. And many of the ideas that correspond to and justify these inequalities will also persist. All of this is not only unjust but also constitutes the basis for the possibility of restoring capitalism and the emergence of leaders, even within a part of the revolutionary communist party, who will fight to return to the capitalist road, as occurred in the socialist societies of Russia and China in the last century.

    Therefore, it will be essential to continue forging a growing solid core, with the revolutionary communist party as its leading element and also including a growing number of other people in the new society, who will fight to continue the revolution under socialism, step by step restricting all the inequalities and relationships inherited from the old society, as well as digging up the corresponding backward and oppressive ideas.

    Interacting, and ultimately, as part of the struggle to continue the revolution under socialism, great freedom will be unleashed among the people, an atmosphere encouraging dissent, criticism, and debate such as the world has never seen before. This process of broad debate, dissent, and criticism in socialist society is essential not only for people to feel free to express themselves and carry on their lives, but also for getting to the truth, identifying errors, and involving an increasing number of formerly exploited and oppressed people in governing the new society and grappling with the great challenges of transforming everything in the interests of the people and ultimately in the interests of all humanity.

    While any attempt to restore the old society by means of arms will be suppressed, people will be free even to argue in favor of the old capitalist society. There will be elections, not only for the government but also for the leading committees of all economic, social, educational, cultural, and other institutions in society. That is, this will be radically different from today’s society: Every workplace, for example, will be run by a revolutionary committee elected by the people who work there. And this will be the case in every other institution in society. Candidates from diverse viewpoints will be able to run, although there will be protections to prevent the restoration of capitalism through elections unless the overwhelming majority votes in that sense.

    All of this is an application of Bob Avakian’s unheard-of concept of a solid core with a lot of elasticity based on the solid core. Its application in this case is to foster both a growing solid core struggling to continue the revolution under socialism, and a broad atmosphere of debate, dissent, and criticism throughout society. For the revolutionary leadership, it will undoubtedly be very difficult to try to encompass and learn from all of this in a way that contributes to getting to the truth, overcoming problems, and advancing toward a bright communist future. At times, it will require going almost to the brink, as Avakian has said, of being drawn and quartered by the various forces pulling from different sides in society. However, this is an essential process for forging a vibrant new society that is more liberating than ever before, getting to the truth in all its complexity, recognizing and rectifying errors, preventing capitalist restoration, and achieving greater leaps toward the emancipation of all humanity.

    From the interrelationship between this growing core struggling to continue the revolution under socialism, and the broad diversity of thinking, dissent, and debate, a diverse and inspiring new culture will emerge, promoting the values of community, mutual respect, and hope for the future that we can barely imagine in the face of the rotten, selfish, misogynistic, and racist culture that predominates today.

    11. The Challenge for Everyone, in the Face of a Terrible, Agonizing World, and a New, Shining World Struggling to Be Born

    Not only in Mexico but also throughout the world, the old, outdated system of capitalism-imperialism is reaching its limits. Unnecessary suffering increases year after year, the lives of billions are becoming increasingly desperate, and humanity teeters on the brink of existential threats of environmental disaster and nuclear war. The old world is agonizing, but it will not collapse under its own weight. Capitalism must be gotten rid of before does away with us.

    The old society is agonizing amid great crises and upheavals. But beneath the gloomy surface, new possibilities are opening up for a real and truly liberating revolution. Transforming these possibilities into the reality of an emancipatory struggle for a real revolution depends on what each of us does. Dare to learn about the new communism. Have the courage, the heart, and the critical mind to take up a commitment to the people who desperately need a revolution and join the battle for the new socialist society of hope, liberation, and community that is struggling to be born.

  • ARTICLE:

    U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)

    Brief Introduction:

    The following article by Bob Avakian was originally published in 1987. We are republishing it now, because it remains highly relevant in terms of understanding the basic nature of this system we live under—the system of capitalism-imperialism—and the role of the U.S. Constitution as the legal and political basis for this system of ruthless exploitation, murderous oppression and massive destruction. In this republished version, Bob Avakian has provided some Added Notes at the end of the article, to further clarify important points.

    * * * * *

    James Madison, who was the main author of the Constitution of the United States, was also an upholder of slavery and the interests of the slaveowners in the United States. Madison, the fourth president of the United States, not only wrote strongly in defense of the Constitution, he also strongly defended the part of the Constitution that declared the slaves to be only three-fifths human beings (that provided for the slaves to be counted this way for the purposes of deciding on representation and taxation of the states—Article I, Section 2, 3 of the Constitution).

    In writing this defense, Madison praised "the compromising expedient of the Constitution" which treats the slaves as "inhabitants, but as debased by servitude below the equal level of free inhabitants; which regards the slave as divested of two-fifths of the man." Madison explained: "The true state of the case is that they partake of both these qualities: being considered by our laws, in some respects, as persons, and in other respects as property.... This is in fact their true character. It is the character bestowed on them by the laws under which they live; and it will not be denied that these are the proper criterion." Madison got to the heart of the matter, the essence of what the U.S. Constitution is all about, when in the course of upholding the decision to treat slaves as three-fifths human beings he agrees with the following principle: "Government is instituted no less for protection of the property than of the persons of individuals."1 Property rights—that is the basis on which outright slavery as well as other forms of exploitation, discrimination, and oppression have been consistently upheld. And over the 200 years that this Constitution has been in force, down to today, despite the formal rights of persons it proclaims, and even though the Constitution has been amended to outlaw slavery where one person actually owns another as property, the U.S. Constitution has always remained a document that upholds and gives legal authority to a system in which the masses of people, or their ability to work, have been used as wealth-creating property for the profit of the few.

    The abolition of slavery through the Civil War meant the elimination of one form of exploitation and the further development and extension of other forms of exploitation. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That?, "despite the efforts of abolitionists and the resistance and revolts of the slaves themselves—and their heroic fighting in the Civil War itself—it was not fought by the Union government in the North, and its president, Lincoln, for the purpose of abolishing the atrocity of slavery in some moral sense.... The Civil War arose out of the conflict between two modes of production, the slave system in the South and the capitalist system centered in the North; this erupted into open antagonism, warfare, when it was no longer possible for these two modes of production to co-exist within the same country."2 The victory of the North over the South in the U.S. Civil War represented the victory of the capitalist system over the slave system. It represented the triumph of the capitalist form of using people as a means of creating wealth. Under a system of outright slavery, the slave is literally the property of the slaveowner. Under capitalism, slavery becomes wage-slavery: The exploited class of workers is not owned by the exploiting class of capitalists (the owners of factories, land, etc.), but the workers are in a position where they must sell their ability to work to a capitalist in order to earn a wage. Capitalism needs a mass of workers that is "free," in a two-fold sense: They must be "free" of all means to live (all means of production), except their ability to work; and they must not be bound to a particular owner, a particular site, a particular guild, etc.—they must be "free" to do whatever work is demanded of them, they must be "free" to move from place to place, and "free" to be hired and fired according to the needs of capital! If they cannot enrich a capitalist through working, then the workers cannot work, they cannot earn a wage. But even if they cannot find a capitalist to exploit their labor, even if they are unemployed, they still remain under the domination of the capitalist class and of the process of capitalist accumulation of wealth—the proletarians (the workers) are dependent on the capitalist class and the capitalist system for their very lives, so long as the capitalist system rules. It is this rule, this system of exploitation, that the U.S. Constitution has upheld and enforced, all the more so after outright slavery was abolished through the Civil War.

    But here is another very important fact: In the concrete conditions of the U.S. coming out of the Civil War, and for some time afterward, wage-slavery was not the only major form of exploitation in force in the U.S. Up until very recently (until the 1950s), millions of Black people were exploited like serfs on Southern plantations, working as sharecroppers and tenant farmers to enrich big landowners (and bankers and other capitalists). A whole system of laws—commonly known as Jim Crow laws—were enforced to maintain this relationship of exploitation and oppression: Black people throughout the South—and really throughout the whole country—were subjected to the open discrimination, brutality, and terror that such laws allowed and encouraged. All this, too, was upheld and enforced by the Constitution and its interpretation and application by the highest political and legal authorities in the U.S. And, over the past several decades, when the great majority of Black people have been uprooted from the land in the South and have moved into the cities of the North (and South), they have still been discriminated against, forcibly segregated, and continually subjected to brutality and terror even while some formal civil rights have been extended to them.

    Once again, this is in accordance with the interests of the ruling capitalist class and capitalist system. It is consistent with the principle enunciated by James Madison: Governments must protect the property no less than the persons of individuals. In fact, what Madison obviously meant—and what the reality of the U.S. has clearly been—is that the government must protect the property of white people, especially the wealthy white people, more than the rights of Black people. It must never be forgotten that for most of their history in what is now the United States of America Black people were the property of white people, particularly wealthy plantation owners. Even after this outright slavery was abolished, Black people have never been allowed to achieve equality with whites: they have been held down, maintained as an oppressed nation, and denied the right of self-determination. Capitalism cannot exist without the oppression of nations, and this is all the more so when capitalism develops into its highest stage: monopoly capitalism-imperialism. If the history of the United States has demonstrated anything, it has demonstrated this.

    The Heritage They Won’t Renounce

    The ruling class of the U.S. today—above all the U.S. imperialists, the large-scale capitalists and international exploiters who dominate the U.S. and most of the world—are indeed, as they proclaim, the direct and worthy descendants of their “Founding Fathers.” And this is why the ruling class and its political representatives, while they feel obliged to say that they are opposed to slavery today (at least in the U.S. itself), solemnly praise and celebrate slave owners and upholders of slavery who were so prominent among the “Founding Fathers” and played so central a part in the establishment of the system in the U.S.: men like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.

    These imperialists will never admit that their “Founding Fathers” established a system of government that, in its very foundation, is based on oppression and exploitation. They will never admit that their Constitution is the legal instrument for enforcing that exploitation and oppression. They cannot admit this, any more than they can admit their much-vaunted wealth and power has been established and built up by stealing land and resources from the native peoples (and Mexico) through extortion and outright murderous means; by trading in human flesh and harnessing human beings in slave labor; by pitilessly exploiting immigrants in their millions as wage-slaves; by robbing and plundering throughout the world, particularly Latin America, Africa, and Asia (what today is generally called the Third World). They cannot acknowledge that, while the forms of slavery have changed, the U.S. has, from the beginning and down to today, remained a society where enslavement, in one form or another, has been at the very heart of the economic system and the very basis of the political structure.

    There are many (including even Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall) who argue that, because of the upholding of slavery in the Constitution—and other injustices, such as excluding women from voting, and the treatment of the Indians—the Constitution was not such a great document when it was written, but it has been made great through the history of the U.S. and the struggles to create a more perfect Union and a more perfect Constitution. In other words, the Constitution may have had defects in some important ways when it was originally conceived, but the miracle of it is that the Constitution has within it provisions for changing and improving it—for extending democracy and rights to those previously excluded. And, some will add, while the Constitution upholds property rights, it also upholds individual and civil rights (even the statement from Madison cited at the beginning of this article stresses that, some might argue). Let’s look more deeply at these questions.

    Extension of the Constitution … Extension of Bourgeois Domination

    The extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them has gone together, in an overall way, with the extension of bourgeois (capitalist) relations and their dominance throughout the U.S. And, at the same time, it has gone hand-in-hand with the continuation of the oppression of Black people, of Native Americans, of Latinos and immigrants from Latin America (and elsewhere), of the oppression of women, and other forms of oppression and exploitation. All this is not in contradiction to but is consistent with the fundamental principles on which the Constitution is based and the way in which it treats the relationship between the rights of property and the rights of individuals.*

    It is noteworthy that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution (echoing the 5th Amendment) has as its pivotal point the provision that no State may “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” Especially in the period since World War 2, this amendment has been used as a major part of the basis to extend civil rights for Black people, for women, and for others discriminated against. Yet this amendment was passed right after the Civil War, in 1866; and for many decades this amendment was not used to combat racial or sexual discrimination. Instead, “For many years the Supreme Court applied the due-process clause mainly to protect business interests against state regulatory legislation.”3 It was only beginning after World War 1, and more fully after World War 2, that the 14th Amendment was applied in a significant way to the questions of racial and sexual discrimination. Thus, “in a long series of cases” beginning in 1925, the Supreme Court “gradually expanded its definition of due process so as to include most of the guarantees of personal liberties in the Federal Bill of Rights and has protected them from state impairment. A similar development occurred with respect to the equal-protection clause.”4 These changes in Supreme Court decisions were part of larger changes in ruling-class policy. But these resulted not from some brilliant new legal insight, nor from some sudden flash of moral awakening within the ruling class. Rather, they resulted from the changed situation of Black people in U.S. society and, more decisively, from the situation and needs of the ruling imperialists.

    As noted earlier, the masses of Black people have undergone a dramatic change in their particular conditions of existence—and of oppression—in the U.S. This began during and immediately after World War 1 but developed fully during and after World War 2. Demand for labor in war production and other strategic industry, followed after World War 2 by sweeping changes in Southern agriculture—called forth by technological changes and international economic competition—drove millions and millions of Black people from the rural South to the urban ghettos of the North and South, and into the most exploited sections of the proletariat. At the same time, the U.S. imperialists emerged not only victorious but greatly strengthened from world war that devastated those countries which were much more directly and centrally involved. So, after World War 2 U.S. imperialism was everywhere, scooping up the former colonial possessions of the prior colonial powers and establishing U.S. neocolonial domination in the name of freedom and (usually) in the guise of allowing formal independence. In this situation, it was not so necessary—nor was it so helpful—to openly and blatantly treat Black people as “second-class citizens” in the U.S. itself. So, over the period of the next several decades, concessions were made to civil rights demands and struggles at the same time as deception, vicious repression, and the promotion of “loyal and responsible Negro leaders” were carried out to keep things firmly under the control of the ruling class and in the service of its larger interests. Similarly, recent decades have seen political and legal changes that have brought certain extensions of formal rights to women and certain concessions to their battle against oppression. These have corresponded to significant changes in society and the world, including the fact that in only a small percentage of U.S. families is it any longer the case that the family is supported by just the man working. But, again, these concessions have been confined within limits that fundamentally conform to the interests and needs of the ruling class in the face of changing conditions in the U.S. and the world.

    Would anyone dare say that, because of these changes and concessions, inequality and injustice have been eliminated in the U.S.? The fact is, none of this has in any way eliminated, or come close to eliminating, discrimination against Black people, their overall conditions of oppression, their status as an oppressed nation. Nor have the ruling imperialists ceased to oppress the Native Americans—they have never even stopped trying to cheat and rob them of valuable land and resources. Nor have these imperialists ceased to discriminate against and viciously exploit other national minorities and immigrants. Nor, despite the constitutional amendment (the 19th, in 1919) giving them the right to vote and other concessions to “women’s rights,” have women been granted equality—there has been no end to the subjugation and degradation they have been subjected to: The oppression of women remains a foundation stone of U.S. society, as indeed it must so long as a system of class domination and exploitation is in force. Today, 200 years after the U.S. Constitution first took effect, and after all the changes and amendments, no one can seriously and reasonably argue that the various kinds of oppression that I have spoken to here do not exist or are only a minor aspect of the situation. No one can seriously and reasonably argue that they are not a basic and deeply rooted feature of American society.

    The reason for this is rooted in the very reality and nature of the economic system in the U.S. and the political system that upholds and enforces this economic system, including the Constitution as the legal “cement” of the political structure. The fundamental reason why the “extension” of constitutional rights to those previously excluded from them has not put an end to exploitation, inequality, and oppression is this: The essence of the capitalist economic system is not the competition of commodity owners, all vying equally in the marketplace (equal opportunity for all). The essence is the exploitation of labor as wage-labor, the command by capital over labor power (the ability to do work) as a commodity—a unique commodity—that creates wealth through its use.** (As a dockworker told me years ago: No one gets rich working; the only way to get rich is by making other people work for you.) And the essence of the political structure that goes along with and protects this capitalist economic system is not freedom and democracy for all, regardless of wealth and social position. The essence is the dictatorship of the bourgeois class—its monopoly of political power and armed force—over those it dominates in the economic system, especially the proletariat. Thus, the right to vote and other formal rights for the proletariat and other oppressed masses are in no way in fundamental opposition to the economic and political system of capitalism and bourgeois dictatorship.

    Bourgeois Democracy—Bourgeois Dictatorship

    Bourgeois democracy presents itself as classless democracy: It proclaims equality for all. Thus, the U.S. Constitution does not say that different classes of people shall have unequal wealth and power; rather, it sets forth a charter that appears to treat everyone the same, regardless of wealth and social status. Yet there never has been, and never could be, a capitalist society without tremendous differences in wealth and power, without fundamental class divisions and antagonisms. In fact, a capitalist society without these things is not even conceivable. And in reality, democracy in capitalist society can only be bourgeois democracy. This means there is democracy—equal political rights and the power to make fundamental decisions—only among the capitalist class, the ruling class. For the rest, and for the proletariat especially, bourgeois democracy means dictatorship: It means being ruled over by the capitalists, even while being allowed to vote and even while being governed by a Constitution that sets forth laws that are said to be applied, equally, to all. How can this be?

    First, as for voting, as I pointed out in Democracy: Can’t We Do Better Than That?:

    On the most obvious level, to be a serious candidate for any major office in a country like the U.S. requires millions of dollars—a personal fortune or, more often, the backing of people with that kind of money. Beyond that, to become known and be taken seriously depends on favorable exposure in the mass media (favorable at least in the sense that you are presented as within the framework of responsible—that is, acceptable politics)…. By the time “the people express their will through voting,” both the candidates they have to choose among and the “issues” that deserve “serious consideration” have been selected out by someone else: the ruling class….

    Further, and even more fundamentally, to “get anywhere” once elected—both to advance one’s own career and to “get anything done”—it is necessary to fit into the established mold and work within the established structures.5

    But that is not all:

    If, however, the electoral process in bourgeois society does not represent the exercise of sovereignty by the people, it generally does play an important role in maintaining the sovereignty—the dictatorship—of the bourgeoisie and the continuation of capitalist society. This very electoral process itself tends to cover over the basic class relations—and class antagonisms—in society, and serves to give formal, institutionalized expression to the political participation of atomized individuals in the perpetuation of the status quo. This process not only reduces people to isolated individuals but at the same time reduces them to a passive position politically and defines the essence of politics as such atomized passivity—as each person, individually, in isolation from everyone else, giving his/her approval to this or to that option, all of which options have been formulated and presented by an active power standing above these atomized masses of “citizens.”… [T]he very acceptance of the electoral process as the quintessential political act reinforces acceptance of the established order and works against any radical rupture with, to say nothing of the actual overturning of, that order.6

    And let us remember that one of the main reasons for which the U.S. Constitution was “ordained and established,” as proclaimed in its “Preamble,” was to prevent social upheaval and the overturning of the order upheld by that Constitution—to “insure domestic tranquility.”

    The same can be said of the other aspects of bourgeois democracy and the kind of rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution (including its “Bill of Rights”): They have the purpose and function of reinforcing the rule of the bourgeoisie and keeping political activity within limits acceptable to the bourgeoisie. Thus, “the much-vaunted freedom of expression in the ‘democratic countries’ is not in opposition to but is encompassed by and confined within the actual exercise of dictatorship by the bourgeoisie. This is for two basic reasons—because the ruling class has a monopoly on the means of molding public opinion and because its monopoly of armed force puts it in a position to suppress, as violently as necessary, any expression of ideas, as well as any action, that poses a serious challenge to the established order.”7 The history of the U.S., like the history of all other “democratic” bourgeois dictatorships, is full of graphic illustrations of just how true the above-quoted statement is!

    Formal equality—the treatment of all persons as equal, and specifically as “equal before the law,” without regard to wealth or social position—in bourgeois society actually covers over the relationship of complete subordination, exploitation, and oppression to which the proletariat and masses of people are subjected. If a small group—the capitalist class—controls the important means of creating wealth, then in reality they have the power of life and death over those who control little or none of these. To have such power over other people is, in essence, to hold them in an enslaved condition, whether or not the chains are literal and visible. In such a situation—which is the fundamental condition of capitalist society—how can there be anything but profound inequality economically, socially, and politically? And with such a fundamental division, with such fundamental inequality, there can never be anything but exploitation, oppression, domination, and dictatorship.

    With regard to the law, this will manifest itself in two main ways. First, those who dominate society economically will dominate in deciding, through the political structure, what the laws will be. They will insure that the laws serve their interests. And second, the actual application and enforcement of the law will discriminate in favor of those with wealth and power and against those without them—and even more so against oppressed nationalities, women, and others who are “the last of the last” in society. Everyday life in any capitalist society proves this over and over. Thus, once again, as with the right to vote and other constitutional rights in a bourgeois-democratic republic, formal equality before the law expresses itself, in reality, as profound inequality—and more—as something confined within and conforming to bourgeois domination and dictatorship.

    The basic difference between the bourgeoisie’s view of freedom and democracy on the one hand, and the striving of oppressed masses for an end to oppressive conditions on the other hand, is sharply drawn in recent events in Haiti, the Philippines, and South Korea. The oppressed masses (and students and other revolutionary intellectuals) want some kind of fundamental change in the social system and a breaking of the chains of imperialist domination in their countries. But the bourgeois opposition leaders and parties want only the recognition of bourgeois-democratic provisions and procedures—with elections the highest expression of political activity. Most of all, they want the sharing of power more broadly and “equally” among the upper classes—really, they want their chance to hold the reins of power—while leaving the social system and imperialist domination intact. As for the imperialists, where they become convinced of the need for change in such situations, they make every effort to keep it confined within the framework of imperialist domination and bourgeois rule. Indeed, they try to use such situations to strengthen and perhaps “refine” the apparatus of bourgeois politics—and, above all, of repression—in the countries involved.

    This brings us to a most fundamental point that is so often ignored or glossed over in discussions and debates about democracy in countries like the U.S.: The fact is that even the extent to which rights are allowed to the nonruling classes in imperialist countries depends on a situation where, in large parts of the world under imperialist domination, the masses of people are subjected to much more open and murderous repression. In short,

    The platform of democracy in the imperialist countries (worm-eaten as it is) rests on fascist terror in the oppressed nations: the real guarantors of bourgeois democracy in the U.S. are not the constitutional scholar and the Supreme Court justice, but the Brazilian torturer, the South African cop, and the Israeli pilot; the true defenders of the democratic tradition are not on the portraits in the halls of the Western capitols, but are Marcos, Mobutu, and the dozens of generals from Turkey to Taiwan, from South Korea to South America, all put and maintained in power and backed up by the military force of the U.S. and its imperialist partners.8,***

    But, at the same time, the imperialist rulers and ardent worshippers of bourgeois democracy go to great lengths to try to cover over, or explain away, the brutal repression “at home” that is so essential to the functioning of the system and the maintenance of the established order:

    For there is vicious repression and state terror carried out continually—and not only in times of serious crisis or social upheaval—in the imperialist countries; it is carried out specifically against those who do not support but oppose the established order, or who simply cannot be counted on to be pacified by the normal workings of the imperialist system—those whose conditions are desperate and whose life situation is explosive anyway.

    In the U.S. the hundreds of police shootings of oppressed people, particularly Blacks and other minority nationalities, every year; the fact that jails are overwhelmingly filled with poor people, the greatest number again being Black and other minority nationalities—it is an amazing but true statistic that one out of every thirteen Black people in the U.S. will be arrested each year (and Blacks are incarcerated eight and one-half times as frequently as whites)!—and the widespread use of drugs, surgical techniques, and other means to repress and terrorize prisoners (as well as an astounding number of people not in jail, including allegedly recalcitrant children); the use of welfare and other so-called social service agencies to harass and control poor people down to the most intimate details of their personal lives; this, and much more, is part of the daily life experience of millions of people in the major imperialist countries. Along with all this, of course, is the use of the state apparatus for direct political repression….

    In times of severe crisis and social strain, of course, all this is carried out more intensively and extensively…. Already, right now in the U.S., to cite one important aspect of this, hundreds of thousands of immigrants, “illegal” and “legal,” are being subjected to a campaign of terror—including raids at their places of work and homes, the sudden and forcible separation of parents from children, and the deportation of large numbers of refugees back to the waiting arms of death squads and other government assassins in countries like El Salvador. The same kind of thing is also being directed against immigrants in France, West Germany, England, and other imperialist democracies.

    Through all this, while overt political repression by the state is in one sense the clearest indication of the class content of democracy—in the imperialist countries as well as elsewhere—in another sense the daily, and often seemingly arbitrary, terror carried out against the lower strata in these imperialist countries concentrates the connection between the normal workings of the system and the political (that is, class) nature of the state.9

    A New and Far Greater Vision of Freedom

    In the course of this article so far, in speaking to some essential questions concerning the U.S. Constitution and the system it upholds, I have answered some of the main arguments made in defense of this Constitution and this system, including the argument that the Constitution, if not perfect, is perfectible—that it can be continually improved and the rights it establishes can be extended to those previously excluded. Before concluding, I want to briefly address some of the other main arguments made on behalf of—or in defense of—this Constitution and the principles and vision it embodies.

    “This Constitution establishes a law of the land that is applicable to all—it establishes a government of laws, not of people.” This is closely linked to the principle of “equality before the law.” What is meant by “a government of laws, not of people” is that no one is “above the law” and that what is allowed and what is forbidden are set forth before all, in one set of regulations binding on everyone, and this can be changed only through the procedures established for making such changes. A “government of people” refers to a notion of a government where it is the will and the word of certain people—a king, a despot, a small group of tyrants, etc.—that determine what is allowed and what is forbidden, and where this can and will change according to the dictates and the whims of such rulers: There is no common and clearly spelled-out standard binding on all, even on the political leaders and the powerful and influential in society.

    Like all principles of bourgeois democracy, this notion of “a government of laws, not of people” misses and obscures the essential question. First of all,

    “the rule of law” can be part of a dictatorship, of one kind or another, and in the most general sense it always is—even where it may appear that power is exercised without or above the law, laws (in the sense of a systematized code that people in society are obliged to conform to, whether written or unwritten) will still exist and play a part in enforcing the rule of the dominant class. Conversely, all states, all dictatorships, include laws in one form or another.10

    Most fundamentally, the question is: What is the character and the class content of the laws, what system do they uphold and enforce, which class interests do they represent—of which class dictatorship, bourgeois or proletarian, are they the expression and instrument—and toward what end are they contributing—the maintenance of class division and domination, exploitation and oppression, or the final elimination of class divisions, of all oppressive social divisions, and of social antagonisms? In short, the essential question is not “a government of laws vs. a government of people,” it is which people—which class—rules, and what laws are in force, in the service of what ends?

    “‘We The People,’ that is the heart of this Constitution and the genius of this Constitution: It establishes a government of, by and for all the people.” As a matter of historical fact, this opening phrase of the Constitution, “We the people of the United States,” was not the product of some lofty desire by the “framers” of the Constitution to set forth some universal principle of popular sovereignty. It was the product of their desire to overcome the problem of States posing their own sovereignty against that of the Federal Government—and the desire to avoid the specific problem of not knowing which States would ratify the Constitution: “The Preamble of the Articles of Confederation had named all the states in order from north to south. How was the [Constitutional] Convention to enumerate the participating states without knowing which would ratify? In a brilliant flash of inspiration, the Convention began with the words, ‘We the People of the United States…do ordain and establish this Constitution….’”11

    More importantly, the larger historical context and the actual content of this proclamation—“We The People”—must be made clear. The founding of the United States of America as an independent country represented not just the breaking away from domination by a foreign power. It also meant breaking away from a form of government that vested great power in the person of the monarchy—even while it ultimately served the interests of the bourgeoisie and the landed “nobility.” In general, the rights and the restrictions of power established in the Constitution of the newly founded United States revolved around preventing arbitrary rule by despots and the concentration of too much power in one person or one part of the government. The “separation of powers” and the “checks and balances” of different branches of government was seen as a way of insuring that the government would serve the interests of the capitalist class and (at that time) the slaveowners as a whole. It is in this light that “We the people of the United States,” in the “Preamble” of the Constitution, must be understood. Obviously, “We the people of the United States” did not include all those who were expressly excluded from the process of selecting the government and endorsing the Constitution. For, “Even on the most obvious level, how could the government of the newly formed United States, for example, be considered to have derived its powers ‘from the consent of the governed’ when, at the time of the formation of the United States of America, a majority of the people ‘governed’—included slaves, Indians, women, men who did not meet various property requirements, and others—did not even have the right to vote…to say nothing of the real power to govern and determine the direction of society?”12

    Bourgeois ruling classes generally speak in the name of the people, all the people. From their standpoint, it may make a certain amount of sense: They do, after all, rule over the masses of people. But from a more basic and more objective standpoint, their claim to represent all the people is a deception. If it was a deception at the time of the founding of the United States and the adoption of its Constitution, it is all the more so now. For now the rule of the capitalists is in fundamental antagonism with the interests of the great majority of people, not just in a particular country, but all over the world. Now the decisive question is not overcoming economic and political obstacles to the development of capitalism and its corresponding political system. The time when that was on the historical agenda is long since passed. What is now on the historical agenda is the overthrow of capitalism and the final elimination of all systems of exploitation, all oppressive social relations, all class distinctions, through the revolution of the exploited class under capitalism, the proletariat.

    To get a very stark sense of just how historically conditioned—how long since outmoded and completely reactionary—are the interests and the paramount concerns of the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants, the ruling imperialists of today, let us consider the fact that, in writing their Constitution, Madison and others "For theoretical inspiration...leaned heavily on Locke and on Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. Both writers had insisted on the need for separation of powers in order to prevent tyranny; in Montesquieu's view even the representatives of the people in the legislature could not be trusted with unlimited power."13 In reading over Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws I could not help but be struck by how thoroughly his frame of reference is that of a bygone age and his outlook that of exploiting classes whose period of historical ascendancy is long since past. As a glaring illustration, consider the following:

    If I had to justify our right to enslave Negroes, this is what I would say: Since the peoples of Europe have exterminated those of America, they have had to enslave those of Africa in order to use them to clear and cultivate such a vast expanse of land.

    Sugar would be too expensive if it weren't harvested by slaves.

    Those in question are black from the tip of their toes to the top of their heads; and their noses so flattened that it is almost impossible to feel sorry for them.

    It is inconceivable that God, who is a very wise being, could have placed a soul, especially a good soul, in an all-black body....

    One proof of the fact that Negroes don't have any common sense is that they get more excited about a string of glass beads than about gold, which, in civilized countries, is so dearly prized.

    It is impossible that these people are men; because if we thought of them as men, one would begin to think that we ourselves are not Christians.14,****

    Let the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants draw theoretical inspiration from the likes of Montesquieu! Let them defend slavery and modern-day exploitation on the ground of property rights, taking their lead from the likes of James Madison, the main author of the Constitution. As for the proletariat, our goal is "Marx's view of the complete abolition of bourgeois property relations—and all relations in which human beings confront each other as owners (or non-owners) of property rather than through conscious and voluntary association."15

    For the exploiting classes, and in a system under their rule, the "bottom line" is to reduce the masses of people to mere wealth-creating property—and today, under the domination of the imperialists, the greatest of all exploiters, the mass of humanity is treated as merely a means to amass even greater wealth and power in the hands of, and for the profit of, so few. And at what cost! This cost must be measured in massive human suffering, degradation, and destruction. Imagine the even greater cost in human suffering, degradation, and destruction that will have to be paid unless and until the oppressed and exploited victims of this system, who are the great majority of humanity, rise up and overthrow this system and finally put an end to all social relations of exploitation and oppression.

    In conclusion, The Constitution of the United States is an exploiters' vision of freedom. It is a charter for a society based on exploitation, on slavery in one form or another. The rights and freedoms it proclaims are subordinate to and in the service of the system of exploitation it upholds. This Constitution has been and continues to be applied in accordance with this vision and with the interests of the ruling class of this system: In its application it has become more and more fully the instrument of bourgeois domination, dictatorship, oppression, conquest, and plunder.

    Our answer is clear to those who argue: Even if The Constitution of the United States is not perfect, it is the best that has been devised—it sets a standard to be striven for. Our answer is: Why should we aim so low, when we have The Communist Manifesto to set a far higher standard of what humanity can strive for—and is capable of achieving—a far greater vision of freedom.*****

     

    NOTES

    1. Quotes from James Madison are from the Federalist Paper No. 54 in The Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), pp. 336-341, especially pp. 339 and 337. [back]

    2. Bob Avakian, Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (Chicago: Banner Press, 1986), pp. 110-11. [back]

    3. Edward Conrad Smith, editor, The Constitution of the United States with Case Summaries (New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1979), p. 18. All citations in this article are from the essay “The Origins of the Constitution.” [back]

    4. Ibid., pp. 18-19. [back]

    5. Avakian, Democracy, p. 69. [back]

    6. Ibid, p. 70. [back]

    7. Ibid, p. 71. [back]

    8. Lenny Wolff, The Science of Revolution: An Introduction (Chicago: RCP Publications, 1983), p. 184. [back]

    9. Avakian, Democracy, pp. 137-39. [back]

    10. Ibid., pp. 233-34. [back]

    11. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 12. [back]

    12. Avakian, Democracy, p. 100. [back]

    13. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 13. [back]

    14. Charles Montesquieu, De L'Esprit Des Lois, Paris: Garnier, 1927, livre 15, chapitre 5, "De L'Esclavage Des Negres" (The Spirit of the Laws, book 15, chapter 5, "On the Enslavement of Negroes"), my translation. [back]

    15. Avakian, Democracy, p. 212. [back]

    Added Notes by the Author, Spring 2023

    * A major factor underlying this “extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them” has—especially since the second half of the 20th century—been the increasing globalization of the capitalist-imperialist economy, a worldwide system of exploitation ensnaring literally billions of people, and in particular super-exploitation of masses of people, including more than 150 million children, in the Third World of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. The relationship of this worldwide exploitation, and super-exploitation, to the situation in the U.S. itself—particularly with regard to the economic structure and social and class relations within this country—is analyzed in depth in the paper by Raymond Lotta Imperialist Parasitism and Class-Social Recomposition in the U.S. From the 1970s to Today: An Exploration of Trends and Changes, which is available at revcom.us. The political dimensions of this are explored in my article Imperialist Parasitism and “Democracy”: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of “Their” Imperialism (also available at revcom.us), where the following is made clear:

    [T]his imperialist plunder provides the material basis for a certain stability, at least in “normal times” in the imperialist “home country” (with the U.S. a prime example of this). This relative stability, in turn, makes it possible for the ruling class to allow a certain amount of dissent and political protest—so long as this remains within the confines of, or at least does not significantly threaten, the “law and order” that serves and enforces the fundamental interests of this ruling class.

    At the same time, as sharply demonstrated in mass uprisings which do call into question that “law and order” and/or defy allegiance to the imperialist interests of this system—such as the mass outpouring against police terror in 2020, and urban rebellions and mass opposition to the Vietnam war in the 1960s—the rulers of this country will frequently respond to such opposition with severe repression and murderous retribution.  For example, the city of Wilmington, in Biden’s home state of Delaware, was placed under martial law for months during the 1960s upsurge against the oppression of Black people, and a number of members of the Black Panther Party, most prominently Fred Hampton, were murdered by police, along with many Black people taking part in urban uprisings in that period, while militant mass resistance against the Vietnam war and rebellions among middle class youth and students were in some cases subjected to a vicious, and at times murderous, response by police and National Guard troops.

    It should never be forgotten, or overlooked, that the “law and order” that enforces this relative stability has included the regular murder of Black people, as well as Latinos, by police—resulting in the fact that the number of Black people who have been killed by police in the years since 1960 is greater than the thousands of Black people who were lynched during the period of Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror, before the 1960s. It should also not be overlooked that the U.S. has the highest rate of mass incarceration of any country in the world, with Black people and Latinos particularly subjected to this mass incarceration. [back]

    ** The point here, as emphasized in my work Breakthroughs: The Historic Breakthrough by Marx, and the Further Breakthrough with the New Communism, A Basic Summary, is that the essence of the capitalist economy, and the source of capitalist “wealth” and “economic growth,” is not a bunch of capitalist entrepreneurs and their “innovation,” or their “entrepreneurial genius.” It is the exploitation by the capitalists (the bourgeoisie) of wage-workers (the proletariat). This is different than the question of what is the driving force compelling the capitalists to continue to intensify the exploitation of the proletariat and to continually find new means of doing so. As also pointed out in Breakthroughs:

    Engels, in Anti-Dühring, discussed the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism between socialized production and private appropriation. He pointed out that the working out of this contradiction assumes two different forms of motion that go into the dynamic process of this fundamental contradiction’s motion. Those two forms of motion are, on the one hand, the contradiction between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat that it exploits, and the other form of motion that Engels identified, importantly, is the contradiction between organization and anarchy, the organization of production on the level of, say, an enterprise—which may be highly organized, with lots of calculations going into it, market estimates and all kinds of things, and may be very tightly organized in terms of how the actual process of production is carried out on the level of the particular capitalist corporation, and so on—while, at the same time, this is in contradiction to the anarchy of production and of exchange in the society as a whole (or today in the world as a whole, today more than ever in the world as a whole). So you have these two forms of motion—and I’ll come back later to a crucial distinguishing aspect of the new communism: the importance of identifying the second form of motion of this fundamental contradiction, that is, the anarchy/organization contradiction, or the driving force of anarchy, as overall the principal and most essential form of the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism....

    In this regard, in the article “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” Raymond Lotta cited this statement of mine:

    anarchic relations between capitalist producers, and not the mere existence of propertyless proletarians or the class contradiction as such, that drives these producers to exploit the working class on an historically more intensive and extensive scale. This motive force of anarchy is an expression of the fact that the capitalist mode of production represents the full development of commodity production and the law of value.

    And then there is this very important passage:

    Were it not the case that these capitalist commodity producers are separated from each other and yet linked by the operation of the law of value they would not face the same compulsion to exploit the proletariat—the class contradiction between bourgeoisie and proletariat could be mitigated. It is the inner compulsion of capital to expand which accounts for the historically unprecedented dynamism of this mode of production, a process which continually transforms value relations and which leads to crisis.

    (Breakthroughs is available at revcom.us; and the article by Raymond Lotta referred to here, “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” can be found in the online theoretical journal Demarcations, Issue Number 3.) [back]

    *** As noted in “Imperialist Parasitism and ‘Democracy’: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of ‘Their’ Imperialism”:

    Some of the mass murderers in other countries who today play such a crucial role in serving the interests of U.S. imperialism throughout the world, and in making possible the maintenance of bourgeois democracy in this country itself (worm-eaten as it is indeed), are the same as they were 40 years ago, and some are different—but the essential reality remains that the “platform of democracy” in this country rests on fascist terror, along with ruthless exploitation, in the oppressed nations of the Third World (Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia). [back]

    **** In relation to this statement by Montesquieu—and more generally his views on slavery—I am reproducing here the following “A Note from Bob Avakian: On Montesquieu, Slavery and the U.S. Constitution,” which appeared in Revolution #037, March 5, 2006, posted at revcom.us:

    Recently, Revolution ran an excerpt from a pamphlet I wrote, which was originally published in 1987, U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom. In that excerpt, there is a quote from De L'Esprit Des Lois (or, in English, "The Spirit of the Laws") by Charles Montesquieu, an 18th–century French philosopher, who was one of the sources of inspiration for the U.S. Constitution, and in particular the theory of the separation of powers that is incorporated in that Constitution. The quote from this work of Montesquieu's, which was published in 1748, is one in which he recites an extreme and grotesquely racist justification for "the enslavement of the Negroes." In relation to this, it is not infrequently argued that Montesquieu was being ironic here, and deliberately overstating this argument, in order to, in effect, polemicize against the enslavement of African people, and that in general Montesquieu's writings express opposition to slavery. But the reality is not so simple as this, nor does this reflect what Montesquieu was essentially seeking to do in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws." It can be said that in "The Spirit of the Laws" Montesquieu's position is one of general opposition to slavery, and he indicates that slavery is not appropriate in countries like France; but, at the same time, he speaks to various circumstances in which he believes slavery can be justified or reasonable. For example, he argues that in the parts of the world, in particular the southern regions, where the climate is warmer, this climate makes people lazy (indolent), and slavery may be justified in order to get them to work (and he argues that in a despotic country, where people's political rights are already repressed, slavery may not be worse for people in that condition).

    This, and the general discussion of slavery that makes up this part (book 15) of "The Spirit of the Laws," is included in a broader discussion by Montesquieu on the nature of different societies and governments in different countries and parts of the world (this is found not only in book 15 but also books 14 and 16 of "The Spirit of the Laws") in which Montesquieu argues that geography and in particular climate plays a big part in determining the nature of different peoples and the character of their society and governing system. And it is important to understand that, although in this discussion Montesquieu makes logical refutation of certain arguments, including certain defenses of slavery, this is not a polemic for or against slavery, or other forms of government, and its character is not that of moral argumentation, so much as it is an attempt to explain why various practices, and various forms of society and government, have existed (and in some cases continue to exist) in various places.

    Another way to put this is that what Montesquieu is doing, in these parts of "The Spirit of the Laws" (and generally in this work), is attempting to make a kind of materialist analysis of these phenomena, including slavery in many places where it has existed—although it must be emphasized that this is not a thoroughly scientific, dialectical materialism but instead a rather crude and vulgar materialism which is marked, and marred, by a considerable amount of determinism: it is a kind of mechanical materialism that argues for a direct and straight-line (linear) connection between things like geography and climate and the character of society and government. It is a kind of materialism that does not adequately and accurately characterize the real motive forces in the development of human society, and in fact this kind of vulgar materialism has often been used to justify various forms of oppression, including colonial and imperialist domination. While we can, and should, recognize that, in the circumstances and time in which he wrote—about 250 years ago—there are aspects of what Montesquieu was seeking to do that were new and represented a break with the suffocating and obfuscating feudal outlook and conventions, it is very important to understand how Montesquieu's outlook and method were marked, and limited, by the social, and international, relations of which they were ultimately an expression: relations in which one part of society, and of the world, dominates and exploits others. And that is the basic point that was being emphasized in relation to Montesquieu and the U.S. Constitution, in the pamphlet U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom.

    With regard to the specific passage that was cited in U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom, "on the enslavement of the Negroes," there is, in fact, some reason to accept that Montesquieu does not actually agree with the justification for this enslavement that he summarizes, and that he is actually subjecting this kind of justification to some ironic and satirical treatment. A reasonable interpretation of Montesquieu's arguments, as he goes on in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws" (book 15), is that this kind of argument, about the non-human character of the Negroes, is not a valid argument, not one that actually justifies this enslavement. But then he does go on to explore the question of what might actually be reasonable justifications, in certain circumstances, for slavery; and, as spoken to above, he finds such justifications in situations such as those where there is a despotic government, or where—as he concludes, through an application of vulgar and determinist materialism—the warm climate makes people lazy and unwilling, on their own initiative, to work.

    Thus, in looking into and reflecting on this further, I would say that, while it is important to understand the complexity and nuance of what Montesquieu writes here—and it can be said that the way in which I cited Montesquieu in writing this pamphlet on the U.S. Constitution does not really or fully do that—it is not the case that what Montesquieu was doing here was actually making a case against the enslavement of the Negroes, or against slavery in general. Once again, it is important to keep in mind the fact that, although he was opposed to slavery on general principle, and declared that it was a good thing that it had been eliminated in his home country, France, and more generally in Europe, Montesquieu did not think slavery was wrong, or without justification, in all circumstances. And it also seems that Montesquieu did not hesitate to invest in companies involved in the slave trade. In this, there is a parallel with John Locke, the English philosopher and political theorist, who, as I pointed out in this same pamphlet (U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom), was also a major influence in the conception of the U.S. Constitution. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (p. 29):

    "In sum, the society of which Locke was a theoretical exponent, as well as a practical political partisan, was a society based on wage-slavery and capitalist exploitation. And it is not surprising that, while he was opposed to slavery in England itself, he not only defended the institution of slavery, under certain circumstances, in the Second Treatise, but turned a not insignificant profit himself in the slave trade and helped to draw up the charter for a government headed by a slave-owning aristocracy in one of the American colonies. For as Marx sarcastically summarized: ‘The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signalized the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production.’" [back]

    ***** In the years since the writing of this article, I have devoted considerable work to the development of what is meant by this “far greater vision of freedom”—what it would mean “in real life.” One very important result of this is the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which provides both a sweeping vision and a concrete blueprint for a radically different and emancipating society and world. This Constitution is available at revcom.us. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Readers’ Corner

    Updated

    Readers Corner

     

    Readers’ Corner highlights views that you, our readers, send us on the big questions about making revolution. Questions about building the movement for an actual revolution. Or responses to, and thoughts provoked by, the social media messages from Bob Avakian—the revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism. Thinking and questions you may have on other important documents from Bob Avakian (BA) and the Revcoms. As well as reflections on the new communism brought forward by BA, both overall and in relation to the urgent moment at hand. Now especially is a time for collective scientific grappling.

    Please send these to revolution.reports@yahoo.com. If your submission isn't reposted, it will still feed into our overall enriched understanding of what questions we should be speaking to.

    * * * * *

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world

    Learning Science—On the March
    Part 1, Thoughts on @BobAvakianOfficial from a reader

    In January, Sunsara Taylor interviewed the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian (BA). In Part 2 of that interview, she asked him about what role his social media messages play in helping people to understand, and radically change, the world.

    Watch his answer:

    There are some key things that BA speaks to there that I don't think we've really appreciated. 

    BA's social media messages do speak to timely burning questions. They are working on obstacles in people's thinking that have to get quickly cleared away. Struggling with people who don't want to confront how rapidly fascism is consolidating or who don't get that fascism—no matter how it comes to power—is illegitimate. BA breaks down why the Democrats won't fight these fascists the way they need to be fought. He exposes the system of capitalism-imperialism that underlies this fascism and causes so many other horrors. He answers people who think the problem is "human nature," instead of the nature of the system of capitalism-imperialism, and how a radically different system is necessary and possible. He is waging struggle with Black people about their role and responsibility among the front ranks in the fight to defeat fascism... and I could go on and on. 

    So the content of these messages really matter—and we should make a big deal out of these when they come out. It would open up a different dynamic in society if what BA was speaking to were the questions being sharply debated by millions of people.

    But even more important than the content of each individual piece is learning from the method that BA applies—and trains others in—in all of his messages. 

    Read more

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world:

    Einstein, Astrology and Bob Avakian
    Part 2, from a reader 

    “To evaluate Bob Avakian from the standpoint of what passes for political thought today is like trying to evaluate Einstein on the basis of astrology.”

    When I heard this from a comrade a few months ago, I thought it captured a big problem that the revcoms and all those who want a better world need to understand, and fight to change—quickly! And I want to share some thoughts on why this is so profound, and so true!

    Bob Avakian (BA) is a revolutionary leader who has developed a whole new framework for human emancipation—the new communism. 

    In her book, Science and Revolution: On the Importance of Science and the Application of Science to Society, the New Synthesis of Communism and the Leadership of Bob Avakian, the scientist Ardea Skybreak said: 

    ...this is a completely, a radically and fundamentally, different vision of how the world could and should be. It’s a completely different framework. And when we talk about how “BA is the architect of a completely different framework”—of revolution, of the revolutionary process, and of the new society to bring into being—that's exactly what he is. You can like it or not like it, agree or don't agree, but objectively that's what he actually is. And he's been developing this framework very systematically, on the basis of scientific methods. And that is why we make such a big deal about this one person, BA. There is no one else in the world today who is on the same level in terms of developing the science of revolution and its application to the struggle to transform this society and the world on a radical, a truly radical basis, that deals with fundamental problems. Nobody's taken it as far, and on such a consistently scientific basis, and has as worked out a sense of not only why it needs to be done, but how to do it, and what to bring into being to replace this system. That's why we make such a big deal about him.

    (Go here for a longer excerpt from this Interview.)

    But when BA's work is brought to most people, most of the time, the responses are way too often on the level of: "why should I look into that, he's an old white guy," or kneejerk opposition to "so much focus on one person," without any analysis into what this person is saying and what the significance of it is, or one of the most unthinking replies, "Bob Avakian is a cult leader." 

    In other words, people come back with astrology.

    Read more

    The Fight Against Fascism… Before, and After, BA: Internationalism
    From a reader

    I've been returning to and digging into the recent interviews with Bob Avakian (BA): Part 1: On Fascism, Capitalism, & the Way Out of the Madness; Part 2: The New Communism: A Whole New Way To Live, a Fundamentally Different System. As I have, I have been repeatedly struck by a point that was made in a letter from a reader on revcom.us last December:

    In the history of [communism] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions...

    What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    There’s so much in these interviews that illustrate this. One thing that struck me deeply in these last couple weeks is the question of internationalism, which I want to speak to here. Internationalism is one very important element of the “before and after” spoken to above, though far from the only one.

    Read more

    The World's Most Radical Thinker On Women's Liberation is An “Old, White, Man”:  A Challenge to Put Aside Ill-Founded Prejudice and Engage Bob Avakian
    by Sunsara Taylor

    Bro culture seething with the hatred of women. Gleeful taunts of “Your body, my choice.” Fascist enforcement of patriarchal gender codes. Trump/MAGA 2.0 is moving at lightning speed. Alongside his genocidal racism, his threats against the people of the world, and the sledgehammer he is taking to any remaining democratic norms or basic rights of the people, Trump is pushing for the open enslavement of women and complete erasure of trans people.

    We Stand At A Crossroads

    Never before have so many women in so many parts of the world broken free of so many traditional chains of patriarchy. Women have fought their way into public life and into every profession. In the U.S., women outpace men in higher education. Women dominate pop culture. Growing numbers boldly reject the shame that has long attached to female sexuality, to abortion, and to being a victim of sexual assault. Meanwhile, LGBT people have become widely visible, won important basic rights and achieved growing respect and acceptance.

    Read more

    Letter from a reader
    Appreciating, Wielding and Promoting Bob Avakian's Official Biography

    ....I would like to recommend that people read, and wield, the recently updated “Bob Avakian Official Biography.” THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity in LA has been wielding this in meetings with broader forces who need to be united in a powerful movement built with the very specific aim of defeating fascism along with the series of @BobAvakianOfficial social media messages REVOLUTION #102-111. Additionally, we have been using it with people who have come into the Revcom Corps as a way to learn about the importance of revolutionary theory and to get an introduction to the actual breakthrough in human understanding the new communism is. 

    Bob Avakian - Official Biography book cover

     

    This biography is also really an excellent introduction to the person who is the kind of leader that has never before existed in this country and whose leadership is of enormous importance for the emancipation of all humanity. It gives a history of the formative experiences that made BA who he is, the times that helped shape him and the critical junctures in the development of those times where his leadership has been decisive—from growing up in Berkeley and his early political life to becoming a communist and communist leader, to the restoration of capitalism in China and the end of the first stage of communist revolutions. It gets into how BA was and is the only thinker and leader in the world today to meet this defeat with the interrogation of that experience in a way that has qualitatively advanced the science of communism. Theory that has met the end of a wave of revolutions in a world that is tragically stymied and existentially imperiled—paving not only a path out of this but a path to a future that not only makes revolution viable again but worth fighting for. Paving the way for a new wave of truly emancipating revolutions throughout the world.  Read more

    A Letter from a Reader—To the Revcoms, and All Who Seek a Radically New World

    “A clear before and an after”: 

    What Bob Avakian (BA) has brought forward is not just another big advance in the history of our project.  In the history of our project there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions. 

    We shouldn’t want to repeat any of that! We shouldn’t want even the best of the past socialist revolutions and societies, especially now that we have an even much better theoretical and practical framework to work with! What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    How much do we all really understand and appreciate that? Really agree? Read more.

    Further Grappling with “A Clear Before and an After” with the New Communism Developed by Bob Avakian 

    I’ve been part of a lot of rich discussions responding to the letter from a reader posted here a couple weeks ago: “A clear before and an after.”

    That letter makes the point:

    In the history of our project [a communist world, free from all forms of exploitation and oppression, with an emancipating culture] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA [Bob Avakian]...

    One thing I’ve kept coming back to in these discussions is what it means to say that “the new communism is a whole new framework for human emancipation.”  Or as it says in the letter, “What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.” Read more

    What Is Most Important About Bob Avakian's Leadership?

    From a reader

    Several weeks ago, revcom.us published the following statement:

    We will never succeed in having a real revolution in this country—certainly not one really worth having and that is truly emancipating for the vast majority of people—unless and until millions of people are won to become conscious followers of Bob Avakian and the new communism he has developed as the pathway and blueprint for the emancipation of all of humanity.

    There are several important things in this crucial and true statement, but I want to start with what is the most important (and what is, at the same time, still the least understood and appreciated) part of that statement. The most important part of that statement is not merely or absolutely that there couldn't be a revolution without BA, but that any revolution that is not led by the new communism Bob Avakian has forged wouldn't lead anywhere good. Simply put: There is no road to human emancipation without Bob Avakian's new communism. There is no way to continue to understand and change the world in the fundamental interests of humanity as a whole, to overthrow and defeat the old order and build a new society and system that enables people to uproot and overcome all forms of oppression and exploitation, and do so in a way that unleashes and increasingly involves and relies on the masses of people in this process. Read more

    Why Bob Avakian Is So Important

    From a reader

    “Besides the fact that he is the only leader in this country who is talking about a real revolution—and besides the fact that he is actually leading the process of actively working for that revolution—what Bob Avakian (BA) has done, with the development of the new communism, is of world historic importance. It is, in fact, a whole new framework for human emancipationNo one else has done what BA has done. 

    In the Six Resolutions of the Central Committee of the Revolutionary Communist Party, the sixth one states that while BA is Chairman of the Party, he is “greater than” that. It goes on to say, “As we have emphasized, the leadership of BA and the new synthesis of communism that he has brought forward provides the theoretical framework, the scientific method and approach for a whole new stage of communist revolution, not just in this country but in the world as a whole. BA is not just solving tactical problems or things encountered “on the way,” but BA has actually envisioned what the new socialist society would be based on and tackled the contradictions involved in moving a socialist society toward communism—without putting a gun to people’s backs. This is the historic contradiction and because BA has solved it with the new communism, we can actually say humanity has the understanding to get to a world without exploitation and oppression, to a conscious and voluntary association of human beings solving the problems of society and engaging in debate, creative and scientific activities, enriching humanity materially, socially, intellectually and spiritually in a materialist sense. Read more