Skip to main content

Posts by issue number/Posteos por número de la edición

 

Articles in this issue (scroll down or click to read article below):

  • From RefuseFascism.org:

    The time has come for…THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIMEBeginning November 5, 2025Washington DC
  • A MAJOR STATEMENT BY BOB AVAKIANREVOLUTION #141:The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!
  • From RefuseFascism.org:

    The People’s Indictment of Donald Trump: A Unified Declaration of Illegitimacy
  • Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

    A Timeline and Bibliography

  • To Those Who Abhor Fascism and Truly Want to See It End: Fantasies of Trump Self-Destructing or Future Electoral Landslides Will Be the Death of Us—Drop Your Delusions and…

    Surround the White House on December 13: TRUMP MUST GO NOW!!!
  • Venezuela and the Fascist Way of War Mass Murder Is Legal Because We Say So
  • The method and strategy behind the Trump regime’s lawless mayhem and murder in the Caribbean…

    Trump Regime Escalates War Threats Against Venezuela
  • A call from THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity:

    NO U.S. IMPERIALIST WAR ON VENEZUELA!

    Emergency Protest in front of the White House (on Pennsylvania/Lafayette Square) at 5 pm on the day of any U.S. invasion, bombing, or assassination in Venezuela. Or 5 pm the next day if it happens in the evening.

  • Donald Trump's Persecution and Vilification of Immigrants in the First 10 Months of His Term Rivals Hitler’s Persecution of the Jews in HIS First 10 Months... in Fact, in Some Ways Trump EXCEEDS Hitler
  • Stephen Miller says immigrants come from—and must return to—“broken homelands”… but the REAL question is:

    Who Broke Those “Homelands”? And What Does That Tell Us About the Fascists Who Now Rule This One?
  • The Lie of Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire

    Genocidal Slaughter, Blockades and Gaza Concentration Camps

  • The Illegitimate Fascist-Dominated Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Appeal on Birthright Citizenship, and Green-Lights Texas Racist Gerrymandering
  • Deadly Assault on People’s Health: Fascists Recommend Ending Universal Hepatitis B Vaccine for InfantsTrump Must Go Now!
  • Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes

    The Revcoms reply to Kristofer Goldsmith’s lies about Refuse Fascism, the Revcoms and the Revolutionary Leader Bob Avakian

  • Documentary Filmmaker David Zeiger: Response to Kristofer Goldsmith
  • Join the revcoms for a zoom discussion of: “Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes…”
  • Featured video this week from Bob Avakian:

    Bob Avakian on Why He Wrote the CONSTITUTION for the New Socialist Republic in North America
  • Fundraising for “Surround the White House” Trump Must Go Now!
  • From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Executions in Iran at Highest Rate in Decades, Sparking Protests: “Silence in the Face of Injustice is Betrayal”
  • From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Oppose Persecution of the People’s Artist: Jafar Panahi
  • New zine: Why do so many people buy into the GTF?
  • In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the MovementThe Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today
  • “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 
  • What If People Had Listened?THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!In the Name of HumanityWe REFUSE to Accept a Fascist AmericaA Better World IS Possible
  • From Aurora Roja, voice of the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution
  • U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)
  • Readers’ Corner
  • ARTICLE:

    From RefuseFascism.org:

    The time has come for…THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIME
    Beginning November 5, 2025
    Washington DC

    This is reposted from RefuseFascism.org.

    11-05 11 AM - NATIONAL MALL - WASHINGTON MONUMENT - TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

     

    Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now

    Humanity's only hope is for the decent people of this country to rise in our millions. We cannot wait for future and rigged elections. We must drive the Trump Fascist Regime from power.

    Beginning November 5, the one-year anniversary of Trump's election, flood DC in nonviolent protest. Surround the White House. Surround the Capitol. Surround the illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court. Come back again and again. Across the country, refuse to comply. Every person of conscience, millions of us together, grind the machinery of the fascist regime to a halt.

    Don't stop until Trump is removed.

    The Trump Fascist Regime is illegitimate. What it is demanding we become is unconscionable. At every level of society, in every institution, tens of millions of us know this in our bones. If we dare, we can defeat a horror that threatens humanity's very survival. If we fail to even try, future generations — if they exist — will never forgive us.

    The Trump Fascist Regime is shredding the rule of law. Making a mockery of due process. Disappearing immigrants and other brown-skinned people into brutal concentration camps. Aggressively resurrecting genocidal white supremacy. Reversing the gains not only of the 1960s, but even of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Enslaving women through the brutality and suffocation of forced motherhood. Erasing LGBT people. Trampling democratic rights. Violating international law. Illegitimately deploying the military on U.S. soil. Assaulting and threatening politicians and judges. Paving the way for boundless terror against the people. Accelerating climate collapse. Cutting science and medicine, costing millions of lives. Depleting humanity's store of knowledge. Destroying truth. Drowning out reason. Subjugating the arts to fascist cruelty and conformity. Targeting everything that is decent, moral and good. All at the whim of a debased lunatic tyrant.

    Hopes of waiting this out are illusion. Every accommodation – even in the name of preserving some ability to do some good – only fuels the regime's demand for ever more slavish submission. Every capitulation – by universities, law firms, agencies – only feeds its ravenous hunger to remake all of society in its grotesque image.

    This is FASCISM. A different form of brutal rule. It cannot be lived with. It must be defeated.

    The elections are way too late. Besides, no honest person can expect the tyrant who instigated and then pardoned the January 6th insurrectionists to respect an election he loses.

    But there is a way.

    We have protested. Marched. Defended neighbors from ICE. Decried genocide. Some of us have resigned or blown the whistle. This shows we are millions. Many more of us than of them. Now we must take all this higher. We must direct all this and more towards the only thing that truly measures up to the existential threat humanity faces:

    The Trump Regime Must Go Now!

     

    The Whole Trump Fascist Regime Must Be Driven From Power!

    This Can Be Done. By refusing to surrender the future and our humanity to a vengeful fascist maniac. By millions rising in massive, unrelenting, nonviolent protest and resistance. By defying and refusing to comply with fascist dictates. By walking out. By shutting down. By fearlessly using our platforms and influence to inspire and challenge others to join us.

    By doing all this day after day. Coming back stronger in the face of attack and repression. Uniting, not dividing, across many viewpoints and backgrounds. Fostering a collective spirit of courage and righteous fury. Willing to sacrifice for the greater good of defeating this fascism.

    We begin now. On Wednesday November 5, from across this nation, we pour into DC. From that day forward, we don't stop until the regime is removed.

    History is full of examples where people who had right on their side fought against tremendous odds and were victorious. It is also full of examples of people passively hoping to wait it out, only to get swallowed up by a horror beyond what they ever imagined.

    The future is unwritten. WHICH ONE WE GET IS UP TO US.

    In the Name of Humanity,
    We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America!
    The FASCIST TRUMP REGIME MUST GO NOW!

    Initiated by RefuseFascism.org
    welcoming everyone to join the biggest nonviolent mobilization in US history

     

    Go to RefuseFascism.org to commit to join nonviolent relentless protest in DC now.

    Sign up with RefuseFascism.org.

    To learn more, go to RefuseFascism.org and @RefuseFascism or @refusefascismdmv.

  • ARTICLE:

    A MAJOR STATEMENT BY BOB AVAKIAN

    REVOLUTION #141:
    The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!

    This major statement from Bob Avakian was released prior to the recent demonstrations for No Kings Day on October 18 and  on November 5 initiating the sustained mass nonviolent protest needed in DC to drive out the Trump fascist regime. But the analysis, strategic vision and orientation laid out here continues to provide critical and extremely relevant guidance to everyone working for the removal of the Trump regime and the defeat of fascism.

    This is Bob Avakian—REVOLUTION—number 141.

    Over the past 30 years, I have analyzed how the Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist. And now, with the “second coming” of the Trump regime, this fascism is on an unrestrained rampage.

    It would have been far better—we would very possibly not be faced with the terrible situation we are now forced to confront—if this analysis, sounding the alarm about very real fascism, had not been so often ignored, or met with stubborn resistance and cheap accusations of being dishonestly “alarmist.” In a number of critical situations over the past decades, those of us who have recognized this developing fascism for what it is, have called for massive mobilization to defeat it—but, although some responded to this call, the millions who should have taken it up did not do so. So, now, here we are. And, while we should not “live” in the past, we definitely should learn from it.

    Every day this is driven home more and more forcefully and cruelly: There is no living with this Trump/MAGA fascism—it must be removed from power before it commits even more horrific atrocities and forcibly shuts down any real possibility of resistance. 

    The profound question with which all decent people are now confronted is: Will we rise together, in the millions, to do what urgently needs to be done, to drive out this Trump fascist regime that is a truly terrible scourge on humanity and a very serious threat to humanity’s future?

    This means actively resisting—massively defying and demanding that all institutions refuse to comply with—the dictates of this fascist regime. It means rallying in even greater numbers than before on October 18 in the “No Kings 2.0" demonstrations around the country. And, most crucially, it means actively taking up the Call initiated by RefuseFascism.org, and open to all:

    “The Time has come for...THE FALL of the TRUMP FASCIST REGIME – Beginning November 5, 2025 – Washington DC.” The Call continues:

    “Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now

    “Humanity’s only hope is for the decent people of this country to rise in our millions. We cannot wait for future and rigged elections. We must drive the Trump Fascist Regime from power.

    “Beginning November 5, the one-year anniversary of Trump’s election, flood DC in nonviolent protest. Surround the White House. Surround the Capitol. Surround the illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court. Come back again and again. Across the country, refuse to comply. Every person of conscience, millions of us together, grind the machinery of the fascist regime to a halt.

    “Don’t stop until Trump is removed.”

    Why DC? Because that is the seat of government—it is where the power of this fascist regime is concentrated, and where it can be impacted by masses of people in the most concentrated and powerful way.

    In a number of messages—including the previous one (number 140)—I have spoken to the basic means through which this regime could actually be driven from power: the decent people, in the millions and tens of millions, who deep in their hearts abhor this fascism, must seize the initiative themselves, rising with nonviolent but powerful determination to reset the terms, creating a massive “political earthquake from below,” bringing about a profound political crisis such that the completely illegitimate nature of the Trump fascist regime stands out all the more sharply, provoking and motivating major shifts and realignments throughout society, including within the dominant and ruling institutions, such that this regime can no longer function and cannot remain in power.

    There are many people and forces within the ruling institutions—or with strong ties and potentially important influence within those institutions—who are very deeply troubled by, or even strongly opposed to, how they see the actions of the Trump fascist regime “violating the Constitution and the law, destroying our great American experiment in democracy” and “seriously undermining and damaging our country’s standing in the world.” As a revolutionary communist who has developed the new communism as a whole new framework for human emancipation, I have a fundamentally different understanding of the nature of the system that rules in this country and its role in the world; but, at the same time, I have a clear sense of the very real difference it makes, in a profoundly terrible way, when there is not even a pretense of democracy and basic rights are openly trampled on. In light of the urgent need to defeat and remove the Trump regime that is enforcing an undisguised fascist dictatorship, and the crucial importance of uniting all who can be united to drive out this regime, I recognize the particularly important role that such people and forces, with ties and influence in key institutions, could play in regard to this urgent need. I also recognize that they will only feel both compelled and enabled to play this role if there is, in fact, the kind of “massive political earthquake from below,” that can be brought about by millions taking up the Call from Refuse Fascism, and in this way moving to create the kind of political crisis where this “political earthquake from below,” in combination with heightening divisions within the dominant and ruling institutions, could lead to the removal of the Trump fascist regime.

    Finally, I want to speak directly to this: While there is a real possibility that this powerful combination could actually succeed in creating the conditions where the Trump fascist regime is removed from power, there is no “guarantee” that this will succeed. But there are times and circumstances when—even as the challenge is daunting and the chances of success are uncertain and may seem unlikely—going up against powerful forces of oppression is necessary and a far better course of action than failing to do so. This is one of those times and circumstances. 

    If the Call from Refuse Fascism—to flood DC with the nonviolent protest of millions, beginning November 5—had not been made, if work to make this a reality were not being carried out, then any possibility of actually defeating and removing this fascist regime would be effectively shut down, and very soon. The profound reality is this: The massive mobilization called for by Refuse Fascism, and open to all, represents the real possibility—the ONLY real possibility—of actually driving out this fascist regime, and putting an end to the endless horrors it is determined to perpetrate.

    Yes, the Trump regime might seize on the mobilization for November 5 as an excuse to bring down further repression. But this regime has already brutally demonstrated that it intends to viciously persecute those it chooses to identify as “enemies,” and to relentlessly repress any actual or potential forces of opposition, within the ruling class itself as well as in the larger society, whether or not they actively resist the regime.

    In the circumstances we are now facing, failing to even try to drive out this fascist regime, while there is still a possibility of succeeding, would be far worse than failing in the attempt to drive out the regime. As the Call from Refuse Fascism plainly and sharply puts it: “If we fail to even try, future generations—if they exist—will never forgive us.”

    But we may not fail! As dramatically demonstrated by the accelerating juggernaut of the Trump fascist regime—and, on the other side, by the continuing protests and repeated massive rallies and marches against this fascist horror—these are not “normal times.” In these extraordinary times, things can change very rapidly, on a huge scale and with major impact. That can apply not only in very negative but also very positive ways: the repeated outpourings against this regime can be built on and then given the most powerful expression in the mobilization and convergence on DC, November 5, being called for by Refuse Fascism, with an open invitation to all who are outraged by Trump/MAGA fascism.

    If this succeeds, it will be a truly historic achievement for humanity now, and something that will contribute in a profound way to the possibility for a far better world for future generations.

    And again, if millions are rallied to this Call for a massive, nonviolent but determined mobilization and convergence on Washington DC, November 5—there is a real possibility that this could succeed.

  • ARTICLE:

    From RefuseFascism.org:

    The People’s Indictment of Donald Trump: A Unified Declaration of Illegitimacy

    Revcom.us editors’ note: This indictment was originally posted at RefuseFascism.org. We are reposting on our site with permission.

    Donald Trump

     

    History teaches that fascists, once firmly in power, are extraordinarily difficult to remove. It is absolutely critical that we take up the responsibility to expel such a regime before consolidation becomes irreversible. Donald Trump’s fascist administration, through repeated injuries, usurpations, and acts of violence, has forfeited any claim to legitimacy. Therefore, We the People submit the following indictment asserting that the Trump administration constitutes an illegitimate fascist regime and must be removed from power.

    Donald Trump: You are indicted for crimes against the people of the United States and installing fascism in the U.S.

    I. A Regime of Tyranny and Betrayal of the Constitution

    The Trump administration has systematically violated the fundamental principles of the U.S. Constitution. The promises of liberty, justice, equality, consent of the governed, and the rule of law have ALL been eroded by the actions of a President who is sworn to preserve and defend them.

    Trump has defied federal courts, ignored lawful orders, targeted judges and lawyers, and replaced constitutional governance with rule by decree. He has used executive power to obstruct justice, override Congress, and install loyalists who serve his will rather than the public good.

    He has wielded federal agencies as weapons against immigrants, protesters, journalists, and political opponents, even threatening the execution of members of Congress. This administration has undermined basic democratic rights, targeted marginalized communities, and shredded civil liberties with open contempt.

    II. Crimes of Fascism and the Consolidation of Dictatorship

    Trump’s MAGA Fascism aims to install an open dictatorship, unrestrained and unchecked, reliant on white-supremacist Christian-nationalism, misogyny, xenophobia, and violent repression. The actions of this administration are not isolated — they form a coherent fascist program. Traditional democratic channels cannot halt a regime that destroys those very channels.

    Count One: Violent Persecution and Terrorizing of Immigrants

    Trump unleashed heavily armed federal strike forces and illegally mobilized National Guard units to target immigrants and anyone racially profiled as such. ICE became his private army — disappearing people, terrorizing children, defying courts, and deporting individuals to torture and abuse in concentration camps both here and overseas.

    Count Two: Lawless International Aggression

    Trump has openly disregarded international law and disparaged our allies, waged unauthorized military actions, threatened wider war, and supported acts of genocide and war crimes. He asserted a doctrine of U.S. domination over entire regions, dismissing international law and human rights.

    Count Three: Attacks on Elections and Voting Rights

    Trump pardoned January 6th insurrectionists, empowered election deniers, gerrymandered Black and Brown communities out of political power, and enabled voter suppression schemes designed to entrench minority rule.

    Count Four: Subversion of the Courts

    The Supreme Court — illegitimately packed with Trump loyalists — continues to overrule lower courts, often through unexplained “shadow docket” decisions. They have surrendered judicial independence, suppressed the voice of the people, and enabled the regime’s assault on the Constitution.

    Count Five: Weaponizing Federal Power Against Political Opponents

    The administration twisted law enforcement and prosecutorial powers into instruments of retribution. Political enemies, NGOs, journalists, and movement activists were all targeted.

    III. A History of Repeated Injuries, Usurpations, and Abuses

    The Trump regime has intensified white supremacy, misogyny, and the erasure of LGBTQ+ people; demonized immigrants; escalated militarism; and undermined science and public health.

    To establish and enforce white supremacy, Trump exalted the Confederacy, purged diversity programs, attacked the teaching of Black and Native history, removed symbols of civil rights progress, and installed white supremacists in key positions.

    To subjugate women and erase LGBTQ+ people, Trump dismantled reproductive rights, threatened nationwide abortion bans, outlawed gender-affirming care, purged transgender people from public institutions, and reinstated oppressive norms as state policy.

    To target entire peoples and escalate global conflict, Trump carried out mass deportations, stripped legal protections from migrants, bombed foreign nations illegally, backed genocide, and invoked 19th century doctrines of imperial domination.

    To consolidate dictatorship, he declared himself above the Constitution, weaponized the DOJ, attacked universities and the press, purged the military, and created a personalist authoritarian system.

    IV. Violations of Human and Civil Rights at Home and Abroad

    Trump’s administration has committed widespread violations of civil, constitutional, and human rights:

    • Silencing journalists, suppressing protest, and retaliating against whistleblowers.
    • Warrantless surveillance, unlawful detentions, and militarized policing.
    • Cruel treatment of detainees; particularly women and children, immigrants, and transgender individuals.
    • Rollback of LGBTQ+ protections, racial equity programs, disability rights, and reproductive freedoms.
    • Family separations, denial of asylum, and deportations to known torture regimes.
    • Abandonment of international human rights commitments and obstruction of war-crimes investigations.

    These constitute moral, legal, and humanitarian crimes deserving the strongest condemnation.

    V. A Government of, by, and for Tyrants

    Trump, and the officials complicit in his regime, have enriched themselves while undermining public health, education, economic stability, environmental protections, and essential social programs. They have dismantled oversight mechanisms, sold influence to the wealthy, and reduced governance to a corrupt spectacle.

    This is an authoritarian plutocracy government, run by and for a corrupt elite.

    VI. The Mandate of the People: Trump Must Go NOW

    No matter how they attain power, fascist regimes are never legitimate. Trump’s regime poses a direct threat to humanity in an era of climate catastrophe, nuclear proliferation, and global instability.

    Therefore, we declare:

    • President Donald Trump needs to be removed from power immediately.
    • The entire Trump regime is illegitimate.
    • Its continued rule violates the Constitution, human rights, and the principles of a free society.
    • Any further executive or legislative action that oppresses or exploits the people constitutes a direct attack on the public.

    VII. A Call to Action for a Free and Just Future

    Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now. It is a completely different, brutal, form of rule. It cannot be lived with; it must be defeated.

    Fascist rule is never legitimate, no matter how it comes to power. This administration surrendered any claim to “legitimacy” the minute they began using their power to violate and dismantle the U.S. Constitution and our rule of law.

    If we dare, we can defeat this horror unlike anything we’ve faced before. If we fail to even try, future generations will never forgive us.

    There can be no business as usual under fascism; that’s why we call on people across this country to join us in sustained, nonviolent mass resistance. To walk out of work, to walk out of school, and to come from all across the country — millions together in the streets of the nation’s capital — returning again and again, day after day, until the Trump regime falls!

    The future is unwritten. Which one we get is up to us.

    IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY,
    WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A FASCIST AMERICA.
    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

    People's Indictment of Trump

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Bob Avakian’s Work on Fascism: 1996-2025

    A Timeline and Bibliography

    Recently, in Bob Avakian’s (BA’s) social media message, REVOLUTION #141—“The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!,” BA made the following sobering assessment:

    Over the past 30 years, I have analyzed how the Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist. And now, with the “second coming” of the Trump regime, this fascism is on an unrestrained rampage.

    It would have been far better—we would very possibly not be faced with the terrible situation we are now forced to confront—if this analysis, sounding the alarm about very real fascism, had not been so often ignored, or met with stubborn resistance and cheap accusations of being dishonestly “alarmist.”  In a number of critical situations over the past decades, those of us who have recognized this developing fascism for what it is, have called for massive mobilization to defeat it—but, although some responded to this call, the millions who should have taken it up did not do so.  So, now, here we are.  And, while we should not “live” in the past, we definitely should learn from it.

    Below is a timeline of selected talks and writings by Bob Avakian over the past 30 years that warned of the rise of fascism in the U.S.; exposed its roots in the soil of this country; addressed its accelerating development and expanding atrocities; and most recently, emphasized the urgency and the stakes of driving out the Trump fascist regime. 

    Most of the works listed below can be found at BA’s Collected Works at revcom.us, or through the website’s search function, as well as @BobAvakianOfficial Substack page

    For a “comprehensive overview” of BA’s analysis and discussion of Trump fascism in particular, see The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go! In The Name of Humanity, We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America. A Better World IS Possible. This is a film of a talk given by Bob Avakian in 2017; it is also available as a PDF of text. These can be found in the Collected Works of BA at revcom.us. 

    1996

    1. Preaching From a Pulpit of Bones: The Reality Beneath William Bennett's “Virtues”
    2. Putting an End to “Sin”
    Return to top

    1997

    Return to top

    1998

    Return to top

    2004

    Return to top

    2005

    Return to top

    2006

    Return to top

    2007

    Return to top

    2009

    Return to top

    2010

    • Birds Cannot Give Birth to Crocodiles, But Humanity Can Soar Beyond the Horizon (Part 1: Revolution and the State; Part 2: Building the Movement for Revolution)
    Return to top

    2017

    • THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO! In The Name of Humanity, We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America. A Better World IS Possible A Film of a Talk by Bob Avakian (Available as film and text.)
    Return to top

    2019

    Return to top

    2020

    Part 1: The Democrats Can’t Fight Trump the Way He Needs to Be Fought
    Part 2: Trump Is Already Stealing the Election and Threatening Even More Violence to Stay in Power
    Part 3: Trump’s Fascism—More Blatant and Dangerous Every Day: How a Determined Fight and Massive Mobilization Could Defeat This (Long Version—The Larger Canvas and Fuller Picture; Short Version—The Basic Picture and Essential Vision)

    Return to top

    2021

    Return to top

    2022

    Return to top

    2023

    Return to top

    2024

    Return to top

    2025

    • 2025: A New Year—Profound New Challenges—And a Profoundly Positive Way Forward in the Face of Very Real Horror.
    • TRUMP/MAGA FASCISM What We’re Really Facing, Why and What Must Be Done to Defeat It Before It’s Too Late, Volume 1
    • TRUMP/MAGA FASCISM What We’re Really Facing, Why and What Must Be Done to Defeat It Before It’s Too Late, Volume 2
    • REVOLUTION #112—Trump’s fascist rule, like Hitler’s before him, is a regime of horrors—and is completely illegitimate.
    • REVOLUTION #113—The Trump MAGA fascists would have been on the side of the Confederacy in the Civil War, fighting to maintain, and expand, slavery.
    • REVOLUTION #114—Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!
    • REVOLUTION #115The Trump Fascist Regime Must GoNOW—before it is too late!
    • REVOLUTION #116—Black People Should Be Among the Front Ranks in the Fight to Defeat Trump/MAGA Fascism
    • REVOLUTION #117—Trump/MAGA fascists—cruel, demented, dark ages oppressors—who twist reality inside-out to “justify” their lawless tyranny
    • REVOLUTION #118—This system has brought forth Trump/MAGA fascism: People, in their millions, must put an end to this fascist regime—NOW—before it is too late!
    • REVOLUTION #119—Democratic Party politicians may contribute to the crucial struggle against Trump/MAGA fascism—but the Democratic Party will not, and cannot, lead the struggle where it needs to go.
    • REVOLUTION #120—Opposing the enemy within in the fight to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism
    • REVOLUTION #124—Donald Trump’s whole fascist regime is caught in a contradiction of its own making: his continual Big Lies
    • REVOLUTION #125—Not the courts, and not the Democratic Party: Decent people, mobilizing massively and relentlessly, are the force that must be relied on to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism.
    • REVOLUTION #130—Blatant racism, overall fascism—not “fighting crime”—is the basic reason why Trump is illegally using the military to occupy cities and terrorize people.
    • REVOLUTION #131—Crime is a real problem. But fascism is not the answer to crime—fascism is itself a monstrous crime.
    • REVOLUTION #133—Yes, this Trump/MAGA fascism really is that bad. And, if it is not driven from power soon, it will get far worse.
    • REVOLUTION #134—“Play by the rules” and lose—succumbing to a fascist horror, far beyond even the worst of today—or, do what needs to be done to drive out this fascist Trump regime.
    • REVOLUTION #135—Now the MAGA maniacs are openly proclaiming that they are fascists!
    • REVOLUTION #136—Truth is Truth, Fascism is Fascism—and why there is “no version of Charlie Kirk” on the “left”—part one.
    • REVOLUTION #137—Deeper reasons why there is no “left” version of Charlie Kirk—and why the Democratic Party will not, and cannot, do what needs to be done to drive out the Trump fascist regime. Part 2
    • REVOLUTION #139—Yet more genocidal racism from Donald Trump!
    • REVOLUTION #140—Blatant racism and undisguised fascism are openly and officially celebrated—and people opposing this are threatened, attacked, hounded and sacked!
    • REVOLUTION #141—The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime!
    Return to top
  • ARTICLE:

    To Those Who Abhor Fascism and Truly Want to See It End: Fantasies of Trump Self-Destructing or Future Electoral Landslides Will Be the Death of Us—Drop Your Delusions and…

    Surround the White House on December 13: TRUMP MUST GO NOW!!!

    Refuse Fascism protest in front of White House, November 17, 2025.

     

    Refuse Fascism protest in front of White House, November 17, 2025.    Photo: RefuseFascism.org

    Time to Indict This Fascist Regime for Its Crimes…

    Refuse Fascism has called for major days of protest against the Trump Fascist Regime, from December 11th through the 13th. As the key focus of this, they have called on people to surround the White House with crime scene tape this Saturday, December 13, demanding Trump’s removal and presenting a comprehensive and well-documented indictment of his whole regime. 

    People's Indictment of Trump

     

    It is very important, going into the holidays and in the face of recent escalations by the fascists, that there be a mass, nonviolent political statement calling for Trump’s immediate removal—and challenging others to act. 

    We Need to Really Face Reality

    If you are listening to too many “anti-Trump influencers” fantasizing about “a regime collapsing under the weight of its own incompetence”1… if you’ve heard people chattering about “lame duck” and spin fantasies about how “two or three elections down the road we’ll make some reforms so this can’t happen again”… and especially if you’re finding comfort and reassurance from all that…

    Then we warn you: These “influencers” badly underestimate Trump and they even more grossly underestimate fascism. And here’s the thing: if you allow yourself to do this, it is not only at your own peril, but at the peril of hundreds of millions in this country and billions around the world.

    Yes, Trump may lash out and fall asleep and seem to lapse into incoherence at times… but so what? He still holds the reins of power. Not only that, the serious players around Trump and behind Trump—Stephen Miller, Russell Vought (who wrote Project 2025), JD Vance and others—are damn clear on what they want, and they are moving quickly to get it. The National Security Plan that this clique released last week aims to reshape the world and almost everything in people’s lives, from the global scale right down to the most intimate—and this is NOT a world you will want to live in or see others forced to live in. More than that: it is a world humanity may not survive. (Go here for the document; and stay tuned to revcom.us for analysis.)

    Think About the Last Two Months or Even Just the Last Two Weeks

    The last two months have witnessed the remaking of the U.S. armed forces into a force without even the pretense of legality. The U.S. armed forces have for months carried out repeated slaughters of defenseless people in the Caribbean on the sole order of Trump, as he prepares to wage an utterly illegal war. This is the same army whose commanders were told by Trump and Hegseth in late September that their principal fight will be “at home” against “the enemy within,” and that they should favor "maximum lethality, not tepid legality.”

    Then there’s the last two weeks and the escalation of the genocidal rampage against immigrants. The scope of Trump’s plans for ethnic cleansing came into even sharper view last week when he ranted that Somalis as a people are “garbage”(!), and a week before that when he mused online about reviewing the “status” of the over 50 million residents of the U.S. who were not born here—including over 20 million naturalized citizens. This is Nazi talk, preparing for Nazi action. And if you think we’re being alarmist, go here for a comparison of Trump’s first 10 months of attacking immigrants with how Hitler’s attacks on the Jews unfolded.

    What We Must Recognize… and What We Must Do

    At the very beginning of the year, Bob Avakian (BA) spelled out a bedrock truth:

    2025: A New Year—Profound New Challenges—And a Profoundly Positive Way Forward in the Face of Very Real Horror.

     

    Trump 2025 is not just another administration coming into office. This is fascism: the undisguised dictatorship of this system of capitalism-imperialism in the world’s most powerful capitalist-imperialist country—openly and aggressively oppressive and repressive—a fascism fueled by anti-scientific and Christian fundamentalist lunacy, moving to forcibly impose its racist, immigrant-persecuting, woman- and LGBT-hating MAGA madness, determined to unleash unbridled capitalist plunder and naked imperialist expansionism, prepared to violently crush any opposition or resistance.

    Has anything happened to reveal this as not true? Or has it in fact been borne out—in spades?

    In that same message, BA went on to say that:

    [T]his is “not a time for accepting this Trump/MAGA fascism as ‘legitimate,’ and staying within the confines of ‘how things work’ under this system, as Democratic Party heads and other ‘mainstream’ ruling class representatives are urging people to do. It is not a time for turning inward and attempting to ‘take care of self’ as the juggernaut of Trump/MAGA fascism gains momentum and crushes masses of people. This is a time for reaching out to all the others who feel the same outrage at Trump/MAGA fascism—a time for collective action and self-sacrificing struggle for the greater good: the greater good of defeating this fascism.”

    This is a time for uniting all who can be united in determined struggle against this fascism, beginning now, before this fascist rule is fully consolidated, and in order to prevent it from being fully consolidated—a movement aiming to become so massive and powerful that it creates a profound political crisis, such that Trump cannot govern the country and implement his fascist program.

    This too is still true—truer, and more important, than ever, in fact. 

    Bob Avakian Revolution #134

     

    Read/listen to this social media message from @BobAvakianOfficial.
        

    BobAvakianOfficial Message #119

     

    Listen to and watch Bob Avakian's social media messages.    

    Earlier this year, the prominent fascist Steve Bannon said that the Trump regime would have to move at “muzzle velocity”—that is, the peak speed of a bullet coming out of a gun. These fascists saw this fall's many protests, and they are coming back harder. We who oppose this fascism—all of us—have to recognize that the only thing that will stop this is acting offensively, eventually in our millions, at the seat of power in sustained, nonviolent, determined protest to drive the regime from power.

    All this dramatically underscores the importance of the Call from Refuse Fascism and others to “Surround the White House 2.0” on December 13, encircling it with crime scene tape and indicting it before the world. Come on December 11 and 12 to work with others to spread the word and prepare to take this message into the holidays. 

    IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY, WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A FASCIST AMERICA!

    TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Meidas+, 12/6/25  [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Venezuela and the Fascist Way of War 

    Mass Murder Is Legal Because We Say So

    Last March, the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian defined a key aspect of what we’re facing with Trump fascism this way:

    Fascism is a qualitatively different way that this system enforces its rule over people.

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arena, without even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.
    —from REVOLUTION #114: “Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!” 

    This describes what is being violently hammered into place with the regime's attacks on boats near Venezuela. The Trump fascist regime, with the Christian fascist crusader Pete Hegseth at the helm of the Department of “War”, is moving to set extremely dangerous fascist precedents. This is being met with significant opposition within the dominant ruling institutions of this system—but millions need to act now in sustained nonviolent protest in Washington, DC, to create “a political earthquake from below” to force the removal of this regime. Anything less will mean we are one major leap closer to the all-out consolidation of a fascist America.

    Setting Fascist Precedents

    Screenshots of the December 4 US strike against a boat in Caribbean.

     

    Screenshots of the December 4, 2025 strike against a boat in the Caribbean that killed 4 people.    U.S. Southern Command

    Over the last three months, the U.S. military has carried out at least 22 violent attacks on boats in waters off Venezuela, murdering at least 88 people in cold blood. These were not war crimes becausewhile the regime is lying about thisthe U.S. is not at war. This is murder, carried out under the leadership of Donald Trump, under the direct orders of Secretary of “War” Hegseth, and implemented by an unknown number of lower ranking people, all of whom have a legal and moral responsibility to refuse illegal orders. 

    But the worst thing about this is not even the terrible loss of life, the heartbroken families, or the turning of an important seaway and fishing ground into a deadly shooting gallery. Nor was the worst thing how Trump joked about how fishermen would be scared to fish—as if depriving people of their means to survival, or kidding about killing innocent people, is a big laugh!

    No, the worst thing is the fascist precedents—the “norms” of what the regime can get away with—that are being established right before our eyes, and which we will see metastasize like cancer if the regime remains in power.

    New Norm Number One: It's legal because we say so

    First, “It’s legal because we say it is.” 

    Q: So you didn't see any survivors after that first strike? HEGSETH: I did not personally see survivors. The thing was on fire. This is called the fog of war. This is what you in the press don't understand. You sit in your air conditioned offices and plant fake stories in the Washington Post

    [image or embed]

    — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) December 2, 2025 at 1:58 PM

    Look at the “legal rationales” for the massacres so far. 

    The regime says that Tren de Aragua are “narco-terrorists,” meaning that they are using drug sales, not primarily to make money, but as part of a “mission” to “poison” America, and therefore they are “at war” with the U.S., and anyone involved with them is a “combatant” in that war, subject to being murdered. Evidence? They have none. 

    The regime says that Venezuela’s president, Nicolas Maduro, heads up the “foreign terrorist organization” Cartel de los Soles. Maduro and his government have been put in the same category as groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. But the truth is: Cartel de los Soles doesn’t exist! It is a figure of speech that’s been used by Venezuelan journalists for decades to refer to military officials corrupted by drug money. “Cartel of the Suns” in English is a phrase that mocks corrupt officers by referring to the “suns” that Venezuelan generals wear to show their rank, like the stars worn by U.S. officers.

    But still the murder of fishermen is legal “because we say so.” The Office of Legal Counsel in Trump’s fascist Justice Department signed a memo that said it accepted Trump’s determination that this is an armed conflict against these alleged drug cartels and so sinking these boats is lawful. The memo has not been made public and in any case, everything about their fascist logic is based on lies. But the memo is supposed to give the participants in these illegal bombings legal cover: in other words, because the regime has said it is legal, it is legal.

    Just think of the implications. If there is no “need” for evidence, for trials, for due process of any kind, anyone who the regime considers an enemy can be labeled a “terrorist” and killed. The regime is already labeling anti-fascist resistance as “terrorism,” and even millions of peaceful protesters demanding "No Kings" as “domestic terrorists!” And Trump is sending the U.S. military into cities across the country to enforce their fascist rule.

    This is Alice in Wonderland “off with their heads” style “justice”: verdict first, trial afterwith the full backing of the world’s most powerful military.

    New Norm Number Two: a green light to slaughter civilians, “legality” be damned

    Second, giving the U.S. military open license to commit war crimes without even any pretense towards legal oversight or “laws of war.” Or in Hegseth's words, a military based on “maximum lethality, not tepid legality.”

    Admiral Frank Bradley and General Dan Caine walk to meeting with senators, December 4, 2025.

     

    U.S. Navy Admiral Frank Bradley (left) and General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (right) walk to meeting with senators on Capitol Hill, December 4, 2025.    Photo: AP

    Over the last two weeks, there has been a major open controversy within the dominant ruling institutions focused on the first of the U.S. military strikes on boats off the coast of Venezuela. In that September 2 strike, the first missile blew up the boat and killed nine of the 11 people on board. But two others survived and clung desperately to the boat’s wreckage. After watching them struggling in the water for 41 minutes, the commander of the operation, Admiral Bradley, gave the order to strike again, murdering those two survivors.

    The Washington Post said that according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation, Bradley was following Hegseth’s spoken order to “Kill them all.” Hegseth claims this is “fake news,” that Bradley gave the second order, but that (in Hegseth's view) Bradley was justified in carrying out this second strike.

    As we wrote last week:

    Ordering the execution of unarmed people who were desperately clinging for dear life to a burning boat is not just a war crime by international law, but given that the U.S. is not even at war, it is state-sanctioned murder prosecutable by U.S. criminal courts.

    On Saturday, a group of former judge advocate generals (JAGs)—military lawyers responsible for, among other things, prosecuting war crimes—issued a statement declaring that the group unanimously “considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both,” and called for “anyone who issues or follows such orders [to] be prosecuted for war crimes, murder, or both.”

    At the same time, the main committees in the Senate and House overseeing the military—made up of Republicans and Democrats—issued statements promising “vigorous oversight.”

    Only a tiny snippet of the full video has been released publicly, but last week, the full video was privately shown to some people in Congress. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said the video was “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service. You have two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion with a destroyed vessel who were killed by the United States.” 

    In response to criticism, Hegseth went on the attack. In a cabinet meeting, Hegseth defended this criminal act, saying, “This is what you and the press don't understand. You sit in your air conditioned offices or up on Capitol Hill and you nitpick... And then you want to throw up really irresponsible terms about American heroes about the judgement they made... I wrote a whole book on this topic because of what politicians and the press does to war fighters.”

    The book Hegseth refers to is from 2024, titled: The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free. Taking on the sick logic of Hegseth’s full argument here is beyond the scope of this article, but it is bound up with the lie that the U.S. got “bogged down” in Iraq and Afghanistan because the U.S. wasn't able to just openly slaughter people. (Setting aside the fact that the at least 185,000 Iraqi civilians were violently killed, either directly by the U.S. or in the storm of violence unleashed by the U.S. invasion.) In contrast, he upholds the U.S.’s nuclear bombing of Japan.

    In the book, Hegseth argues: “If our warriors are forced to follow rules arbitrarily and asked to sacrifice more lives so that international tribunals feel better about themselves, aren’t we just better off winning our wars according to our own rules?! Who cares what other countries think.” 

    In September Hegseth told an unprecedented meeting of almost all the generals and admirals in the U.S. military, “We unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy. We also don’t fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement.”

    The U.S. military has always been a machine of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Just look through the American Crime series on this website for mountains of evidence. (See for instance, American Crime Case #96: Vietnam, March 16, 1968 and American Crime Case #93, U.S. Invasion of Korea—1950.) But Hegseth is moving to rip away any pretense of legality. This is a fascist military doctrine aiming to reforge the existing U.S. military into a fascist fighting force: a force ready and willing to carry out illegal orders and kill civilians because the fascist tyrant said so.

    New Norm Number Three: Who Will You Become?

    Hegseth sent meme of cartoon Franklin as firing at boats, November 7, 2025.

     

    This brings us to the third dangerous precedent being set: Bound up with this is a bloodthirsty celebration of slaughter. In the face of all this controversy, Hegseth posted a graphic of Franklin the Turtle (an animated character for preschoolers) gleefully firing on men in boats. MAGA mouthpiece Megyn Kelly said on her SiriusXM show that “I really do kind of not only want to see them killed in the water… I’d really like to see them suffer. I would like Trump and Hegseth to make it last a long time so that they lose a limb and bleed out a little.” 

    This is how you turn people into heartless genocidal Nazis. This is how you mold a generation willing to “exterminate” and torture those they have been taught to view as lower beings. And this is how you forge a people who find meaning in the pain and degradation of others.

    Will you allow this to get hammered into place? Or will you rise to defeat this? And will you ask the deeper questions about where this fascist nightmare came from, and what it will take to get to a world without war?

  • ARTICLE:

    The method and strategy behind the Trump regime’s lawless mayhem and murder in the Caribbean…

    Trump Regime Escalates War Threats Against Venezuela

    Screenshots of the December 4 US strike against a boat in Caribbean.

     

    Screenshots of the December 4, 2025 strike against a boat in the Caribbean that killed 4 people.    U.S. Southern Command

    The Trump fascist, gangster regime's preparations to attack Venezuela have headlined the news in the U.S. and internationally day after day. The murder of people in small boats continues. The U.S. has amassed the largest troop buildup in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis1 in 1962. The largest aircraft carrier in the world is stationed right offshore from Venezuela, threatening that country. Trump has closed the skies above and surrounding Venezuela, and labeled its president, Nicolás Maduro, a narco-terrorist.

    At the same time, the conflict within the ruling class over the blatant lawlessness of this regime's actions, without Congressional approval, has come out into the open. But the Trump regime has doubled down on their determination to force Maduro out of power, ready to open fire if he doesn't step down, or isn't toppled by his own officials or generals. 

    There has been mounting political “blowback” over the regime's criminal strikes on so-called narco-terrorist boats. Nevertheless, on Monday, December 1, the U.S. Southern Command announced that it had conducted another strike against a small boat in the eastern Pacific Ocean near Colombia the previous Thursday, after an almost three week pause. This is the 22nd U.S. military strike on boats in the waters near Venezuela and Colombia since September 2. There were apparently four more casualties in this latest strike, bringing the total number murdered by the U.S. to at least 87 people. 

    Divisions Sharpen but Fascist Regime Doubles Down

    Sharpening divisions within the ruling class came to the surface last week. On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a war powers resolution seeking to halt what they called Trump's unauthorized (U.S. military) hostilities, and directed Trump to withdraw U.S. forces unless Congress explicitly authorizes the mission. 

    This came amidst sharp conflict in and beyond Congress over exposure of the hideous, wanton, and criminal murder of two survivors clinging to a boat that had already been destroyed by a U.S. strike on September 2. The vote on the Senate resolution is supposed to take place within 10 days. This followed similar legislation in the House introduced on Tuesday by three Democratic Congresspeople. 

    Whether this will trigger an attack on Venezuela before a vote, or the Republi-fascists can block the vote, remains to be seen. But remember: Trump has repeatedly insisted that he will not go to Congress for legal authorization and does not need its approval to launch an attack. 

    Hegseth Cheerleads for War

    On December 5, fascist “War” Secretary Hegseth made clear the military will continue bombing alleged “narco” boats in the Caribbean, regardless of being accused of committing a war crime. When his pal Andrew Kolvet, the new head of the fascist group Turning Point USA, wrote on X, “Every new attack aimed at Pete Hegseth makes me want another narco drug boat blown up and sent to the bottom of the ocean.” Hegseth responded on X, “Your wish is our command, Andrew. Just sunk another narco boat.”

    And on December 6, speaking at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Hegseth said, “President Trump can and will take decisive military action as he sees fit to defend our nation’s interests. Let no country on earth doubt that for a moment.” Coming as it did in the midst of the current controversy, the message was very pointed.

    The Larger Strategy at Work

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford en route to the Caribbean, October 1, 2025.

     

    Aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford sent to the Caribbean.    Photo: U.S. Navy

    On December 4, the Trump regime released its 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS). The document is supposed to present to Congress the President's strategic vision for foreign policy and defense planning. The strategy puts great stress on consolidating Latin America into an economic, political, and military fascist bloc with the U.S. at the head. This is seen as a strategic necessity for U.S. imperialism in their contention with China, their top global imperialist rival. China is now South America’s top trading partner and a major source of both foreign direct investment and energy and infrastructure lending. China is a significant and growing rival in Latin America, and the strategy puts a high priority on quashing that.

    Venezuela has become increasingly dependent on China. In the face of the U.S.'s punishing sanctions against Venezuela, nearly half of all Chinese loans to Latin America and the Caribbean have gone to Venezuela. And China buys 90 percent of Venezuela's vast oil production. The core of Trump's regime sees forcing Venezuela's president out of power as the first step toward toppling Cuba and Nicaragua, the two other regimes they see as obstacles to their strategy for the region. 

    The NSS says the regime's strategy is to “restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere, and to protect our homeland and our access to key geographies throughout the region.” In the words of the NSS document: “We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our Hemisphere.” They don’t mention China (or anyone else) in this context, but in a document that clearly sees China as the main strategic rival, the intent is clear.

    The NSS calls this strategy for Latin America the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine. Under the Monroe Doctrine, originated in the 1820s, Latin America was to be considered America's “back yard,” for the U.S. to dominate and exploit and to keep other foreign powers out. This has in fact been U.S. imperialism's treatment of Latin America ever since.

    What is new here is NOT U.S. military domination of and aggression against Latin America. The U.S. has made major invasions of other countries in the hemisphere at least 41 times, as well as pulling off brutal coups and—as they have done with Venezuela and Cuba—using economic warfare and CIA financing of opposition. That’s imperialism, and this IS an imperialist system.

    What is new is the shift away from even the barest pretense of legality—congressional oversight? NO. Revealing the findings on which these murders are supposedly based? NO. Totally ignoring any international bodies organizations, treaties or laws? YES. Crowing about murder and cultivating bloodlust? YES. 

    Bob Avakian captured it this way, in his social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #114: Defeating Trump/MAGA fascism: Looking to some future elections... or working now to mobilize millions around this powerful unifying demand: The Trump fascist regime must go!:

    Trump fascism is a regime that openly and aggressively strips away basic rights and blatantly declares that there is no rule of law and due process of law other than what it dictates, and that raw destructive power is what must rule in the international arenawithout even the pretense of adherence to international law or concern about the sovereignty, or even the right to exist, of less powerful peoples and countries.

    The point is this: Trump's bloody serial murders on the seas—and threats of even bigger war crimes against Venezuela and other countries in the region—are completely lawless and illegitimate. They are part of a larger strategy to bring Latin America even more thoroughly under U.S. domination. These moves pose extreme danger to the people of Venezuela, Colombia, to all of Latin America, and the whole world. Any war launched by the Trump fascist regime would be a criminal outrage.

    AND… People in this country have a huge responsibility to oppose any such aggression—nonviolently in the streets and in the arenas of public opinion—as an imperialist predatory war waged by a fascist regime.   

    Revolution #114

     

    Read and listen to social media message Revolution #114 from Bob Avakian.   

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1.  The Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962 was a 13-day confrontation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union over whether Soviet nuclear missiles would be deployed in Cuba. (This came after the U.S. attempted to overthrow the Cuban government in the 1961 Bay of Pigs Invasion.) It's considered the closest point the Cold War came to escalating into nuclear conflict. See "Chapter 5: Life Interrupted"—An Excerpt from From Ike to Mao and Beyond, by Bob Avakian.  [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    A call from THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity:

    NO U.S. IMPERIALIST WAR ON VENEZUELA!

    Emergency Protest in front of the White House (on Pennsylvania/Lafayette Square) at 5 pm on the day of any U.S. invasion, bombing, or assassination in Venezuela. Or 5 pm the next day if it happens in the evening.

    Trump and warships

     

    Survivors clung to wreckage after the first U.S. bomb struck, then Hegseth ordered “Kill them all”

     

    ** The U.S. military has blown up 22 boats off the coast of Venezuela and Colombia, murdering over 80 people alleged to be "drug smugglers" with no evidence and no due process, and in at least one case executing helpless survivors of a U.S. strike, reportedly based on orders from U.S. War Secretary Pete Hegseth to “kill them all.”

    ** Trump has declared the airspace above Venezuela to be closed, an illegal act of aggression and violation of sovereignty.

    ** Trump has put a bounty out on Venezuela's president and declared him to be a "narco-terrorist" leader of a drug cartel ("Cartel de los Soles") which doesn't even exist.

    ** Trump has authorized the CIA to conduct lethal covert operations inside Venezuela.

    ** Trump has said that "land action" against alleged drug traffickers in Venezuela would be starting "very soon."

    ** The U.S. has amassed about 15,000 troops in the Caribbean, including the world's largest warship.

    ** The Trump regime is purging the military of anyone who objects to war crimes and threatening the Congresspeople who reminded the military of their duty to disobey illegal orders.

    All this is criminal. It is escalating. And it could very well be a prelude to all-out war. People in this country have a huge responsibility to oppose any such aggression, nonviolently in the streets and in the arenas of public opinion, as an imperialist predatory war waged by a fascist regime.

    To organizations and individuals: endorse this call, or put out your own complementary call to action. Spread this call. And message us @therevcoms to talk with us about your ideas about what needs to be done.

    Trump and warships

     

  • ARTICLE:

    Donald Trump's Persecution and Vilification of Immigrants in the First 10 Months of His Term Rivals Hitler’s Persecution of the Jews in HIS First 10 Months... in Fact, in Some Ways Trump EXCEEDS Hitler

    Jewish boy surrenders in Warsaw, Poland, May 1943. Chicago family arrested by U.S. Border Patrol, October 2025

     

    This headline is not clickbait. It’s not hyperbole. It’s a statement of FACT. 

    We are invoking the utter horror of Hitler’s monstrous assault on Jewish people under his regime (1933-1945) because, while the particulars may be different, THAT IS THE TRAJECTORY WE ARE ON RIGHT NOW with respect to immigrants. And either we recognize it and act in a way that is commensurate with the stakes and the urgency, or millions and millions of people may well pay a price which will go far beyond even the massive suffering already inflicted by Trump.

    Starting Point: Both Trump and Hitler Believed Racial Purity Was/Is Central to National Power and Wealth (“Greatness”)

    Emerging as a fascist political leader in a period of deep crisis for German imperialism, in the wake of its devastating defeat in World War 1, Hitler held to an extremely racist nationalism which blamed the Jews for Germany’s loss in the war, for poverty, for crime… everything. The motto of the official paper of Hitler’s Nazi Party was “The Jews are our misfortune.” 

    NASIs marching off Jews

     

    Jews arrested following Kristallnacht, Baden Baden, Germany 1938   

    Hitler’s “theory” imagined Germans as a “pure” and “superior” race brought down by the “impure” and “sinister” Jews. And so the restoration of German power on a world scale depended on expelling, or reducing to slave-like conditions, or murdering Jews, as well as Slavs and other peoples who were viewed as “inferior” by these demented Nazis. Thus from early on, Hitler spoke about finding “a Final Solution” to “the Jewish problem,” and simultaneously forging national unity among those of “pure German blood.”

    At the start, Nazi policy was to either expel Jews, or terrorize them into “self-deporting,” by cutting away the legal, economic and social ground that Jews stood on. (They also aimed to wipe out the cultural influence and imprint, the history, language, art and communities of Jewish people.) 

    Hitler’s first year as chancellor (1933) was mostly devoted to laying the foundations for what was to come: consolidating his undisputed power over the Nazi Party and the government, and passing a law to legalize “de-naturalizing” nationalized Jewish citizens who had emigrated from Eastern Europe. Jews began to be barred from certain jobs and professions. Nazi Stormtroopers organized a boycott of Jewish businesses and whipped up anti-Semitism in the population. Anti-Jewish riots were unleashed. The first concentration camp was opened at Dachau, though this was mainly for communists and other political enemies of the Nazis.

    There was a slow tightening of the noose choking Jewish life over the next few years—including some violence and detentions—and some people were expelled or fled “voluntarily.” But it was not until 1938 that state-organized violence was unleashed on a mass scale, starting with the Storm Trooper-led Kristallnacht pogrom on November 9-10 in which 91 Jews were killed, many more beaten or abused, and thousands of homes, businesses, schools and synagogues vandalized or set on fire. Only then did a broad sense of alarm take hold in the Jewish population, and large numbers sought to leave.

    But for various reasons, including the refusal of the Western “democracies” to admit significant numbers of Jewish refugees, most found themselves trapped. In that sense, this was a "failure" of the Nazi’s policy to “solve the Jewish problem” through expulsions and “self-migration.” 

    But here is a crucial point: this “failure” did not lead to an abandonment of the war on Jews, but an escalation. Especially with the start of World War 2 in 1939, the Nazis adopted a policy of containment: forcing the entire Jewish population of Germany—and then of the countries Germany conquered in the first years of the war—into miserable overcrowded and locked-down ghettos, or into even worse concentration camps. The single concentration camp at Dachau had mushroomed into a network of 44,000 camps, ghettos and other detention sites holding millions of Jews under the most barbaric conditions. Large numbers died of disease and hunger, or on the whim of Nazi guards. 

    Finally, in 1941, the Nazis set out to literally murder all the Jews within their reach, through massacres and in gas chambers, and succeeded in killing six million, as well as many millions of other nationalities. Note that this decision was eight years after Hitler took power.

    Trump’s Nazi-like White Nationalism and Hatred of Immigrants

    DT-GenocidalRacist-5.jpg

     

    The Trump regime is on a similar path, guided by a similar outlook. 

    Trump truly rivals Hitler in his dehumanization of immigrants, repeatedly describing them as subhuman “animals” and monstrous criminals that revel in tormenting “our people.” He falsely and repeatedly claimed that Haitian immigrants were stealing and eating the pets of their neighbors and that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” This past week he went even further—seizing the spotlight of a televised meeting with his cabinet to call all Somalis in the U.S. “garbage,” who should get out of the U.S. and fix “their own” country. (A high percentage of people of Somali heritage within the U.S. are U.S. citizens—in Minnesota, which has the highest concentration of people of Somali descent in the U.S., 95 percent are citizens. But in the past two weeks the fascist administration has increasingly talked of “denaturalizing” citizens.)

    This has been a steady drumbeat that goes back over a decade, aimed at whipping up and weaponizing fear and hatred among tens of millions of followers. And it comes with a heavy dose of Hitler-ite extreme nationalism. Over and over, Trump says if you don’t seal the border, and if you don’t bar immigrants from “shithole countries” like Haiti or Black African countries, then “you won’t have a country.” In his recent Thanksgiving rant (that the White House labeledone of the most important messages ever released by President Trump”), Trump painted a terrifying image of “Americans” (meaning white people) under threat from “Somalian gangs… roving the streets looking for ‘prey’ as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone.”

    Trump and his defenders have tried to pretend that this is all about going after “the worst of the worst,” while leaving the law-abiding immigrant majority alone. This would be unjust enough, but here is a basic fact: of the roughly 700,000 immigrants booked into ICE custody this year (as of October 1), five percent had convictions for violent crimes, and 73 percent had no criminal record of any kind. Most criminal charges were for immigration or traffic violations! So it is overwhelmingly “regular people” trying to live their lives and feed their families who are being driven out.

    Trump spewed forth his actual thinking in his Thanksgiving screed. He complained: “The official United States Foreign population stands at 53 million people (Census), most of which are on welfare, from failed nations, or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs, or drug cartels… This refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America.” [Our emphasis] 

    In other words, Trump is plainly identifying the vast majority of immigrants as enemies to be driven out. And if current methods don’t do the job, Trump—if he remains in power—will almost certainly escalate to more brutal, terroristic and murderous means.

    The Regime’s Brutal Attacks on Immigrants Are in the Service of Racist Fascist Ideology

    ICE Raid in a North Chicago suburb on October 31 2025.

    The demonization of immigrants is not a "distraction" but the heart of the comprehensive fascist program. The Trump/MAGA forces ache for an America in which there are millions fewer foreign-born, non-English speaking, nonwhite, and non-Christian people in the country and on the streets, and where white Christian men are openly setting the terms and in charge. This nightmarish “vision” runs through everything MAGA does, but it is most openly on display in the anti-immigrant campaign. 

    The regime has said it aims to deport 3,000 people a day, or about a million a year. That’s a huge amount of suffering for families ripped apart, but still a small percentage of the U.S. immigrant population that is being targeted. And even according to the Department of Homeland Security (which is overseeing this all, and which is notoriously dishonest), they have only reached about half that number.2

    But the bigger picture is that the way in which they do this is meant to drive immigrants out of the country—including legal permanent residents and even citizens—by making life in the U.S. impossible, and increasingly terrifying, for people who were not born here. 

    This speaks to the shocking and seemingly needless brutality of the immigration Nazis. The situation right now is one marked by the pervasive presence of heavily armed and masked men, shattering car windows with axes and dragging parents out right in front of their kids. Regular cops, sheriffs and highway patrol demanding that brown-skinned people “show me your papers.” People being abducted off the street and then “disappeared” into ICE’s network of hundreds of detention centers, many in remote locations, without any contact with their families, lawyers, and sometimes medical care—that’s if they are not whisked off to a torture prison in El Salvador, or forcibly deported to a country that they have no ties to.

    Sixty thousand people are in ICE custody now, often in what are straight up concentration camp conditions. The American Immigration Council reports:

    a Massachusetts ICE field office used a windowless room as a holding area packed with “35 to 40 men” who had to share one toilet without privacy and sleep “head-by-toe” on the concrete floors. Similarly, at Krome Service Processing Center in Florida, people were forced to sleep on the floor and only given “a cup of rice and a glass of water a day.” ICE is refusing to give people enough food in some facilities and provides rotten food at other facilities.

    At least 23 detainees have died in ICE custody this year—that’s higher than ICE’s death toll during the first year of the COVID epidemic!

    How can you read this and not think about conditions in Nazi concentration camps?

    They Are Not Stopping with “Illegals”

    And at the same time, the regime is stripping away one category after another of legal status short of citizenship. So, yesterday you had legal status and were building a life on that basis, but today you are “illegal” and wide open for detention or deportation. 

    For example, Temporary Protected Status (TPS)—covering situations where conditions in people’s home country are simply too dangerous to return—has been eliminated for people from nine countries since Trump took office. This has stripped at least 675,000 people of legal residence, subjecting them to deportation at any time. Many more countries are in line to lose their TPS status soon. And Trump’s Thanksgiving message declared that he plans to:

    • “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries”
    • “terminate all the millions of Biden’s illegal admissions”
    • “remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States”
    • “end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens of our Country”
    • “denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility”
    • “deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization.” [Emphasis ours]

    This could be shorthanded to “find a way to deport every non-white immigrant, even naturalized citizens, and make sure that those who remain are denied the most basis elements of the social safety net!”

    All of this is taking a huge toll on immigrants, regardless of their legal status. DHS claims that 1.6 million immigrants have “voluntarily” self-deported this year—that’s three times as many as ICE claims it was able to legally deport.

    A National Wave of Terror That Is Driving Millions into the Shadows—or Out of the Country

    ICE agents raid South Shore apartment building: 'They just treated us like we were nothing' October 1, 2025 | ABC 7 Chicago 

    Earlier we referenced Trump’s outrageous screed about good white Christians “locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone” by rampaging immigrant gangs. But who really is “locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone”?

    Listen to the voice of Maria Hinojosa, a Mexican-American journalist who grew up in Chicago, posting on X in early September, right after ICE thugs began their months-long terroristic assault on the Latino people there:

    [I am] witnessing a community under siege. And I think about people going to see the Anne Frank exhibit in New York City.3 And my brain explodes. She is right here in Chicago. Her name is Anita. Her name is ANITA. And she is invisible. And she is Mexican.

    Again, this is not hype, and it is in fact happening around the U.S., in an ongoing way, and we have all seen the evidence. And children are not exempted—in fact they are often targeted.

    Federal agent carries a child during an imigration arrest in downtown Chicago, September 28.

     

    Federal agent carries a child during an immigration arrest in downtown Chicago, September 28.    Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times via AP

    • Pro Publica reports that ICE is holding at least 600 children in custody, separated from their parents who sometimes don’t even know where they are, held for an average of almost six months. Think about the overwhelming fear and anxiety this inflicts on children and their families—but more than that, on the whole community who now realize that it could be them, their kid, no matter what their status is, no matter how much they “follow the rules” and try to be “good citizens.” Think what it means to know in your gut that the society you live in would even allow this to be done to children, because of where they were born, the color of their skin, the language they speak.
    • neaToday (publication of National Education Association) quotes a Texas Special Ed teacher: “They have abducted our students, separated our families, and terrorized communities.” They cite a child psychologist who notes that what children are seeing is “their classmates, their family members, their neighbors often being apprehended in violent and confusing ways while… doing things like picking up their children from the bus stop or going to their jobs, and this, for children, creates a sense that nowhere and no one is safe.” [Our emphasis.]
    • The Los Angeles Times reports that about 7,000 students have left the L.A. school system since ICE raids intensified there last summer. The district superintendent said, “These declines reflect a climate of fear and instability created by ongoing immigration crackdowns, which disrupt family stability, housing and mobility. When families are afraid to be seen, or when they cannot afford to remain in their communities, they are less likely to enroll, reenroll, or stay in public schools.” An L.A. teacher said, “We're not too sure if some students are sheltering in place, if they're working, or if they got deported or self-deported. We've done our best to help them with resources but with a lot of the kiddos, we just don't know what happened to them.”

    “Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now.”

    Left untouched, there is a trajectory here. And while the exact destination of this horror cannot be predicted, the objective of “racial purification” is and will be at the heart of that trajectory. And like Hitler, Trump has and will double-down on that, even in the face of opposition, rather than retreat from this core principle. Trump and his fascist movement cannot be constrained, they cannot be “waited out,” they must be nonviolently removed from power. 

    A final and more immediate note, especially for those waiting on the mid-terms: despite the truly heroic and inspiring resistance that has arisen to these deportations, they have in fact been steadily increasing—and the tens of billions of dollars in extra money given by the fascist-controlled Congress to ICE has not yet really begun to stream. And instead of moderating, the rhetoric and plans from the administration have become more fanatical and more unabashedly racist. 

    They could be defeated by millions pouring into the streets and that political earthquake from below, in the words of Bob Avakian, compelling and enabling those on the top who do in fact strongly oppose Trump for their own reasons to move in ways that could result in the end of the regime. But the clock on that possibility is ticking. To wait at this point for the elections, or to pin your hopes on “the regime is melting down,” amounts to accommodation—and, as Bob Avakian has put it,  “accommodation means collaboration with its monstrous and mounting tyranny and ongoing atrocities.” (from social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #124: Donald Trump’s whole fascist regime is caught in a contradiction of its own making: his continual Big Lies.)

    BE IN DC, DECEMBER 11-13—SURROUND THE WHITE HOUSE! TRUMP MUST GO NOW!

    BobAvakianOfficial Revolution #112

     

    Listen to social media message Revolution #112 from Bob Avakian   

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Deportation is usually a relatively slow process, which Trump is trying to accelerate by stripping away all but the thinnest pretenses of legal procedures and legal rights. But even then, other countries have to agree to accept the deportees, it takes time and money to transport people to sometime-distant countries, and so on. These are the same types of problems Hitler encountered in his maniacal drive to “cleanse” Germany of Jews. [back]

    2. Anne Frank was a Jewish teenager who, along with her family, hid for two years in an attic in occupied Netherlands to escape Nazi agents that were hunting down Jewish people. She kept a moving diary of the experience, which has been read by hundreds of millions, and became an important voice for the millions murdered. The family was eventually discovered; Anne was sent to a concentration camp in Germany, where she died a few months later. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Stephen Miller says immigrants come from—and must return to—“broken homelands”… but the REAL question is:

    Who Broke Those “Homelands”? And What Does That Tell Us About the Fascists Who Now Rule This One?

    Updated

    Four national guard in front of Lincoln Memorial, November 28, 2025.

     

    National Guard patrol in front of the Lincoln Memorial, November 28, 2025.    Photo: AP

    On November 26, two National Guard soldiers in Washington, DC were shot at close range. Sarah Beckstrom, a 20-year-old woman, died, and Andrew Wolfe, a 24-year-old man, is still in the hospital with extremely serious injuries. Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan man who fought on the U.S. side in the Afghanistan war has been charged with first degree murder and three other felonies. He has pleaded not guilty.2 Lakanwal was shot on the scene and is still in the hospital. 

    The shooting of the two National Guard members was a heinous act. And as Refuse Fascism said in a statement, “Incidents such as this have nothing to do with and only do harm to the nonviolent mass struggle of millions that is needed to drive the fascist Trump regime from power.” But Trump and the other MAGA vultures were quick to jump on this tragic situation to further whip up hatred against Muslims and overall anti-immigrant sentiment, and to impose even more restrictions on immigration from the “Third World.” 

    Although even the police say that they don’t know what motivated the shooting, Trump declared it was “terrorism.” Kristi Noem (head of the Department of Homeland Security) claimed (without evidence) that Lakanwal had been “radicalized” by people in the Afghan community in Washington state. She said that that whole community needed to be “investigated.” Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville tweetedWe must IMMEDIATELY BAN all ISLAM immigrants and DEPORT every single Islamist who is living among us just waiting to attack.” Trump called for a “reexamination” of all Afghans who had previously been granted asylum or other legal status. 

    Trump also called for the expulsion of all Somali immigrants, calling them “garbage,” and saying they should “go back to where they came from” and that “their country is no good for a reason.” And he ordered major ICE operations targeting Somalis in the Minnesota-St. Paul area, where more than 80,000 people of Somali origin live.

    In that same cold-blooded xenophobic (immigrant-hating) spirit Trump’s chief advisor, Stephen Miller, posted this (responding to criticism of Trump for blaming whole countries for the [alleged] act of one person):

    This is the great lie of mass migration. You are not just importing individuals. You are importing societies. No magic transformation occurs when failed states cross borders. At scale, migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions, and terrors, of their broken homelands.

    How America “Broke” Afghanistan

    As one Pakistani novelist said on hearing this, “Who broke the homeland!!?” 

    This is exactly the right question! The answer to that starts with the fact that Afghanistan is “cursed” by its strategic location bridging Central and East Asia to the Middle East. So imperialist powers have repeatedly fought to control it. Britain invaded three times in the 19th century. In 1979, the former Soviet Union, which was a social-imperialist country (whose dominant power is now Russia), invaded to prop up a friendly government. In response, the U.S. helped organize, arm and fund Islamic fundamentalist armies to overthrow the pro-Soviet government. At least one-half million Afghan civilians were killed, and Afghanistan’s Islamic theocratic fascist forces were given a tremendous boost. This was part of U.S. imperialism’s drive to control the entire region of Central Asia and the Middle East. Yes, all these countries had all the problems of oppressive class societies to begin with—but by the second half of the 20th century, U.S. imperialism was the power that mainly set the terms for who did and didn’t rule, and what did and didn’t happen in these countries.

    In reaction to this and other developments, nationalist political movements rooted in Islam arose in this region. Bob Avakian summed this up in 2007 in a way that explains much about the international dynamics of the past 30 years:

    What we see in contention here with Jihad [Islamic fundamentalism] on the one hand and McWorld/McCrusade [increasingly globalized western imperialism] on the other hand, are historically outmoded strata among colonized and oppressed humanity up against historically outmoded ruling strata of the imperialist system. These two reactionary poles reinforce each other, even while opposing each other. If you side with either of these “outmodeds,” you end up strengthening both.

    While this is a very important formulation and is crucial to understanding much of the dynamics driving things in the world in this period, at the same time we do have to be clear about which of these “historically outmodeds” has done the greater damage and poses the greater threat to humanity: It is the historically outmoded ruling strata of the imperialist system, and in particular the U.S. imperialists.

    The U.S. War Against the Taliban

    Afghani boy shows scars from shrapnel. wounds U.S. bombing

     

    Ghulam shows scars from shrapnel wounds received during U.S. bombing of wedding in Kakarak in July 2002 which killed 25 people.    Photo: AP

    Afghanis peer in hole left by US airstrike

     

    Afghan villagers stand near a hole in the ceiling of a house in Kakarak, Afghanistan on July 3, 2002 after it was hit by a U.S. bomb. Between 2004 and 2018, the U.S. dropped over 38,000 bombs on Afghanistan.    Photo: AP

    Afghani children 2004

     

    Afghani children, 2004.    Photo: AP

    17 year old victim of an acid attack in Afghanistan

     

    November 12, 2008: Atifa Bibi, an Afghan school girl, recovers in a hospital after two men threw acid on her in Kandahar as she walked to school.     Photo: AP

    Afghani kids play in rubble from U.S. drone strike

     

    Afghan children play near the debris of a damaged house after a U.S. drone crashed in Jalalabad, east of Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, August 2011. By March 2020, the U.S. had carried out over 12,000 drone strikes in Afghanistan, killing thousands of Afghans.    Photo: AP

    Hospital in Afghanistan destroyed by U.S. airstrike

     

    October 16, 2015: An employee of Doctors Without Borders walks inside the charred remains of the organization's hospital after it was hit by a U.S. airstrike in Kunduz, Afghanistan killing 42 Afghans. By August 2016, some 111,000 people had been killed and over 116,000 injured in the war.    Photo: AP

    7-Afghanistan-2008-AP09080505156-600.jpg

     

    Relatives look at children killed by a 2009 U.S. airstrike in Kandahar.    Photo: AP

    People inspect the rubble of home in Afghanistan destroyed by U.S. drone strike..

     

    People inspect the damage of the Ahmadi family house in Kabul, Afghanistan, which was destroyed in the U.S. drone strike on August 29, 2021.    Photo: AP

    killed_by_us_afghanistan-2009-RAWA-600px.jpg

     

    Bodies of civilians killed by U.S. airstrike in Afghanistan, 2009.    Photo: RAWA

    One grouping of those theocrats, the Taliban, came to power in 1996 after a period of civil war. They imposed extreme oppression of women as well as minority religions and others. In 2001, Osama bin Laden operated out of a base in Afghanistan to engineer the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. The Taliban offered to negotiate bin Laden’s turnover to the U.S., but the U.S. instead seized the opportunity to invade and occupy Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. They cobbled together a corrupt and widely despised puppet government in its place. War erupted between the U.S. and its lackey government on one side and the Taliban on the other, leading to an estimated 241,000 civilian deaths by violence, and hundreds of thousands more from war-caused hunger and disease.

    Forty years of war, generations being born, living and dying surrounded by death, destruction, brutal oppressors and foreign armies. Agriculture devastated, and the economy increasingly dependent on war spending and other funds, almost all of which either came from or were controlled by U.S. imperialism.

    What It Really Means to Work for American Occupiers

    During the U.S. occupation many thousands of people worked for the U.S., the pro-U.S. government, or NGOs or businesses tied to the U.S. Some were thugs and gangsters tied into one or another warlord that the U.S. allied with, but some took these jobs either to ward off hunger, or in the misguided belief that the U.S. was actually there to help liberate them from the oppressive Taliban. But doing this also put them at odds with many in their families or neighbors who opposed the U.S. occupation even as they also hated the Taliban. And it put them at risk of being killed by the Taliban.

    Rahmanullah Lakanwal was one of them, reportedly recruited into the CIA-led Unit 03 of the Kandahar Strike Force in 1992, when he was just 16 years old. These Strike Forces (also known as “Zero Units”) were in fact death squads, committing war crimes against the Afghan people. In 2019, Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported on 14 documented incidents in which these units carried out night raids, bursting into homes as people slept, and slaughtering civilians, including small children and elderly people, and other crimes.3

    When the U.S. was recruiting Afghans to work with them, they always promised “we’ll protect you, we’ll have your back.” But then when the U.S. pulled out, it made no serious provision for the safety of tens of thousands of people who had worked with them, whether as teachers, soldiers or political leaders. There was a desperate scramble for people to get out as the Taliban retook the country. Some thousands did escape, and then (like Lakanwal) were put through intensive vetting to prove, again and again, that they were “loyal” enough to enter the U.S., while the U.S. government sought to wash its hands of them as quickly as possible.4

    We don’t know a lot about Lakanwal, but one thing that has been reported by friends, family and social workers is that he appeared to be going through a mental breakdown, spending weeks in a dark room not talking to anyone, going off for weeks in the family car. And this was reportedly bound up with his experience in the Zero Unit.

    So when it comes to the question of “who broke the homeland?” it is clear it is the imperialist system, with its built-in drive for imperialist powers like the U.S. and its rivals to divide and redivide the world. Then, when things go sideways for them, they have the nerve to turn on the victims of their butchery and treachery, and question their humanity, and demand that they be cast out of society or driven into the shadows? Afghanistan is not unique in this. You can look at our series American Crime and find some similar stories all over the world, including from more than one of the 19 non-European countries from which Trump has now banned all immigration to the U.S.

    Faced with a huge crisis of that very system, the fascist section of this imperialist ruling class—Trump, Miller, Vance and all the rest—are on a mission to save that system through a fascist form of rule. In their view, a fascist form of rule—one rooted in blatant, open and violent white supremacy, in male domination of women and repression of LGBT people, and in open hatred and massive scapegoating of  those they consider “foreigners”; one saturated in anti-scientific ignorance and theocratic fundamentalist Christianity; and one in which due process and civil liberties are essentially wiped out—is the only thing that can save the empire.

    In the face of this, once again, we revcoms say:

    In The Name Of Humanity, We Refuse To Accept A Fascist America!
    This Whole System Is Rotten And Illegitimate!
    We Need And We Demand: A Whole New Way To Live, A Fundamentally Different System!
    Bringing Forward Another Way cover 600
    Bringing Forward Another Way cover 600

     

    This groundbreaking analysis, made during the George W. Bush years, continues to be very relevant, especially in the context of sharpening contradictions centered in the Middle East.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. We want to emphasize that Lakanwal is innocent until proven guilty. This (“innocent until proven guilty”) is an important principle for many reasons, but especially so in this situation where virtually all information is coming from the police and FBI. It is a well-known fact that such agencies will bend facts, outright lie or even manufacture evidence, especially in “high-profile” cases. In this article we are getting into how the fascists are trying to use the incident, which is different from whether the incident went down the way the authorities say. [back]

    2. Speaking of these night raids, which were a central part to U.S. military operations, a U.S. Army Ranger told a journalist, “You go on night raids, make more enemies, then you gotta go on more night raids for the more enemies you now have to kill.” [back]

    3. There was significant anger about this from sections of the U.S. military and diplomatic core who felt they had some responsibility for people they had drawn into a dangerous situation. Many organized private groups to get people out. For some, this was an eye-opening experience, beginning to grasp that the claims by the rulers that their wars were waged for the benefit of oppressed people, were just propaganda to suck people in. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    The Lie of Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire

    Genocidal Slaughter, Blockades and Gaza Concentration Camps

    The ceasefire risks creating a dangerous illusion that life in Gaza is returning to normal. But while Israeli authorities and forces have reduced the scale of their attacks and allowed limited amounts of humanitarian aid into Gaza, the world must not be fooled. Israel’s genocide is not over.
    —Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International

    Nearly two months ago, Israel and Hamas4 agreed to Trump’s 20-point “Peace Plan” and a ceasefire. Last month, the United Nations Security Council approved a U.S.-sponsored resolution endorsing this plan.5 By then all the living Israeli hostages held by Hamas had been freed, meeting a key requirement of the ceasefire.

    But the ethnic cleansing and vicious oppression and terror being brought down on the Palestinian people has continued, even as this is getting less and less worldwide attention.

    Israel is still:

    * Killing: Israel’s military continues to bombard Gaza—from land, air and sea.

    At least 366 Palestinians have been killed and another 938 injured since October 11, when the ceasefire took effect.6 Israel’s ongoing killing spree also spreads terror across Gaza, and makes life, reconstruction, and aid deliveries much more difficult if not impossible. 

    Israel firebombs refugee camps, destroying tents and burning alive people inside them. And they have repeatedly used drones to kill people for crossing an arbitrarily drawn and often invisible "yellow line" (these are areas from which the Israeli army operates).

    This past week, two children—brothers Fadi and Juma Abu Assi, 8 and 10 years old—were killed by an Israeli drone as they gathered firewood for their father, who is disabled. 

    In an official statement, the Israeli army said these children were "suspects" who "conducted suspicious activities on the ground, and approached [Israeli] troops operating in the southern Gaza Strip, posing an immediate threat to them." They continued that the Israeli army "eliminated the suspects in order to remove the threat."

    The threat?! These were unarmed children collecting firewood so they could eat a warm meal! 

    Upon receiving their dead bodies, their father said, trembling: "I removed the shroud and hugged them. My little Juju's head was blown off... His arms were severed and parts of his torso were gone." He added that "Fadi's right hand and left leg were cut off."

    * Blockading: Israel continues to blockade urgently needed food, medicine and other aid—even infant formula. Instead of the 600 trucks a day promised by Trump’s plan, Israel is allowing in only 220 daily, while some 6,000 trucks loaded with enough aid for three months wait at the border. Israel finally opened the Rafah crossing into Egypt—the only crossing open to the world and not leading into Israeli territory. But Israel opened it only for Palestinians leaving Gaza, not the thousands wanting to come back in.

    Men walk by destroyed apartment buildings at the Al-Shati camp in Gaza City, November 18, 2025.

     

    Apartment buildings destroyed by Israeli attacks at the Al-Shati camp in Gaza City, November 18, 2025.    Photo: AP

    * Freezing: Israel is still blocking tents, mobile homes and other housing from entering Gaza, denying Palestinians adequate shelter, even as a harsh winter is upon them. 

    * Destroying: Israel is continuing to occupy growing swaths of Gaza and to destroy and level whole neighborhoods, leaving more and more Palestinians with no homes to return to.

    No Change in Israel’s Genocidal Intent, No Change in Trump's Genocidal Support 

    Trump and his fascist counterpart in Israel—led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (aka Netan-Nazi)—continue to work closely together. And while they do have real tactical differences on various issues, the U.S. continues to pour huge amounts of political and military support into backing Israel's military death machine. 

    In fact, on December 1, Trump and Netanyahu reportedly spoke by phone. According to Netanyahu’s Office, they reaffirmed their joint “commitment to disarming Hamas and demilitarizing the Gaza Strip,” this as Israel drops U.S.-made bombs on Gaza.7

    Amnesty International sums up: “Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction, without signaling any change in their intent.”8 (Emphasis added)

    It warns, “The ceasefire must not become a smokescreen for Israel’s ongoing genocide.” 

    Yet that’s what it’s become, with Israel’s atrocities barely making the mainstream news, if they are covered at all. 

    U.S. “Housing Solution” for Gaza = The Promise of Israeli Concentration Camps

    Children in makeshift camp for displaced people in the central Gaza Strip, November 18, 2025.

     

    Children in makeshift camp for displaced people in central Gaza Strip, November 18, 2025.    Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana

    Shelter is one of the most urgent needs people have in Gaza. Israel has systematically—and criminally—damaged or destroyed 84 percent of all structures, including completely destroying over 60 percent of its housing units. Today, 1.7 million Palestinians—over 80 percent of Gaza's population, is displaced and forced to live in tents or makeshift shelters. Especially now, with winter's freezing rains, they’re barely habitable, if habitable at all. 

    If this were a real ceasefire, Israel would end its bombardments and open Gaza’s borders. This would allow the UN and other aid agencies to flood the territory with the equipment and supplies they have at the ready. It would enable the Palestinian people, with all their creativity, determination and experience, to build livable temporary shelters and then begin the process of reconstruction. 

    But Israel’s objectives and the Trump plan have never been about helping the Palestinian people, much less respecting their fundamental rights and humanity. They’ve always been about suppressing and subordinating—even eliminating—the Palestinian population and ensuring U.S. imperialist domination of the Middle East, and Israel’s dominance of historic Palestine, and military dominance in the region overall. 

    As a result, virtually no reconstruction has taken place in Gaza. Why? Because of Israel’s ongoing attacks and blockade, and because the Trump plan gives Palestinians no authority to govern their own land, determine their own future, or protect themselves from Israel’s murderous assaults. So the U.S.-sponsored UN resolution calls for disarming all Palestinians and “demilitarizing” Gaza (except of course for Israel and forces chosen by Trump) before any construction can be authorized there. 

    Map of Gaza showing areas red and green

     

    Gaza. The U.S. has reportedly decided to begin building in the so-called “Green Zone,” the area that’s been seized, occupied, and violently cleared of Palestinians by Israel. The so-called “Red Zone” to the west, where over two million Palestinians have been forced into, would be left to rot for the time being.   

    What the U.S. has reportedly decided to do is begin building new, temporary housing in the so-called “Green Zone.” That’s the 53-58 percent of eastern and southern Gaza that’s been seized and occupied by Israel, cleared of nearly all Palestinians, largely razed to the ground, and is now policed by the genocidal Israeli army.

    The so-called “Red Zone” to the west, where over two million Palestinians have been forced into, would be left to rot for the time being.9 

    All the details of this plan have yet to be decided on or released, but it’s not hard to see how it could lay the groundwork for new genocidal outrages:

    • There are reports that Israel will only allow in "well vetted" people—with no ties to Hamas. But Israel has a long history of claiming people have ties to Hamas to set them up for assassination or imprisonment and torture, providing zero proof—from journalists, doctors, aid workers and on and on. This provides a political pretext to only allow in people who will collaborate with Israel.
    • Would Palestinians be allowed to leave, for example to see family members, or are they to be locked into a concentration camp disguised as a housing development?
    • Would Palestinians trying to enter be detained or imprisoned?
    • Would the whole operation turn into the kind of killing field that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s aid stations did? (See box on new CNN exposure of mass graves.)
    • By refusing to rebuild in the “Red Zone,” where well over 90 percent of the Palestinian population is living, is this a means for forcing a mass exodus from Gaza?
    • Does this plan open the door to a permanent Israeli occupation, or annexation of over half of Gaza and perhaps “repopulate” it with Israeli settlers?

    What's Driving This?

    On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a reactionary attack on Israel which included the targeting of civilians. some 1,200 people were killed and some 250 taken as hostages. In response, Israel launched a full-scale genocide aimed at the Palestinian people as a whole. 

    In the two years plus, Israel has murdered at least 70,117 people, including at least 20,179 children. At least 170,999 people have been injured. And these numbers do not include the thousands still buried under the bombed buildings and ash. Israel obliterated the entire infrastructure of Gaza, leaving only trauma, terror and rubble—schools, hospitals, mosques and churches, libraries... all gone.

    In November 2023, revcom.us spoke to why this was happening: 

     

    Netanyahu (aka Netan-Nazi) and Israel’s rulers are seizing on Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel—which included the war crimes of taking hostages and the murder of civilians—to attempt a “final solution” to the “Palestinian problem.” This means, at a minimum, reducing the Palestinians to such a state that they can no longer pose any obstacle to Israel’s objectives. Beyond that, it could mean mass expulsion and/or slaughter on a massive scale, beyond even what Israel is now carrying out.

    This is what has continued to unfold—in new and horrific ways. And because the U.S. system of capitalism-imperialism requires Israel as a military and political outpost in the strategic region of the Middle East—the rulers of this system have continued to back and fund and support Israel's open genocidal slaughter.

    Trump’s Fascist, Imperialist “Peace Plan” Must Be Opposed

    To maintain the cover of stability, Trump is insisting that his “peace plan” is moving ahead, despite problems (including Israeli airstrikes), into Phase 2, and that he plans to announce his “Board of Peace” before Christmas. This is the board—with Trump himself at the head—that would assume total control of Gaza, and eventually—supposedly—replace Israeli forces with an international stabilization force. Whether this will actually come to pass is impossible to know with certainty.

    However, people should recall that in 2001, the U.S. invaded and occupied Afghanistan, promising to liberate its people, end “terrorism,” and build a new society. In 2003, it invaded Iraq, promising to create a liberated, “democratic” Iraq. These grandiose promises and real plans of the U.S. imperialists failed abysmally, while costing hundreds of thousands of Afghans and nearly a million Iraqis their lives. 

    What we can say with certainty about the current situation in Gaza, and which revcom.us has previously exposed HERE and HERE, is that Trump’s is a thoroughly reactionary, predatory plan which represents a further assault on the Palestinian people, a further bolstering of the genocidal Israeli state, and a further and deeper U.S. intervention into the Middle East.

    End Israel’s Blockade of Gaza!
    Stop the U.S.-Israeli Genocide of the Palestinian People
    This whole system is rotten and illegitimate! We need and we demand: a whole new way to live, a fundamentally different system!

    CNN Exposé: Israel Slaughtered Palestinians Seeking Aid—Then Bulldozed Their Bodies into Mass Graves

    The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was created by the U.S. and Israel supposedly to bring food and other needed aid to the Palestinian people. In reality, the “aid hubs” of this now defunct Foundation turned into killing grounds, where between 2,000 and 3,000 Palestinians were gunned down, and another 19,000 were wounded, as they desperately sought food. 

    A CNN investigation has now revealed not only that the Israeli military indiscriminately fired on starving Palestinians collecting food at a GHF aid distribution site near the Zikim crossing in June 2025, but it then bulldozed their bodies into shallow, unmarked graves. Some bodies were left exposed for days to decompose or be partially eaten by dogs. All had been buried without IDs or records of who they were. You can see CNN’s full report here.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Hamas is a reactionary Islamic fundamentalist organization which has been the governing power in Gaza since 2007.  [back]

    2. For background on Trump’s plan and the UN’s resolution, see, Trump’s Gaza “Peace Plan”: Erasing Palestinian Rights, Locking in Israel’s Genocide, Deepening U.S. Domination and Plunder, revcom.us, October 6, 2025; Trump Regime Demands Israel Adhere to Its Imperialist “Peace” Plan - Palestinians in Gaza Still Suffering from the Horrors of U.S.-Israeli Genocide, revcom.us, October 27, 2025; UN Shamefully Rubber Stamps Trump’s Fascist Gaza “Peace Plan” —Israel Continues Its Killing Spree, revcom.us, November 24, 2025. [back]

    3. CNN Finds Israel Killed Palestinian Aid Seekers and Bulldozed Bodies into Shallow, Unmarked Graves, Democracy Now!, December 5, 2025. [back]

    4. “It is unclear if there has been any progress on efforts to demilitarize Gaza [and install an International Stabilization Force to manage security], which Israeli and American officials believe would cement a long-term cease-fire,” the New York Times reports. “Israel's opposition to Turkish deployment [in Gaza] is causing potential partners such as Pakistan and Azerbaijan to hesitate, putting the US scheme at risk,” according to the Middle East Eye. [back]

    5. Overall, Israel’s military operations have “significantly undermined every pillar of survival” in Gaza, according to a new report from the UN, causing Gaza’s entire population of 2.3 million to suffer “extreme, multidimensional impoverishment,” and threatening a total economic collapse. [back]

    6. See, US military planning for divided Gaza with ‘green zone’ secured by international and Israeli troops, Guardian, November 14, 2025; Sari Bashi, Gaza: The Threat of Partition, the New York Review of BooksNovember 23, 2025; U.S. Plans Compounds to House Palestinians in Israeli-Held Half of Gaza, New York Times, November 25, 2025. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    The Illegitimate Fascist-Dominated Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Appeal on Birthright Citizenship, and Green-Lights Texas Racist Gerrymandering

    Large banners In front of Supreme Court: Trump Must Go Now! and Hands Off Birthright Citizenship!

     

    In front of the Supreme Court, May 15, 2025.    Photo: IG refusefascism

    graphic NAZI SCOTUS

     

    Credit: revcom.us

    Two steps taken by the Supreme Court last week underline how this Court is now a totally illegitimate institution that serves as an instrument of Trump/MAGA fascism and its systematic violations of constitutional rights. One, the Court agreed to hear the Trump regime’s challenge to lower-court rulings blocking Trump’s unconstitutional executive order to eliminate birthright citizenship. Two, the Court gave a green light to the racist redrawing of electoral maps in Texas that will give Republi-fascists additional seats in the House of Representatives.

    Lending Legitimacy to Trump’s Attack on Birthright Citizenship

    Bob Avakian sounded the alarm in his social media message in April (REVOLUTION #115: The Trump Fascist Regime Must GoNOW—before it is too late!about this outrageous and illegitimate move by Trump on his first day back in office:

    In the very first days following his inauguration this January, after officially swearing to uphold the Constitution of the United States, Trump openly defied and trampled on that Constitution: He issued an “Executive Order” that was in direct opposition to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which establishes that everyone born in this country is a citizen of the country. This Amendment is not a “policy”—it is part of the Constitution itselfWhen this Amendment was passed, right after the Civil War, one of its most important purposes was to guarantee citizenship to former slaves; and, by its very clear language, this Amendment guarantees citizenship to everyone born in the U.S.

    If Trump wanted to legally and Constitutionally change this—which itself would be a very bad, reactionary move—he could try to do so by following the procedures for amending the Constitution that are set forth in the Constitution itself. But that is just the point: Trump does not recognize any limits to his fascist dictatorship—not the Constitution, and not the laws or the rule of law and due process of law.

    Trump’s order was quickly challenged in the courts, and several district courts issued injunctions stopping the order from going into effect nationwide. The legal fight reached the Supreme Court earlier this year. But this shouldn’t even be a question! Presidents cannot eliminate a basic constitutional right through some arbitrary executive order. If the Supreme Court was actually acting as the so-called “guardian” of constitutional rights and rule of law, it should have immediately struck down Trump’s order as a blatant violation of the Constitution. 

    Instead, in a truly disgraceful ruling in June, the fascist majority of the Supreme Court acted to greatly limit the ability of federal district courts to temporarily block clearly unconstitutional orders like Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. This gave a major boost to Trump’s moves toward consolidating his fascist hold on power.

    A new class action lawsuit was filed challenging the constitutionality of Trump’s order, and a federal judge issued a nationwide injunction. And now the Supreme Court has agreed to consider the Trump regime’s demand to overturn that lower court and give a go-ahead to the elimination of birthright citizenship. 

    The ruling in this case will probably come the middle of next year. We have already seen this rogue Supreme Court repeatedly blocking the efforts of lower courts to hold Trump accountable to the Constitution. And as Bob Avakian pointed out after the June ruling:

    The fact is that the Supreme Court majority is determined to enable Trump to bulldoze over challenges to his fascist regime—regardless of legal precedent, basic logic, and the obvious meaning of things, including the Constitution. It is not clear at this point whether this majority is prepared to further expose its fascist nature by blatantly ruling against the clear language of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, but it is definitely possible that the Court could at some point (and perhaps soon) side with Trump’s whole assault on Birthright Citizenship, even as Trump’s actions are flagrantly in violation of the 14th Amendment. (Now Trump is threatening to revoke the citizenship of people he regards as “enemies.” Can anyone feel confident that the Supreme Court will not find a way to back him up on this?) [From social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #126: More on why only the sustained determined action of decent people can be relied on to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime.]

    Giving a Go-Ahead to Racist Gerrymandering and Rigging of Elections

    Protesting gerrymandering in Austin, Texas, July 24, 2025.

     

    Protesting gerrymandering in Austin, Texas, July 24, 2025.    Photo: AP

    The fascist majority of the Supreme Court handed Trump/MAGA fascists another important win by giving an OK for Texas to use a gerrymandered electoral map that a lower court had ruled to be racially discriminatory. Texas’s Christian-fascist governor and the Republi-fascist majority in the state legislature had forced through the redrawing of the map, under orders from Trump to do so in order to gain five more Republican seats in the House in the next election.

    Gerrymandering means redrawing electoral maps to favor a particular party. In the hands of the Republicans—a fully fascist, white supremacist party—gerrymandering is aimed at guaranteeing electoral victories for them by splitting up and diminishing the effects of the votes of Black and other oppressed people, who generally vote Democratic. The result in Texas is that in a state that is 40 percent white, white voters control over 73 percent of congressional seats.

    Republicans across the country—in Missouri, Virginia, Indiana, and other states—are also trying to carry out gerrymandering to gain more congressional seats. And, as revcom.us has analyzed, racist gerrymandering is just one of the ways that the Trump regime and MAGA fascists are working overtime, from many different angles, to rig and steal any future elections. 

    A Shameful Secretive Court That Rules In the Shadows

    The ruling on Texas gerrymandering is another in this Supreme Court’s “shadow docket”—which the Court’s majority has used repeatedly to overturn lower courts that ruled against Trump’s unconstitutional acts. Over 90 percent of those shadow docket rulings this year have been in favor of Trump. These are decisions that are unsigned, decided without hearing oral arguments, and most of the time, include little or no explanation of the legal basis for the ruling.

    But the actions of this Court speak volumes. As Bob Avakian points out:

    [T]hose who make up the majority on the Supreme Court are not acting as “legal scholars” who adhere to the Constitution and make rational judgments about whether laws are constitutional. They are fascist functionaries who “re-interpret” the Constitution and the laws, ignoring and defying legal precedent, basic logic and the clear meaning of things, as a key part of enforcing the aims of the Trump fascist regime, of which they are effectively an instrument.(From REVOLUTION #126: More on why only the sustained determined action of decent people can be relied on to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime.)

    To re-emphasize: this fascist-dominated Supreme Court is a thoroughly illegitimate institution.

  • ARTICLE:

    Deadly Assault on People’s Health: Fascists Recommend Ending Universal Hepatitis B Vaccine for Infants

    Trump Must Go Now!

    1981 electron microscope image of Hepatitis B virus particles indicated in orange (from the USCDC).

     

    A 1981 electron microscope image of hepatitis B virus particles indicated in orange.    Photo: CDC via AP

    The U.S. government has long recommended that all infants be vaccinated for the hepatitis B virus. The ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices), a powerful government committee, met last week and reversed that recommendation. There is no evidence backing the ACIP decision, and plenty against it. If this is carried out, it will have severe and long-term consequences for the health of babies, children and adults. And it will be a further assault on vaccines which have saved millions of lives. 

    Why Is It So Important for Infants to be Vaccinated Against Hepatitis B?

    Hepatitis B causes liver cancer and other dangerous liver diseases. For most people, the virus has no symptoms, which means people can spread it without knowing they have it. The policy of vaccinating infants at birth made sure that all people get this crucial vaccination before they get infected.

    Hepatitis B virus infection in infancy leads to lifetime of risks.

     

    Hepatitis B virus infection in infancy leads to a lifetime of health risks. (Click image to enlarge)    Graphic: NVHR

    Before 1991 in the U.S., infants were vaccinated at birth only if their mothers showed signs of being infected. But some mothers had hepatitis B and didn’t show signs or know it, or at times the tests for the disease can give a false negative(Very young infants and children can also catch hepatitis B from family members or others.) So that policy led to nearly 9,000 children in the U.S. getting hepatitis B each year during childbirth. (And when the disease begins in an infant, it is much more harmful than when people get it later in life, and it often lasts a lifetime.) In 1991 doctors started vaccinating all children at birth, and because of this childhood and adolescent hepatitis B infections have dramatically decreased, by 95 percent! 

    Essentially what the ACIP is now recommending is a return to the pre-1991 policy that led to so many sick children. But these facts, and mountains of evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, made no difference to the ACIP. After the ACIP voted, Trump praised the recommendation in a social media post. 

    The Attack on Vaccines Comes from and Serves the Fascism Now in Power

    California No Kings protest.

     

    No Kings protest in California, October 18, 2025.    IG @sukiyeagley  

    This is one more very harmful step in the assault on vaccines and public health by the Trump regime (see here and here for earlier steps). Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chief of the Department of Health and Human Services, leads the charge. Earlier this year, as an important part of his campaign to attack vaccines (and science in general), Kennedy purged the ACIP of all 17 members—scientific experts with years of experience in vaccines. He replaced them with the current panel dominated by quacks, hacks, and campaigners against vaccines. 

    These anti-vaccine lunatics have rammed through a decision that will do great harm. They dismissed extensive evidence of the vaccine’s safety and how many lives it has saved, and raised a blizzard of lies and an assault on medical science. One doctor called this out:  “The Evidence Collective (TEC) counted more than 60… falsehoods, distortions, and outright lies being megaphoned from one of the nation's highest committees.” (The Evidence Collective, a group of science and health communicators, has written a detailed account.)

    The anti-vaccine frenzy is part and parcel of the conspiracy theories and anti-scientific thinking that are at the heart of the fascist movement in the U.S. As Bob Avakian sharply characterized that movement: 

    These Republicans have mobilized a significant section of people who believe, with an intense, irrational passion, that white supremacy, male supremacy, and other oppressive relations (as well as unrestrained plunder of the environment) must be firmly upheld and enforced. They have been driven to a state of vicious insanity, embracing all kinds of lunatic conspiracy theories, along with a crazed Christian fundamentalism, as a response to the threat they see to their entitled (or “god-ordained”) position and their insistence that further concessions to the struggle against oppression will destroy what has “made America great.” (From SOMETHING TERRIBLE, OR SOMETHING TRULY EMANCIPATING: Profound Crisis, Deepening Divisions, the Looming Possibility of Civil War—And the Revolution That Is Urgently Needed)

    Doctors, Scientists, and Others Waged Important Resistance—but That Is Not Enough

    The ACIP did not completely ban the hepatitis B vaccine but recommended cutting back its use on infants. Kennedy and others clearly wanted to go further in restricting the vaccine—they even sneaked in outside speakers for the meeting who were anti-vaccine fanatics. In part the ACIP decision did not go as far as Kennedy wanted because of a determined effort by doctors, scientists, and many others to publicize and oppose what ACIP was doing. 

    One doctor wrote: “A nationwide, grassroots effort leading up to this meeting helped protect science…” This included experts in hepatitis B; medical professional organizations; two ACIP committee members who opposed the decision; and scientists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who have been under assault by Kennedy but who stood up for vaccine science and public health. 

    Trump/MAGA Fascism Must Go Now!

    It is very important that so many doctors, medical workers, public health advocates and others actively sounded the alarm about what the ACIP is doing with the hepatitis B vaccine, and defended vaccines. But the reality is that despite their great effort, and even with the overwhelming evidence and rational arguments they marshaled, the big majority of the ACIP committee voted for a policy that will harm many children, will undermine public understanding and support for vaccines, and undercut scientific medicine and scientific thinking. 

    The ACIP committee was able to do this NOT because of evidence or real argument. Rational arguments and real evidence must be wielded against them, and it is very important that the case for vaccines be made before all of society. But these fascists do not listen to reason. They are able to do the damage they do because Trump/MAGA fascism holds state power. THAT is the most essential thing that we must change.

    This really is a fascist regime, and it must be driven from power by mass, nonviolent struggle, as called for here by Refuse Fascism, at the earliest possible time.

  • ARTICLE:

    Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes

    The Revcoms reply to Kristofer Goldsmith’s lies about Refuse Fascism, the Revcoms and the Revolutionary Leader Bob Avakian

    Updated

    In a hit piece on Substack, Kris Goldsmith relies on tired slander and anti-communist distortion to attack Refuse Fascism for its association with the revcoms and Bob Avakian, the revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism.  Goldsmith paints a cartoon caricature of sinister communists working behind the scenes to take advantage of people in protests against fascism for "visibility."  He repeats the lie that the revcoms are a "cult."  Absent in his essay are any actual statements from Avakian or the revcoms.

    Goldsmith laces his argument with dire warnings that Refuse Fascism and the revcoms will do damage to the fight against Trump/MAGA fascism. This is despite the fact that Refuse Fascism (an organization involving people from different perspectives which was formed just weeks after Trump's first election) has been the most consistent, and usually the only, national organization that has recognized what we are facing as fascism and called on people to act commensurately. 

    Goldsmith's whole argument is based on the Trumpian logic that "a lot of people are saying" so it must be true. 

    But repeating crude slanders and cheap lies does not make those slanders and lies any more true, or less harmful—and invoking others who have spewed the same lies and slanders does not make them any more credible.  It only puts you in the company of others using unprincipled methods, and joins in the harm such unprincipled attacks do.  This is especially terrible now, given the monumental stakes involved in the fight against this Trump/MAGA fascism. 

    Many people have called out these divide-and-conquer schemes, seeing the urgent need to unite all who can be united behind the single demand: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW!  But there are unfortunately too many others who take up the "I heard it on the internet so it must be true" logic, believing lies and distortions about the position of the revcoms and Bob Avakian without having the intellectual integrity to look into it for themselves.

    These attacks—and the accompanying gossip culture—do the dirty work for Trump fascism by working to undermine the broad and principled unity needed to defeat this fascism.  These tactics—relying on rumor, lies and distorting people's views to isolate and silence them—smack strongly of the tactics of the right wing fascist forces in this country and the political police (the FBI, etc.) who create pretexts to go after revolutionary groups, and who engage in character assassination to discredit revolutionary leaders. (See: “In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the Movement...”)

    Especially as the Trump fascist regime is moving to classify all anti-fascist opposition—from Democratic Party politicians to No Kings protesters—as "domestic terrorism," these attacks are extremely dangerous.  Don't fall for it.

    Principled debate over strategy and analysis are essential to any movement for positive change.  But that is very different than lies, slander, and personal attacks.  With Goldsmith in particular, these attacks seem to be covering over and distracting from major differences about this fundamental truth: the Trump fascist regime cannot be contained, it must be stopped.  And the only way to stop it is to drive it from power through sustained, nonviolent determined protest centered in Washington, DC at the seat of power.  This is what the organization Refuse Fascism, involving people from different perspectives and viewpoints, has been tirelessly organizing people to do. 

    Three Essential Differences

    Central in Goldsmith's attack is a dishonest distortion about who Bob Avakian is and what his work and leadership are actually about. 

    Bob Avakian (or BA) is a revolutionary leader and the architect of the new communism.  He’s played a role in the revolutionary movement going back over 60 years now, to the Free Speech Movement in Berkeley and working closely with the Black Panther Party.  You can learn more about him, his work and his life here

    Here, we are going to focus on three crucial points at issue: how serious is this fascism; on what basis should the dividing lines within those fighting this fascism be drawn; and what does good leadership consist of.  As part of that, we’ll go into BA’s work on fascism, leadership and the importance of critical thinking so that people will actually have some basis to judge right and wrong.  We’ll also show how Goldsmith avoids original sources and instead relies on rumors and innuendo and why Goldsmith’s mode of attack is not only incredibly dishonest but dangerously irresponsible. 

    Difference number one: How dangerous and how consolidated IS this fascism?

    The single most important question facing people in this country today is the rapid imposition of fascism on America. 

    In his hit piece, Goldsmith talks about the “creeping normalization of fascist politics in America.” Creeping normalization”—sorry, but that ship sailed a long time ago. Creeping?” Please. As the Refuse Fascism call states, “Fascism is upon us.”

    It’s not creeping. It’s in power and moving to consolidate that power daily.  Do you want to deny the truth of what Bob Avakian said less than three months ago?

    If this fascist regime is allowed to remain in power, everything that decent people have felt they could rely on to seek justice will be brutally shut down...every uplifting moral value will be reviled and repressed...every sphere of society will be remade, in terrible ways, in line with the male supremacist, anti-LGBT, white supremacist and anti-immigrant cruelty and the anti-scientific, health and climate destroying madness of the Trump fascist regime and the bloodthirsty ravings and depraved violence of fanatics heading “the department of war,” with the deranged maniac Trump having his finger on the nuclear button.

    Every vision, and every active striving, for a better, more just world, for a future worth living in, will be violently suppressed and effectively foreclosed, at least for the foreseeable future.

    This is not hyperbole—it is the bitter reality that is being rapidly enforced.

    No, this didn’t happen overnight. Bob Avakian has studied the question of fascism in America, and he has written and spoken on it for 30 years.  He’s traced its development and scientifically analyzed its deep roots in American society, as well as the dynamics driving it. Go here from 2004, here from 2017, and here from two months ago to get a sense of the content, through-line and the development of this analysis.  So yes, not overnight, but way the hell away from “creeping”—and with Trump Two, all this has taken a further leap.

    A History of Attacks Which Serve to Hide the Real Difference

    Goldsmith hinges much of his argument on recycling old attacks on Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, a national organization that revcom Sunsara Taylor founded along with abortion provider Merle Hoffman, feminist writer Lori Sokol and others.  What Goldsmith doesn't tell you is that the organizations who launched this attack were the same ones who refused to call for mass protest against the overturning of Roe v Wade. These groups focused only on distribution of abortion medication and abortion funds.  While both provide an essential service, this was a losing and defensive strategy.  In contrast, Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights called people into the streets with the aim of preventing the ripping away of the fundamental right to abortion nationwide. 

    The organizations that attacked Rise Up followed the longstanding line of the Democratic Party—minimizing the fascist danger, ceding the moral high ground to anti-abortion fanatics, compromising on women's lives, and working within the “normal channels” of this system, even as an illegitimate fascist-packed Supreme Court was ripping away basic rights, and the fascists were shredding those “normal channels.” 

    But, as Goldsmith does today, instead of openly debating out these differences over strategy and analysis, they relied on lies, slander and personal attacks to shut down this debate.

    And whatever the intention, Goldsmith's attack on Refuse Fascism serves the same goal: keeping people's thinking and actions confined to terms set by the “normal channels” of this system, even as once again and even more rapidly, those channels are being shredded.

    Goldsmith says he is seeking to protect the "Removal Coalition” from the "co-optation efforts" of Refuse Fascism.  The Removal Coalition is a relatively new grouping, started in June 2025.  Goldsmith writes: “Veterans, activists, and content creators gathered in Washington right now for the Remove the Regime rally have every reason to be proud. This is the kind of pro-democracy organizing we need more of—creative, strategic, and grounded in community.”

    But he does not speak to the important differences over strategy.  In writing about the three days of protest organized by the Removal Coalition on November 20-22, revcom.us wrote

    All this brought important energy and public pressure and opposition to Trump into the nation's capital and this is a positive contribution to the mass struggle that is needed to bring about the regime's removal. At the same time, while impeachment could be one means through which this demand is met, it is not the only means through which Trump could be nonviolently removed. Even more essential: it is unlikely in the extreme that it would be brought about without a massive, nonviolent, sustained struggle of millions demanding Trump's removal. Also, the terms and pacing of this struggle must not be set by congressional calendars and procedures; the pace of the fascist juggernaut is way too urgent for that. And while lobbying can certainly play a role, such activity cannot substitute for what must ultimately be millions in the streets in sustained nonviolent protest—centered in Washington, DC.

    Goldsmith Indulges Himself in Fantasy and Delusion in the Face of REAL Danger

    Goldsmith repeatedly downplays the extreme danger of Trump MAGA fascism, danger that is posed right now.  He does this in a recent video when he says that “Senator Mark Kelly is being investigated for sedition—and that’s a good thing.”  He paints a rosy scenario in which Kelly will certainly be acquitted and at the same time this will finally wake up the Democrats and, through a series of elections, allow for the threat of fascism to be crushed.  Goldsmith blinds himself to the actual threat being posed to Kelly and to the rapid and radical fascist-driven transformations of the officer corps and military justice system (that Goldsmith assumes will acquit Kelly). He refused to deal with the actual reasons the Democratic Party as a whole has up to now not resisted fascism, and to the great likelihood that the 2026 elections—if they happen at all—will be rigged by Trump and MAGA (a process already being set in motion). 

    Even if somehow this extremely complicated and extremely unlikely chain of events should come to pass, it is profoundly immoral to wait until the midterms while thousands of people are being chewed up and destroyed by Trumpian fascism and the whole planet is being imperiled. 

    So, that’s difference number one—“creeping normalization” and relying on the Democrats vs. coming to grips with the reality of the fascist transformation of America NOW.

    Difference number two: On what basis should the movement against fascism unite?

    Goldsmith further argues, “Opposition to fascism, on its own, is not a political compass. What matters is what they want in its place.” 

    To the contrary, at this time opposition to fascism is in fact the most important political dividing line in the country.  The single thing that has to unite millions—communists, Democrats, never-Trump Republicans, social democrats, all the decent people who refuse to capitulate to dark ages fascism—is the determination to drive the Trump fascist regime from power.  Whether you want to restore what you see as “the promise of America,” or whether like us you advocate for getting to a world “without everything America stands for and everything it does in the world,” we must come together behind one single unifying demand: The Trump Fascist Regime Must Go NOW!

    As Avakian has repeatedly argued for:

    Many individuals, organizations and groups will have different views on what has given rise to this fascism, and what should replace it, and we revcoms (revolutionary communists) will continue to forthrightly put forward and argue for our views on this, and encourage others to similarly put forward their own perspectives. But this must take place in the context and atmosphere where we are all pulling together to overcome every obstacle—including “divide and conquer” schemes, from whatever source and in whatever guise—uniting all who can be united, in the millions and millions, to achieve the truly historic goal of driving out this fascist regime.

    Part of Goldsmith's "warning" is that Avakian and the revcoms supposedly have sinister and nefarious goals in trying to unite with others, trying to "coopt" mass movements.  Aside from the capitalist mode of thinking that movements against oppression can be "owned," we have to ask: why is wanting to defeat fascism to restore the status quo seen as a legitimate position, but wanting to defeat fascism because you are driven by the interests of humanity all over the world to live free from exploitation and oppression is somehow suspect? 

    Last December, in a social media message Avakian predicted that this accusation might be made by "people looking for some reason, or excuse, not to rise to the challenge of defeating this fascism"

    I am not calling for a mass movement to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism as some kind of “gimmick” whose aim is not really to defeat this fascism but is to somehow “trick” people into supporting a revolution to overthrow the whole system. One of the most fundamental principles of the new communism I have developed is the need to consistently approach things in a serious, scientific way—and this means being open and honest about what our objectives are. As I said at the beginning, we revcoms (revolutionary communists, based on the new communism) are serious about defeating this fascism—because this fascism represents a very real horror not only for the people in this country but for people throughout the world.

    At the same time, as I have repeatedly emphasized, this fascism has been brought forth by—has grown out of the very soil of—the system of capitalism-imperialism and its development through the history of this countryBy its very nature, this system has continually brought forth horror after horror; and only an actual revolution can open the way to finally ending the terrible atrocity and needless suffering constantly caused by this system.

    We revcoms will continue to work urgently to win people, in the thousands and then millions, to see the need—and to act on the need—for revolution. If it turned out that a massive movement actually succeeded in defeating Trump/MAGA fascism, without that involving the revolutionary overthrow of the whole system of capitalism-imperialism, then we would certainly not somehow be “disappointed”! We would recognize the great importance of this victory, for the cause of humanity. And we would continue to work tirelessly to carry forward the struggle toward the goal of revolution which is necessary to end the endless horrors of this whole system of capitalism-imperialism, and bring into being a much better system—as set forth in the Declaration at revcom.us: WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM.

    Difference number three: The question of leadership

    Without a real argument of substance to make, Goldsmith falls back on the favorite of those who want you to avoid engaging Bob Avakian, that the revcoms are a “cult.”  Avakian himself has spoken to this more than once, including why this kind of thing too easily gets over in the current culture. 

    Beyond that, though, one of the hallmarks of the new communism that Bob Avakian has brought forward is the recognition of the need for a scientific, evidence-based approach to understanding and radically changing the world. He argues for a process that fosters debate and dissent.  Speaking about the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America which Avakian authored, he said:

    It is a fact that, nowhere else, in any actual or proposed founding or guiding document of any government, is there anything like not only the protection but the provision for dissent and intellectual and cultural ferment that is embodied in this Constitution, while this has, as its solid core, a grounding in the socialist transformation of the economy, with the goal of abolishing all exploitation, and the corresponding transformation of the social relations and political institutions, to uproot all oppression, and the promotion, through the educational system and in society as a whole, of an approach that will “enable people to pursue the truth wherever it leads, with a spirit of critical thinking and scientific curiosity, and in this way to continually learn about the world and be better able to contribute to changing it in accordance with the fundamental interests of humanity.”

    Avakian goes on to say, in this same message (“Irresponsible Opportunist Distortions Should Not Be Allowed…”), 

    The principles and methods that have led to the development of the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America are also the basis and the guideline for how we revcoms approach working with many others, of different political perspectives, in order to unite all who can be united in massive, powerful, sustained and relentless non-violent struggle to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime—which, from our perspective, is a crucial part of moving to bring about the revolution that will lead to the profoundly liberating system that is embodied in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, aiming for the emancipation of humanity as a whole from all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression everywhere in the world.

    This is what I and the revcoms actually stand for, and have dedicated our lives and efforts to fighting for. Honest questions or principled disagreement about this is welcome and can be the basis for meaningful discussion and debate—at the same time as everyone who refuses to accept a fascist America is united as a powerful force to meet the urgent need to defeat and remove the Trump fascist regime.

    That is the principle, clarity and urgency needed now.  As the fascist regime is moving so so quickly to lock down an all-out fascist America which threatens humanity and the planet, it is everyone's responsibility to not fall for dishonest divide-and-conquer schemes, and call these out when you see them. 

  • ARTICLE:

    Documentary Filmmaker David Zeiger: Response to Kristofer Goldsmith

    David Zeiger is an American film director, writer and producer. He is most well known for the documentary Sir! No Sir! (2005), which is the only full-length film chronicling the extensive antiwar and resistance activity of U.S. troops during the Vietnam War.

    David Zeiger, filmmaker

     

    David Zeiger    Photo: PD

    Posted on Facebook December 2, 2025

    As I have posted here before, I am a strong supporter of Refuse Fascism and its campaign to flood Washington DC with relentless nonviolent protests with the explicit aim of driving out the Trump regime. They have called on people very broadly to recognize that: 1–what we are facing is indeed Fascism that is not imminent but is now upon us; 2–this Fascism cannot be defeated by staying within the bounds of “the way things work,” particularly relying on the 2026 election to flip congress (if you want to see how Trump and his allies are preparing to make sure that does not happen, check out the articles in The Atlantic of December by David A. Graham and J. Michael Luttig); and 3–the only way to end this nightmare is for the people themselves to force the government to grind to a halt by standing up in their millions, not unlike what happened in Egypt in 2013.

    Refuse Fascism poster for Surround the White House 2.0

     

    I was at the initial rally in Washington DC on November 5, and while I knew the turnout would be nowhere near the millions that Refuse Fascism says are necessary, the turnout of I think around 5,000 folks was impressive for its breadth of participants, particularly the number of young people (in contrast to that, the No Kings march in New York, which I also participated in, was heavily dominated by—ahem—people my age). Part of the basis for their strategy is recognizing that the many influential people, including in the government, who would join in this effort only if pushed from below, and that push has to be extremely broad and widespread. Unite all who can be united, recognizing that there are huge differences in ideology and goals within that tent–from liberals of every stripe to anarchists, from pacifists to traditional conservatives, and yes, even revolutionary communists. 

    And that brings up the point of this posting. Recently Kristofer Goldsmith, an anti-Trump influencer with a significant following, posted a rant against Refuse Fascism claiming, as if he had uncovered some deep dark secret, that it was what he called a “front” for the Revolutionary Communist Party (the RevComs) and in particular its leader, Bob Avakian. His purpose was to “warn” the increasing ranks of active opposition to Trump to “stay away” from this insidious, secretly communist led group that only existed to recruit innocent people into their sinister “cult” while pretending to unite with the real Trump opponents.

    I want to make it clear that I am not a RevCom, but I have worked with the RCP on many occasions and I have tremendous respect for Bob Avakian and the work that he has done these past several decades since the 1960s, when thousands of us believed in and fought for a new world. He has never given up on the goal of a communist revolution in this country, but he has not stayed mired in the past. Just the opposite, he has deeply analyzed both the accomplishments and flaws of the previous communist revolutions and emerged with what he has dubbed a “New Communism,” which is indeed quite new and startling. I strongly encourage everyone reading this to check out the “Draft Proposal for a Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in America,” which he wrote. Agree or disagree, you owe it to yourself to see what this is all about.

    Bob Avakian on Why He Wrote the CONSTITUTION for the New Socialist Republic in North America

    Here is what I want to say about Goldsmith’s fear-mongering rant: First of all, the RevComs are not exactly hiding in the shadows. It takes about five seconds on the Refuse Fascism website to know that they were key initiators of that movement. No big news there. In fact, Refuse Fascism was initiated (yes, by the RevComs along with others) during the first Trump administration when most people were firmly in denial that his program and goals were indeed Fascist (what was Goldsmith doing back then?). Not only are they quite open about their ideology and goals, but they are among the most principled people I have ever worked with. They don’t approach other organizations so they can sneakily latch on to their coattails, they approach them with their program and in the spirit of unity and debate (a spirit that is so critically needed today). They don’t lie about what they believe. They don’t try to trick people into following them. How many Democratic politicians, including progressive ones, can you say that about? 

    Goldsmith of course repeats the tired trope that the RevComs are a “cult,” blindly worshipping Bob Avakian who rules them with smoke and mirrors. While cults do indeed demand blind, unquestioning obedience to the “great leader,” Avakian has written and continues to write extensively about everything from the rise of Fascism in this country to the debate over who is the “goat” of professional tennis. Not only that, but he not only encourages but insists on open debate about his theories and program (again, take a look at that Constitution). Blind obedience? Quite the opposite. And as far as cults being a way for the “great leader” to gain power and fame, well, if that’s your goal you can do a lot better than advocating a Communist revolution in this, the most powerful imperialist country in the world.

    We, the people not only of this country but of the entire world, are today facing the most severe crisis since the rise of Hitler. Fighting that threat with a genuine goal of thoroughly defeating it demands a level of both commitment and unity not seen since the 1960s. The LAST thing we need is for allies to assist the Fascists by throwing around baseless accusations and tired myths that do nothing but derail the kind of movement we need. With that in mind, my own warning to everyone reading this is to not be swayed by 1950s style accusations. If you have questions about Refuse Fascism and the role of the RevComs in it, then by all means ask them and debate as deeply and thoroughly as you want. In that light I am going to link to the RevCom’s response to Goldsmith in the first comment.

    And thanks for reading!

  • ARTICLE:

    Join the revcoms for a zoom discussion of: “Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes…”

    Join the revcoms for a zoom discussion of: 

    Warning for the Decent People Who Oppose Trump/MAGA Fascism: Don't Fall for Dishonest Divide-and-Conquer Schemes, The Revcoms reply to Kristofer Goldsmith’s lies about Refuse Fascism, the Revcoms and the Revolutionary Leader Bob Avakian

    Monday, December 8, 8 pm ET, 7 pm CT, 5 pm PT
    REGISTER HERE

    We'll talk about what these attacks objectively serve, the facts vs. the lies, and what's at stake in overcoming what Bob Avakian has called "the enemy within this fight" against Trump/MAGA fascism: "the putrid culture that still prevails way too much and too often—including among people who claim to care about and to be working for a better world." 

    In addition to reading the reply, we encourage people to read/listen to this three-part playlist of Bob Avakian's social media messages: Opposing the enemy within the fight to defeat Trump/MAGA fascism: this putrid culture lies & slander

  • ARTICLE:

    Featured video this week from Bob Avakian:

    Bob Avakian on Why He Wrote the CONSTITUTION for the New Socialist Republic in North America

    Bob Avakian on Why He Wrote the CONSTITUTION for the New Socialist Republic in North America
    Excerpt from Part 3 of The Bob Avakian Interviews: Up Close and Personal with Bob Avakian, Heart and Soul & Hard-Core For Revolution (2022)   
  • ARTICLE:

    Fundraising for “Surround the White House” Trump Must Go Now!

    “Signs of Fascism” at the Hollywood Farmers Market, Los Angeles, November 28, 2025.

     

    For the last few weeks in Los Angeles, Refuse Fascism and the members of THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity have been raising funds to send and support the volunteers who have gone to DC from LA.

    As crazy as it might sound in the nation's second largest city—crowds of people can be hard to find. But the holiday season brings out people to mingle and shop, so for the past few weeks, we have gone to some of the farmers markets that serve parts of this sprawling city—some of them that stretch blocks in different directions. People have been experimenting and for a couple of these we have joined forces with a woman who has printed a series of signs that show the signs of fascism—which people may have seen manifested by people in suburbs and cities across the country.

    We have walked through these markets in single file with the signs chanting, “Danger Danger there's a Fascist in the White House—It's up to Us To Drive Them OUT!” followed by each person reading the sign they are carrying and why this is Fascism that is Upon Us Now. The person at the front and/or the back has done agitation on why there is No living with Fascism and conveyed in their own words the message from the Refuse Fascism calls. 

    It's been important to shake up the atmosphere of normalization by challenging  people that the future depends on what the people do now. Accommodate to this by going on with life that continues on as normal for many people, or join a movement with a strategy to defeat fascism before it is able to consolidate? Together with the signs that show what fascism IS—people have held up the Trump Must Go NOW signs. In our single file procession, we have enough division of labor for several people to hold stacks of them—encouraging people to take one, donate and get signed up to distribute them in the neighborhood. A person(s) with a bucket follows near the end of our single file procession and collects the donations asking people to donate 10 or 20 dollars or what they can. In addition to this, we have set up at the entrance to the markets organizing tables or distribution carts with leaflets, posters, stickers and bandannas manned by someone good at talking with people and recruiting them to become organizers themselves. At each of these, we have been able to raise a couple hundred dollars in one or two hours and distribute hundreds of posters, which people are encouraged to post at their homes or their neighborhood businesses. 

    This has been a learning experience with each person trying out their own agitation with a mixture of views while the Refuse Fascism chapter has been honing its own ability to sharpen the messaging and actually organize people into the movement on the spot. 

    While far too many people are going along as  atrocities mount by the hour—and people are not responding as a populace should to the flagrant escalations of raw fascist power—going out with this message also surfaces the reservoir of deep feeling and support that exists among people very broadly.

    People's Indictment of Trump

     

    At a recent farmers market in a section of the city where many people work in the entertainment industry, people applauded and chanted with us as we went through  the market. People stepped forward  to get posters and donate. At every one of these markets, there has been polarization with Trumpers and Zionists—and at this market, one of them tried to provoke us into a fight by obstructing the procession. One of the people who had been applauding us immediately jumped in between the man trying to provoke an incident and the woman he was belligerently harassing, and with fantastic spirit, she demanded he leave those women alone—while five more people jumped in to join her surrounding him so that the procession could move on. (You can see some of the rapid response training people have internalized in this incident.) Later, the security for the market came, not to expel us but to accompany us so that we could continue without incident. 

    The more concrete we made the “ask”—by calling on people to join this effort by following us on Instagram, taking a poster or stack of posters for their neighborhood and making a donation—the more we created a collective atmosphere where people could take part and make a difference. One woman who was a conservationist and very upset that people were not doing more, joined us and took up one of the “Fascism Is…” signs. More would have joined us if we'd been more oriented to inviting more people in. Another woman recovering from a serious injury festooned her walker with posters, put the orange bandanna on her service dog, and set off on the major boulevard with a stack of posters, leaflets and stickers—getting back to us within an hour to let us know she needed more because she had run out before she could even get to the coffee shop she was headed for. 

    People who had seen our procession stopped by the table to sign up and engage in deeper discussion with people being invited to the next Refuse Fascism meeting and given ways to spread this themselves. There are now five or six businesses who have agreed to carry posters in different parts of the city where people can pick up the materials they need. This needs more focused and persistent work by the chapter for  a more organized campaign of distribution and participation by people who can themselves make the demand known as not just a sentiment or wish—but immediate objective. The new PEOPLE'S INDICTMENT OF DONALD TRUMP: A UNIFIED DECLARATION OF ILLEGITIMACY provides a whole new way to continue to advance these kinds of initiatives in the service of the one strategy that could truly change the course of history.

  • ARTICLE:

    From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Executions in Iran at Highest Rate in Decades, Sparking Protests: 

    “Silence in the Face of Injustice is Betrayal”

    Revcom.us editors’ note: We received the following from the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now (IEC). Translations are improved mechanical translations. 

    How do we convey the true human cost and societal impact that in one month in Iran, 5 or even 10 people were hanged in a single day? There isn’t even accurate accountability of the dead. Human rights organizations estimate a number each month by combing through local news reports and collecting personal information from families and activists. Even as the number of executions for last month ranges between 152 (Iran Human Rights NGO) to 260 or even 303, many of these organizations agree that it was the highest of any month in the last 20 years. According to those same reports, between 1,426 and 1702 prisoners were executed so far this year, so that 2025 stands out as the most murderous year in decades.

    Protests by family members of prisoners, November 25. Banner reads: “No to Executions.”

     

    Protests by family members of prisoners, November 25. Banner reads: “No to Executions”.     Composite: Screenshots of video posted on Burn The Cage

    In response, support for the “No to Execution Tuesdays” weekly prisoners’ strike against executions saw an “unprecedented expansion,” as reported by Burn The Cage (a campaign in support of Iranian political prisoners, based in Europe) on November 25, with simultaneous protest rallies in more than 16 cities inside Iran. The next week, on December 2, Burn the Cage noted that families of political prisoners sentenced to death, or of those who were killed by the regime’s police forces in recent years, played a powerful role in the front lines of these weekly protests. This is a much needed and welcomed development in response to the horrific dizzying rate of executions in Iran for some time, notably since the Woman, Life, Freedom uprising (2022-2023) and since the unprovoked Israeli-U.S. bombing of Iran in June 2025. The courageous prisoners’ weekly hunger strikes have now grown to 55 prisons across Iran in its unbroken 97th consecutive week. January 28, 2026 will mark its remarkable two year anniversary.

    “Silence in the face of injustice is betrayal”—Mother of Student on Death Row

    Parents with picture of their son, Ehsan Faridi, who is on death row.

     

    Parents of student Ehsan Faridi appeal to the people to fight against his and other executions.     Screenshot of video posted by Reza Akvanian

    One of the thousands on death row is Ehsan Faridi, a 22-year-old student initially charged with the generic “propaganda against the state” and released on bail. Then, with no evidence, the fascist theocratic regime’s judicial system suddenly changed the charge to “corruption on Earth” and sentenced him to death.10

    His mother posted a painful video appeal to the public:

    I am a mother who for two full years, with hope of proving my child's innocence, anxiously climbed the steps of the prosecutor's office and the court. I remained silent because I am certain of my child's innocence. But from today, I will no longer be silent. Because I believe that silence in the face of injustice is betrayal…I hope that no mother, to save her child's life, the piece of her flesh, should have to throw herself into fire and water in such agony and torment.

    Human rights activist and 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi, currently on medical furlough, is again facing serious threats from Iran’s regime. In November, she had requested permission to travel to France to celebrate the 19th birthday of her twins, whom she has not seen since they were 8.11

    Two separate judicial bodies issued bans on her travel outside Iran, one of which was marked “permanent”. Narges summarized sharply the intensifying situation in a November 3 interview:

    The repression has intensified. The fact is the executions reflect the degree of violence and cruelty the IR has unleashed against the Iranian people. Arrests have been far more widespread and have now reached layers of society that although always under threat, had not been directly targeted like this before. I see the repression now as extremely serious. The establishment’s violence against its own people is a naked one and I know people are deeply angry.12

    The alarm being sounded about, and by, Narges Mohammadi and her supporters needs to be heard. In the world we inhabit today of naked capitalism and imperialism with its attendant fascism and unabashed state repression, the determined struggle of Iran’s political dissidents and prisoners stands as a beacon to all who hate injustice. It is an urgent clarion call to rise up in commensurate resistance and the fiercest fight for a far better world than this.

    Morteza Parvin, Iran political prisoner

     

    Morteza Parvin    Photo: iranwire.com

    In these challenging times, there are sparks of struggle for dignity and humanity that emerge out of the deep dungeons of Iran’s prisons to be appreciated. One such ray of light is the art of Morteza Parvin, an Azeri activist in Evin prison whose art behind the prison walls rejects despair and serves the indomitable free-thinking human spirit that our world needs much more of right now. As reported by @iranprisonatlas on November 18,

    A one-day exhibition of abstract paintings by Morteza Parvin, a political prisoner and artist in the visual and performing arts field, was held.... 50 of Morteza Parvin's paintings, which were painted with minimal facilities and in just 5 days, were displayed to the prisoners… [Several other political prisoners] gave speeches about the value of an artist not giving up even in prison and continuing his artistic work despite all the restrictions. Morteza Parvin also held exhibitions in Evin Prison on the occasion of International Workers' Day and International Women's Day last year

    The text of Morteza Parvin's speech to political prisoners visiting his painting exhibition is: “I paint because I consider it necessary to leave my works for this time and of course for future generations; perhaps by those whose expressive lips and artistic hands are forbidden by the locks and shackles of silence. For my countless fellow human beings and sisters and brothers...for whom freedom is the most beautiful and worthy description. For Taher Naghavi, Vadood Asadi [imprisoned Azerbaijani activists], who are currently on hunger strike and whose families are sitting outside the doors of Evin Prison every day. I dedicate this exhibition to these dear ones.”

    FREE ALL IRAN’S POLITICAL PRISONERS NOW! STOP EXECUTIONS! NO TO U.S. THREATS AND WAR MOVES! 

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Student Faces Execution After Iran's Supreme Court Rejects Retrial, iranwire.com, October 23, 2025. Iran’s Supreme Court dismissed his lawyer’s request for retrial “in less than an hour.”  [back]

    2. “Following a recent surge of arrests across Iran, including human rights defenders, lawyers, teachers, writers, journalists, scholars, and women’s rights defenders, we are deeply concerned for the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Narges Mohammadi, who faces no guarantee of remaining free from another imprisonment. Mohammadi, who has been outside prison on a temporary sentence suspension since December 2024, is banned from leaving the country and having a passport. She still faces 10 additional years of imprisonment when she returns to jail.” Iranian Government Must Drop All Charges Against Narges Mohammadi and Allow Her to See Her Children, narges.foundation, November 25, 2025.  [back]

    3. Translation by Bloomberg interpreter. Excerpt posted by Narges on YouTube, November 3, 2025. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    From the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now

    Oppose Persecution of the People’s Artist: Jafar Panahi

    Revcom.us editors’ note: We received the following from the International Emergency Campaign to Free Iran’s Political Prisoners Now (IEC).

    Jafar Panahi, born in Iran in 1960, is a truly creative director, screenwriter, and editor. He has dozens of awards and credits from around the world stretching over three decades. But above all, he is one of the world’s most courageous and caring dissident artists, daring us to dream and ask the hard questions, “what would you do? what would you risk?” through his films and in real life. He must be defended against the latest attack by the theocratic regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI).

    Jafar Panahi

     

    Jafar Panahi    Photo: AP

    Panahi is on tour for his Academy Award-nominated film It Was Just an Accident. The film won the prestigious Palme d’Or award in May 2025 at the Cannes Film Festival in France. Panahi is currently on a world tour for this film. Last week,  Iran’s regime gave him a one-year sentence in absentia and a two-year travel ban. Variety reported that while at a film festival in Morocco, Panahi said, regarding this sentence, that “I know my films don’t please the government,” but that he plans to return to Iran upon completing the tour.

    IT WAS JUST AN ACCIDENT - Official Trailer 

    It Was Just an Accident is a morality thriller about revenge that has universal lessons. It follows the journey of former political prisoners who are seeking justice against their purported torturer. It is full of wild twists and turns and nuances based on Panahi’s own experiences as a twice-jailed political prisoner. The key questions posed are the consequences to their own humanity: Will the victims just become like their oppressors? Will you? Does the end justify the means? Or will the ordinary people rise above in their search for real justice and a better world? 

    Theocrats Attempt to Silence Criticism but Had to Back Off 

    Iran’s Islamic fundamentalist regime repeatedly tried to suppress Panahi's voice but had to back off, up to now, due to his irrepressible and brave persistence and international support. 

    In 2009, Panahi was arrested at the cemetery as he joined mourners for 26-year-old Neda Agha-Soltan, who was murdered by IRI police during “Green Movement” protests against suspicious election results. At a subsequent film festival, he convinced the jury to all wear green scarves in solidarity with this movement. In 2010, he was arrested for making a documentary about it. Later that year, he was given a six-year sentence and a 20-year ban on filmmaking; he was released on bail four months later after international outrage, and then placed under house arrest. 

    Panahi has continued to make films clandestinely, including This Is Not a Film, shot inside his house, and Taxi, shot inside a cab with him as the driver interviewing riders. (See a synopsis of his films.) He has consistently stood up for others, such as against the repression of rapper Toomaj Salehi, and recently in October, signing a solidarity statement for the ongoing prisoner hunger strikes against executions at Ghezel Hesar Prison.

    International and broad support has been a critical factor in this struggle, including from prominent U.S. filmmakers such as Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, the late Robert Redford, and Francis Ford Coppola. He is justifiably a most beloved, popular artist among the people of Iran as well.

    In 2022 Panahi was arrested when he went to Evin Prison to inquire about two of his jailed colleagues, one of whom was the world-renowned film director Mohammad Rasoulof, who has been forced into exile. After seven months in Evin, Panahi went on a hunger strike and was released shortly thereafter. Clearly la lucha continua (the struggle continues). 

    U.S. Condemns State Repression—by Iran

    The U.S. State Department’s Persian-language account on X immediately kicked into gear to exploit the Iranian regime’s attack on Panahi. It is worse than shameless hypocrisy at the very moment Trump issued a travel ban on 19 countries, including Iran. It is yet another reality check, a real-life reminder of the truth in the IEC’s 2021 Emergency Appeal's unique political stance that:

    The governments of the U.S. and Iran act from their national interests. And, in this instance, we the people of the U.S. and Iran, along with the people of the world, have OUR shared interests, as part of getting to a better world: to unite to defend the political prisoners of Iran. In the U.S., we have a special responsibility to unite very broadly against this vile repression by the IRI, and to actively oppose any war moves by the U.S. government that would bring even more unbearable suffering to the people of Iran.

    Astute observers of geopolitics may note that the erasure of truth and real history is in full swing in the United States of Amnesia. The State Department might check on the history of how Panahi was harassed by the New York Police Department at JFK airport in April 2001 en route to a film festival. They demanded to fingerprint and photograph him, to which he refused to submit and was then handcuffed, denied phone calls, and finally released a day later. Given the U.S. track record of coups and invasions in the world, including Iran in 1953, its State Department should be automatically disqualified in any language unless it first condemns itself and its now fascist Trump regime.

    We demand of the Islamic Republic of Iran: HANDS OFF JAFAR PANAHI! FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS NOW!

    We say to the US government: NO THREATS OR WAR MOVES AGAINST IRAN! LIFT SANCTIONS!

     

  • ARTICLE:

    New zine: Why do so many people buy into the GTF?

    Zine cover Why Do So Many People Buy Into The GTF?

     

    New Zine   

    Print the attached on 11x17 paper, then fold and cut like a normal zine. If you're new to making zines, watch the video below.
     
    Go here to read or watch the excerpt from Bob Avakian's 2017 speech, “The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go! In The Name of Humanity, We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America. A Better World IS Possible.” . 

     

  • ARTICLE:

    In the 1960s, the Government Spread Lies to Foment Violent Conflict Within the Movement

    The Lessons of That Time Need to Be Learned Anew Today

    Updated

    Did you know that from 1956 to 1971 the FBI conducted a program designed to foment conflict within revolutionary movements, as well as broader movements for reform—conflicts which not only crippled these movements, but served as a cover to carry out frame-ups and even outright murder of revolutionary fighters and activists?

    Did you know that they sent undercover people into these movements specifically to create or magnify conflicts? Did you know that they relied on unsubstantiated gossip and often inventions, as well as forged documents as part of their arsenal?

    Did you know that they took statements out of context to distort the real views of activists and revolutionary fighters and use these as pretexts for smear campaigns and attempted prosecutions?

    All this came to light in 1971, when some brave and heroic people appropriated the files revealing this program in a nighttime operation to go into an FBI office and bring these criminal activities by the government to light. As a result, many people in the movements of the time and even beyond, in broader society, adopted different standards for settling inevitable conflicts over politics and ideology in a principled way, and preventing the police, FBI and other government agencies from spreading slanders, fomenting conflicts and endangering the lives of people active in the struggle for justice.

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.

     

    Muhammed Kenyatta waves stolen FBI documents, 1971.    Photo: AP

    Now, decades later, a new generation is way too unaware either of the FBI activities or the protocols widely adopted. We saw the results of this in 2022, with the vicious and very dangerous slander campaign that was launched against Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, the revcoms, Bob Avakian and Sunsara Taylor. And now, in light of the heightened repression from Trump fascism and the low standards that exist among people broadly, we are reissuing this article.

    We urge people to read and spread the article below, and to insist on principled discussion and debate over disagreements and to oppose any dangerous campaigns of lies, disinformation and distortion.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    COINTELPRO was launched by the FBI in secret in 1956 in the context of the rising civil rights movement, and operations were later “signed on” to by the Kennedy administration. Its reach was broad and vicious. The FBI, working in sync with local police “Red Squads” (political police) wrote leaflets fomenting conflicts between different groups. They sent anonymous letters warning parents and school administrators of what their children and students were supposedly doing. They conducted police surveillance and repression against antiwar coffee houses opening near military bases. And those the FBI identified as leaders, in particular, were marked for “neutralization” by the FBI, a euphemism for being framed up on serious criminal charges or killed.

    One of the earliest, ugliest and most grievous FBI operations was against Malcolm X. We recently covered this, and we are including it here as a companion to this article.

    Going After Martin Luther King Through Personal Slander and Harassment

    One element in COINTELPRO attacks on the civil rights movement was the dissemination by the FBI of allegations about Martin Luther King’s sex life that had nothing to do with the struggle for civil rights, or debates within that movement or in society as a whole. The FBI bugged King’s bedroom(!) and then, directly or posing as “concerned individuals” sent supposed taped “evidence” to media outlets and others, including colleges where King was invited to speak, demanding he be disinvited. They even sent such a tape to his wife, Coretta Scott King, in the hope of causing anguish and breaking up the marriage.

    The FBI also circulated allegations that King’s movement had organizational and financial connections to communists, playing on anti-communist prejudices, to push (and provide an excuse for) white liberals and what the FBI identified as “the responsible Negro community” to stay away from the civil rights movement at a time when civil rights activists were being brutally attacked and murdered by police and the KKK, and as a cover for massive surveillance of the civil rights movement. Whether or not the authorities were directly involved in King’s murder in Memphis in 1968 as his family and close associates have insisted, the COINTELPRO operation created conditions that facilitated his assassination and was continued for a year after his death.

    WIKI-Mlk-suicide-letter-400.jpg

     

    Going After the Panthers: Fomenting Conflicts to Murder Leadership

    A major objective and focus of COINTELPRO was isolating and setting up the most revolutionary forces at the time, especially the Black Panther Party (BPP), for attack. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, in a secret memo, wrote to offices calling for “imaginative and hard-hitting counterintelligence measures aimed at crippling the BPP.” (Emphasis added.)

    As they did with Malcolm X (see the accompanying article), the FBI often focused on setting up others to do the actual dirty work. To take one notorious example, the FBI forged a letter, supposedly from someone in the community, to Jeff Fort, the leader of the Blackstone Rangers, a Chicago gang at the time, claiming that the Black Panther Party was getting ready to move on him. In this case, in the climate of the times when there was both a broad culture of being alert to moves by the authorities to forge accusations to set people up, and when there was broad respect for the Panthers and the revolution, Fort decided the threatening letter was not credible. This letter was part of a larger COINTELPRO operation that set into motion events that led to the assassination of Panther leader Fred Hampton by Chicago police and the FBI in 1969.

    FredHamptonKilledHirez_AP691204082-400.jpg

     

    Chicago police with Fred Hampton's body.    Photo: AP

    In another COINTELPRO operation, the LA office of the FBI came up with a plan to forge a letter claiming the US Organization (United Slaves), which had been attacking the Panthers, believed that the BPP had a contract out to kill their leader. The LA FBI office wrote that the objective was for “this counterintelligence measure [to] result in an ‘US’ and BPP vendetta.” The operation was part of what led to the terrible murder of Black Panther leaders John Huggins and Alprentice “Bunchy” Carter by US members in Los Angeles.

    Black Panthers, Bunchy Carter and John Huggins

     

    Bunchy Carter and John Huggins, Black Panther leaders, murdered in 1969.   

    Again, there were real issues to resolve, questions to investigate, and debates to struggle out among those struggling for a different and better world in different ways, coming from different outlooks at the time, as now. The pattern and practice of COINTELPRO was to exploit these contradictions to twist them into vicious, destructive personal attacks, with an aim of disintegrating the movements for social change and an edge of isolating and setting up the most radical and revolutionary forces and leaders for what COINTELPRO documents euphemistically referred to as “neutralization.”

    Conclusion: don’t fall for—and don’t tolerate—the kinds of behavior that mimic what the FBI has used to destroy social movements. Call it out.

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.

     

    FBI surveillance files on Bob Avakian.   

    Identifying and Going After Bob Avakian Early On

    In his memoir, From Ike to Mao and Beyond, Bob Avakian (BA), who emerged as a revolutionary in the 1960s and today is leading the movement for revolution, talks about how he was a target for surveillance. At a demonstration, he was approached by the head of the Berkeley police “red squad” and told that he and the Revolutionary Union (the RU, which BA played a central role in founding) were under surveillance.

    BA has written about being in Chicago for the New Politics Convention and going back to his car and finding a guy who was “obviously from the Chicago red squad or the FBI” in a car behind his car “writing things down.” A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) discovery revealed that the House of Representatives did a “whole report and investigation on the RU.” Another FOIA inquiry also showed that BA was under surveillance in Maywood, a suburb of Chicago, and that the FBI had made a diagram of the inside of his house, “indicating through which windows someone could see different things going on inside the house.” This was a similar type of diagram to that used by the FBI and the Chicago cops that enabled them to assassinate Fred Hampton, leader of the Chicago Black Panther Party.

    memoir-front.jpg

     

    Resources:

    The book The COINTELPRO Papers, by Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall contains a vast collection of original FBI memos and reports including documentation for the incidents described in this article. It is available as an online PDF.

    This article draws on installments of the American Crime series at revcoms.us: American Crime Case #41: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the New Left, 1964-1971 and American Crime Case #42: COINTELPRO—The FBI Targets the Black Freedom Struggle, 1956-1971.

    An important letter drawing lessons for today from the COINTELPRO operation against Malcolm X: A Reflection on Piggery—Then and Now.

  • ARTICLE:

    “Don’t Talk”—A Fundamental Principle for Resisting Repression and Defending the Rights of the People 

    Trump/MAGA fascism is being aggressively imposed on this society in many horrifying ways, instilling fear and a pull towards cooperation with government authorities. One of the ways people are being confronted with this is in situations where people are stopped as they go about their daily business at school, work, or shopping for food and necessities. Right now, that is a living reality for people who are being targeted as “illegal” immigrants, based on how they look or talk. But there are other situations that can be equally frightening: like when someone is arrested at or in connection with a political protest, or when someone is being questioned by police when they don’t have any idea what it is about. In all cases, people need to know what is the best way to respond to prevent these government agencies from doing great harm

    In the popular culture in movies and TV shows, to the ever-present law-and-order shows of one kind or another, and even the news, all trumpet the same theme: if the police want to talk to you, you are already assumed to be guilty—of something. To exercise one's legal rights is viewed as further evidence of guilt; even the most basic right—getting a lawyer to defend oneself from the legal and illegal onslaught of cops, prosecutors and judges—is depicted with a sneer as "lawyering up," as though this shows you must be guilty or have something to hide. 

    Miranda Rights, four points.

     

    Sometimes you hear the police reading what’s called the Miranda warning (see box) to a person they are intending to interrogate, stating that you have the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. But then everything proceeds as though the person being questioned is showing their guilt by refusing to answer questions and getting a lawyer to represent them.

    But in real-life situations, the best advice lawyers give anyone who is being arrested, questioned or contacted in any way by the police is: DON’T TALK. 

    It is important for people to know what rights they DO have when agents of repression come sniffing around. And it is especially important to insist on those rights even as they are increasingly coming under attack. 

    Bob Avakian has spoken to this point in his social media message @BobAvakianOfficial REVOLUTION #106:

    As we revcoms (revolutionary communists) have made clear in the Declaration WE NEED AND WE DEMAND: A WHOLE NEW WAY TO LIVE, A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEM: “So long as we are still living under the rule of this system of capitalism-imperialism, we will defend people against attacks on their lives and on the rights that are supposed to be guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.”

    So, what rights based on the U.S. Constitution are supposed to apply whether during an arrest or in any contact with police or government agencies? How should people defend their rights individually and collectively, and what kind of culture is needed to resist the government forces of repression?

    The Right to Remain Silent—Don't Talk

    When facing agents of government repression (here we are talking about the local police and prosecutors, state or federal law enforcement or various government agencies), the principle of "Don't Talk" is an important legal principle overall, and it is crucial in fighting to protect the various movements of resistance and of revolution from government repression. This principle is stressed very strongly by criminal defense lawyers and civil rights organizations—you have a RIGHT to remain silent.

    Many legal rights organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and National Lawyers Guild (NLG), have published materials to inform people of their rights. The most important thing they all advise is to assert your right to NOT answer questions. 

    For example, the following is from a brochure published by the ACLU of Southern California

    WHAT TO DO IF YOU’RE STOPPED BY POLICE, IMMIGRATION AGENTS OR THE FBI:
    YOUR RIGHTS 

    • You have the right to remain silent. If you wish to exercise that right, say so out loud.
    • You have the right to refuse to consent to a search of yourself, your car or your home.
    • If you are not under arrest, you have the right to calmly leave.
    • You have the right to a lawyer if you are arrested. Ask for one immediately.
    • Regardless of your immigration or citizenship status, you have constitutional rights.

    And the National Lawyers Guild advises what to do if an FBI agent or police officer knocks at the door:

    Do not open the door. State that you are going to remain silent. Do not answer any questions, or even give your name. Anything you say, no matter how seemingly harmless or insignificant, can be used against you or others. Ask the agents to slide their business cards under the door and tell them that your lawyer will contact them. If the agent or officer gives a reason for contacting you, take notes and give the information to your lawyer.11 

    What Harm Can Talking Do?

    There are many myths and lies promoted in the dominant culture and by the police themselves which leave people confused and feeling they have no choice but to cooperate. This is absolutely wrong and dangerous to any movements of resistance from among the people. 

    Myth #1—Cooperating will make the authorities go away.

    In fact, it often does just the opposite. After all, if they size someone up as a "talker" or weak link, they'll milk this person for all the information they can get. They may return with more questions or continue this line of questioning with others.

    Myth #2—Talking will prevent being arrested.

    The authorities promote the illusion that a person should try to "save their own hide" by cooperating and talking. In reality, as the ACLU and NLG underscore, in many circumstances talking may increase the chances of a person being busted, and may be sealing the case against himself/herself as well as others.

    Myth #3—As long as the information provided is harmless, there's nothing wrong with talking.

    When people don't know their rights and talk freely to the authorities, this can do great harm—no matter what information they provide.

    First of all, because the person doesn't know the full agenda of the authorities, he/she has no basis to evaluate whether or not information is "harmless." Even if the authorities claim to be investigating something that has nothing to do with your politics or political activities (or those of others), appearances can be deceiving. The authorities can and will twist any information to their advantage.

    Secondly, the act of talking encourages the authorities to pursue this tactic and go after others.

    Finally, and most importantly, talking fuels the government's efforts to eliminate any movements of opposition and dissent, while standing firm and not talking as a matter of principle contributes to building a culture of resistance and defiance.

    Myth #4—If I don't cooperate, won't it look like I have something to hide?

    According to the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR),

    This is one of the most frequently asked questions. The answer involves the nature of political "intelligence" investigations and the job of the FBI. Agents will try to make you feel that it will "look bad" if you don't cooperate with them. Many people not familiar with how the FBI operates worry about being uncooperative…. (T)hey [the FBI] are intent on learning about the habits, opinions, and affiliations of people not suspected of wrongdoing....

    They will do anything to get a person to talk: from good cop/bad cop approaches (aimed at getting the person to "open up" to the more sympathetic cop) to threats and outright brutality. They also use "mind games" such as saying that others have already informed on a person; or even going so far as falsely telling someone a family member has died in order to get the person to let down his/her guard and reveal information about themselves or others.

    Any information that a person provides—no matter how seemingly insignificant—can be twisted and used against that person themselves, or against people and organizations who expose and oppose the crimes of this system. The government has a long history of lying about the facts and fabricating "evidence" in order to frame movement activists and revolutionaries. They take intelligence gathered from a variety of sources and use it in the most sinister ways, even including murder. Consequently, there is no reason to be in the least defensive about not talking to or cooperating with authorities.

    If a person thinks that he/she can just "bullshit" an agent, this too is a trap. The investigators are trained to be "friendly" and listen to people's stories. To quote a textbook on interrogation techniques, "Letting the subject tell a few lies, and letting him apparently get away with them, is an excellent technique, and works well with many types of subjects. We have seen that lying on the part of the subject works to the advantage of the interrogator...." The NLG has pointed out:

    Keep in mind that although they are allowed to lie to you, lying to a government agent is a crime. Remaining silent is not. The safest things to say are "I am going to remain silent," "I want to speak to my lawyer," and " do not consent to a search." [emphasis added]12

    Conclusion

    As spoken to throughout this article, as part of trying to beat down movements of resistance and of revolution, agents of the government (police, FBI, prosecutors, etc.) have developed methods to trick, intimidate and brutalize people into giving up legal rights and protections established by the legal system in this country. This basic dynamic and truth needs to be clearly understood, and if various organizations and movements are serious about the challenges they face, they need to grapple with how—mainly by relying on mass movements of the people—to resist such repression.

    History has shown that when the decent people refuse to concede the moral authority on what is right and what is wrong, they are better able to withstand repression and continue to develop resistance. If they do not take this approach, they find themselves in a situation where: That which you do not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn—or be forced—to accept. Part of building a culture of defiance and resistance among people standing up against fascism and the crimes of this system is refusing to allow the government to either intimidate or bamboozle people into giving up resistance, and refusing in any way to enter into complicity with such intimidation and repression.

    In this context, the legal principles underlying "Don't Talk" take on heightened importance. Those confronted by police agents should not be bamboozled into giving up the legal rights they do have, as this will only lead to strengthening the repressive apparatus of the state, and help to undercut the ability to struggle against the crimes of this system and to build a movement for revolution to overthrow this system and bring about a fundamentally different and much better system. 

    Immigrant Legal Resource Center red cards

     

    Red Cards

    Red cards are being distributed by the thousands in immigrant communities throughout the country, advising people of their rights. This is the text of the “red cards.” 

    I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on my 5th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. I do not give you permission to enter my home based on my 4th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter, signed by a judge or magistrate with my name on it that you slide under the door. I do not give you permission to search any of my belongings based on my 4th Amendment rights. I choose to exercise my constitutional rights. These cards are available to citizens and noncitizens alike.

    • DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR if an immigration agent is knocking on the door.
    • DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS from an immigration agent if they try to talk to you. You have the right to remain silent.
    • DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING without first speaking to a lawyer. You have the right to speak with a lawyer.
    • If you are outside of your home, ask the agent if you are free to leave and if they say yes, leave calmly.
    • GIVE THIS CARD TO THE AGENT. If you are inside of your home, show the card through the window or slide it under the door.

    _______________

    FOOTNOTES:

    1. Operation Backfire: A Survival Guide for Environmental and Animal Rights Activists, National Lawyers Guild, 2009 [back]

    2. “Know Your Rights! What to Do if Questioned by Police, FBI, Customs Agents or Immigration Officers,” by National Lawyers Guild, S.F. Bay Area Chapter, ACLU of Northern California and the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC-SF), 2004  [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    What If People Had Listened?

    THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!

    In the Name of Humanity
    We REFUSE to Accept a Fascist America
    A Better World IS Possible

    BAfilmTrumpencemustgo3.jpg

     

    What If People Had Listened?
    This talk was given in 2017, during the first Trump fascist regime, and it is all the more crucial now, with what Bob Avakian has referred to as the “second coming” of the Trump regime and this fascism now “on an unrestrained rampage.”
    See Q&A from the film, clips, and trailer.

    Listen to and read Avakian's most recent social media message: Revolution #141: The Time Is Urgently Upon Us Now—To Drive Out The Trump Fascist Regime! and join the mobilization for the Call from RefuseFascism.org, and open to all, for “The Fall of Trump Fascist Regime, November 5, Washington DC.

    We are confronted by—we are now being ruled by—a fascist regime: relentlessly assaulting civil rights and liberties and openly promoting bigotry and inequality; acting with callous disregard or cold-blooded malice toward those they consider inferior and a drain or stain on the country; on a mission to deny health care to millions who will suffer and many who will die without it; crudely degrading women, as objects of plunder, breeders of children without the right to abortion or birth control, subordinate to husbands and men in general; defying the science of climate change, attacking the science of evolution, and repudiating the scientific method overall; a regime brandishing an arsenal of mass destruction and threatening nuclear war; intensifying state terror against Muslims, immigrants and people in the inner cities; unleashing and giving encouragement and support to brutal thugs spewing vile “America First,” white supremacist, male supremacist and anti-LGBT venom—a regime that boasts of all this and declares its intention to do even worse.

    This has caused disgust, anger, and agonizing among huge numbers of people, and there have been many important acts of resistance, big and small, to the continuing outrages committed by this regime and its supporters. But the regime remains in power and is determined to ride roughshod over all obstacles to carry out its monstrous agenda; and the need for a massive outpouring of people, acting together nonviolently but with sustained determination, to create a political situation where this regime cannot remain in power—cries out.

    The organization Refuse Fascism (RefuseFascism.org) has put forward a call and a plan, and is actively building, for that mass mobilization, to begin on November 4.

    So this is the challenge we are facing. To meet this challenge there are big questions that need to be seriously engaged, even as people are moving to build momentum toward November 4.

    Donald Trump claims to have won the popular vote in the 2016 election. That is another of his Big Lies. But the fact is: It would have been a disgrace if just 10 people voted for this, or 10 thousand—but tens of millions did. Why? The fundamental answer lies in the whole history of this country and its role in the world.

    Did you know that the Constitution adopted by the founders of this country institutionalized the right of men to rape, at will? I had thought of beginning this talk with that statement—and then, in response to the gasps of shock and disbelief that such a statement should call forth, I could have said: No, the Constitution didn’t actually do that, but it did something no less horrific: institutionalizing the enslavement of millions of people. In fact, however, the Constitution adopted by the “founders” did legalize mass rape: Besides enshrining property relations in which men could legally rape their wives, the Constitution, by explicitly codifying the status of slaves as property, in effect established the “right” of the slaveowners to do anything they wished to their slaves, including raping the women. And slave women were raped, regularly and repeatedly, by their owners and overseers.

    Often, people who do not want to face the reality and the implications of this will argue: “We have to judge things by the standards of the time—people back then did not know better.” As they say in England: rubbish! For one thing, the slaves knew better! And there is the example of Edward Coles, who before becoming governor of Illinois was private secretary to James Madison (the main author of the U.S. Constitution): Coles freed his own slaves and tried to convince Madison and Thomas Jefferson (author of the Declaration of Independence) to do the same. They refused, but you can’t say nobody knew better back then! It is true—Madison and Jefferson (and, yes, Hamilton!) belong to a past time—and it is long past time that we move beyond what they represent.

    The terrible truth is that, with some notable exceptions (including the very significant exception of the generation that came of age in the 1960s), white people overall have either been directly involved in, or have supported or at least passively accepted all this throughout the history of this country. During the whole time of slavery. During the decades of Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror, when repeatedly Black people, in particular Black men, who did not “know their place”—or sometimes without even knowing why, angered some white person—would be lynched, while crowds of white people would gather in a “picnic” atmosphere, vying to get parts of the mutilated body of the Black person hanging from a tree, and photographs of this were turned into postcards that were sold throughout the country. Yes, this is true—the ugly, shameful truth. Today, with the repeated murders of Black people by police, in the rare instances when the murdering cop is indicted, there are white people who sit on juries and refuse to convict. And still too many white people who claim to care about justice, and will take to social media to denounce far less outrageous and sometimes even trivial acts, cannot find it in themselves to be outraged and moved to act about this! If the police wantonly shot down dogs, over and over again, there would be a huge outcry throughout society, including from people who are silent, or make excuses, when this is done to human beings of darker skin.

    Now, it would be wrong, and harmful, to ignore the fact that there are white people, in particular younger white people (but others as well), who have taken to the streets to protest these murders by police, and who have put forward the stand: White silence is violence, it is complicity in murder. This is, of course, a good thing—and it needs to happen much more, on a much greater scale. But, given the actual history of this country, down to today, does it really make sense to insist, as some people still stubbornly do, that “fascism couldn’t happen here, not in this country, with our democracy and our great traditions”?!

    It is, however, very important to dig into the question: How did things come to this point, where we are confronting the real horror of a fascist America? Here, told briefly, is the “longer story,” the broader history that has led to this.

    Thousands of years ago, human beings, who had lived for tens of thousands of years before in small hunting and gathering societies, settled on land and carried out farming and domestication of animals, particularly in the “fertile crescent” of the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East areas. With this came the emergence of class division, the polarization between rich and poor, powerful and powerless, including the patriarchal oppression of women by men. As this way of life spread and took hold in large parts of the world, ancient civilizations and empires arose—for example, in India, Egypt, China, Persia, Greece and Rome, and then, centuries later, the Islamic empire, covering a large territory in the Middle East and parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe. While built on plunder and oppression, they nevertheless brought forth many great achievements in architecture, art, music, the development of language and literature, science and other spheres. But the history of the rise of empires has also been the history of their decline and fall—because of contradictions and conflicts within them and because of invasions from outside forces, themselves driven by their own contradictions, conflicts and challenges.

    This went on for thousands of years. But then, several hundred years ago, something dramatically new emerged: the development of the capitalist system. This is a far more dynamic system than previously existed in human history—a system driven by its own internal contradictions to constantly expand, to continually transform the technological basis on which it operates, to repeatedly intensify the exploitation of people on which its profits rest. And, again as a result of the contradictions and conflicts within and between different countries, and the rise and fall of different powers, it just so happened that it was mainly in Europe that capitalism first took hold and emerged as a dominant force on the world stage. This was accomplished, in its very foundation, through the most horrendous means. Karl Marx, the founder of communism, described, with bitter irony, the “rosy dawn” of capitalism: the massive hunting of slaves in Africa, shipping them in chains, in the millions, to be worked mercilessly in the Americas; the conquest of the original peoples in South America and their enslavement unto death in the gold and silver mines there; and atrocities of a similar kind that fed countless human beings, in far-flung parts of the world, into the relentless machinery of an ever-expanding capitalism. This, as well as brutal exploitation, including child labor, within these capitalist countries themselves, was the basis on which “western civilization” made leaps in its development and became the dominating force in the world, economically, militarily, politically, and culturally.

    Capitalism, through all the horrors it has brought about, including two world wars and countless other armed conflicts, has in fact laid the basis for a whole new leap, beyond relations of exploitation and oppression, and the madness of war and environmental destruction; but, at the same time—and this is now posed in very stark and acute terms—this system of capitalism stands as the greatest obstacle to this advance, and human society everywhere is straining against the confines in which capitalism continues to enchain human existence.

    This puts in proper perspective and sharply refutes the racist notion of “the superiority of western (that is, white European) civilization” and the idea that somehow capitalism is the highest form of existence that human beings can attain and should aspire to.

    And here is the “shorter story,” the more particular reasons why things have come to this crossroads in this country, with potentially disastrous consequences for human beings everywhere.

    The USA is a country which established its territory and built the foundation of its wealth through the armed conquest of land, genocide, slavery, and ruthless exploitation of successive waves of immigrants to America. And it has continued as a country marked by white supremacy, patriarchy and male supremacy, and other oppressive divisions, while expanding its domination into an empire stretching across the globe, sitting atop a lopsided world of profound inequalities and plunder of the environment (it would take the resources of nearly 5 earths for the rest of world to have the kind of “consumer society” that exists in the U.S.)—all this backed up and enforced by a massive machinery of death and devastation, the U.S. military, and reinforced with a constant barrage of ideas and culture rationalizing and justifying all this oppression and destruction, propagated through an equally massive machinery of molding public opinion. Today, while the U.S. is, and loudly proclaims itself to be, the world’s number one superpower, it is riddled with sharpening contradictions, and facing growing challenges, within the country and internationally, and this has brought forth a fascist regime that now holds the reins of power, with the finger of a demented bully on the nuclear button—a regime that, without exaggeration, threatens not just greatly heightened suffering for the masses of humanity but the very existence of humanity itself.

    So this poses sharply the immediate, urgent challenge we face.

    Calling this regime fascist is not an “insult” but speaks to the terrible reality. On the website revcom.us this explanation regularly appears:

    “Fascism is the exercise of blatant dictatorship by the bourgeois (capitalist-imperialist) class, ruling through reliance on open terror and violence, trampling on what are supposed to be civil and legal rights, wielding the power of the state, and mobilizing organized groups of fanatical thugs, to commit atrocities against masses of people, particularly groups of people identified as ‘enemies,’ ‘undesirables,’ or ‘dangers to society.’

    “At the same time—and this can be seen through studying the examples of Nazi Germany and Italy under Mussolini—while it will likely move quickly to enforce certain repressive measures in consolidating its rule, a fascist regime is also likely to implement its program overall through a series of stages and even attempt at different points to reassure the people, or certain groups among the people, that they will escape the horrors—if they quietly go along and do not protest or resist while others are being terrorized and targeted for repression, deportation, ‘conversion,’ prison, or execution.”

    Refuse Fascism has published as a pamphlet, and posted on RefuseFascism.org, material that can be made into portable panels outlining the outrages already committed by the Trump/Pence regime, as well as what they are preparing to do (and what they have called forth from the thugs they have encouraged and unleashed), in their attacks on Muslims, immigrants, civil liberties, women and LGBTQ people, on the environment and on the people of the world, and what they have done to reinforce and fortify white supremacy, police brutality, and mass incarceration. It is very striking how far things have already gone, and how much worse they are bound to get, if this regime is allowed to remain in power and fully implement its agenda.

    One of the most distinguishing and significant features of this particularly American version of fascism is the “unholy alliance” between Trump and fundamentalist Christian Fascists. As I pointed out in another recent talk:

    “Trump, I think it’s fair to say, could not have won the election if the Christian Fascists ... not only if they had opposed him, but if they’d been unenthusiastic about him ....And ... even when the ... pussy-grabbing thing came out, they didn’t turn against him (...Jerry Falwell, Jr. and all these others)—because they recognized: “Here is somebody who is going outside of the whole rules and the way this is done in the ‘swamp of Washington,’ who will actually carry through on this stuff [like outlawing abortion and suppressing gay people].”... And Trump, for his part, recognized that if he didn’t get this force behind him, he was not going to be able to do it....

    “Pence is obviously a critical linchpin in this ... uniting of what’s represented by Trump ... and the Christian Fascists.... [T]he regular bourgeois institutions, ... like CNN, the Democratic Party and so on, ... they keep saying: ‘He can’t do that, that’s not the way things are done.’ But then [Trump] does it, because he’s not playing by those rules. He’s not working within the norms as they’ve been. He is going directly up against them, precisely as an important part of what he’s doing.”

    And, while Pence plays a very important role in all this, he is far from the only Christian Fascist in this regime. Besides the appointment of Neil Gorsuch, who is himself a Christian Fascist, to the Supreme Court—re-establishing, after the death of Antonin Scalia, the right-wing majority on the Court—Trump’s cabinet is full of these Christian Fascists.

    Perhaps it seems harsh, or even extreme, to refer to these fundamentalist Christians as fascists. Well, in Katherine Stewart’s book The Good News Club, The Christian Right’s Stealth Assault on America’s Children, she cites these comments by Rich Lang, himself a former Christian fundamentalist, who broke with that and became a liberal Christian pastor:

    “When I was born again [Lang recalls], faith was something inside of you, something you were supposed to reflect through your life. But in the 1980s, something happened. Fundamentalist Christianity jumped back into the public square with the intention to reshape the country as a Christian nation as defined by them....

    “It’s no different than the Nazis wanting to start with the Hitler Youth. That is where you’d want to start if you were trying to build a fascist movement....

    “That’s the word, ‘fascism.’ Nobody likes to use it in this country. But I believe that in this country, underneath the appearances, that is exactly the great temptation of our time. ...[A]nd you have to call it what it is—‘Christian Fascism.’”

    Stewart further summarizes Lang’s views this way: “Modern fundamentalism, like fascism in earlier times, he says, involves a strong feeling of persecution, typically at the hands of godless liberals or a religious ‘other’; the belief that one belongs to a pure race or national group that is responsible for past greatness, suffers unjust oppression in the present, and is the rightful ruler of the world; the impulse to submit unquestioningly to absolute authority; and the relentless drive for power and control. It is, he says, a kind of supremacist movement, with religion rather than race at its core.”

    And there is this chilling statement by Lang:

    “People have no idea it’s going on....

    “What does it mean that the conservative church that’s growing in America is an end-times church? What does it mean that we are raising a generation of children to believe that they are the last generation? What is going to happen if we keep on telling them, ‘Don’t care about the environment, and bring on the war, because we’re going to be lifted out of here, and you can forget about loving your neighbors, because they’re just going to get blown away?’”

    So, that is the insight of someone very familiar with these Christian Fascists. And the fact is that, in this country, with its whole history of genocide, slavery and racism, any form of fascism, including one basing itself on “Christian supremacy”—any urge to “restore past greatness”—cannot help but be bound together with white supremacy.

    The Republican Party has been moving in a fascist direction since the late 1960s, with further leaps since then to becoming more and more openly fascist.

    In running for President in 1968, Richard Nixon adopted what has been called the “southern strategy,” which the Republican Party has followed ever since. This is a direct appeal to white supremacy—to the racism of white people, particularly (though not only) in the southern states, who are enraged that Black people are not “staying in their place.”

    The Republican Party is not “the Party of Lincoln”—as it sometimes demagogically claims to be—it has become much more the Party of the Confederacy.

    With Ronald Reagan, the Republican Party took another leap on the road of fascism. Reagan very deliberately began his campaign for president in 1980 in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where in 1964, three civil rights workers were kidnapped and brutally murdered by white supremacists. There, in Philadelphia, Mississippi, Reagan proclaimed his support for “states rights,” which, particularly in the South, have long been code words for white supremacist lynch-mobism.

    And after George W. Bush took things still further in a fascist direction—including the open use of torture and the active promotion of Christian fundamentalism—the Trump/Pence regime has made the leap into all-out fascism.

    There is a direct line from the Confederacy to the fascists of today, and a direct connection between their white supremacy, their open disgust and hatred for LGBT people as well as women, their willful rejection of science and the scientific method, their raw “American First” jingoism and trumpeting of “the superiority of western civilization” and their bellicose wielding of military power, including their expressed willingness and blatant threats to use nuclear weapons, to destroy countries.

    The truth—another terrible truth that must be faced—is that, in the context of profound and acute contradictions that are asserting, or re-asserting, themselves in ways that are tearing at the very fabric and deepening cracks in the foundation of this country, at the same time as the American empire is facing serious challenges internationally, fascism is one possible resolution of this, on the terms of this system and its ruling class, even as this is a horror for humanity.

    While the Constitution does establish the separation of church and state—and the Christian Fascists are wrong, or simply lying, when they insist that the founding documents of this country established it as a “Christian nation”—the reality is that Christianity has all along been the unofficial state religion of this country, and the country’s identity, throughout its history, has been as a “white Christian nation,” grounded in male supremacy as well as white supremacy and driven by a “manifest destiny” to dominate not only the continent of North America but ultimately the world as a whole. All this has been brought into question, and has become the focus of intense struggle, going back to the 1960s and, in some important ways, back to the Civil War. And while developments internationally, including the demise of the Soviet Union, have given further impetus to the globalization of the capitalist world economy, this very heightened globalization has propelled changes that have sharpened contradictions within the U.S. as well as on the world level, particularly with an emerging capitalist China mounting a challenge to U.S. global economic dominance, at the same time as this heightened globalization, under conditions of western imperialist domination, has wreaked havoc in countries throughout the Third World, including the Middle East (and other places where Islam is the prevailing religion), adding fuel to a virulent Islamic fundamentalism that has declared war on the “decadent West” and on “infidels” and others oriented toward the West and facilitating its imperial domination.

    In order to bring about any positive resolution to all this, even short of abolishing and moving beyond this whole system, it is necessary and crucial to break with the “normal routine” and the “normal workings” of the political process.

    Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winning economist, recently wrote that, faced as we are with the gravity of the growing climate crisis, those now ruling us may end up destroying civilization because of their willful ignorance and opposition to the scientific method. This was said very seriously, and it is deadly serious. Speaking to this, in “A Question, A Challenge for Paul Krugman, And All Those Concerned About the Future of Humanity,” I emphasized the importance of refusing “to simply hope that the ‘normal workings’ of a process that has brought these people to their ruling position will somehow prevent them from acting in accordance with their ‘willful ignorance,’ and worse.” But why do many people still stubbornly cling to such false hopes?

    Thomas Frank is the liberal author of a book with the catchy title What’s the Matter With Kansas?—How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. But the more important question is: What’s the matter with liberals?

    Well, it is important, first of all, to draw the distinction between ruling class “liberals” and “regular” liberals. As for “liberals” of the ruling class, what is “the matter” with them is something I will get to shortly. But for those who are not part of the ruling class, the “matter” is that, although they are willing to admit that there are real problems in this country and they would like to have a more just society, and world, many resist recognizing the systematic and systemic nature of the injustices, and they fear the conflict, turmoil and chaos that could be set loose by a determined struggle against this. Even as they do have a sense of the horrors that the Trump/Pence regime represents, too many are caught up in thinking that amounts to this: “I am hoping, and by staying within the established ‘norms’ I am gambling on the hope, that the horrors don’t hit me and those I most care about.” This, it has to be said, is politically as well as morally bankrupt, and will only contribute to the impending disaster. It used to be a common saying: To the person of the Right, order is more important than justice, while for the person of the Left, it is the opposite. Now, the question is put squarely to liberals, and really to everyone: Which, after all, is more important: Order, even if that is the order of fascism, with everything that means? Or justice, even if that means stepping outside of our “comfort zone,” and putting ourselves on the line to prevent this fascism from consolidating its rule and fully implementing its program?

    Another dangerous illusion is the notion that, particularly for Black people, what is happening now is just more of the same. Yes, the history of this country is the history of unspeakable atrocities committed against Black people, as well as others—but what we are facing now, with this fascist regime, is the heightened possibility not just that this oppression will be carried to genocidal extremes, and that the masses of people everywhere will be subjected to previously unseen horrors, but that the human species itself will be wiped out.

    In confronting and moving to prevent this, one of the biggest obstacles standing in the way, and weighing people down, is American chauvinism—the disgusting notion that America and Americans are better and more important than everybody else. This is a poison infecting people broadly in this country, even among the bitterly oppressed, and there is a great need for people to break with this American chauvinism. Free yourself from the GTF!—the Great Tautological Fallacy. A fallacy: an idea, or a way of thinking, that is false, wrong. A tautology: a round-in-a-circle way of reasoning that asserts something and then claims to prove it by merely asserting the same thing again. So, the Great Tautological Fallacy to which I am referring is the notion that America is a force for good in the world, and therefore whatever it does is good (or at least done with “good intentions”), even if the same thing when done by other forces, especially forces opposed to “us,” is bad, is evil—because... because America is a force for good in the world. Thus, in the grip of the Great Tautological Fallacy, when one is told by the authorities in government and the media, etc., that North Korea developing a small number of nuclear weapons and a few long-range ballistic missiles poses a “grave threat,” one does not question, one does not ask why that is a “grave threat,” while the only country ever to use nuclear weapons, the United States, having thousands of nuclear weapons and the capability to use them, anywhere in the world, is somehow not a grave threat. Under the influence of the Great Tautological Fallacy, one does not stop to think about the fact that, in this situation, North Korea could only be developing this weaponry as an attempt to deter an attack from the United States—for North Korea’s leaders know that if they initiated an attack, they would face massive, overwhelming retaliation—and from the point of view of the imperial rulers of the United States, such a possibility of deterrence is precisely the problem, because it could in some measure limit the ability of the U.S. to dominate and dictate.

    Here is another example: Recently, Chelsea Manning, a former solider, who took great risk and spent years in prison for exposing, among other things, war crimes by the U.S. military in Iraq, was extended an invitation to be a lecturer in an academic program at Harvard University. But then, when some government officials and others, including Mike Pompeo, objected and threatened to pull out of the program, Harvard disinvited Manning. Well, who is Mike Pompeo? He is the head of the CIA—an “intelligence” arm of the U.S. government which, without exaggeration, is an instrument of murder on a mass scale. Going back to the 1950s, and through succeeding decades, the CIA has worked through right-wing butchers, in countries such as Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Indonesia, and many others, to pull off coups that have removed popular governments from power and replaced them with murderous reactionary dictatorships. More than a million people have been slaughtered as a result of these actions by the CIA. But, through the lens of the Great Tautological Fallacy, the head of the CIA is a respected figure, and his denunciations of Chelsea Manning can cause Manning to be ousted from the program to which she was invited at Harvard.

    Of great help in casting off the Great Tautological Fallacy is the “American Crime” series that appears regularly on revcom.us—where you can get a beginning sense of the scope and the depth of the atrocities that have been carried out, here and all over the world, by the rulers of this country, from the beginning and down to today.

    But from childhood we are indoctrinated with the notion that America is a shining light of freedom, and the President of the United States is “the leader of the free world.” Well, when has this been true? Was it true during all the years of slavery? Or during the long years of Jim Crow segregation after the Civil War, when thousands of Black people were lynched while leering mobs of white racists celebrated, and Black people as a whole were subjected to constant terror? Is this a shining light of freedom now, when Black people have to take to the streets demanding “Stop Killing Us!” because the police kill a thousand people every year, many of them unarmed, especially Black people, Latinos, and Native Americans? When millions of women are battered and huge numbers are raped every year in this country, is this a shining light to the world? And what is this “free world?” Does it include the countries where the U.S. has backed and armed military juntas and other oppressive dictatorships, with their bloodthirsty death squads terrorizing the people, over the last 100 years and more, throughout Latin America and many other parts of the world? Does it include today countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey—all “allies” of the U.S. and all ruled by brutally repressive governments? Or what about the Philippines, where the government has carried out the cold-blooded murder of more than 10,000 people within the last year, and the head of state, Duterte, openly boasts of this? Does the “free world” include Israel, a nuclear-armed state that has occupied Palestinian land, in flagrant violation of UN resolutions, for 50 years, and forcibly maintains over a million Palestinian people in Gaza in what amounts to an open-air prison, living barely above survival level, and subject to repeated bombardment by Israeli armed forces, which in 2014, with full support from the U.S. government (headed then by Obama), killed over 2,000 people in Gaza, the overwhelming majority civilians, hundreds of them children. Is all this the “free world” of which the U.S. is the leader? Once you remove the blinders of the Great Tautological Fallacy, it can be seen that the “free world” simply means those parts of the world that are under the domination of, or are “friendly” to, the United States, no matter how monstrous their ruling classes may be, while the “non-free world” is made up of those who remain outside of, and especially those who pose opposition or obstacles to, the domination of the U.S. empire.

    The U.S. government wages war in Africa and Asia, as well as the Middle East, claiming it is fighting to defend civilization against the brutal and murderous Islamic fundamentalist jihadists. But the imperialists of the U.S. are certainly no less brutal and murderous, and the “civilization” they boast of is literally built on the blood and bones of people all over the world. And why is this Islamic fundamentalism such a force now? Fundamentally because of the workings of capitalist imperialism itself. Besides the overall role of imperialism in creating more favorable soil for these Islamic fundamentalists, actions of the U.S. imperialists have further fed their growth.

    In the 1980s, the U.S. actually armed and built up Osama bin Laden and other Islamic fundamentalists to strike at the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

    In 2003, in violation of international law, the U.S. invaded Iraq to overthrow the head of government there, Saddam Hussein. This invasion was carried out under the cover of lies that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. This invasion, and the occupation of Iraq by American forces that followed, caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, set off bloody conflicts among the Iraqi people and created more fertile ground for Islamic fundamentalist forces.

    And the same thing happened in Libya. Under the presidency of Barack Obama, and with the insistent urging of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the U.S. intervened in a conflict within Libya on the side of forces opposed to the long-time ruler Muammar Qaddafi. With the fall of Qaddafi—which was brought about mainly as a result of massive bombing of his forces by the U.S. and its allies—the rivalries and conflicts within Libya were intensified, and Islamic fundamentalist forces gained strength.

    Or take the case of Iran. In 1953, the CIA engineered a coup that overthrew a popular government that was moving to nationalize the oil of the country, so that it could be used for the development of its economy, instead of being controlled and plundered by the U.S. and Britain. This coup brought the Shah of Iran to power, and the people of Iran suffered decades of torment and torture at the hands of the Shah and his secret police. And, here again, these actions of the U.S. created more favorable ground for the forces of Islamic fundamentalism, which ultimately seized power through the revolution that overthrew the Shah in 1979.

    These are only a few examples of the American crimes that have been committed, and the kinds of consequences that have followed from these crimes, in countries all over the world. And all this underlines the crucial importance of casting off the blinders of the Great Tautological Fallacy and breaking with American chauvinism. We need to think about humanity, first and above all.

    During the 1960s, a whole generation (or a large and defining part of that generation) broke with American chauvinism, cast off the Great Tautological Fallacy and, at the cost of real sacrifice, dared to stand up against the atrocities committed, here and throughout the world, by the rulers of this country, and fight for a better world. Unfortunately, all too many (though not all!) of that generation have become disoriented and have allowed themselves to become, as the French say, “récupérer”—that is, they have come back under the wing of the ruling class, in particular its “liberal” representatives in the Democratic Party, and have far too much accepted things on the terms of a system they once, very rightly, recognized as viciously criminal. But now, when the workings of this system have brought this fascist regime to power, there is, more than ever, a profound and urgent need for people, of all generations, to finally and thoroughly break with American chauvinism, and act in the interests of humanity.

    Here is another important statement that can be found on revcom.us:

    “The Democrats, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, etc., are seeking to resolve the crisis with the Trump presidency on the terms of this system, and in the interests of the ruling class of this system, which they represent. We, the masses of people, must go all out, and mobilize ourselves in the millions, to resolve this in our interests, in the interests of humanity, which are fundamentally different from and opposed to those of the ruling class.”

    Why is it that the Democrats can only try to resolve this on the terms of the system—and for that reason cannot offer any alternative that is in our interests, in the interests of humanity?

    Why are they determined to keep things within the “established norms” and “acceptable limits.”

    We can turn to the words of Barack Obama, shortly after Trump won the electoral college vote. We, Democrats and Republicans, are on the same team, Obama insisted. And he made a point of saying that we should wish Trump well and help him succeed because his success is success for all of us. Well, we can say that here Obama was telling an important truth—ultimately and fundamentally they are all on the same team—which explains why the Democratic Party will only oppose what the Trump/Pence regime is doing within narrow limits, and always in the interests of the “team” of which they are all a part. And, really, we should all help Trump succeed with his fascist agenda, because a “successful” fascism will be good for all of us? Only with the perverted logic of the system all these politicians serve, and with the poisonous outlook of American chauvinism, could anyone put forward such a position!

    Like the Republicans, the Democrats believe in the superiority of the capitalist system of exploitation and the “exceptional greatness” of America and its empire.

    They champion a brave new world of “21st century globalization,” which rests on a vast network of sweatshops where people, including children, slave long hours for near-starvation wages.

    They firmly believe in the right of America to dominate the world—and to overturn governments, bomb countries and slaughter people to do so—but they say it should be done with the cooperation of allies and in the name of “making the world more free, orderly and peaceful.”

    They will talk about “diversity” and “inclusiveness” while actually acting to maintain the fundamental relations of inequality and oppression that are hallmarks of this country, because those relations are built into this system and it could not exist or function without them.

    In short, even with their real differences with the Republicans, they represent and serve the same system—the system whose “normal workings” have now brought fascists to power.

    It will only make things worse, and work against what needs to be done to put an end to this nightmare, if people are taken in when Trump appears, for a moment, to be “more reasonable” and is praised by his ruling class opponents for being “more presidential,” or when they treat him as a miserably failing clown, or an egomaniac with no ideology or program, while he forges ahead with his fascist agenda. Hitler, too, while perpetrating monstrous atrocities, and preparing to do even worse, became skilled at “normalizing” this at each step and at times “toned down” his rhetoric. This fed illusions that too many wanted desperately to cling to.

    Upon coming to power, Hitler moved to crush the communists, because of his deep hatred for communism and because the communists were the most powerful organized opposition to the Nazis. Early in the Nazi regime’s rule, the Reichstag (German parliament building) was burned down and, although there are indications that the Nazis themselves were responsible for this, they blamed the communists, and seized on this situation to round up communists and declare emergency measures eliminating or severely restricting rights and liberties, measures which they moved to make permanent. A group of communists was charged with burning down the Reichstag—but the trial actually resulted in the acquittal of most of them, including the prominent communist Georgi Dimitrov. Many people wanted to believe: If communists are acquitted in court proceedings in these circumstances, surely that shows that the “separation of powers” and the remaining institutions of democracy can still “work” to contain and restrain Hitler. These kinds of illusions fed political paralysis and undermined the kind of massive resistance that might have ousted the Nazis from power, before they were able to force the reorganization of society in line with their barbaric outlook and aims, and go on to commit atrocities on a scale few would have thought possible when the Nazis first came to power.

    So, it is crucial to correctly understand, and respond to, the maneuvers of the fascist regime in power now in this country and the conflicts among the powers-that-be. As the statement on revcom.us, about why the “liberal” section of the ruling class cannot resolve this crisis in our interests, goes on to say:

    “This, of course, does not mean that the struggle among the powers-that-be is irrelevant or unimportant; rather, the way to understand and approach this ... is in terms of how it relates to, and what openings it can provide for, ‘the struggle from below’—for the mobilization of masses of people around the demand that the whole regime must go, because of its fascist nature and what the stakes are for humanity.”

    This brings us again to Refuse Fascism and November 4. As the publication from Refuse Fascism, “NOV. 4—IT BEGINS” explains:

    “RefuseFascism.org is a movement of people coming from diverse perspectives, united in our recognition that the Trump/Pence regime poses a catastrophic danger to humanity and the planet and that it is our responsibility to drive them from power. This means working and organizing with all our creativity and determination toward Nov. 4 when many thousands of people will fill the streets of cities and towns, beginning a struggle that must continue day after day and night after night, eventually involving millions of people, demanding: This Nightmare Must End: The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go!

    As I also emphasized in the “Paul Krugman” article:

    “People who hold many divergent points of view must come together and act politically, in what is really a meaningful and powerful way, to deal with the looming—in fact the ongoing—disaster embodied in this Trump/Pence regime, because of its willful opposition to the scientific method and its utter disregard for and repeated trampling on the truth, because of its overt white supremacy and misogyny, its xenophobic and bigoted attacks on immigrants, Muslims and LGBT people, its raw ‘America First’ jingoism and the grave danger it poses to human existence through its predatory approach to the environment and bellicose wielding of military power, including its expressed willingness and brazen threats to use nuclear weapons.”

    Many people who deeply hate everything Trump is about, have nonetheless raised: If we drive out Trump, then we’ll just get Pence, and if anything he is even worse. But that reflects still too much being confined within, and weighed down by, the “normal way” of doing things, which is precisely the trap that people have to break out of in their millions and millions. It is a matter of driving out the whole Trump/Pence regime through massive and sustained political mobilization and resistance from below, changing the whole political landscape, the whole political situation, culture and atmosphere in society. If, and as, this begins to happen on the scale and with the determination that is needed, this, in turn, will have significant repercussions among the ruling political forces, creating or deepening cracks and divisions among them and forcing at least sections of the “liberal” ruling class forces to pretend to recognize the legitimacy of what this mass mobilization is demanding, while at the same time seeking to co-opt it and bring it back within the normal and “acceptable” channels and positions. This, in turn, must be responded to by seizing on the further openings that are created by all this, to draw even greater numbers of people into massive and sustained mobilization. And this overall dynamic must be continued, amplified and accelerated toward the goal of actually driving out this regime before it can fully consolidate its rule and implement its program.

    Thousands must be organized to take to the streets in cities all over the country, beginning on November 4, overcoming fear and feeling the strength of their common cause and action, and their common aspiration and determination, making clear their resolve to not just make a statement but to continue—and, more than that, to spread and multiply their numbers and impact—until millions have been mobilized and refuse to stop until the demand has been met: This Nightmare Must End: The Trump/Pence Regime Must Go! Preparations must be made, logistically as well as politically, so that this mobilization can be sustained and can continue to expand and gain strength, so that the spirit, the determination and courage of those involved can be lifted and reinforced, while growing numbers of people, from broad and diverse sections of society, can be involved and can provide support and assistance. This is the great cause and the great movement to which all those who REFUSE to accept a fascist America must apply their energy and creativity to make a reality, now and moving forward to November 4, and beyond.

    A Better World IS Possible!

    In the most fundamental sense, only a thorough transformation of society, through a revolution to break the hold of this system and bring into being a completely different economic and political system, geared to meeting the needs of the people, for basic necessities and for a stimulating and inspiring intellectual and cultural life, seeking the truth through scientific means and giving flight to creativity and imagination, with new relations among people that do away with all oppressive divisions—only this can bring an end to the unnecessary suffering that is continually inflicted on the masses of humanity and make possible a world where human beings can truly flourish.

    Going back to the foundation of this country and the decisive role that slavery played in its rise as a capitalist power, and reflecting on the historical development of not just this country but human society more broadly, I have pointed to this profound reality:

    There is the potential for something of unprecedented beauty to arise out of unspeakable ugliness: Black people playing a crucial role in putting an end, at long last, to this system which has, for so long, not just exploited but dehumanized, terrorized and tormented them in a thousand ways—putting an end to this in the only way it can be done—by fighting to emancipate humanity, to put an end to the long night in which human society has been divided into masters and slaves, and the masses of humanity have been lashed, beaten, raped, slaughtered, shackled and shrouded in ignorance and misery.”

    Within the framework and limits of this talk, it is not my purpose, nor is it possible, to go deeply into the analysis of why this system cannot be reformed but must be abolished through revolution. I have done this in the book The New Communism, which not only speaks to why a revolution is necessary but also what the character of that revolution must be, and how that revolution could actually be brought about, even up against the tremendous power of the existing oppressive system.

    And in the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America a sweeping, and at the same time concrete, vision and plan for a radically different society and world is laid out, embodying a whole new dimension of freedom and whole new relations, among people and between people and the environment, beyond the narrow confines and the terrible consequences of the present system of exploitation and plunder.

    But, whether we consider ourselves revolutionaries, convinced of the need for a radical overturning of the system and thorough transformation of society, or we believe that it is possible to bring about changes that will lead to a more just society within this system; whether our understanding is that America is not, and cannot be, a force for good in the world, or we hope it still can become that—all of us need to come together, and act together, with the urgency that corresponds to the terrible present and the gravely imperiled future that this fascist regime represents for humanity, and with the conviction that something far better is necessary and possible.

    We may have differences about what that “something far better” is, and how it can be brought about—and we should continue to discuss and debate this, with the orientation of seeking the truth, whether convenient or inconvenient, comfortable or uncomfortable, and following the truth wherever it leads—but it is not only possible but crucial and urgent that we unite—and actively go forward to win truly massive numbers of people—to act, in a really meaningful way, to bring about the removal of this fascist regime before it can fully consolidate its rule and bring down the full effect of its horrific agenda. In the “Paul Krugman” article, I put it this way:

    “Krugman is a proponent of capitalism, whereas I am an advocate of communism, a new communism, who is convinced that what is ultimately and fundamentally required to deal with the current horrors facing the masses of humanity, and the looming threat to the very existence of humanity, is a truly radical and emancipating revolution. But that is not the immediate question and challenge before all of us at this present moment. Rather, it is to deal with the grave danger posed by those now in power, through nonviolent but massive and sustained political action—the mobilization of first thousands, growing into millions, determined to get and remain in the streets until this regime is removed from power. Does not the common recognition that this regime ‘may end up destroying civilization,’ demand of us—of all those, of many divergent viewpoints, who can recognize that these are the stakes for humanity—that we act together, and do everything in our power, to bring about the massive political manifestation that is urgently needed to drive out this regime?”

    And, in concluding, let me go back to what I wrote at the end of that article:

    “to act, from their own perspective, to give meaningful support to, and indeed to become actively involved in, the critical work building toward November 4: publicly endorsing and promoting the Call from Refuse Fascism, helping to break through what is effectively a white-out of this by the mainstream media, donating and raising funds, directing people to the RefuseFascism.org website, and in countless other ways helping to develop the necessary political and organizational basis for what Refuse Fascism very rightly calls ‘this great cause.’ For it is the massive and sustained political mobilization called for by Refuse Fascism that truly represents the prospect of forging a positive path through and beyond this extremely dangerous and potentially disastrous situation.”

  • ARTICLE:

    From Aurora Roja, voice of the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution

    Revcom.us editors’ note: The following translation from Spanish to English is by revcom.us volunteers. Download the PDF of the 44-page pamphlet in Spanish at: RevolucionSocialista-OCRM.pdf

    1. We Need a Real Revolution, Nothing Less

    Fight Now for the New Socialist Revolution Cover

     

    Why? Because we live under a system, a capitalist system dominated by imperialism. This system of exploitation and oppression is the root cause of so much unnecessary suffering of the people, so many crimes, so many atrocities. Globally, this system, capitalism-imperialism, is leading humanity and many other species toward the precipice of potential extinction, whether through rampant environmental destruction or a disastrous nuclear war between major imperialist powers like the United States, China, and Russia, while perpetuating crimes against humanity everywhere, such as the genocide of the Palestinians. In Mexico, it has left a growing bloody toll of murders, disappearances, femicides, rapes, trafficking in women, poisoning of nature and human populations, macrocrime, and other completely unnecessary and intolerable horrors.

    This revolution is not only urgently necessary, it is also possible. We are fighting seriously now for this revolution. If you’re not yet participating in this struggle, you need to understand —many more people need to understand—what a real revolution is, why this revolution is possible, and the radical liberating transformations possible with this revolution. This is what we’ll address here.

    We must face the reality of the world we live in, and not remain on the sidelines, locked in the narrow struggle to “get ahead,” hoping the crimes and horrors that surround us will not touch us. By understanding that a much better world is possible, you can and must open your mind, open your heart to the people, and join the struggle for a new socialist society of hope, liberation, and community.

    2. A Real Revolution Overthrows This System and Creates Another, Radically Different and Much Better System

    Since the fundamental problem is the system itself, a real revolution is needed to put an end to this system. How do we put an end to the system? We must overthrow and destroy the current state, which represses and murders people to defend this system of exploitation and oppression. In its place, the very revolutionary struggle of millions of people will forge a radically different new revolutionary state that will promote, support, and defend the struggle to end all forms of exploitation and oppression.

    The imperialist-dominated capitalist economy must also be eliminated, which superexploits and impoverishes people, destroys the environment, and wages a bloody war against the people in its relentless pursuit of maximum profits. A victorious revolution will confiscate the economic assets of big national and foreign capitalists and pave the way for the voluntary collectivization of economic activity by peasants, small business owners, and merchants. This will create a new socialist economy dedicated to meeting the needs of all people, overcoming all forms of inequality, exploitation, and oppression, and driving forward the world revolution.

    By breaking these chains, the creativity of millions, now suppressed or distorted in most cases, will be unleashed, criticizing the putrid culture and selfish, racist, and macho ideas that currently prevail, and giving rise to the blossoming of a new culture and diverse, vibrant, revolutionary, and inspiring ideas.

    In short, this socialism born of a real revolution will create a radically different and far better new economic system, a new political system, and a new culture. It will be a great liberating advance for the people of Mexico and, at the same time, will support, give impetus to, and inspiration for the revolutionary struggle of people around the world. This revolution is part of the worldwide struggle for communism, a society without classes, exploitation, or oppression, and the emancipation of all humanity.

    A real revolution is needed, nothing less, unlike the various false illusions promoted as supposed “alternatives,” which we will address below.

    3. A Real Revolution Is Needed, Not a So-Called “Ideological Revolution”

    The so-called “ideological revolution” influences a significant number of people in various forms and to varying degrees. The basic idea is that, to achieve fundamental change, all that’s needed is to change people’s ideas, whether in the family, at school, or in society as a whole. This is a false illusion that traps people in continuing to suffer under the current perverse system. This is what it leads to, regardless of the often progressive intentions of people influenced by this idea.

    It’s true that changing people’s ideas is enormously important. In fact, transforming people’s thinking is a fundamental part of the revolutionary process, both before and after overthrowing this system and forging another radically different system. But first, changing people’s ideas to what other ideas and to achieve what? It must be nothing less than upholding the emancipation of all humanity, and not simply the interests of one group or country against others. It must be to serve the people and be caretakers of the environment, rather than merely seeking “something for me and my people.”

    On the other hand, if the capitalist economy continues to operate with its ruthless competition of everyone against everyone, if the mainstream media, education, government, and other institutions are left in the hands of the ruling classes, which are the ideas that will prevail? No matter how hard you try to change people’s ideas, capitalist institutions and the very functioning of the capitalist economy and the relationships between people it engenders will continue to impose the selfish, racist, misogynistic, and other ideas that are inherent to the economic, political, and social relations of the current reactionary system. Just think of the daily competition to get into a good school, get a job, or outsell the competition. The very operation of the system instills selfishness and a “me first” attitude. Not to mention the dominant culture that the most important thing is to “get ahead,” without concern for others, to “stand out” above all others, that men must “conquer” women, and other values that are inherent to the economic and social relations of the current system.

    Finally, if you have the audacity to act according to ideas that clash even with aspects of how the current system works, what happens? The capitalist state, its Army, National Guard, and police, come to punish, repress, or kill you. This can be direct, like the cowardly murder of student teacher Yanqui Kothan by police from the Morena [political party] government of the state of Guerrero, to serve as a warning to all those who dare to fight for something as basic as truth and justice for the 43 Ayotzinapa student teachers who disappeared in a joint operation by the Army, police, and organized crime. Or it can be indirect, like the hitmen hired to kill Samir Flores after he was threatened by the federal government delegate for opposing the ecocidal thermoelectric plant in the state of Morelos (a project that former Mexican president López Obrador [AMLO] promised to stop during his campaign, and later imposed by force). The large number of social activists, journalists, and defenders murdered year after year bear witness to the consequences of acting according to more progressive ideas under this system.

    Special mention of, and genuine contempt for, must be made regarding the so-called “revolution of consciences,” a phrase commonly used by members of Morena (the National Regeneration Movement). In practice, it boils down to parroting what the president says during his or her morning press conferences and turning a blind eye to the accumulation of crimes against the people and the destruction of the environment. All of this continues under the governments of the so-called “Fourth Transformation” [the current nationally ruling party coalition platform], as well as under the despicable electoral parties of the bourgeois “opposition.”

    Transforming the way people think is essential to achieving a fundamental, radical change, but it must be an integral part of the process of making a real revolution. The so-called “ideological revolution” is like thinking that a person drowning in the sea only needs to change their ideas, shouting “Cheer up, you can do it.” It’s not wrong to try to encourage them, but you have to change the real material situation, by throwing them a life preserver and helping them out of the water. That’s how it is. We fight to transform people’s thinking as an integral part of the struggle to change everything, so that humanity doesn’t continue to drown in the sea of this outdated system, but rather has new life and hope in a world we all want to live in.

    4. Nothing Fundamental Is Going to Change Through Elections Under the Current System

    Mexico’s recent experience also illustrates that it is not possible to change anything fundamental through elections. There was genuine jubilation among many, and hope for real change when the bloodthirsty criminals of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and National Action Party (PAN) were finally removed from power with the triumph of López Obrador and Morena in 2018. But what happened? He promised to return the military to their barracks, but instead imposed the greatest militarization of Mexican society in history. He preached “hugs, not bullets,” while the number of murders and disappearances reached the highest level of any recent six-year presidential term, and to top it all off, he tried to “disappear the disappeared,” attempting to erase them from the official record. They say “we don’t repress,” while, under AMLO and [current Mexican president] Sheinbaum, the Army, National Guard, and police continue to murder citizens and migrants, as we have extensively documented on our website. (See, among other articles, “Nuevas masacres militares: con ejecuciones y militarización, SÍ son lo mismo” [New Military Massacres: With Executions and Militarization, They ARE One and the Same Thing]).

    They claim “we are not the same as the neoliberals,” while carrying out the ethnocidal and ecocidal megaprojects that previous neoliberal governments only promised, such as the so-called “Maya” Train and the Isthmus Interoceanic Corridor, among many others. They rightly label the bourgeois opposition as “traitors,” while Morena also follows Washington’s orders, even calling for “collaboration” with the fascist Trump administration to “contain,” repress, deport, and murder migrants. In fact, current Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s six-year term began with the military murder of six migrants in Chiapas and another two in Chihuahua. They maintain many of the neoliberal policies of the past and even boast of achieving high levels of imperialist foreign investment and high profits for big business. Sheinbaum has even refused to repeal the 2007 ISSSTE [social security] Law, which she herself called “neoliberal” and promised to repeal during her campaign, thus condemning teachers and others to a miserable retirement. She is trying to cover this up with another cynical promise: Welfare funds, which will not be forthcoming.

    Yes, they’re throwing more money at their “social programs” to get people to support them, but fundamentally, nothing has changed. In fact, for many people, especially where there is “co-governance” with organized crime, the situation has gone from bad to worse.

    And why? Simply because AMLO, Sheinbaum, and Morena are a bunch of lying frauds like all the politicians in this system? No, not only because of this. The problem is deeper. Because, no matter how honest and well-intentioned a person is, upon coming to power, they have to face the reality of how the capitalist system dominated by imperialism works and must function. They have to seek more foreign investments and loans from the imperialists, they have to foster the scandalous profits of big national and foreign businessmen, or the economy will collapse. They have to respond to the demands, especially of U.S. imperialism. And they have to defend the system in which a few people exploit and oppress the vast majority, or everything would become chaos.

    As in the example mentioned by Bob Avakian, author of The New Communism, what would happen in this system if it were declared that everyone had the right to eat, so anyone could go to the supermarket and take whatever they needed without paying? Obviously, there would be chaos, and soon there would be no products in the supermarket, because who is going to produce them for free? The productive capacity exists to feed everyone healthily, not just in Mexico, but throughout the world, and yet, under this system, many go hungry, many suffer from malnutrition. Only under a different system, under true socialism, will it be possible to guarantee something as fundamental as the right to eat.

    Thus, it is not possible to change anything fundamental through elections, because even if you have the best intentions, once you come to power, you find that you must act in accordance with the necessary functioning of the current economic and political system. Therefore, as Marx said, bourgeois elections are, at best, nothing more than the right to choose which representatives of the ruling class will oppress and repress the people in the coming period. The change that people so urgently need will not come from elections under this system but from a real revolution that gets rid of the current system and gives birth to a radically different and much better system: Socialism guided by the scientific understanding of the new communism.

    5. It Is Not Possible to “Change the World Without Taking Power”; It Is Necessary to Destroy the Current State Power and Forge a New, Radically Different, Revolutionary State Power

    Nor is it possible to “change the world without seizing state power” by generalizing alternative projects of autonomy, self-management, self-defense, or other such projects under the current system. Ultimately, “seizing state power” within the current system, whether through elections or other means, will not change anything for the reasons we have already pointed out. Nothing fundamental can change without destroying, shattering, the current state power, that is, the capitalist state, getting rid of the entire current system, and creating a radically different system through a real revolution.

    Supporters of the position of “changing the world without taking state power” through alternative projects often cite the experience of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) as an example, although Zapatista leaders do not use that phrase. What does that experience show us? The peasant and indigenous uprising of 1994 inspired millions, although the EZLN’s program would not actually take us beyond the current capitalist system, for reasons we have explained elsewhere. (See, for example, Hace falta tumbar el sistema capitalista, no tratar de “democratizarlo” [See an English translation here: We need to overthrow this system, not try to “democratize” it], available on our website.) However, within a few days, the EZLN halted the uprising and entered into negotiations with the government. The government then betrayed even the limited demands it had accepted and signed in the San Andrés Accords.

    With monetary and other support from various forces in Europe and elsewhere, the EZLN has achieved certain partial changes in its limited territory of greatest influence in Chiapas, and we can and should learn from that experience. However, the greatest lesson is the narrow limits to change within the current system, without overthrowing the capitalist system. Although the Zapatistas have done much to avoid antagonizing the government, what has happened? All governments of all electoral parties have mounted, including with the advice of U.S. imperialism, a systematic campaign of harassment, repression, and murder of the Zapatista rank and file, using the Army, the National Guard, police, paramilitaries, and, especially more recently, drug traffickers’ hitmen. This reactionary repressive campaign continues today. We must denounce and fight against this repression against the EZLN. It must also be recognized that this illustrates the need to overthrow the state and the entire current system, and not just try to create “alternatives” within the confines of the current repressive system.

    Attempts at “self-defense groups,” “community police,” “autonomous municipalities,” and other alternative projects often represent positive efforts by the people to fight and resist the onslaught of the current system of exploitation and death. However, they have faced similar counterinsurgency campaigns, again from all electoral parties, because they all represent and defend the same capitalist system dominated by imperialism.

    While these attempts to achieve certain partial changes in one or another circumscribed place remain under siege by the dominant system, or are, in fact, suppressed or co-opted, the deadly capitalist system continues to ruin lives, crush hopes, impose misery, disappearances and murders, as well as destroy the environment in Mexico as a whole.

    Regardless of the intentions of those who promote the possibility of “changing the world without taking state power” or, in general, who deny the need to overthrow the state and the entire capitalist system through a real revolution, this position also condemns the people to continue suffering unnecessarily under this system.

    It’s time to discard the false illusions of some “ideological revolution” or “revolution of consciences,” of electoral “change,” or of “changing the world without taking state power,” limiting ourselves to “alternatives” that, at best, are nothing more than Band-Aids applied to the cancerous wounds of a rotten system. For the people, for humanity, the radical surgery of a real revolution is necessary. We must support every just struggle and mobilize the masses in key struggles against state power. But on their own, these struggles, although just and necessary, are at best able to wrest a bit of land or other concessions. Sooner or later, they are attacked and ultimately defeated or subverted by the system if they are not linked to the struggle for a real revolution. Instead of confining people to the necessary but limited immediate struggles to survive under this criminal system, we must fight against state power and transform the people for revolution.

    6. This Revolution Is Possible Because More and More People Can No Longer Live as Before, and the Ruling Classes Face Increasing Difficulties in Continuing to Govern as Before

    It’s common to hear the opinion that revolution isn’t possible because “look at where the people are at.” But look at where the people are really at! Entire communities are displaced, uprooted, and destroyed, whether by the government’s deadly megaprojects, by the devastating mining operations of big national and foreign capitalists, or by organized crime, which increasingly takes over the national territory in collusion with authorities at all levels and all electoral parties. Young people in many places face the cruel choice of either being forced into the mafia, fleeing with their families elsewhere, or daring to try to confront, using community police or other means, the infernal triple alliance of the government, organized crime, and big business. Fighters, defenders, and honest journalists are being murdered or disappeared left and right. With each new six-year presidential term, the bloody toll of murders, disappearances, trafficking of women and children, “co-governance” with drug traffickers, extortion, and other abominations increases.

    What’s more, in the face of this situation, thousands of people are struggling, even with great courage. Many family members persist in the fight to find their missing loved ones and to expose the criminal complicity of the authorities, despite the threats and the murder of several mothers and other searchers for missing people. The courage and determined, and sometimes even armed, resistance of many indigenous communities and other peasants in defense of their territories, water, forests, and crops against the death-dealing megaprojects of the government and big business, as well as the terror, forced recruitment, and extortion that organized crime attempts to impose in collusion with the government and big business, is inspiring. A sea of green and purple periodically fills the streets with the fury and joy of women fighting to end femicides, for the full right to abortion, and to end patriarchy. Family members, students, teachers, activists, and others continue to fight for Truth and Justice for the 1968 Tlaltelolco Plaza massacre, the Dirty War, Acteal, El Charco, Ayotzinapa, and other crimes against the people, which not only remain unpunished, but the government has even rewarded several of the responsible criminal military officers. Many people across Mexico have taken to the streets to protest the genocide in Palestine, while the current so-called “leftist” government refuses to break relations with Israel or even clearly call out the genocide. Thousands of people are fighting even bravely and selflessly, and it is not right to turn our backs on them and justify our own apathy with the apparent “apathy” of the majority of the people. In reality, the problem for many people is not simply “apathy,” but that they do not see or are not convinced of how they could really change the situation.

    The truth is that millions of people in Mexico desperately need a revolution, and more and more people cannot continue living as before. This is an aspect of the potential unfolding of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation that requires further research and analysis. This is very acutely expressed in large areas of the countryside, in many small and medium-sized cities, and in the “slums” surrounding large cities. A striking example of both this potential revolutionary situation and the revolutionary potential of the masses is the repeated emergence in various parts of Mexico, primarily in the countryside, of various forms of “self-defense groups,” “community police,” and other forms of armed popular resistance. These are not in themselves revolutionary struggles aimed at overthrowing the system, and in the face of vicious aggressions by the government, drug traffickers, and business leaders, many end up crushed or co-opted by the system. However, they very concretely express that conditions in significant parts of Mexico are forcing the masses to arm themselves as the only viable means of resistance to the atrocities they are experiencing.

    Though the revolutionary potential of the masses has not yet manifested itself in the emergence of a revolutionary people of millions, this is not because the majority of people are content with the situation. Even a significant portion of the population—millions—thinks a revolution is needed, although their understanding of what this means varies greatly, and they do not yet see how this would be possible.

    So that this feeling, this desire, this need can be transformed into a conscious material force, into an ever stronger movement for revolution, a growing core of revolutionary communists must go out to the people, to debate and convince them of the truth that we don’t have to continue living, suffering, and dying like this, and to organize them now for a real revolution. It requires going against the suffocating dogma of the reformist “left,” which insists that revolution is a “last resort” in a far-off future when the people “are up to their necks in water.” They refuse to see that, for millions, the water has already risen far beyond their necks. Many are on the verge of drowning or have already drowned in the deadly waters of this system. They don’t need the reformist leadership so prevalent on the so-called “left,” which refuses to face the reality we are living in. They need revolutionary leadership capable of scientifically analyzing the real facts that make revolution possible and convincing more and more people of that reality. And one of those facts, as we’ve already pointed out, is that more and more people can no longer live as they did before or, quite simply, are no longer with us.

    The other aspect of the potential unfolding of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation, not in some distant future, but in the midst of what we are experiencing now, is that the ruling classes are facing increasing difficulties governing Mexico. This is partly expressed in the petty contention between the highly discredited bourgeois parties—PAN, PRI, and PRD—and the bourgeois parties of the so-called “Fourth Transformation.” However, it is even more acutely expressed in the violent conflicts between one or another group of big capitalists, including their political representatives, allied with one or another organized crime cartel. The multimillionaire leaders of the main cartels already constitute part of the ruling classes, that is, the big national and foreign capitalists and rural landowners. They exercise local power or “co-government” in more and more areas of Mexico. They are intertwined and colluding with several so-called “legal” capitalists and with authorities at all levels, not only in Mexico but also in the United States. The clashes between different groups—both “legal” and “illegal”— of the ruling classes are most openly expressed in the fact that they can no longer hold elections without a pile of massacred candidates and their supporters, as well as in the bloody wars waged between the various cartels, often allied with one or another part of the state, and “legal” businessmen. The supposed actions of the state against organized crime have nothing to do with actually eliminating this scum, but rather with favoring one or another opposing group or showing the public that “something is being done.”

    Both the investigations into the Ayotzinapa state crime by the Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts (GIEI) and the “Guacamaya Leaks” documents show that the Mexican Army has clearly identified the criminal gangs and their members, but curiously, it can only find one or another, according to their interests. In reality, organized crime is so integrated with all three levels of government and the ruling classes in general that the authorities are neither able nor willing to truly combat it. Now the Trump fascist administration has pressured the Mexican government—always willing to “collaborate” (as Sheinbaum herself says) with that fascist regime—to mount more operations against certain sectors of organized crime. The goal of the U.S. fascists is also not to wipe out organized crime, but rather to subject it—and Mexico in general—to more direct control by U.S. imperialism. There is a whole history of collusion between the U.S. government and organized crime, of which the “Iran-Contragate” scandal is only the most publicized case, in which the United States used drug trafficking to supply arms to counterrevolutionaries in Nicaragua.

    All of this is fueling conflicts and violent clashes between different capitalist forces (both “legal” and “illegal,” although it is increasingly difficult to distinguish one from the other). They are causing increasing risks and instances of ungovernability, such as the recent armed attacks in Sinaloa, Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Guanajuato, and even the recent murder of two close associates of the mayor of Mexico City. Although the rampant growth of organized crime presents significant problems for the revolution, it is drowning Mexico in a growing sea of blood, disrupting the daily lives of millions and creating increasing conditions of ungovernability. These internal struggles within the ruling classes are opening cracks in the power structure through which the suppressed revolutionary potential of the masses could erupt with enormous force.

    The unfolding of a potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation in Mexico is deeply intertwined with the current crisis in the United States. The clash is growing between the Trump administration’s attempts to consolidate fascism—the open dictatorship of the ruling class—and the struggle of a growing number of people against this, notably in the widespread protests across the U.S. in defense of immigrants and against the consolidation of a fascist regime. As Bob Avakian, author of The New Communism, has profoundly and scientifically analyzed, this situation entails both the enormous danger of the consolidation of fascism in the U.S. and the possibility of revolution —yes, revolution!—in the most powerful imperialist country in the world. And the Revolutionary Communist Party, and the Revcomare fighting against all odds both to remove the fascist Trump from power and to make such a liberating revolution. Since U.S. imperialism is the strongest bulwark of support for the system of exploitation and oppression in Mexico, this deep conflict across the Rio Bravo/Grande also opens up both enormous dangers and enormous revolutionary possibilities here.

    U.S. imperialism has always mercilessly superexploited, oppressed, and plundered the Mexican people, as it does against other peoples around the world. The consolidation of fascism in the U.S. would take all this to another level of brutality and horror, as reflected in Trump’s constant characterization of Mexicans and oppressed immigrants in general as “murderers and rapists,” as well as the increasing aggression and espionage against Mexico by his government, despite the collaborationist Sheinbaum’s assurances that this is “cooperation.”

    On the other hand, the advance of the “Trump Must Go Now!” movement by the Refuse Fascism organization, as well as the struggle for a real revolution in the United States, encourages and propels revolutionary possibilities in Mexico, as well as the advance of the movement for revolution in Mexico encourages and propels the struggle for revolution in the U.S. This is why it is so important to forge revolutionary unity among the oppressed people on both sides of the border against the big capitalists and their governments in both countries.

    In short, revolution is possible in Mexico, not at some distant time, but in the times we live in, because more and more people can no longer live as before, the ruling classes are finding increasing difficulties in continuing to govern as before, and the political crisis in the United States is also exacerbating all of this. However, it is not possible for all this to lead to a real revolution without forging a growing revolutionary communist leadership core guided by scientific understanding, and not by the common “wisdom” of the majority of the so-called “left.”

    7. The Possibility of Revolution Arises from a Revolutionary Situation Caused by the Contradictions and Crises of the System, Not from the Slow Accumulation of Struggles for Reforms

    Contrary to what we’ve been arguing, the overwhelming majority of this so-called “left” sees revolution as something vague and distant, at best a buzzword to add to their speeches for a select audience. Why? Because they don’t approach the question scientifically, but rather with a reformist approach incapable of seeing beyond the existing oppressive system. They imagine (or they have been wrongly taught to think) that revolutions are the product of a growing mass movement for immediate demands, and since there is currently no high tide in mass struggle, they conclude that the prospects for a revolution are very remote. This is the dogma of all the phony “communists” of the various groups that identify themselves with the acronym “PCM” [Mexican Communist Party], the multiple permutations of Trotskyists, and even many anarchists, among others.

    Revolutions do not happen this way, through the gradual accumulation of forces in the daily struggle for demands. Revolutions are the product of the intensification of the central contradictions of the system, which give rise to the emergence of a revolutionary situation. This was the case with the Russian Revolution, which occurred amidst the deep contradictions of the system that burst out in the First World War. At first, the Bolsheviks’ revolutionary opposition to the imperialist war was more isolated and even faced stone-throwing from the patriotic masses, but with the intense sharpening of all the contradictions during the course of the war, the conditions for the triumph of the socialist revolution were created. In the case of the Chinese revolution, the existence of an unevenly developing revolutionary situation made it possible to wage a protracted people’s war from the countryside until a shift in the international situation in the wake of the Second World War made it possible to seize power throughout the country. (For a deeper analysis of these experiences and their relevance today, we highly recommend Bob Avakian’s excellent pamphlet, Revolution: Major Turning Points and Rare Opportunities, available at revcom.us.) As we discuss in more detail in Revolutionary Hope, the Mexican Revolution of 1910, while not a socialist revolution, also did not happen as the phony revolutionaries imagine. It erupted with the intensification of the exploitation and oppression of the peasants by the haciendas [large rural land holdings] and imperialist domination amidst a situation of apparent relative apathy among the masses.

    No one is as blind as those who refuse to see. No one willing to open their eyes can deny the reality that this system is creating an increasingly desperate situation for millions of people. Nor can it be denied that the enormous bloodbath of murders and disappearances created by criminal gangs of hitmen, the Army, the National Guard, the police, and imperialist agents expresses growing conditions of ungovernability. But the phony reformist and counterrevolutionary “revolutionaries” and “communists” want to blame the masses for their own lack of revolutionary will. Their position, in essence, is that “when the masses rise up in revolutionary struggle, we too will recognize that revolution is possible.” No, no, no, no. A hundred times no! The masses make revolutions, but, as Marx pointed out, revolutions are not a product of what people think or do at a given moment, but of what the upheavals of the system force them to confrontas long as a leading revolutionary force exists capable of leading the struggle of millions to victory. And in the case of socialist revolution, such a leading force must be guided by a correct scientific understanding of the problem and the solution, among other things.

    There is no doubt that, in the current situation, this is not easy. A lot of debate and struggle among the people is needed to convince even the most revolutionary-minded people that a real revolution is necessary, possible, and liberating. Why? Among other reasons, because the owners of the capitalist system obviously have a strong interest in convincing people that such a revolution would be very bad and even impossible, while viciously repressing even struggles for the most basic needs. Also because the prevailing phony “left” suppresses the revolutionary potential of the people, lulling them with empty phrases about a supposed “revolution” in the distant future. They preach that we must limit ourselves now to fighting for crumbs under this system. If this deeply flawed position is followed, that future will actually be an uninhabitable planet at best.

    Furthermore, the potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation is not readily apparent; this requires science. This requires the science of the new communism to penetrate beneath the enormous power and very real repressive force of the system and realize that the very crises of the system and the internal struggles among the powers that be open cracks of ungovernability through which the revolutionary potential of the exploited and oppressed masses could burst forth. This requires science to penetrate beneath the surface and see that the situation experienced by increasing millions is not simply tragedy and tears—which it is, by far—but also contains an intensification of the revolutionary potential of the masses, capable of exploding with tremendous force, even though the people themselves do not yet realize their enormous potential revolutionary force.

    It takes science to penetrate beneath the surface, the appearances, and analyze the features and intensification of the potential unevenly developing revolutionary situation we have highlighted here. This requires a revolutionary communist nucleus armed with and applying that science. And this requires taking out to the people this scientific understanding that revolution is possible, not in the distant future, but in the times in which we live. This must be taken to the people, and it must be debated, fought for, and more and more people must be convinced and organized now for revolution.

    8. The People Must Be Organized for Revolution, and Not Be Trapped in Struggles for Immediate Economic Demands That They Are Already Waging

    We’ve just written that the people must be organized for revolution, and we can already hear the chorus of complaints from the so-called opportunist “revolutionaries”: “It’s not possible to talk to people about revolution. They can’t understand it.” Nonsense! Have they ever tried? We have. We’ve talked about revolution and the new communism, we’ve debated this with peasants and intellectuals, with day laborers and students, with merchants, and mothers and fathers searching for disappeared loved ones. In short, with all kinds of people. Because a real revolution can only be the product of the conscious struggle of the people. And we’ve found that it’s possible to talk to all kinds of people about a real revolution. Some are against it, others think it’s not possible, and they raise all kinds of doubts and questions. But there’s no one who can’t “understand.” Even the most oppressed people, whom the system has denied every opportunity, have their opinions about revolution and ask us fundamental questions: “How will it be possible to defeat the Mexican Army, let alone a Yankee intervention?” “I’ve been told that communism is bad, because if you have two cows, they’ll take one away from you.” “After the revolution, won’t it be more of the same thing, like in Nicaragua?” “I don’t see that this is possible now, given where the people are at.” And many more questions.

    The phony “revolutionaries” despise the people, claiming they “can’t understand.” They blame the masses for their own backwardness. They themselves don’t want to grapple with the real problems of making revolution, because in reality, they don’t seek a real revolution but rather a movement for reform within the suffocating confines of this system, sometimes exalted with “revolutionary” rhetoric. So they repeat over and over again the old, worn-out dogma of the opportunist “left” for decades past and all over the world: “The masses must be organized to fight for their most heartfelt demands,” by which they mean the economic struggles that, in many cases, the masses themselves are already waging.

    They are not concerned that this has never led to a real revolution. The so-called “Leninists” are not concerned that this economistic position is precisely the erroneous position Lenin polemized against in his famous work What Is To Be Done? And without a thoroughgoing repudiation of this reformist dogma, the Bolshevik revolution would never have triumphed.

    Economic and other demands for justice are just and should be supported and encouraged. Sometimes they can even have a significant political impact, as in the case of the recent teachers’ struggle for a fair retirement, which made it abundantly clear that the Morena government is on the side of the Afores (annually funded pension fund managers), the banks, and the capitalist system, and against even the most basic rights of the people, despite the current ruling party’s constant use of the words “people, people, people.” Struggles for reform are necessary and can sometimes play an important role, but they must be subordinated, as Lenin said, as the part is subordinated to the whole in the struggle for revolution and socialism.

    However, what the masses most need from true revolutionaries, from revolutionary communists, is not simply to help organize the struggles that people already know how to wage and are currently waging. What they most need is the scientific political understanding that this system has denied them and that they are not going to find out simply in the daily struggle for immediate demands. They urgently need to understand the profound truth that we do not have to continue suffering under this outdated system that is leading all of humanity toward the precipice of extinction, or at least the end of civilization as we know it. They need a basic scientific understanding of why the problem is the capitalist system and why the solution is a real socialist revolution. They need to understand why such a revolution is not only urgently necessary but also possible, and what we must do to ultimately win.

    It’s not that people can’t understand these questions. It’s that we revolutionary communists need to assume our responsibility to the people and to humanity to bring them this understanding, to wrangle and debate with them in a good way, and to organize them for revolution. In doing so, we have found that this struggle is not easy. It requires a lot of struggle and debate about the colossal garbage pit of wrong ideas promoted by the capitalist system in general; by the supposedly “left” capitalist party that is now in power and which has dedicated itself to trying to co-opt, subjugate, or destroy people’s movements; and by the motley opportunist supposedly “revolutionary” and “communist” groups that predominate among what passes for “the left” in Mexico. It is not an easy struggle; it is a struggle going against the current, but it is possible to win over and organize a significant minority for revolution now.

    Organizing these people now for revolution is urgent, because a real revolution doesn’t happen simply because a revolutionary situation arises. The vast majority of revolutionary situations don’t lead to revolution. They either fizzle out due to a lack of revolutionary leadership, as in the case of the Arab Spring in 2010, or they never get out of the capitalist-imperialist system due to the leadership’s wrong orientation, as in the case of the Nicaraguan revolution of 1979. If you wait for a revolutionary situation to mature before organizing people for revolution, you would miss the opportunity to make it and condemn people to continue needlessly suffering the horrors of the current system.

    For people to rise up in revolutionary struggle, for a real and liberating revolution to triumph, not only is a revolutionary situation necessary. A revolutionary communist nucleus based on the revolutionary science of the new communism is also necessary, strong enough and linked to the masses of people to fully awaken their revolutionary potential and lead the difficult struggle, ultimately encompassing millions, to triumph in a real revolution.

    We are organizing people for revolution now by applying a dialectic, an interrelationship, between two aspects: * boldly spreading the new communism through revolutionary exposures of the system and the promotion of revolutionary communist theory and analysis; and * mobilizing the masses in struggle against key crimes of the system that demonstrate its reactionary and outdated nature, such as the struggle for truth and justice for Ayotzinapa and all the disappeared persons, the struggle against femicide and for the right to abortion, the struggle against genocide in Palestine, and many other struggles in which we have participated alongside many others. In these struggles, it is essential to fight to raise people’s consciousness, as well as their combativeness and opposition to this criminal system, thus also serving to strengthen the struggle for a real revolution.

    Also, and very importantly, we are organizing people into the Revolution Movement, which is a mass revolutionary organization united around its six Points of Orientation, where people can contribute in various ways to furthering the movement for revolution while critically debating and learning about the new communism. And we promote and build the Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico, as the revolutionary communist nucleus needed now in the struggle to forge a new type of revolutionary communist party led by and concretely applying the new communism developed by Bob Avakian.

    9. We Are Forging a Revolutionary Communist Core Guided by Bob Avakian’s New Communism, Combating the Snarky Attacks by the Haters

    We are seriously fighting to organize people for a real revolution and to forge the growing revolutionary communist nucleus that is needed. We are not going to lie to you, we are but a few people. Many more people need to join in and contribute their ideas, their creativity, their hearts, and their efforts to this struggle because there is no other real way out for the exploited and oppressed masses, nor for humanity.

    By organizing people for a real revolution, the most important thing is that the guiding understanding be truly correct and scientific, that it correspond to the reality of the current world and how it can truly be changed to liberate people. If the guiding understanding isn’t correct, if it doesn’t correspond to the real world and how it can truly be transformed, it would lead the movement to a dead end and never break out of this system.

    That’s why it’s so important to base it on science, on an understanding developed from real evidence, not from whims or wishful thinking. And today this science is the revolutionary science founded by Marx and raised to a new level in Bob Avakian’s new communism. By learning, among many other sources, from the great breakthroughs but also the significant mistakes of the early socialist revolutions led by Lenin and Mao, and by analyzing the new features of today’s capitalism-imperialism, Avakian has forged a new leap in revolutionary science, a new framework for the emancipation of humanity—one that’s more scientific, more revolutionary, more liberating, and more in tune with our times.

    Faced with the restoration of capitalism in the Soviet Union in 1956 and the subsequent restoration of capitalism in China in 1976 (although it continues to call itself “communist”), the vast majority of female and male revolutionaries around the world abandoned revolution and communism, while others turned it into an empty phrase. Avakian, on the other hand, has dedicated his life to fighting for the exploited and oppressed and for communist revolution worldwide. Moreover, he has dedicated more than 40 years to analyzing and developing a deeper understanding of why capitalism was restored in these early socialist experiences and how to better fight to prevent such restoration, and advance more and better in a new wave of socialist revolutions around the world. He has developed an inspiring and realistic vision of another possible society, one in which dissent, debate, and critical thinking are not only permitted but encouraged, while people’s struggle to end all forms of exploitation, oppression, social inequality, and discrimination is thoroughly promoted and supported.

    In fact, the qualitative leap in the revolutionary science with the new communism is the greatest advantage we now have in the struggle for a very different and much better world. With scientific navigation, a ship can reach its destination and not get lost at sea. With the scientific guide of the new communism, it is possible to chart a correct path toward the emancipation of humanity. Without a scientific guide, the revolutionary struggle would go astray and sink in the murky waters of global capitalism-imperialism.

    The Revolutionary Communist Organization, Mexico (OCR,M) has applied this scientific guide of the new communism to the concrete conditions of Mexico in the world context. It has forged a basic orientation and program for revolution in Mexico, which need to be further developed and deepened. They are embodied in documents such as La revolución liberadora [The Liberating Revolution] and Revolutionary Hope, among others. Many more people need to get into the process of debating and grappling with the new communism, its application to the concrete conditions of Mexico, and the struggle to forge a growing movement for a real revolution in the urgent situation in which we live. If you truly want to fight for deep and real change, you must join the Revolution Movement, critically learn about the new communism and the OCR,M, and participate in fighting the powers that be and transforming the people for revolution. We are very open to debate and criticism, and Bob Avakian himself has been a model of responding to criticism and disagreement with reasoned arguments. He has been the first to criticize and help others learn from the mistakes he himself has made.

    Avakian is appreciated and loved by many for the same reason he is hated by others: Because he is the most revolutionary and scientific international leader of our times. This is because of his uncompromising fight for the deepest interests of the people suffering needlessly under this system, his insistence that a revolution is necessary and nothing less, and his groundbreaking contributions to the science of revolution. Faced with this, the petty projects of the haters who seek only to organize a supposedly “revolutionary” movement in the interests of a few, a movement within and without leaving the suffocating confines of the current system, pale in comparison. Recognizing Avakian’s contributions does not represent a “cult,” as the haters claim. It is appreciating and critically learning from his important contributions to science, just as we also appreciate, or should appreciate, the contributions of a Darwin, Einstein, or Marie Curie, a Lenin or Mao.

    Criticisms of the content of new communism, supported by reasoned arguments, are most welcome: Debating them contributes to deepening everyone’s understanding and to rectifying errors where they exist. But the phony communists and revolutionaries loyal to the system, the haters who slander and defame the new communism, spewing lies instead of presenting serious arguments, do everything possible to avoid the content of Bob Avakian’s work, like the vampires in fables who avoid the light. They limit themselves to snarky, personal, and lying attacks because they are incapable of refuting the scientific content of new communism.

    The struggle against imperialism is a farce and a deception without the struggle against opportunism, said Lenin. And this remains profoundly true today. They will say that we are “isolated.” We are not afraid of being “isolated” from the opportunists. We are not afraid of being “alone” with the honest masses in their millions, while we fight to make clear to honest people the true content of the new communism, against the pernicious deceptions of the opportunists. In this, we are not fighting for the interests of “our group.” We are fighting for debate to take place on the basis of principles and honest criticism of the content of both positions, which is a fundamental and vital process for any truly revolutionary movement.

    10. We Are Fighting for a New and True Socialism of Hope, Liberation, and Community, Not the Phony “Socialism” of Maintaining Capitalism with More State Ownership and “Social Programs”

    The triumph of the real socialist revolution in Mexico will open up a new dawn, a completely new horizon for the liberation of the people and, ultimately, for the emancipation of all humanity.

    We’re not talking about something like the phony “socialism” and real state capitalism of countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and present-day China. For phony “socialists” and “communists,” “socialism” simply boils down to a degree of state ownership, some economic planning, and some social programs to somewhat alleviate the misery of the exploited and oppressed. However, if state ownership and planning are led by the capitalist principle of maximizing profits, the result is a capitalist society not unlike those openly claiming to be such. This is the stark reality of present-day China, with its billionaires, its stock market, and its imperialist superpower behavior competing with U.S. imperialism for world domination. Cuba is another example of capitalism under a “socialist” banner. While the criminal blockade imposed by U.S. imperialism must be condemned and opposed, that blockade has been even more effective due to the fact that from the beginning, the Cuban revolution remained within the imperialist capitalist system, dependent at the time on the Soviet Union, which was restoring capitalism (under a “socialist” banner). The island’s focus was on maximum profits, prioritizing sugar cultivation for export, rather than a diversified agriculture to feed the people. Later, the island became increasingly open to foreign imperialist investment and became dependent on “industries” like tourism, accompanied by prostitution, openly justified by Fidel Castro himself when he said, “Cuban women like this,” a repugnant misogynistic self-exposure.

    True socialism requires, but is not reduced to, confiscating capitalist property, converting it into the property of all the people, and planning the economy. This requires that the planning is governed not by the capitalist principle of maximizing profits, but by the socialist principles of meeting the needs of the people, continuing to transform the inequalities, oppressive relationships, and ideas inherited from the old society, and contributing to the advancement of the world revolution.

    Above all, revolutionary China, but also the Soviet Union, were early experiences of advancing along the path of true socialism, before the restoration of capitalism in both cases. Contrary to bourgeois propaganda, they actually achieved great, inspiring breakthroughs which demonstrate what the exploited and oppressed are capable of when they hold state power. They also suffered from significant errors, which is not surprising given that these were the first and unprecedented experiences of a radically different and better society, under the fire of capitalism-imperialism, which still predominated in the world.

    However, we’re not even talking about repeating the best achievements of these truly socialist revolutions, by avoiding past mistakes. We’re talking about a new socialism inspired by the new framework for human emancipation of the new communism developed by Bob Avakian, applied to the specific conditions of Mexico.

    With another system, everyone could have what they need to live a full life. No one would have to endure the worries and real anguish of the daily struggle to survive under the current system. The resources and scientific and technological knowledge already exist to provide healthy food, decent housing, and quality medical care for everyone. Although this will be a hard struggle to break the shackles of imperialist domination of the economy and society in Mexico, this will also be possible in Mexico by developing a socialist, independent, and internationalist economy after a real revolution. It is only because of capitalism, which seeks maximum profits for few people, that so many people suffer from hunger and malnutrition, live in the street, and die from lack of medicine, medical care, or from substandard medical care.

    The victorious revolution will break the shackles of capitalism and imperialist domination by confiscating the companies and capital of the big national and foreign capitalists, as well as renouncing foreign debt and unequal treaties. This will lay the bases for a new socialist economy guided by the principles of serving the needs of the people, caring for the environment, and promoting a world revolution for the emancipation of all humanity. It will no longer be an economy subordinated to the dictates of imperialism and big capitalists, based on the super-exploitation of cheap labor, the plundering of natural resources, and the devastation of nature.

    An urgent transition to clean energy sources will begin, drastically reducing and ultimately eliminating dependence on fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), which cause global warming and are leading the Earth toward existential disaster for our species and many others. At the same time, the people and scientists of the world will be called upon to join the determined fight against this destruction of our only planet. Mexico has a decisive role to play in this regard, not only because of the example such a transformation will set for the world, but also because of the impact the revolution here will have on the possibilities for a revolution in the United States, the world’s largest source of pollution, if there hasn’t already been a revolution on the other side of the border.

    Agriculture, now largely dominated by mega-corporations, often transnationals, which poison the land, water, air, and their very products with pesticides, monocultures, genetically modified crops, and nasty concentrations of pigs and other livestock, largely for export, will be transformed. These big corporations will be confiscated, and peasants and day laborers will be relied on in carrying out a radical land redistribution and the transformation of large agricultural units, respecting the rights of the indigenous peoples. On this basis and based on a process of voluntary collectivization, a new decentralized and diversified agriculture will be created, based on organic and healthy methods to feed the people.

    The oppression of the indigenous peoples will be attacked at its roots, who, as part of the backbone of the revolutionary army and the revolutionary vanguard, will not only retake the territories that rightfully belong to them but will also establish regional indigenous autonomy. Instead of the current artificial states that often divide one indigenous nationality among several states in Mexico, autonomous indigenous regions will be established in the areas of concentration, with their own government and economic planning, where all people, both indigenous and non-indigenous, will enjoy equal rights. As part of the national socialist planning of the economy, priority attention will be given to raising the standard of living of the indigenous peoples and the countryside in general. The development of indigenous languages, now suppressed in many ways in fact, will be encouraged, and the new revolutionary state will promote a nationwide struggle against the racism that remains so prevalent in Mexican society.

    This new state, radically different and emerging from the conscious revolutionary struggle of millions of people, will mobilize the people themselves in new ways of administering expeditious justice subject to due process and genuine respect for the rights of the accused, to arrest, prosecute, and punish all the femicidal murderers, rapists, and harassers who enjoy almost complete impunity in today’s macho and misogynistic society. The right of women to have or not have children will be finally established, with the right to abortion at any point during pregnancy and the broad and accessible distribution of contraception. Throughout the revolutionary process, the fury of women will have been unleashed as a powerful force for the revolution to transform all of society and, in particular, to overcome all forms of oppression and inequality for women, as well as the macho ideology that justifies those forms. Likewise, equality and respect for LGBTQ people will be thoroughly protected, and backward prejudices in this regard will be fought against throughout society.

    With new methods of administering justice, once again expeditious but also subject to due process and genuine respect for the rights of the accused, those responsible for so many state crimes will be prosecuted and punished, from the 1968 massacre, the Dirty War, Acteal, Ayotzinapa, and the massacres of migrants under the current government. Since the new state, born of the conscious revolutionary struggle of the people, will no longer be in collusion with both “legal” and illegal big business, the organized crime cartels will be swiftly and finally dismantled, giving the rank and file of these organizations, often recruited by force, avenues for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

    All of this will be regulated by a new socialist Constitution that, unlike the laws in current Mexican society, will be respected and applied consistently, guaranteeing the rights of the people. The Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North Americawritten by Bob Avakian, serves as an excellent example of a new vision and conception of a truly liberating socialist society. While this Constitution applies specifically to the territory of what is now the United States (and not to the particularities of Mexican society), it is guided by several universal principles and methods of the new communism for leading the socialist society and pursuing revolution, which need to be applied in all countries. An example of this is the principle of a solid core with a lot of elasticity based on the solid core, which we will explain a little later.

    The future Revolutionary Communist Party, Mexico, having led the revolutionary struggle of millions, will provide leadership for the new socialist state within the framework of the principles of the new Constitution. However, unlike even the best socialist experiences from the past, it will not attempt to play this leading role by monopolizing leadership positions in the new political and economic apparatus, but rather by presenting proposals to the new institutions and through its influence and mobilization of the masses to continue transforming society and contributing to the world revolution toward the luminous goal of communism. That goal is a society without classes, exploitation, oppression, or social inequalities, with a fundamental transformation of all the backward ideas that correspond to the relationships in the old capitalist society. This future communist society will be a truly free and diverse community of human beings throughout the planet.

    Even with all the big and radical transformations that will be possible with the triumph of the socialist revolution, many relationships and inequalities inherited from the old society will still remain—between women and men, between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples, between rural and urban areas, between manual workers and intellectual workers, between those who earn more and those who earn less, among others. And many of the ideas that correspond to and justify these inequalities will also persist. All of this is not only unjust but also constitutes the basis for the possibility of restoring capitalism and the emergence of leaders, even within a part of the revolutionary communist party, who will fight to return to the capitalist road, as occurred in the socialist societies of Russia and China in the last century.

    Therefore, it will be essential to continue forging a growing solid core, with the revolutionary communist party as its leading element and also including a growing number of other people in the new society, who will fight to continue the revolution under socialism, step by step restricting all the inequalities and relationships inherited from the old society, as well as digging up the corresponding backward and oppressive ideas.

    Interacting, and ultimately, as part of the struggle to continue the revolution under socialism, great freedom will be unleashed among the people, an atmosphere encouraging dissent, criticism, and debate such as the world has never seen before. This process of broad debate, dissent, and criticism in socialist society is essential not only for people to feel free to express themselves and carry on their lives, but also for getting to the truth, identifying errors, and involving an increasing number of formerly exploited and oppressed people in governing the new society and grappling with the great challenges of transforming everything in the interests of the people and ultimately in the interests of all humanity.

    While any attempt to restore the old society by means of arms will be suppressed, people will be free even to argue in favor of the old capitalist society. There will be elections, not only for the government but also for the leading committees of all economic, social, educational, cultural, and other institutions in society. That is, this will be radically different from today’s society: Every workplace, for example, will be run by a revolutionary committee elected by the people who work there. And this will be the case in every other institution in society. Candidates from diverse viewpoints will be able to run, although there will be protections to prevent the restoration of capitalism through elections unless the overwhelming majority votes in that sense.

    All of this is an application of Bob Avakian’s unheard-of concept of a solid core with a lot of elasticity based on the solid core. Its application in this case is to foster both a growing solid core struggling to continue the revolution under socialism, and a broad atmosphere of debate, dissent, and criticism throughout society. For the revolutionary leadership, it will undoubtedly be very difficult to try to encompass and learn from all of this in a way that contributes to getting to the truth, overcoming problems, and advancing toward a bright communist future. At times, it will require going almost to the brink, as Avakian has said, of being drawn and quartered by the various forces pulling from different sides in society. However, this is an essential process for forging a vibrant new society that is more liberating than ever before, getting to the truth in all its complexity, recognizing and rectifying errors, preventing capitalist restoration, and achieving greater leaps toward the emancipation of all humanity.

    From the interrelationship between this growing core struggling to continue the revolution under socialism, and the broad diversity of thinking, dissent, and debate, a diverse and inspiring new culture will emerge, promoting the values of community, mutual respect, and hope for the future that we can barely imagine in the face of the rotten, selfish, misogynistic, and racist culture that predominates today.

    11. The Challenge for Everyone, in the Face of a Terrible, Agonizing World, and a New, Shining World Struggling to Be Born

    Not only in Mexico but also throughout the world, the old, outdated system of capitalism-imperialism is reaching its limits. Unnecessary suffering increases year after year, the lives of billions are becoming increasingly desperate, and humanity teeters on the brink of existential threats of environmental disaster and nuclear war. The old world is agonizing, but it will not collapse under its own weight. Capitalism must be gotten rid of before does away with us.

    The old society is agonizing amid great crises and upheavals. But beneath the gloomy surface, new possibilities are opening up for a real and truly liberating revolution. Transforming these possibilities into the reality of an emancipatory struggle for a real revolution depends on what each of us does. Dare to learn about the new communism. Have the courage, the heart, and the critical mind to take up a commitment to the people who desperately need a revolution and join the battle for the new socialist society of hope, liberation, and community that is struggling to be born.

  • ARTICLE:

    U.S. CONSTITUTION: AN EXPLOITERS’ VISION OF FREEDOM—ADDED NOTES (AND BRIEF INTRODUCTION)

    Brief Introduction:

    The following article by Bob Avakian was originally published in 1987. We are republishing it now, because it remains highly relevant in terms of understanding the basic nature of this system we live under—the system of capitalism-imperialism—and the role of the U.S. Constitution as the legal and political basis for this system of ruthless exploitation, murderous oppression and massive destruction. In this republished version, Bob Avakian has provided some Added Notes at the end of the article, to further clarify important points.

    * * * * *

    James Madison, who was the main author of the Constitution of the United States, was also an upholder of slavery and the interests of the slaveowners in the United States. Madison, the fourth president of the United States, not only wrote strongly in defense of the Constitution, he also strongly defended the part of the Constitution that declared the slaves to be only three-fifths human beings (that provided for the slaves to be counted this way for the purposes of deciding on representation and taxation of the states—Article I, Section 2, 3 of the Constitution).

    In writing this defense, Madison praised "the compromising expedient of the Constitution" which treats the slaves as "inhabitants, but as debased by servitude below the equal level of free inhabitants; which regards the slave as divested of two-fifths of the man." Madison explained: "The true state of the case is that they partake of both these qualities: being considered by our laws, in some respects, as persons, and in other respects as property.... This is in fact their true character. It is the character bestowed on them by the laws under which they live; and it will not be denied that these are the proper criterion." Madison got to the heart of the matter, the essence of what the U.S. Constitution is all about, when in the course of upholding the decision to treat slaves as three-fifths human beings he agrees with the following principle: "Government is instituted no less for protection of the property than of the persons of individuals."1 Property rights—that is the basis on which outright slavery as well as other forms of exploitation, discrimination, and oppression have been consistently upheld. And over the 200 years that this Constitution has been in force, down to today, despite the formal rights of persons it proclaims, and even though the Constitution has been amended to outlaw slavery where one person actually owns another as property, the U.S. Constitution has always remained a document that upholds and gives legal authority to a system in which the masses of people, or their ability to work, have been used as wealth-creating property for the profit of the few.

    The abolition of slavery through the Civil War meant the elimination of one form of exploitation and the further development and extension of other forms of exploitation. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That?, "despite the efforts of abolitionists and the resistance and revolts of the slaves themselves—and their heroic fighting in the Civil War itself—it was not fought by the Union government in the North, and its president, Lincoln, for the purpose of abolishing the atrocity of slavery in some moral sense.... The Civil War arose out of the conflict between two modes of production, the slave system in the South and the capitalist system centered in the North; this erupted into open antagonism, warfare, when it was no longer possible for these two modes of production to co-exist within the same country."2 The victory of the North over the South in the U.S. Civil War represented the victory of the capitalist system over the slave system. It represented the triumph of the capitalist form of using people as a means of creating wealth. Under a system of outright slavery, the slave is literally the property of the slaveowner. Under capitalism, slavery becomes wage-slavery: The exploited class of workers is not owned by the exploiting class of capitalists (the owners of factories, land, etc.), but the workers are in a position where they must sell their ability to work to a capitalist in order to earn a wage. Capitalism needs a mass of workers that is "free," in a two-fold sense: They must be "free" of all means to live (all means of production), except their ability to work; and they must not be bound to a particular owner, a particular site, a particular guild, etc.—they must be "free" to do whatever work is demanded of them, they must be "free" to move from place to place, and "free" to be hired and fired according to the needs of capital! If they cannot enrich a capitalist through working, then the workers cannot work, they cannot earn a wage. But even if they cannot find a capitalist to exploit their labor, even if they are unemployed, they still remain under the domination of the capitalist class and of the process of capitalist accumulation of wealth—the proletarians (the workers) are dependent on the capitalist class and the capitalist system for their very lives, so long as the capitalist system rules. It is this rule, this system of exploitation, that the U.S. Constitution has upheld and enforced, all the more so after outright slavery was abolished through the Civil War.

    But here is another very important fact: In the concrete conditions of the U.S. coming out of the Civil War, and for some time afterward, wage-slavery was not the only major form of exploitation in force in the U.S. Up until very recently (until the 1950s), millions of Black people were exploited like serfs on Southern plantations, working as sharecroppers and tenant farmers to enrich big landowners (and bankers and other capitalists). A whole system of laws—commonly known as Jim Crow laws—were enforced to maintain this relationship of exploitation and oppression: Black people throughout the South—and really throughout the whole country—were subjected to the open discrimination, brutality, and terror that such laws allowed and encouraged. All this, too, was upheld and enforced by the Constitution and its interpretation and application by the highest political and legal authorities in the U.S. And, over the past several decades, when the great majority of Black people have been uprooted from the land in the South and have moved into the cities of the North (and South), they have still been discriminated against, forcibly segregated, and continually subjected to brutality and terror even while some formal civil rights have been extended to them.

    Once again, this is in accordance with the interests of the ruling capitalist class and capitalist system. It is consistent with the principle enunciated by James Madison: Governments must protect the property no less than the persons of individuals. In fact, what Madison obviously meant—and what the reality of the U.S. has clearly been—is that the government must protect the property of white people, especially the wealthy white people, more than the rights of Black people. It must never be forgotten that for most of their history in what is now the United States of America Black people were the property of white people, particularly wealthy plantation owners. Even after this outright slavery was abolished, Black people have never been allowed to achieve equality with whites: they have been held down, maintained as an oppressed nation, and denied the right of self-determination. Capitalism cannot exist without the oppression of nations, and this is all the more so when capitalism develops into its highest stage: monopoly capitalism-imperialism. If the history of the United States has demonstrated anything, it has demonstrated this.

    The Heritage They Won’t Renounce

    The ruling class of the U.S. today—above all the U.S. imperialists, the large-scale capitalists and international exploiters who dominate the U.S. and most of the world—are indeed, as they proclaim, the direct and worthy descendants of their “Founding Fathers.” And this is why the ruling class and its political representatives, while they feel obliged to say that they are opposed to slavery today (at least in the U.S. itself), solemnly praise and celebrate slave owners and upholders of slavery who were so prominent among the “Founding Fathers” and played so central a part in the establishment of the system in the U.S.: men like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.

    These imperialists will never admit that their “Founding Fathers” established a system of government that, in its very foundation, is based on oppression and exploitation. They will never admit that their Constitution is the legal instrument for enforcing that exploitation and oppression. They cannot admit this, any more than they can admit their much-vaunted wealth and power has been established and built up by stealing land and resources from the native peoples (and Mexico) through extortion and outright murderous means; by trading in human flesh and harnessing human beings in slave labor; by pitilessly exploiting immigrants in their millions as wage-slaves; by robbing and plundering throughout the world, particularly Latin America, Africa, and Asia (what today is generally called the Third World). They cannot acknowledge that, while the forms of slavery have changed, the U.S. has, from the beginning and down to today, remained a society where enslavement, in one form or another, has been at the very heart of the economic system and the very basis of the political structure.

    There are many (including even Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall) who argue that, because of the upholding of slavery in the Constitution—and other injustices, such as excluding women from voting, and the treatment of the Indians—the Constitution was not such a great document when it was written, but it has been made great through the history of the U.S. and the struggles to create a more perfect Union and a more perfect Constitution. In other words, the Constitution may have had defects in some important ways when it was originally conceived, but the miracle of it is that the Constitution has within it provisions for changing and improving it—for extending democracy and rights to those previously excluded. And, some will add, while the Constitution upholds property rights, it also upholds individual and civil rights (even the statement from Madison cited at the beginning of this article stresses that, some might argue). Let’s look more deeply at these questions.

    Extension of the Constitution … Extension of Bourgeois Domination

    The extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them has gone together, in an overall way, with the extension of bourgeois (capitalist) relations and their dominance throughout the U.S. And, at the same time, it has gone hand-in-hand with the continuation of the oppression of Black people, of Native Americans, of Latinos and immigrants from Latin America (and elsewhere), of the oppression of women, and other forms of oppression and exploitation. All this is not in contradiction to but is consistent with the fundamental principles on which the Constitution is based and the way in which it treats the relationship between the rights of property and the rights of individuals.*

    It is noteworthy that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution (echoing the 5th Amendment) has as its pivotal point the provision that no State may “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” Especially in the period since World War 2, this amendment has been used as a major part of the basis to extend civil rights for Black people, for women, and for others discriminated against. Yet this amendment was passed right after the Civil War, in 1866; and for many decades this amendment was not used to combat racial or sexual discrimination. Instead, “For many years the Supreme Court applied the due-process clause mainly to protect business interests against state regulatory legislation.”3 It was only beginning after World War 1, and more fully after World War 2, that the 14th Amendment was applied in a significant way to the questions of racial and sexual discrimination. Thus, “in a long series of cases” beginning in 1925, the Supreme Court “gradually expanded its definition of due process so as to include most of the guarantees of personal liberties in the Federal Bill of Rights and has protected them from state impairment. A similar development occurred with respect to the equal-protection clause.”4 These changes in Supreme Court decisions were part of larger changes in ruling-class policy. But these resulted not from some brilliant new legal insight, nor from some sudden flash of moral awakening within the ruling class. Rather, they resulted from the changed situation of Black people in U.S. society and, more decisively, from the situation and needs of the ruling imperialists.

    As noted earlier, the masses of Black people have undergone a dramatic change in their particular conditions of existence—and of oppression—in the U.S. This began during and immediately after World War 1 but developed fully during and after World War 2. Demand for labor in war production and other strategic industry, followed after World War 2 by sweeping changes in Southern agriculture—called forth by technological changes and international economic competition—drove millions and millions of Black people from the rural South to the urban ghettos of the North and South, and into the most exploited sections of the proletariat. At the same time, the U.S. imperialists emerged not only victorious but greatly strengthened from world war that devastated those countries which were much more directly and centrally involved. So, after World War 2 U.S. imperialism was everywhere, scooping up the former colonial possessions of the prior colonial powers and establishing U.S. neocolonial domination in the name of freedom and (usually) in the guise of allowing formal independence. In this situation, it was not so necessary—nor was it so helpful—to openly and blatantly treat Black people as “second-class citizens” in the U.S. itself. So, over the period of the next several decades, concessions were made to civil rights demands and struggles at the same time as deception, vicious repression, and the promotion of “loyal and responsible Negro leaders” were carried out to keep things firmly under the control of the ruling class and in the service of its larger interests. Similarly, recent decades have seen political and legal changes that have brought certain extensions of formal rights to women and certain concessions to their battle against oppression. These have corresponded to significant changes in society and the world, including the fact that in only a small percentage of U.S. families is it any longer the case that the family is supported by just the man working. But, again, these concessions have been confined within limits that fundamentally conform to the interests and needs of the ruling class in the face of changing conditions in the U.S. and the world.

    Would anyone dare say that, because of these changes and concessions, inequality and injustice have been eliminated in the U.S.? The fact is, none of this has in any way eliminated, or come close to eliminating, discrimination against Black people, their overall conditions of oppression, their status as an oppressed nation. Nor have the ruling imperialists ceased to oppress the Native Americans—they have never even stopped trying to cheat and rob them of valuable land and resources. Nor have these imperialists ceased to discriminate against and viciously exploit other national minorities and immigrants. Nor, despite the constitutional amendment (the 19th, in 1919) giving them the right to vote and other concessions to “women’s rights,” have women been granted equality—there has been no end to the subjugation and degradation they have been subjected to: The oppression of women remains a foundation stone of U.S. society, as indeed it must so long as a system of class domination and exploitation is in force. Today, 200 years after the U.S. Constitution first took effect, and after all the changes and amendments, no one can seriously and reasonably argue that the various kinds of oppression that I have spoken to here do not exist or are only a minor aspect of the situation. No one can seriously and reasonably argue that they are not a basic and deeply rooted feature of American society.

    The reason for this is rooted in the very reality and nature of the economic system in the U.S. and the political system that upholds and enforces this economic system, including the Constitution as the legal “cement” of the political structure. The fundamental reason why the “extension” of constitutional rights to those previously excluded from them has not put an end to exploitation, inequality, and oppression is this: The essence of the capitalist economic system is not the competition of commodity owners, all vying equally in the marketplace (equal opportunity for all). The essence is the exploitation of labor as wage-labor, the command by capital over labor power (the ability to do work) as a commodity—a unique commodity—that creates wealth through its use.** (As a dockworker told me years ago: No one gets rich working; the only way to get rich is by making other people work for you.) And the essence of the political structure that goes along with and protects this capitalist economic system is not freedom and democracy for all, regardless of wealth and social position. The essence is the dictatorship of the bourgeois class—its monopoly of political power and armed force—over those it dominates in the economic system, especially the proletariat. Thus, the right to vote and other formal rights for the proletariat and other oppressed masses are in no way in fundamental opposition to the economic and political system of capitalism and bourgeois dictatorship.

    Bourgeois Democracy—Bourgeois Dictatorship

    Bourgeois democracy presents itself as classless democracy: It proclaims equality for all. Thus, the U.S. Constitution does not say that different classes of people shall have unequal wealth and power; rather, it sets forth a charter that appears to treat everyone the same, regardless of wealth and social status. Yet there never has been, and never could be, a capitalist society without tremendous differences in wealth and power, without fundamental class divisions and antagonisms. In fact, a capitalist society without these things is not even conceivable. And in reality, democracy in capitalist society can only be bourgeois democracy. This means there is democracy—equal political rights and the power to make fundamental decisions—only among the capitalist class, the ruling class. For the rest, and for the proletariat especially, bourgeois democracy means dictatorship: It means being ruled over by the capitalists, even while being allowed to vote and even while being governed by a Constitution that sets forth laws that are said to be applied, equally, to all. How can this be?

    First, as for voting, as I pointed out in Democracy: Can’t We Do Better Than That?:

    On the most obvious level, to be a serious candidate for any major office in a country like the U.S. requires millions of dollars—a personal fortune or, more often, the backing of people with that kind of money. Beyond that, to become known and be taken seriously depends on favorable exposure in the mass media (favorable at least in the sense that you are presented as within the framework of responsible—that is, acceptable politics)…. By the time “the people express their will through voting,” both the candidates they have to choose among and the “issues” that deserve “serious consideration” have been selected out by someone else: the ruling class….

    Further, and even more fundamentally, to “get anywhere” once elected—both to advance one’s own career and to “get anything done”—it is necessary to fit into the established mold and work within the established structures.5

    But that is not all:

    If, however, the electoral process in bourgeois society does not represent the exercise of sovereignty by the people, it generally does play an important role in maintaining the sovereignty—the dictatorship—of the bourgeoisie and the continuation of capitalist society. This very electoral process itself tends to cover over the basic class relations—and class antagonisms—in society, and serves to give formal, institutionalized expression to the political participation of atomized individuals in the perpetuation of the status quo. This process not only reduces people to isolated individuals but at the same time reduces them to a passive position politically and defines the essence of politics as such atomized passivity—as each person, individually, in isolation from everyone else, giving his/her approval to this or to that option, all of which options have been formulated and presented by an active power standing above these atomized masses of “citizens.”… [T]he very acceptance of the electoral process as the quintessential political act reinforces acceptance of the established order and works against any radical rupture with, to say nothing of the actual overturning of, that order.6

    And let us remember that one of the main reasons for which the U.S. Constitution was “ordained and established,” as proclaimed in its “Preamble,” was to prevent social upheaval and the overturning of the order upheld by that Constitution—to “insure domestic tranquility.”

    The same can be said of the other aspects of bourgeois democracy and the kind of rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution (including its “Bill of Rights”): They have the purpose and function of reinforcing the rule of the bourgeoisie and keeping political activity within limits acceptable to the bourgeoisie. Thus, “the much-vaunted freedom of expression in the ‘democratic countries’ is not in opposition to but is encompassed by and confined within the actual exercise of dictatorship by the bourgeoisie. This is for two basic reasons—because the ruling class has a monopoly on the means of molding public opinion and because its monopoly of armed force puts it in a position to suppress, as violently as necessary, any expression of ideas, as well as any action, that poses a serious challenge to the established order.”7 The history of the U.S., like the history of all other “democratic” bourgeois dictatorships, is full of graphic illustrations of just how true the above-quoted statement is!

    Formal equality—the treatment of all persons as equal, and specifically as “equal before the law,” without regard to wealth or social position—in bourgeois society actually covers over the relationship of complete subordination, exploitation, and oppression to which the proletariat and masses of people are subjected. If a small group—the capitalist class—controls the important means of creating wealth, then in reality they have the power of life and death over those who control little or none of these. To have such power over other people is, in essence, to hold them in an enslaved condition, whether or not the chains are literal and visible. In such a situation—which is the fundamental condition of capitalist society—how can there be anything but profound inequality economically, socially, and politically? And with such a fundamental division, with such fundamental inequality, there can never be anything but exploitation, oppression, domination, and dictatorship.

    With regard to the law, this will manifest itself in two main ways. First, those who dominate society economically will dominate in deciding, through the political structure, what the laws will be. They will insure that the laws serve their interests. And second, the actual application and enforcement of the law will discriminate in favor of those with wealth and power and against those without them—and even more so against oppressed nationalities, women, and others who are “the last of the last” in society. Everyday life in any capitalist society proves this over and over. Thus, once again, as with the right to vote and other constitutional rights in a bourgeois-democratic republic, formal equality before the law expresses itself, in reality, as profound inequality—and more—as something confined within and conforming to bourgeois domination and dictatorship.

    The basic difference between the bourgeoisie’s view of freedom and democracy on the one hand, and the striving of oppressed masses for an end to oppressive conditions on the other hand, is sharply drawn in recent events in Haiti, the Philippines, and South Korea. The oppressed masses (and students and other revolutionary intellectuals) want some kind of fundamental change in the social system and a breaking of the chains of imperialist domination in their countries. But the bourgeois opposition leaders and parties want only the recognition of bourgeois-democratic provisions and procedures—with elections the highest expression of political activity. Most of all, they want the sharing of power more broadly and “equally” among the upper classes—really, they want their chance to hold the reins of power—while leaving the social system and imperialist domination intact. As for the imperialists, where they become convinced of the need for change in such situations, they make every effort to keep it confined within the framework of imperialist domination and bourgeois rule. Indeed, they try to use such situations to strengthen and perhaps “refine” the apparatus of bourgeois politics—and, above all, of repression—in the countries involved.

    This brings us to a most fundamental point that is so often ignored or glossed over in discussions and debates about democracy in countries like the U.S.: The fact is that even the extent to which rights are allowed to the nonruling classes in imperialist countries depends on a situation where, in large parts of the world under imperialist domination, the masses of people are subjected to much more open and murderous repression. In short,

    The platform of democracy in the imperialist countries (worm-eaten as it is) rests on fascist terror in the oppressed nations: the real guarantors of bourgeois democracy in the U.S. are not the constitutional scholar and the Supreme Court justice, but the Brazilian torturer, the South African cop, and the Israeli pilot; the true defenders of the democratic tradition are not on the portraits in the halls of the Western capitols, but are Marcos, Mobutu, and the dozens of generals from Turkey to Taiwan, from South Korea to South America, all put and maintained in power and backed up by the military force of the U.S. and its imperialist partners.8,***

    But, at the same time, the imperialist rulers and ardent worshippers of bourgeois democracy go to great lengths to try to cover over, or explain away, the brutal repression “at home” that is so essential to the functioning of the system and the maintenance of the established order:

    For there is vicious repression and state terror carried out continually—and not only in times of serious crisis or social upheaval—in the imperialist countries; it is carried out specifically against those who do not support but oppose the established order, or who simply cannot be counted on to be pacified by the normal workings of the imperialist system—those whose conditions are desperate and whose life situation is explosive anyway.

    In the U.S. the hundreds of police shootings of oppressed people, particularly Blacks and other minority nationalities, every year; the fact that jails are overwhelmingly filled with poor people, the greatest number again being Black and other minority nationalities—it is an amazing but true statistic that one out of every thirteen Black people in the U.S. will be arrested each year (and Blacks are incarcerated eight and one-half times as frequently as whites)!—and the widespread use of drugs, surgical techniques, and other means to repress and terrorize prisoners (as well as an astounding number of people not in jail, including allegedly recalcitrant children); the use of welfare and other so-called social service agencies to harass and control poor people down to the most intimate details of their personal lives; this, and much more, is part of the daily life experience of millions of people in the major imperialist countries. Along with all this, of course, is the use of the state apparatus for direct political repression….

    In times of severe crisis and social strain, of course, all this is carried out more intensively and extensively…. Already, right now in the U.S., to cite one important aspect of this, hundreds of thousands of immigrants, “illegal” and “legal,” are being subjected to a campaign of terror—including raids at their places of work and homes, the sudden and forcible separation of parents from children, and the deportation of large numbers of refugees back to the waiting arms of death squads and other government assassins in countries like El Salvador. The same kind of thing is also being directed against immigrants in France, West Germany, England, and other imperialist democracies.

    Through all this, while overt political repression by the state is in one sense the clearest indication of the class content of democracy—in the imperialist countries as well as elsewhere—in another sense the daily, and often seemingly arbitrary, terror carried out against the lower strata in these imperialist countries concentrates the connection between the normal workings of the system and the political (that is, class) nature of the state.9

    A New and Far Greater Vision of Freedom

    In the course of this article so far, in speaking to some essential questions concerning the U.S. Constitution and the system it upholds, I have answered some of the main arguments made in defense of this Constitution and this system, including the argument that the Constitution, if not perfect, is perfectible—that it can be continually improved and the rights it establishes can be extended to those previously excluded. Before concluding, I want to briefly address some of the other main arguments made on behalf of—or in defense of—this Constitution and the principles and vision it embodies.

    “This Constitution establishes a law of the land that is applicable to all—it establishes a government of laws, not of people.” This is closely linked to the principle of “equality before the law.” What is meant by “a government of laws, not of people” is that no one is “above the law” and that what is allowed and what is forbidden are set forth before all, in one set of regulations binding on everyone, and this can be changed only through the procedures established for making such changes. A “government of people” refers to a notion of a government where it is the will and the word of certain people—a king, a despot, a small group of tyrants, etc.—that determine what is allowed and what is forbidden, and where this can and will change according to the dictates and the whims of such rulers: There is no common and clearly spelled-out standard binding on all, even on the political leaders and the powerful and influential in society.

    Like all principles of bourgeois democracy, this notion of “a government of laws, not of people” misses and obscures the essential question. First of all,

    “the rule of law” can be part of a dictatorship, of one kind or another, and in the most general sense it always is—even where it may appear that power is exercised without or above the law, laws (in the sense of a systematized code that people in society are obliged to conform to, whether written or unwritten) will still exist and play a part in enforcing the rule of the dominant class. Conversely, all states, all dictatorships, include laws in one form or another.10

    Most fundamentally, the question is: What is the character and the class content of the laws, what system do they uphold and enforce, which class interests do they represent—of which class dictatorship, bourgeois or proletarian, are they the expression and instrument—and toward what end are they contributing—the maintenance of class division and domination, exploitation and oppression, or the final elimination of class divisions, of all oppressive social divisions, and of social antagonisms? In short, the essential question is not “a government of laws vs. a government of people,” it is which people—which class—rules, and what laws are in force, in the service of what ends?

    “‘We The People,’ that is the heart of this Constitution and the genius of this Constitution: It establishes a government of, by and for all the people.” As a matter of historical fact, this opening phrase of the Constitution, “We the people of the United States,” was not the product of some lofty desire by the “framers” of the Constitution to set forth some universal principle of popular sovereignty. It was the product of their desire to overcome the problem of States posing their own sovereignty against that of the Federal Government—and the desire to avoid the specific problem of not knowing which States would ratify the Constitution: “The Preamble of the Articles of Confederation had named all the states in order from north to south. How was the [Constitutional] Convention to enumerate the participating states without knowing which would ratify? In a brilliant flash of inspiration, the Convention began with the words, ‘We the People of the United States…do ordain and establish this Constitution….’”11

    More importantly, the larger historical context and the actual content of this proclamation—“We The People”—must be made clear. The founding of the United States of America as an independent country represented not just the breaking away from domination by a foreign power. It also meant breaking away from a form of government that vested great power in the person of the monarchy—even while it ultimately served the interests of the bourgeoisie and the landed “nobility.” In general, the rights and the restrictions of power established in the Constitution of the newly founded United States revolved around preventing arbitrary rule by despots and the concentration of too much power in one person or one part of the government. The “separation of powers” and the “checks and balances” of different branches of government was seen as a way of insuring that the government would serve the interests of the capitalist class and (at that time) the slaveowners as a whole. It is in this light that “We the people of the United States,” in the “Preamble” of the Constitution, must be understood. Obviously, “We the people of the United States” did not include all those who were expressly excluded from the process of selecting the government and endorsing the Constitution. For, “Even on the most obvious level, how could the government of the newly formed United States, for example, be considered to have derived its powers ‘from the consent of the governed’ when, at the time of the formation of the United States of America, a majority of the people ‘governed’—included slaves, Indians, women, men who did not meet various property requirements, and others—did not even have the right to vote…to say nothing of the real power to govern and determine the direction of society?”12

    Bourgeois ruling classes generally speak in the name of the people, all the people. From their standpoint, it may make a certain amount of sense: They do, after all, rule over the masses of people. But from a more basic and more objective standpoint, their claim to represent all the people is a deception. If it was a deception at the time of the founding of the United States and the adoption of its Constitution, it is all the more so now. For now the rule of the capitalists is in fundamental antagonism with the interests of the great majority of people, not just in a particular country, but all over the world. Now the decisive question is not overcoming economic and political obstacles to the development of capitalism and its corresponding political system. The time when that was on the historical agenda is long since passed. What is now on the historical agenda is the overthrow of capitalism and the final elimination of all systems of exploitation, all oppressive social relations, all class distinctions, through the revolution of the exploited class under capitalism, the proletariat.

    To get a very stark sense of just how historically conditioned—how long since outmoded and completely reactionary—are the interests and the paramount concerns of the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants, the ruling imperialists of today, let us consider the fact that, in writing their Constitution, Madison and others "For theoretical inspiration...leaned heavily on Locke and on Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. Both writers had insisted on the need for separation of powers in order to prevent tyranny; in Montesquieu's view even the representatives of the people in the legislature could not be trusted with unlimited power."13 In reading over Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws I could not help but be struck by how thoroughly his frame of reference is that of a bygone age and his outlook that of exploiting classes whose period of historical ascendancy is long since past. As a glaring illustration, consider the following:

    If I had to justify our right to enslave Negroes, this is what I would say: Since the peoples of Europe have exterminated those of America, they have had to enslave those of Africa in order to use them to clear and cultivate such a vast expanse of land.

    Sugar would be too expensive if it weren't harvested by slaves.

    Those in question are black from the tip of their toes to the top of their heads; and their noses so flattened that it is almost impossible to feel sorry for them.

    It is inconceivable that God, who is a very wise being, could have placed a soul, especially a good soul, in an all-black body....

    One proof of the fact that Negroes don't have any common sense is that they get more excited about a string of glass beads than about gold, which, in civilized countries, is so dearly prized.

    It is impossible that these people are men; because if we thought of them as men, one would begin to think that we ourselves are not Christians.14,****

    Let the "Founding Fathers" and their descendants draw theoretical inspiration from the likes of Montesquieu! Let them defend slavery and modern-day exploitation on the ground of property rights, taking their lead from the likes of James Madison, the main author of the Constitution. As for the proletariat, our goal is "Marx's view of the complete abolition of bourgeois property relations—and all relations in which human beings confront each other as owners (or non-owners) of property rather than through conscious and voluntary association."15

    For the exploiting classes, and in a system under their rule, the "bottom line" is to reduce the masses of people to mere wealth-creating property—and today, under the domination of the imperialists, the greatest of all exploiters, the mass of humanity is treated as merely a means to amass even greater wealth and power in the hands of, and for the profit of, so few. And at what cost! This cost must be measured in massive human suffering, degradation, and destruction. Imagine the even greater cost in human suffering, degradation, and destruction that will have to be paid unless and until the oppressed and exploited victims of this system, who are the great majority of humanity, rise up and overthrow this system and finally put an end to all social relations of exploitation and oppression.

    In conclusion, The Constitution of the United States is an exploiters' vision of freedom. It is a charter for a society based on exploitation, on slavery in one form or another. The rights and freedoms it proclaims are subordinate to and in the service of the system of exploitation it upholds. This Constitution has been and continues to be applied in accordance with this vision and with the interests of the ruling class of this system: In its application it has become more and more fully the instrument of bourgeois domination, dictatorship, oppression, conquest, and plunder.

    Our answer is clear to those who argue: Even if The Constitution of the United States is not perfect, it is the best that has been devised—it sets a standard to be striven for. Our answer is: Why should we aim so low, when we have The Communist Manifesto to set a far higher standard of what humanity can strive for—and is capable of achieving—a far greater vision of freedom.*****

     

    NOTES

    1. Quotes from James Madison are from the Federalist Paper No. 54 in The Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), pp. 336-341, especially pp. 339 and 337. [back]

    2. Bob Avakian, Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (Chicago: Banner Press, 1986), pp. 110-11. [back]

    3. Edward Conrad Smith, editor, The Constitution of the United States with Case Summaries (New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1979), p. 18. All citations in this article are from the essay “The Origins of the Constitution.” [back]

    4. Ibid., pp. 18-19. [back]

    5. Avakian, Democracy, p. 69. [back]

    6. Ibid, p. 70. [back]

    7. Ibid, p. 71. [back]

    8. Lenny Wolff, The Science of Revolution: An Introduction (Chicago: RCP Publications, 1983), p. 184. [back]

    9. Avakian, Democracy, pp. 137-39. [back]

    10. Ibid., pp. 233-34. [back]

    11. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 12. [back]

    12. Avakian, Democracy, p. 100. [back]

    13. Smith, Constitution of the U.S., p. 13. [back]

    14. Charles Montesquieu, De L'Esprit Des Lois, Paris: Garnier, 1927, livre 15, chapitre 5, "De L'Esclavage Des Negres" (The Spirit of the Laws, book 15, chapter 5, "On the Enslavement of Negroes"), my translation. [back]

    15. Avakian, Democracy, p. 212. [back]

    Added Notes by the Author, Spring 2023

    * A major factor underlying this “extension of constitutional rights and protections to those previously excluded from them” has—especially since the second half of the 20th century—been the increasing globalization of the capitalist-imperialist economy, a worldwide system of exploitation ensnaring literally billions of people, and in particular super-exploitation of masses of people, including more than 150 million children, in the Third World of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. The relationship of this worldwide exploitation, and super-exploitation, to the situation in the U.S. itself—particularly with regard to the economic structure and social and class relations within this country—is analyzed in depth in the paper by Raymond Lotta Imperialist Parasitism and Class-Social Recomposition in the U.S. From the 1970s to Today: An Exploration of Trends and Changes, which is available at revcom.us. The political dimensions of this are explored in my article Imperialist Parasitism and “Democracy”: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of “Their” Imperialism (also available at revcom.us), where the following is made clear:

    [T]his imperialist plunder provides the material basis for a certain stability, at least in “normal times” in the imperialist “home country” (with the U.S. a prime example of this). This relative stability, in turn, makes it possible for the ruling class to allow a certain amount of dissent and political protest—so long as this remains within the confines of, or at least does not significantly threaten, the “law and order” that serves and enforces the fundamental interests of this ruling class.

    At the same time, as sharply demonstrated in mass uprisings which do call into question that “law and order” and/or defy allegiance to the imperialist interests of this system—such as the mass outpouring against police terror in 2020, and urban rebellions and mass opposition to the Vietnam war in the 1960s—the rulers of this country will frequently respond to such opposition with severe repression and murderous retribution.  For example, the city of Wilmington, in Biden’s home state of Delaware, was placed under martial law for months during the 1960s upsurge against the oppression of Black people, and a number of members of the Black Panther Party, most prominently Fred Hampton, were murdered by police, along with many Black people taking part in urban uprisings in that period, while militant mass resistance against the Vietnam war and rebellions among middle class youth and students were in some cases subjected to a vicious, and at times murderous, response by police and National Guard troops.

    It should never be forgotten, or overlooked, that the “law and order” that enforces this relative stability has included the regular murder of Black people, as well as Latinos, by police—resulting in the fact that the number of Black people who have been killed by police in the years since 1960 is greater than the thousands of Black people who were lynched during the period of Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror, before the 1960s. It should also not be overlooked that the U.S. has the highest rate of mass incarceration of any country in the world, with Black people and Latinos particularly subjected to this mass incarceration. [back]

    ** The point here, as emphasized in my work Breakthroughs: The Historic Breakthrough by Marx, and the Further Breakthrough with the New Communism, A Basic Summary, is that the essence of the capitalist economy, and the source of capitalist “wealth” and “economic growth,” is not a bunch of capitalist entrepreneurs and their “innovation,” or their “entrepreneurial genius.” It is the exploitation by the capitalists (the bourgeoisie) of wage-workers (the proletariat). This is different than the question of what is the driving force compelling the capitalists to continue to intensify the exploitation of the proletariat and to continually find new means of doing so. As also pointed out in Breakthroughs:

    Engels, in Anti-Dühring, discussed the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism between socialized production and private appropriation. He pointed out that the working out of this contradiction assumes two different forms of motion that go into the dynamic process of this fundamental contradiction’s motion. Those two forms of motion are, on the one hand, the contradiction between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat that it exploits, and the other form of motion that Engels identified, importantly, is the contradiction between organization and anarchy, the organization of production on the level of, say, an enterprise—which may be highly organized, with lots of calculations going into it, market estimates and all kinds of things, and may be very tightly organized in terms of how the actual process of production is carried out on the level of the particular capitalist corporation, and so on—while, at the same time, this is in contradiction to the anarchy of production and of exchange in the society as a whole (or today in the world as a whole, today more than ever in the world as a whole). So you have these two forms of motion—and I’ll come back later to a crucial distinguishing aspect of the new communism: the importance of identifying the second form of motion of this fundamental contradiction, that is, the anarchy/organization contradiction, or the driving force of anarchy, as overall the principal and most essential form of the motion of the fundamental contradiction of capitalism....

    In this regard, in the article “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” Raymond Lotta cited this statement of mine:

    anarchic relations between capitalist producers, and not the mere existence of propertyless proletarians or the class contradiction as such, that drives these producers to exploit the working class on an historically more intensive and extensive scale. This motive force of anarchy is an expression of the fact that the capitalist mode of production represents the full development of commodity production and the law of value.

    And then there is this very important passage:

    Were it not the case that these capitalist commodity producers are separated from each other and yet linked by the operation of the law of value they would not face the same compulsion to exploit the proletariat—the class contradiction between bourgeoisie and proletariat could be mitigated. It is the inner compulsion of capital to expand which accounts for the historically unprecedented dynamism of this mode of production, a process which continually transforms value relations and which leads to crisis.

    (Breakthroughs is available at revcom.us; and the article by Raymond Lotta referred to here, “On the ‘Driving Force of Anarchy’ and the Dynamics of Change,” can be found in the online theoretical journal Demarcations, Issue Number 3.) [back]

    *** As noted in “Imperialist Parasitism and ‘Democracy’: Why So Many Liberals and Progressives Are Shameless Supporters of ‘Their’ Imperialism”:

    Some of the mass murderers in other countries who today play such a crucial role in serving the interests of U.S. imperialism throughout the world, and in making possible the maintenance of bourgeois democracy in this country itself (worm-eaten as it is indeed), are the same as they were 40 years ago, and some are different—but the essential reality remains that the “platform of democracy” in this country rests on fascist terror, along with ruthless exploitation, in the oppressed nations of the Third World (Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia). [back]

    **** In relation to this statement by Montesquieu—and more generally his views on slavery—I am reproducing here the following “A Note from Bob Avakian: On Montesquieu, Slavery and the U.S. Constitution,” which appeared in Revolution #037, March 5, 2006, posted at revcom.us:

    Recently, Revolution ran an excerpt from a pamphlet I wrote, which was originally published in 1987, U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom. In that excerpt, there is a quote from De L'Esprit Des Lois (or, in English, "The Spirit of the Laws") by Charles Montesquieu, an 18th–century French philosopher, who was one of the sources of inspiration for the U.S. Constitution, and in particular the theory of the separation of powers that is incorporated in that Constitution. The quote from this work of Montesquieu's, which was published in 1748, is one in which he recites an extreme and grotesquely racist justification for "the enslavement of the Negroes." In relation to this, it is not infrequently argued that Montesquieu was being ironic here, and deliberately overstating this argument, in order to, in effect, polemicize against the enslavement of African people, and that in general Montesquieu's writings express opposition to slavery. But the reality is not so simple as this, nor does this reflect what Montesquieu was essentially seeking to do in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws." It can be said that in "The Spirit of the Laws" Montesquieu's position is one of general opposition to slavery, and he indicates that slavery is not appropriate in countries like France; but, at the same time, he speaks to various circumstances in which he believes slavery can be justified or reasonable. For example, he argues that in the parts of the world, in particular the southern regions, where the climate is warmer, this climate makes people lazy (indolent), and slavery may be justified in order to get them to work (and he argues that in a despotic country, where people's political rights are already repressed, slavery may not be worse for people in that condition).

    This, and the general discussion of slavery that makes up this part (book 15) of "The Spirit of the Laws," is included in a broader discussion by Montesquieu on the nature of different societies and governments in different countries and parts of the world (this is found not only in book 15 but also books 14 and 16 of "The Spirit of the Laws") in which Montesquieu argues that geography and in particular climate plays a big part in determining the nature of different peoples and the character of their society and governing system. And it is important to understand that, although in this discussion Montesquieu makes logical refutation of certain arguments, including certain defenses of slavery, this is not a polemic for or against slavery, or other forms of government, and its character is not that of moral argumentation, so much as it is an attempt to explain why various practices, and various forms of society and government, have existed (and in some cases continue to exist) in various places.

    Another way to put this is that what Montesquieu is doing, in these parts of "The Spirit of the Laws" (and generally in this work), is attempting to make a kind of materialist analysis of these phenomena, including slavery in many places where it has existed—although it must be emphasized that this is not a thoroughly scientific, dialectical materialism but instead a rather crude and vulgar materialism which is marked, and marred, by a considerable amount of determinism: it is a kind of mechanical materialism that argues for a direct and straight-line (linear) connection between things like geography and climate and the character of society and government. It is a kind of materialism that does not adequately and accurately characterize the real motive forces in the development of human society, and in fact this kind of vulgar materialism has often been used to justify various forms of oppression, including colonial and imperialist domination. While we can, and should, recognize that, in the circumstances and time in which he wrote—about 250 years ago—there are aspects of what Montesquieu was seeking to do that were new and represented a break with the suffocating and obfuscating feudal outlook and conventions, it is very important to understand how Montesquieu's outlook and method were marked, and limited, by the social, and international, relations of which they were ultimately an expression: relations in which one part of society, and of the world, dominates and exploits others. And that is the basic point that was being emphasized in relation to Montesquieu and the U.S. Constitution, in the pamphlet U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom.

    With regard to the specific passage that was cited in U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom, "on the enslavement of the Negroes," there is, in fact, some reason to accept that Montesquieu does not actually agree with the justification for this enslavement that he summarizes, and that he is actually subjecting this kind of justification to some ironic and satirical treatment. A reasonable interpretation of Montesquieu's arguments, as he goes on in this part of "The Spirit of the Laws" (book 15), is that this kind of argument, about the non-human character of the Negroes, is not a valid argument, not one that actually justifies this enslavement. But then he does go on to explore the question of what might actually be reasonable justifications, in certain circumstances, for slavery; and, as spoken to above, he finds such justifications in situations such as those where there is a despotic government, or where—as he concludes, through an application of vulgar and determinist materialism—the warm climate makes people lazy and unwilling, on their own initiative, to work.

    Thus, in looking into and reflecting on this further, I would say that, while it is important to understand the complexity and nuance of what Montesquieu writes here—and it can be said that the way in which I cited Montesquieu in writing this pamphlet on the U.S. Constitution does not really or fully do that—it is not the case that what Montesquieu was doing here was actually making a case against the enslavement of the Negroes, or against slavery in general. Once again, it is important to keep in mind the fact that, although he was opposed to slavery on general principle, and declared that it was a good thing that it had been eliminated in his home country, France, and more generally in Europe, Montesquieu did not think slavery was wrong, or without justification, in all circumstances. And it also seems that Montesquieu did not hesitate to invest in companies involved in the slave trade. In this, there is a parallel with John Locke, the English philosopher and political theorist, who, as I pointed out in this same pamphlet (U.S. Constitution: An Exploiters' Vision of Freedom), was also a major influence in the conception of the U.S. Constitution. As I wrote in Democracy: Can't We Do Better Than That? (p. 29):

    "In sum, the society of which Locke was a theoretical exponent, as well as a practical political partisan, was a society based on wage-slavery and capitalist exploitation. And it is not surprising that, while he was opposed to slavery in England itself, he not only defended the institution of slavery, under certain circumstances, in the Second Treatise, but turned a not insignificant profit himself in the slave trade and helped to draw up the charter for a government headed by a slave-owning aristocracy in one of the American colonies. For as Marx sarcastically summarized: ‘The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signalized the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production.’" [back]

    ***** In the years since the writing of this article, I have devoted considerable work to the development of what is meant by this “far greater vision of freedom”—what it would mean “in real life.” One very important result of this is the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which provides both a sweeping vision and a concrete blueprint for a radically different and emancipating society and world. This Constitution is available at revcom.us. [back]

  • ARTICLE:

    Readers’ Corner

    Updated

    Readers Corner

     

    Readers’ Corner highlights views that you, our readers, send us on the big questions about making revolution. Questions about building the movement for an actual revolution. Or responses to, and thoughts provoked by, the social media messages from Bob Avakian—the revolutionary leader and architect of the new communism. Thinking and questions you may have on other important documents from Bob Avakian (BA) and the Revcoms. As well as reflections on the new communism brought forward by BA, both overall and in relation to the urgent moment at hand. Now especially is a time for collective scientific grappling.

    Please send these to revolution.reports@yahoo.com. If your submission isn't reposted, it will still feed into our overall enriched understanding of what questions we should be speaking to.

    * * * * *

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world

    Learning Science—On the March
    Part 1, Thoughts on @BobAvakianOfficial from a reader

    In January, Sunsara Taylor interviewed the revolutionary leader Bob Avakian (BA). In Part 2 of that interview, she asked him about what role his social media messages play in helping people to understand, and radically change, the world.

    Watch his answer:

    There are some key things that BA speaks to there that I don't think we've really appreciated. 

    BA's social media messages do speak to timely burning questions. They are working on obstacles in people's thinking that have to get quickly cleared away. Struggling with people who don't want to confront how rapidly fascism is consolidating or who don't get that fascism—no matter how it comes to power—is illegitimate. BA breaks down why the Democrats won't fight these fascists the way they need to be fought. He exposes the system of capitalism-imperialism that underlies this fascism and causes so many other horrors. He answers people who think the problem is "human nature," instead of the nature of the system of capitalism-imperialism, and how a radically different system is necessary and possible. He is waging struggle with Black people about their role and responsibility among the front ranks in the fight to defeat fascism... and I could go on and on. 

    So the content of these messages really matter—and we should make a big deal out of these when they come out. It would open up a different dynamic in society if what BA was speaking to were the questions being sharply debated by millions of people.

    But even more important than the content of each individual piece is learning from the method that BA applies—and trains others in—in all of his messages. 

    Read more

    To the revcoms, and those who want a better world:

    Einstein, Astrology and Bob Avakian
    Part 2, from a reader 

    “To evaluate Bob Avakian from the standpoint of what passes for political thought today is like trying to evaluate Einstein on the basis of astrology.”

    When I heard this from a comrade a few months ago, I thought it captured a big problem that the revcoms and all those who want a better world need to understand, and fight to change—quickly! And I want to share some thoughts on why this is so profound, and so true!

    Bob Avakian (BA) is a revolutionary leader who has developed a whole new framework for human emancipation—the new communism. 

    In her book, Science and Revolution: On the Importance of Science and the Application of Science to Society, the New Synthesis of Communism and the Leadership of Bob Avakian, the scientist Ardea Skybreak said: 

    ...this is a completely, a radically and fundamentally, different vision of how the world could and should be. It’s a completely different framework. And when we talk about how “BA is the architect of a completely different framework”—of revolution, of the revolutionary process, and of the new society to bring into being—that's exactly what he is. You can like it or not like it, agree or don't agree, but objectively that's what he actually is. And he's been developing this framework very systematically, on the basis of scientific methods. And that is why we make such a big deal about this one person, BA. There is no one else in the world today who is on the same level in terms of developing the science of revolution and its application to the struggle to transform this society and the world on a radical, a truly radical basis, that deals with fundamental problems. Nobody's taken it as far, and on such a consistently scientific basis, and has as worked out a sense of not only why it needs to be done, but how to do it, and what to bring into being to replace this system. That's why we make such a big deal about him.

    (Go here for a longer excerpt from this Interview.)

    But when BA's work is brought to most people, most of the time, the responses are way too often on the level of: "why should I look into that, he's an old white guy," or kneejerk opposition to "so much focus on one person," without any analysis into what this person is saying and what the significance of it is, or one of the most unthinking replies, "Bob Avakian is a cult leader." 

    In other words, people come back with astrology.

    Read more

    The Fight Against Fascism… Before, and After, BA: Internationalism
    From a reader

    I've been returning to and digging into the recent interviews with Bob Avakian (BA): Part 1: On Fascism, Capitalism, & the Way Out of the Madness; Part 2: The New Communism: A Whole New Way To Live, a Fundamentally Different System. As I have, I have been repeatedly struck by a point that was made in a letter from a reader on revcom.us last December:

    In the history of [communism] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions...

    What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    There’s so much in these interviews that illustrate this. One thing that struck me deeply in these last couple weeks is the question of internationalism, which I want to speak to here. Internationalism is one very important element of the “before and after” spoken to above, though far from the only one.

    Read more

    The World's Most Radical Thinker On Women's Liberation is An “Old, White, Man”:  A Challenge to Put Aside Ill-Founded Prejudice and Engage Bob Avakian
    by Sunsara Taylor

    Bro culture seething with the hatred of women. Gleeful taunts of “Your body, my choice.” Fascist enforcement of patriarchal gender codes. Trump/MAGA 2.0 is moving at lightning speed. Alongside his genocidal racism, his threats against the people of the world, and the sledgehammer he is taking to any remaining democratic norms or basic rights of the people, Trump is pushing for the open enslavement of women and complete erasure of trans people.

    We Stand At A Crossroads

    Never before have so many women in so many parts of the world broken free of so many traditional chains of patriarchy. Women have fought their way into public life and into every profession. In the U.S., women outpace men in higher education. Women dominate pop culture. Growing numbers boldly reject the shame that has long attached to female sexuality, to abortion, and to being a victim of sexual assault. Meanwhile, LGBT people have become widely visible, won important basic rights and achieved growing respect and acceptance.

    Read more

    Letter from a reader
    Appreciating, Wielding and Promoting Bob Avakian's Official Biography

    ....I would like to recommend that people read, and wield, the recently updated “Bob Avakian Official Biography.” THE REVCOM CORPS For The Emancipation Of Humanity in LA has been wielding this in meetings with broader forces who need to be united in a powerful movement built with the very specific aim of defeating fascism along with the series of @BobAvakianOfficial social media messages REVOLUTION #102-111. Additionally, we have been using it with people who have come into the Revcom Corps as a way to learn about the importance of revolutionary theory and to get an introduction to the actual breakthrough in human understanding the new communism is. 

    Bob Avakian - Official Biography book cover

     

    This biography is also really an excellent introduction to the person who is the kind of leader that has never before existed in this country and whose leadership is of enormous importance for the emancipation of all humanity. It gives a history of the formative experiences that made BA who he is, the times that helped shape him and the critical junctures in the development of those times where his leadership has been decisive—from growing up in Berkeley and his early political life to becoming a communist and communist leader, to the restoration of capitalism in China and the end of the first stage of communist revolutions. It gets into how BA was and is the only thinker and leader in the world today to meet this defeat with the interrogation of that experience in a way that has qualitatively advanced the science of communism. Theory that has met the end of a wave of revolutions in a world that is tragically stymied and existentially imperiled—paving not only a path out of this but a path to a future that not only makes revolution viable again but worth fighting for. Paving the way for a new wave of truly emancipating revolutions throughout the world.  Read more

    A Letter from a Reader—To the Revcoms, and All Who Seek a Radically New World

    “A clear before and an after”: 

    What Bob Avakian (BA) has brought forward is not just another big advance in the history of our project.  In the history of our project there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA—yes, building on the many lessons and accomplishments of the past, but, crucially, breaking with and discarding a tremendous amount of wrong thinking, wrong methods, and wrong practices, that, despite best intentions, seriously vitiated and contributed to derailing the first wave of socialist revolutions. 

    We shouldn’t want to repeat any of that! We shouldn’t want even the best of the past socialist revolutions and societies, especially now that we have an even much better theoretical and practical framework to work with! What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.

    How much do we all really understand and appreciate that? Really agree? Read more.

    Further Grappling with “A Clear Before and an After” with the New Communism Developed by Bob Avakian 

    I’ve been part of a lot of rich discussions responding to the letter from a reader posted here a couple weeks ago: “A clear before and an after.”

    That letter makes the point:

    In the history of our project [a communist world, free from all forms of exploitation and oppression, with an emancipating culture] there is a clear “before” and an “after,” that is delineated by the emergence of the new synthesis of communism developed by BA [Bob Avakian]...

    One thing I’ve kept coming back to in these discussions is what it means to say that “the new communism is a whole new framework for human emancipation.”  Or as it says in the letter, “What BA has developed with the new communism really is a NEW path forward for humanity that is very DIFFERENT, and MUCH BETTER than anything that the first wave of socialism/communism was even able to conceive of, let alone put into practice.” Read more

    What Is Most Important About Bob Avakian's Leadership?

    From a reader

    Several weeks ago, revcom.us published the following statement:

    We will never succeed in having a real revolution in this country—certainly not one really worth having and that is truly emancipating for the vast majority of people—unless and until millions of people are won to become conscious followers of Bob Avakian and the new communism he has developed as the pathway and blueprint for the emancipation of all of humanity.

    There are several important things in this crucial and true statement, but I want to start with what is the most important (and what is, at the same time, still the least understood and appreciated) part of that statement. The most important part of that statement is not merely or absolutely that there couldn't be a revolution without BA, but that any revolution that is not led by the new communism Bob Avakian has forged wouldn't lead anywhere good. Simply put: There is no road to human emancipation without Bob Avakian's new communism. There is no way to continue to understand and change the world in the fundamental interests of humanity as a whole, to overthrow and defeat the old order and build a new society and system that enables people to uproot and overcome all forms of oppression and exploitation, and do so in a way that unleashes and increasingly involves and relies on the masses of people in this process. Read more

    Why Bob Avakian Is So Important

    From a reader

    “Besides the fact that he is the only leader in this country who is talking about a real revolution—and besides the fact that he is actually leading the process of actively working for that revolution—what Bob Avakian (BA) has done, with the development of the new communism, is of world historic importance. It is, in fact, a whole new framework for human emancipationNo one else has done what BA has done. 

    In the Six Resolutions of the Central Committee of the Revolutionary Communist Party, the sixth one states that while BA is Chairman of the Party, he is “greater than” that. It goes on to say, “As we have emphasized, the leadership of BA and the new synthesis of communism that he has brought forward provides the theoretical framework, the scientific method and approach for a whole new stage of communist revolution, not just in this country but in the world as a whole. BA is not just solving tactical problems or things encountered “on the way,” but BA has actually envisioned what the new socialist society would be based on and tackled the contradictions involved in moving a socialist society toward communism—without putting a gun to people’s backs. This is the historic contradiction and because BA has solved it with the new communism, we can actually say humanity has the understanding to get to a world without exploitation and oppression, to a conscious and voluntary association of human beings solving the problems of society and engaging in debate, creative and scientific activities, enriching humanity materially, socially, intellectually and spiritually in a materialist sense. Read more